Researches regarding the using new textile parts in the automotive industry.
Coman, Diana ; Neagu, Ioan I. ; Vlad, Dorin 等
1. INTRODUCTION
From a large variety of raw materials used for airbags, the most
used is a nylon 6.6 fabric. This isn't a surprising thing because
it has some special characteristics. The most recent researches on
different raw materials indicate the possibility to use polyester yarns.
The key factors of development and the airbag's success are:
to maximize the protection of vehicles passengers and to reduce the hurt
risk;
* the performances;
* the impact absorbtion capacity;
* the energy absorbtion and the hardness;
* the stability over time; the cost benefit.
Airbags, used as safety devices, are one of the latest types of
textiles in automobiles and have a potential market for technical
textiles that has a considerable scope for growth and development.
Because of government legislation and consumer interest, the
applications have been extremely successful over the last fifteen to
twenty years. Generally, the airbag is woven by nylon 6,6 filament yarns, which are in demand in huge quantities because of their high
strength-to-weight ratio, favorable elongation, adequate thermal
properties and relatively low cost of production (Wulfhorst et all,
2006).
The aim of the present work is to investigate possibility of using
alternative materials for producing such fabric bag. To fulfill its
protective function, each component of the airbag system must
demonstrate reliability and predictability. Essential function of the
cushion, they enter a hot high pressure gas mixture, to allow safe and
efficient vehicle deceleration in a collision.
The elasticity of the fabric's yarns allows controlled
deformation and hot gas flow efficiency. The performances of the airbag
cushion behavior are expected to remain unchanged during this period and
therefore the reliability and predictability of raw materials are
essential components of the original material This work is focused on
textile materials consist of elements, such as: constant fireproof properties, increased superior mechanical resistances (high module, high
tenacity), resistance to splice, ursting strength, resistance to
delaminating, and comfort characteristics depending on the user's
requirements (Coman & Neagu, 2007).
The novelty lies in the possibility of using the study of
alternative materials derived from native Romanian PES threads, knowing
it until now, more studies on imported synthetic materials.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
This study used PA 6.6 and PES filament yarns with different yarn
counts, obtained by Romanian manufacturers.
Focused characteristics are tensile strength and extension at
break. These characteristics have been measured through two testing
methods according to different customers required. The conditioned
samples are employed before the preparation stage technology.
The tenacity and the breaking elongation of the yarns were
determined using a dynamometer type Titan2--Universal Strength Tester,
based on two standards from automotive industry: ASTM D2256--Tensile
Properties of Yarns by the Single-Strand Method and EN ISO 2062 -Yarns
from packages. Determination of single-end breaking force and elongation
at break. In both cases the following parameters have been met:
Jaw Separation 250.00mm, pretension 0.500cN/tex, break detection:
50.00%, specimens 20, different sppeds.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
For some time, another type of yarn for cushions of the airbag
demonstrates outstanding performance, is reliable to be part of the
supply of cars, such as polyester yarns. We can say that polyester
materials are significantly likely to use, replacing those of nylon 6.6
yarns and that their use would be efficient and benefits, there are
well-established conditions for airbag products (table 1) and for
absorption of impact energy by PES materials, too
(http://www.freepatentsonline.com, 2010).
Now are presented some comparative results obtained by replacing
the 6.6 polyamide yarns with native polyester yarns. Tables 2 and 3 show
the comparative results obtained by testing PA 6.6 and Romanian PES
yarns.
In figure 1 is the graphs determinations of resistance and
elongation at break for technical yarns PES local production, with
similar results of PA yarns.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
The features of the two types of threads are comparable, there is
the possibility of replacing those (PA fabrics) with those of PES but
there is a condition of absorption of fabrics, but there is a condition
of absorption of impact energy by PES material (http://www2.dupont.com,
2010). In figure 2 is observed differences tenacity for different types
of yarns used in experimental measurements.
The comparison of both types of threads shows that polyester yarn
will generally satisfy the air bag specifications established for nylon
fabrics (Dragu & Coman, 2009).
4. CONCLUSIONS
The test methods have been revealed and show that the tenacity of
460 dtex and 470 dtex PES yarns presents the best fits of performance
requirements of automotive components like airbags.
The following problems are the most significant:
--It is obvious that the changing the PA 6.6 yarns with native
technical PES yarns, will induces some change in performance of the
textile parts, resulting from modifications of tenacity and breaking
elongation.
--Increased impact energy absorption characteristics due to changes
in technical yarns of PES will lead to a controlled improvement of
performance properties (tenacity, strength and break elongation).
--Changes in the observed performance characteristics may be
attributed to the used yarns and to the obtained alternative materials.
--The use of alternative materials (PES) for airbags will be an
economic and sustainable handy technique for worldwide airbag
manufacturers.
The aim of further experiments will be the optimization of the
physical and mechanical characteristics of the airbags raw materials in
order to increase performance of these types of textiles.
5. REFERENCES
Coman D.; Neagu I. (2007). Comparative study on the testing of
textile materials used in the automotive industry, Annals of DAAAM for
2007 & Proceedings of the 18th International DAAAM Symposium
"Intelligent Manufacturing & Automation: Focus on Creativity,
Responsability, and Ethics of Engineers", Katalinic.B, (Ed.), pp
167-168. ISSN 1726-9679, ISBN 3-901509-58-5, Published by DAAAM
International, 2007, Vienna
Dragu L.; Coman D., (2009). Possibilities of assessment for textile
automotive structures, Acta Universitatis Cibiniensis Technical series,
vol.LIX, 2009, pp.150-155, ISSN 1583-7149, Sibiu.
Wulfhorst, B.; Gries, T.; Veit, D. (2006). Textile Technology,
Hanser Gardner Pubns, ISBN 1569903719, Aachen
*** (2010)http://www2.dupont.com/Automotive/en_US/assets/d
ownloads/materialssselectionairbagfabrics.pdf "Materials Selection
for Airbag Fabrics., Accessed on 2010-06-15
*** (2010)http://www.freepatentsonline.com/result.html?query_
txt=polyester%2Bairbag&sort=relevance&srch=top&search,
Polyester filament woven fabric for airbags, patent US 7, 498,280 B2,
2009, Accessed on 2010-07-20.
Tab. 1. Opportunities for obtaining technical PES yarn fabrics
airbags
Yarn Filament
count count Tenacity
Yarn [dtex] [dtex] [cN/tex] Elongation [%]
Polyester 250-700 3.2-4 [less than or [less than or
equal to] 65 equal to] 20
[+ or -] Elastomeric coating 20 - 10 g/[m.sup.2]
Fabric Fabric
weight thickness Fabric
Yarn [g/[cm.sup.3] [mm] pattern
Polyester [greater than [greater than canvas,
or equal to] 190 or equal to] 0.30 twill,
crepe
[+ or -] Elastomeric coating 20 - 10 g/[m.sup.2]
Tab. 2. Table with some parameters of testing with fire PA 6.6
polyfilaments
Standards used
Type of Yarn
yarns Counts Physico-mechanical EN ASTM
[dtex] [dtex] properties determined ISO2062 D2256
470/68 470 Tensile strength [cN] 3337 3417
Tenacity [cN/tex] 71 72.7
Extension [%] 25 25.3
467/74 467 Tensile strength [cN] 3955 3792
Tenacity [cN/tex] 84.7 81,2
Extension [%] 20 21
235/34 235 Tensile strength [cN] 2107 2100
Tenacity [cN/tex] 89.7 89.4
Extension [%] 23 23.5
Tab.3. Table with some parameters of testing PES yarns
Standards used
Type of Yarn
yarns Counts Physico-mechanical EN ASTM
[dtex] [dtex] properties determined ISO2062 D2256
550/28/130 571 Tensile strength [cN] 3363 3386
Tenacity [cN/tex] 58.9 59.3
Extension [%] 26.7 28.2
470/120 468 Tensile strength [cN] 3098 3159
Tenacity [cN/tex] 66.2 67.5
Extension [%] 15.9 15.6
460/72 460 Tensile strength [cN] 3008 3062
Tenacity [cN/tex] 65,4 66.58
Extension [%] 16.01 16.04
Fig. 2. Variation of tenacity for PA 6.6. and PES yarns
PA 6.6. PES
Yarn Count [dtext]
470dtex;550dtex 72.7 59.3
470dtex;470dtex 72.7 67.5
467dtex;460dtex 81.2 66.58
235 dtex 89.4
Note: Table made from bar graph.