Tax fraud- specific forms of manifestation in the underground economy.
Dumitrescu, Constantin Dan
1. INTRODUCTION
The scope of activities that may include the economy, is
comprehensive, is justified by the fluidity, flexibility and dynamics in
relation to economic reality.
The following are accepted and considered parts of the underground
economy: tax evasion, black labour and criminal activities.
It can be stated from the start that certain demarcations between
the three above listed elements are purely theoretical; in reality
activities with continuity and progress of the order are subject to a
single goal to maximize revenue. The present paper addressed several
aspects of tax fraud, as a specific manifestation of the economy.
2. TAX FRAUD--TERMINOLOGY, DEFINITION, FORMS OF MANIFESTATION
The term for tax fraud as currently used to define illegal
operations, generating damage to the state budget, is not defined in the
English law. Tax fraud can be defined as all practices designed to
circumvent all or part of the tax due the state. It should be noted that
while, for defining the scope of coverage of tax fraud and to analyze
its content it is appropriate that a contact exists between the economic
theory and the law which defines, regulates and penalizes illegal acts
that are committed in this space (Ciutacu, 2001).
Depending on the event and intensity, fraud may take violent forms,
such as tax evasion, smuggling, cheating but also forms that cannot be
observed or speculative, interpretations of particular provisions in
order to avoid taxation.
In practice employment fraud and the speculation, harsh forms of
manifestation, are determined by the laws of states and time pursuing a
certain activity (Dinu, 2003). Depending on the economic policy adopted
at a time, import operations may be carriers of high taxes or, where
appropriate, the charges may be justified by conventional cost of
customs services. Without detailed reasons for the choice of a customs
policy, it appears clear that circumvent customs requirements will
produce different effects in both cases; the same act can be considered
a serious offence or a statistical error.
Thus, there are many situations in practice where low-income tax
payers are rigorously taxed, while owners of multiple sources of income
enjoyed by a lot of circumstances that ultimately lead to a tax that is
manifestly contrary to the principles of tax fairness (Dinu, 2003).
3. TAX EVASION--FORMS OF MANIFESTATION
According to the procedure used to avoid tax regulations, one can
differentiate between:
* Legal tax evasion;
* Fraudulent tax evasion.
3.1 Legal Tax Evasion
Legal tax evasion means for the tax payer to circumvent the law
using a combination of unexpected and, therefore, tolerated by the
escape of the law. This form of evasion is not possible until the law
shows lacks or inaccuracies. In this case, the tax payer is trying to
put in a more favourable position to benefit the most out of the
advantages of tax current regulations. The only guilty of such evasion
is the legislature and therefore this form of tax evasion is criminally
not punishable and is not the subject of our analysis.
3.2 Fraudulent tax evasion
Illegal tax evasion is to conceal the taxable object, the
underestimation of the taxable amount of matter or the use in other ways
of refusal to pay off the due tax. Basically tax evasion may be
fraudulent under the form of concealing taxes, the declaration of
taxable income below the actual level or driving a faulty accounting,
double accounting.
Factors that must be taken into consideration in the accounting
research are: registers to shrink results, establishing liability
accounts with fictitious nomenclature; unlawful payment and redemption
overestimation, dormant supplies, not justifying legal documents with
the registration, unreal data and information in the trading registers;
errors in personal accounts of parts of benefit, reducing turnover,
masking part of the revenue through omission, accounting for fictitious
expenses and invoices, etc. (Paraianu, 2003). The law sanctions the
cases of infringements of tax customs regulations, by declaring the
goods inaccurate, in any form or the unlawful removal from customs
operations in order not to pay duties or reduce their obligations or
other taxes.
Practicing by importers and exporters of various fraudulent means
to evade the payment of amounts due in foreign currency is the currency
evasion. Estimates due circumvent state practice, especially by
falsifying the import and export statements which show that the goods
would be of lower quality. Therefore lower prices than the actual ones
are obtained, private compensation, a lack of accurate customs charges
is created, transfers in foreign currencies and other countries in
violation of the laws, tourism.
Fraudulent tax evasion is punished with fines or criminal law
actions, as appropriate, as the deed is considered a criminal offense or
contravention.
"There is a psychology of the tax payer never to pay but
whatever he/ she cannot pay. Human nature has always tended to put the
general interest after the particular interest, it is inclined to
consider taxes more as an injury than a legitimate contribution to
public expenditure and to always see with bad eyes the one who wants to
lower her heritage" (Martinez, 1990).
Regarding the size of the tax fraud causers, studies confirm that
fraud is a reverse function of income or turnover. In other words, it is
proportionately more important in the case of small contributors than of
the big ones. This observation was made for all categories of taxes
(Martinez, 1990). Small businesses use to fraud rather than large ones
because of the facilities and needs. Facility is often provided by the
family business like character.
4. TECHNICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF THE TAX FRAUD
Fraud techniques are classified according to various criteria. A
first criterion, most popular, is the tax, under which fraud is
distinguished, that is based on the tax settlement and the one which
occurs in the state tax payment obligation. It consists in reducing the
tax base by minimizing revenue, profits or turnover, or by increasing
deductible expenditure; tax fraud that takes place when liquidity (tax
payment obligations) refers mainly to the duties and to the VAT.
The existence of multiple levels of taxation incites to achieve a
good transition from a forced entry to a faster box less imposed. Thus,
through a false customs statement on the characteristics and use of
imported products, a tax can be reduced by applying a tax rate lower
than due.
Another criterion of classification is the material, which allows
distinguishing two main techniques of fraud: fraud by concealing
(hiding) the tax matter and fraud by increasing deductible expenses.
Also according to the criterion of material, fraud can be
distinguished by the action and by omission. First assume an active
behaviour, for example using a fictional writing, while others are
limited to abstinence, such as non-income (Murgu et al., 1979).
Taking into consideration the authors of fraud, one may distinguish
frauds committed by individuals and frauds committed by legal persons
(moral). This distinction is interesting, particularly related to
sanctions.
Fraud can be regarded from a geographical point of view, when it
comes to national and/ or international tax fraud. National tax evasion
manifests between the borders of a state through its artisan and
industrial forms.
Artisan tax evasion's major feature is that it is defined less
by the technical scale of achievement or avoidance of tax payment to the
state budget, but by the action of its authors. The author of artisan
fraud acts alone or at least without recourse to an organization with
this purpose,
Another form of tax fraud is working on the black market which is
symptomatic for resistance to taxes. It allows the author to obtain
undeclared income (or principal components). When it is operated on the
salary activity it allows a discharge of social spend for an employer
(social contributions or contributions). The higher the difference
between net wage actually received by the worker and the overall cost of
employment (gross salary plus fees which for the employer is chargeable)
is, the employer may be more interested to use undeclared manpower.
Therefore, loss of income tax and social contributions can be
considerable.
Industrial tax evasion manifests through the use of complex
procedures and ingenious legal arrangements. This type of fraud is both
a fiscal and criminal law. Industrial tax fraud is carried out through a
division of action in an underground network which aims to help cover
operations and fictitious. So in this case several individuals/ legal
entities are involved to make profits, usually very important profits,
by the unlawful removal of fraudulent tax.
The principle those who commit industrial tax fraud start from is
simple. The control authorities find and ensure that their line between
the accounts (balance sheet) and supporting documents consisting of
invoices, shipping notices, bills of command, etc. slips is maintained.
To achieve security fraud, it is sufficient to achieve a consistency
between the accounts and documents that underpin it
The methods of committing international tax fraud in particular are
two:
* The transfer of profits to a country with low taxes, by
manipulating the prices of transactions;
* Non-refunding income earned abroad by handling payoffs.
A transfer of profits poses one of the classical problems of
international tax law. The issue of transfer price manipulation occurs
in the relationship between parent companies and subsidiaries. Members
of a group have in fact only a very limited autonomy in relation to the
parent who leads. Commercial transactions taking place between
subsidiaries of a group, give place, therefore, to prices that are not
fixed in the light of economical truth (market prices) but by a tax
wheeze using the way outs and exits offered by various tax laws (Murgu
et al., 1979).
Method two is the price of transfer (transfer pricing). Broad
sense, transfer means any output of the values found in a business that
matches an entry of equal value in the accounts of other businesses. For
the tax administration to establish a presumption of indirect transfer
benefits overseas two conditions have to be fulfilled: the simultaneous
existence of links of dependency between companies and the existence of
an unreasonable advantage.
Specifically, tax evasion is the increase of prices or the lowering
the purchase price of sale.
Increasing purchase prices works on imports, while reducing selling
prices for export operating. All operations are carried out in the
accounts and, although the fiscal authority knows the mechanism well, it
cannot do anything.
5. CONCLUSIONS
Although the terminology referring to tax evasion is well defined
in literature, the particularly wide area in which it occurs combined
with the lack of national laws makes it practical to include the entire
world, regardless of geographical location.
From the procedures and instruments shown before, one could
conclude that the border that separates the international tax fraud of
tax evasion remains uncertain.
The problem complicates to the extent that the actions taken by the
tax payer can be classified in a country like evasion and tolerated in
others, such as manoeuvre's tax fraud.
A reduction in the area of manifestation of tax fraud could be
achieved through a cooperative effort of justice of a multinational
geographic area, for a standardization of national laws in an
international context, but this requires a unified political will,
worldwide.
6. REFERENCES
Ciutacu, C. (2001). Reforma si metareforma, Reform and met reform,
Expert Printing House, Bucharest
Dinu, N. (2003). Economia subterana in Romania, Underground economy
in Romania, Economic Printing House, Bucharest
Martinez, J. C. (1990). Le fraude fiscale, PUF, Paris
Murgu, N., Stefanescu, P. & Isarescu, M. (1979). Afaceri si
caderi financiare in lumea capitalului, Business and financial fall in
the capital world, Dacia Publishing House, Cluj Napoca
Paraianu, M. (2003). Piata paralela a muncii, Parallel work market,
Expert Publishing House, Bucharest