Air flow study on the NERVA space launcher aileron.
Tache, Florin ; Rugescu, Radu Dan ; Bogoi, Alina 等
1. INTRODUCTION
The NERVA-entitled project is a Romanian endeavour to place a small
satellite in orbit and cope with everything related to this goal
(Rugescu, 2008). A simple, modified, old military rocket can be a good
alternative to the inability of reusable systems, like NASA's space
shuttle, to acquire a low cost capability of launching scientific and
commercial payloads in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). The scientific research
project is well under way, having highly-trained participants from the
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering in University "POLITEHNICA"
of Bucharest, Romania, qualified engineers from related industry fields
and military personnel for consultancy purposes.
The paper focuses on the study of the airflow around the launch
vehicle guiding ailerons by means of CFD simulations.
2. CASE BACKGROUND
A simplified 3D model of the rocket has been constructed, paying a
special attention to the point of interest for the current study, namely
the movable red ailerons in the back of the space vehicle shown in
Figure 1. These "small wings" help guide the rocket during its
ascent through Earth atmosphere.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
By rotating the ailerons around their axes, the rocket can be
conveniently guided while there is still sufficient air around it.
Ascent parameters have been set and from the many different flight
regims of the vehicle's journey into orbit, one has been selected
for thorough study. For future research, an extension of the study to
several other important ascent regims is envisaged.
3. ASCENT REGIM INTO CFD SIMULATIONS
The selected case finds the rocket at an altitude of 11km,
travelling at a speed of Mach 2, while surrounding pressure and
temperature are 22632 Pa and 216.65 K, respectively.
The aileron has a thin hexagonal root section that gradually
transforms into a smaller diamond-shaped tip section, with "almost
sharp" leading and trailing edges over its entire span.
Aileron's height is 286 mm, while the chord varies between 445 and
110 mm from root to tip and the thickness from 21 to 8 mm.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
For CFD simulations, four different equaly spaced sections have
been used, along with a 3D model of the complete aileron, thus being
able to study the 2D air flow at different locations on the wing's
span and also having an overall image of the three- dimensional flow
parameters distribution.
4. COMPUTATIONAL GRIDS AND SETTINGS
For each 2D section, as well as for the entire 3D model of the
aileron, six different cases have been studied. While keeping the flow
parameters to the values presented earlier, the angle of incidence has
been varied from 0 to 20 degrees by 5-degree increments. In addition,
the maximum pitch of 28 degrees has been considered. In total, 24
two-dimensional cases and another 6 three-dimensional cases have been
simulated with the commercially available software named Fluent.
As high-supersonic speeds are involved, the computational grids are
of utmost importance (Seebass & Woodhull, 1998). Carefully
constructed grids have been used to allow the simulation of the flow to
be as accurate as possible. Around each 2D section, a structured grid
made of 101075 quadrilateral cells has been constructed (average cell
count; exact number depends on the 2D section). A special attention has
been paid to the boundary layer region and to the leading and trailing
edges of each airfoil. The 3D grid is also a structured one, but made of
roughly 590000 tetrahedral cells. A more thorough grid, made of 3D
quadrilateral cells is intended for future study, which may include the
entire rocket model.
The k-omega turbulence model has been adopted for the simulations.
The use of a k-omega formulation in the inner parts of the boundary
layer makes the model directly usable all the way down to the wall
through the viscous sub-layer. The model switches to a k-epsilon
behaviour in the free-stream and thereby avoids the common k-epsilon
problem that the model is too sensitive to the inlet free-stream
turbulence properties. Authors who use the k-omega model often praise it
for its good behaviour in adverse pressure gradients and separating
flow. Nevertheless, the k-omega model produces a bit too large
turbulence levels in regions with large normal strain, like stagnation regions and areas with strong acceleration, but this tendency is much
less pronounced than with a normal k-epsilon model (CFD-Wiki, 2009).
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
A low Courant number value was used to start the iterations, and it
was gradually incresed during the simulations. A low Courant number does
not allow a steep residuals decrease, but the solution that advances
towards convergence is as stable as possible (FLUENT INC., 2009). The
convergence criteria for the numerical residuals were set to
[10.sup.-5], considering this sufficient enough for an accurate flow
parameters description. As a confirmation, the Drag and Lift
coefficients variations became horizontal by the time the residuals had
reached the aforementioned convergence criteria.
5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The computing power employed for conducting these simulations
included several PC's. The 2D simulations were not so
resource-needy, so systems with a single-core processor and 1 GB of RAM
memory prooving sufficient to lead to convergence in a decent period of
time (around 1200 iterations on average, performed in 3-4 hours for each
considered case). However, the 3D aileron simulations called for a more
powerful system with three-core processor and 4 GB of RAM, in order to
produce a result in an adequate period of time for each incidence angle
considered. For studying aileron-fuselage interference and the entire
rocket model, the platform has been recently upgraded to a faster
mainbord and memory modules, practically doubling the system's
memory speed and capacity.
Following charts show Drag and Lift variations with the angle of
incidence, and Lift variation with Drag for 2D sections and complete 3D
aileron. Airfoil geometry influence is minimal, as differences between
sections are hardly distinguishable. However, the numbers vary for the
3D model.
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
Next pictures show examples of flow parameters (air speed and
pressure) around the aileron (2D sections & 3D body).
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]
Simulations have shown that the fluid accelerates rapidly in the
trailing edge region, especially around the tip section. As expected,
the Lift coefficient of the three-dimensional aileron is lower than that
of any of the 2D sections, mainly due to the effects of a finite span
wing, unlike the infinite span considered in 2D cases. On the other
hand, the Drag coefficient of the 3D object was expected to be higher
than those obtained in the 2D simulations, but the curves depicted in
Figure 4 show otherwise. This will be thoroughly investigated by
considering aileron-fuselage interference in a future study.
6. CONCLUSIONS
Prior to practical application of the NERVA small orbital vehicle,
understanding the rocket's behaviour during air flight and
accurately predicting its performance is mandatory. The obtained
numerical results are promising and encourage further study, extending
the research to other flight regims, including very high altitudes and
velocities and, eventually, incorporating the entire 3D model of the
rocket into the CFD simulations.
Like any numerical study of fluid flows, these results will
ultimately be validated by wind tunnel tests on a reduced-scale model of
the NERVA rocket. In time, they will help in the development of a
simple, yet low-cost and reliable system, capable of placing small-size
payloads in Earth orbit.
7. REFERENCES
Haroldsen, D. J. & Sturek, W. B. (2000). Navier-Stokes
Computations of Finned Missiles at Supersonic Speeds, 22nd Army Science
Conference, Renaissance Harborplace Hotel, Baltimore, MD, 11-13 December
2000
Rugescu, R. D. (2008). NERVA Vehicles, Romania's Access to
Space, Scientific Bulletin of U. P. B., Series D in Mechanics, 70, no.
3, pp. 31-44
Seebass, R & Woodhull, J. R. (1998). Supersonic Aerodynamics:
Lift and Drag, paper presented at the RTO AVT Course on "Fluid
Dynamics Research on Supersonic Aircraft", held in
Rhode-Saint-Gendse, Belgium, 25-29 May 1998, and published in RTO EN-4.
***CFD-Wiki, the free CFD reference (2009). SST k-omega model,
http://www.cfd-online. com/Wiki/SST_k-omega_model, accessed 2009-05-20
*** FLUENT INC. (2009). Fluent Help, accessed 2009-05-17