An application of NAM model for runoff volume estimation in Chi basin.
Hormwichian, Rattana ; Homdee, Tipaporn ; Kangrang, Anongrit 等
1. INTRODUCTION
Chi basin is located in the northeast of Thailand, having total
area of 49,477 square kilometers or 9.66% of total area of the country.
At present, average amount of runoff in Chi basin flowing to Mun River
is about 8,752million cubic meters per year. Since majority of people in
the area are farmers, they need many water sources for agriculture, so
the hydraulic model is required to be improved always. But in some area,
there is no runoff gauging station. So, the model was conducted in order
to estimate runoff volume of the basin before flowing to the main stream
of Chi river. The running of the sub-basin flow to the main stream is
lateral flow of the main stream used for river simulation. If the
accurate data can be estimated, it will make planning for water
management or flood warning better.
Examples of models that are well known and accepted in many
countries, including the Sacramento model (Burnash, 1995), HBV model
(Bergstrom, 1995) and MIKE11/NAM model (Havno et al., 1995). In this
research model, the NAM is part of MIKE11 program developed by Danish
Hydraulic Institute (DHI) for calculating runoff volume. The concept of
this model is based on physical structure and Semi Empirical equation.
The main parameter for each sub-basin consisted of 9 parameters, i.e.
the upper limit of moisture content in the surface zone (Umax), the
upper limit of moisture content in the root zone (Lmax), the overland
flow runoff coefficient (CQOF), Time constant for Interflow (CKIF), time
constant for interflow and overland flow routing (CK1,2), the threshold
value for overland flow (TOF), the root zone threshold value for
interflow (TIF), the root zone threshold value for groundwater recharge
(TG), and the time constant for base flow (CKBF). Each parameter has
relationship in form of hydrologic cycle employing estimation derived
from calibration with actual data. And in this model, there was
repeatedly data processing with several conditions until the
appropriated data was found. This is the daily runoff amount. When the
parameter of basin which represents the area in Chi basin was obtained,
the runoff amount of sub-basin within Chi basin also can be estimated.
2. SCOPE OF THE STUDY
2.1 This study used drainage area of station E29 at Ban Pha Nok
Khao, Loei province; station E65 at Ban Tha Hai, Udon Thani province,
and Station E68A at Ban Khong Po, Nong Bua Lamphu to represent
sub-basins of Chi basin (Fig. 1).
2.2 In this study, a control structures in channel is not
considered.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
3. MATHEMATICAL MODEL
The hydrologic model employed in this study is the NAM model
developed by the Department of Hydrodynamics and Water Resources of the
Technical University of Demark. It is the lumped conceptual model
capable of simulating various components of catchment hydrology, which
consist of three storage components of the hydrologic cycle.
3.1 Surface Zone
Moisture intercepted on the vegetation is stored as well as water
trap in depressions and in the uppermost, cultivated part of the ground
is represented as surface storage. [U.sub.max] is the maximum upper zone
storage of water in the surface storage.
The upper zone storage (U) in the surface storage is continuously
reduced by evaporative consumption as well as by interflow. When the
upper zone storage exceeds the maximum surface storage, will enter the
streams as overland flow, wherefore the remainder is diverted as
infiltration into the root zone and groundwater storage.
3.2 Root Zone
The soil moisture in the root zone, a soil layer below the surface
from which the vegetation can draw water for transpiration, is
represented as root zone storage. [L.sub.max] is the maximum root zone
storage of the amount of water in root zone storage.
3.3 Overland flow
From a structural model, when the surface storage spills, i.e. when
U>[U.sub.max], the excess water gives rise to overland flow as to
infiltration. QOF is the part of the excess water that contributes to
overland flow. It is assumed to be proportional to the excess water and
to vary linearly with the relative soil moisture content
(L/[L.sub.max]), of the root zone storage, the following equation:
[Q.sub.OF] = CQOF(L/[L.sub.max]) - TOF/ 1 - TOF For L/[L.sub.max]
> TOF (1)
[Q.sub.OF] = 0 For L/[L.sub.max] [less than or equal to] TOF (2)
When CQOF is the overland flow runoff coefficient
TOF is the threshold value for overland flow
3.4 Base flow
The base flow from the groundwater storage is calculated as the
outflow from a linear reservoir with time constant (CKBF). The base flow
(BF) is given by
BF = ([GWL.sub.BF0] - GWL)[S.sub.Y] [(CKBF).sup.-1] For GWL [less
than or equal to] [GWL.sub.BF0] (3)
BF = 0 For GWL > [GWL.sub.BF0] (4)
When [S.sub.Y] is specific yield of reservoirs
GWL is groundwater table depth
[GWL.sub.BF0] is maximum groundwater table depth by base flow
4. AN APPLICATION AND RESULTS OF MODEL
NAM model is a mathematical model based on lumped conceptual model
of hydrological process, employing parameters and variables to simulate
relationship between rainfall and runoff continuously, with the
following procedures.
1. To collect data of daily rainfall, daily evaporation, daily
runoff, and geography information system.
2. To synthesis the missing data
3. To divide the area of sub-basin by considering contour line of
Chi basin area.
4. To calculate average rainfall of each catchments area.
5. To use NAM Model to determine a set of parameters by calibrating
with the actual runoff measured at that point; station E29 at Ban Pha
Nok Khao, Loei province, station E65 at Ban Tha Hai, Udon Thani
province, and Station E68A at Ban Khong Po, Nong Bua Lamphu province, by
using daily data from year 2001-2005.
6. To verify the set of parameters derived from calibrating the
model with other events of raining by using daily data from year
2006-2007.
From study on application of model to the catchments area of those
3 stations of Chi basin such as station E29 at Ban Pha Nok Khao, Loei
province, station E65 at Ban Tha Hai, Udon Thani province, and Station
E68A at Ban Khong Po, Nong Bua Lamphu province, it was found that the
hydrograph derived from calibrating the model had the same trend as the
behavior of occurrence of actual runoff of the catchments area (Fig. 2).
The parameter derived from calibration is shown on table 1 and table 2.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
The result of model verification by employing the set of parameters
and data from year 2006-2007, the correlation coefficient were in range
of 0.7-0.738, which were acceptable ranges.
5. CONCLUSION
When applying NAM Model to determine runoff amount from daily
rainfall and daily evaporation rate, a significant part of the model was
adjusted i.e. parameters directly correlating with rainfall and flow
behavior in the stream to close to actual condition as much as possible.
From calibration, the derived correlation coefficient was in range of
0.710-0.824 and from verifying the data in year 2006-2007, the
correlation coefficient was in range of 0.7-0.738, which were acceptable
ranges. So, the parameters mentioned depends on land use and human
activity which influenced the change of flow conditions. However,
application of the model would be the best when it is applied to the
natural flood routing. In this study, it is recommended that the impact
from changing land use and activities on the catchments and the impact
of control structures in channel should be comprehensively studies in
the future.
6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Without the financial support by the faculty of Engineering,
Mahasarakham University, this research would not have been possible. We
would like to thank Mekhala Center, Department of Water Resources,
Thailand, for technical support of Mike11/NAM program.
7. REFERENCES
Bergstrom, S. (1995). The HBV model, In: Computer Models of
Watershed Hydrology, Singh, V.P., (Ed.), 443-476, Water Resources
Publications, ISBN 0-918334-91-8 Highlands ranch, Colorado, U.S.A.
Burnash, R.J.C. (1995). The NWS river forecast system-catchment
model, In: Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Singh, V.P., (Ed.),
311-366, Water Resources Publications, ISBN 0-918334-91-8 Highlands
ranch, Colorado, U.S.A.
Havno, K.; Madsen, M.N. & Dorge, J. (1995). MIKE11-A
generalized river modeling package, In: Computer Models of Watershed
Hydrology, Singh, V.P., (Ed.), 733-782, Water Resources Publications,
ISBN 0-918334-91-8 Highlands ranch, Colorado, U.S.A.
Kobold, M. & Brilly, M. (2006). The use of HBV model for flash
flood forecasting. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Sci.,
Vol.6, No.3, 407-417, ISSN 1561-8633
Tab. 1. Parameter calibration results ([U.sub.max], [L.sub.max],
CQOF, CKIF, and [CK.sub.1/2])
Parameters [U.sub.max] [L.sub.max] CQOF
E29 20 300 0.55
E65 10 159 0.445
E68A 20 300 0.269
Parameters CKIF [CK.sub.1,2]
E29 1000 32
E65 916 48
E68A 500 48
Tab. 2. Parameter calibration results (TOF, TIF, TG, and
CKBF)
Parameters TOF TIF TG CKBF
E29 0.907 0.424 0.720 4000
E65 0.968 0.084 0.136 1114
E68A 0.208 0.595 0.806 1000