Company success dependency on management.
Vanova, Jaromira ; Babelova, Zdenka Gyurak ; Holkova, Andrea 等
1. INTRODUCTION
Background, in which companies occur and perform, is raising its
dynamics. This aspect brings along new demands on management powers.
Intensity and heterogeneousness of these demands and mainly managing
with these demands requires new approach in thinking, proceeding and
acting of managers. These aspects affect management and managers of all
companies. These aspects are also reason, why is necessary to concern of
consequent questions: What do we expect from present-day managers? How
they have to be prepared for their function in united Europe? The
questions of key manager competencies have considerable importance for
the success of their acts and functions.
2. MANAGER, HIS COMPETENCIES AND PERCEPTION OF EMPLOYEES
As resulted of our previous research project VEGA 1/2586/05
realized in 2005-2007 "Exploitation of personnel indicators at
human resources management in business practice in connection with SR
entry to the EU", successful company performance at the market is
influenced by potential of all company employees and managers as well as
their development. "Manager is leader, responsible for achieving
the goals of organizational units (units, collectives) in charge of
manager. He generally considerable participates in generating this goals
and providing the terms of its performance. The manager mostly plan,
organize and control work of his work fellows. (Vodacek & Vodackova,
2006)
"Competencies of managers are complex skills and other
assumptions (mostly motivation) to perform manager duty." (Kubes,
2004)
"Nowadays, concept of competency is in use in several basic
meanings. The first one is competency as an authority, permission,
generally given by some authority or appertaining some authority
(institution or individuality). The second meaning of competency
emphasizes the ability to perform some function, to be possible to
perform this function, to be qualified in concerned area. Competency--to
be able to do something, ability, to dispose with relevant knowledge and
skill." (Kubes, 2004) Caganova, Simurdova use the definition of
competency as a combination of knowledge, skills, attitudes and values
that enable a person to act. Key competences are in their perception
needed by all individuals not only for personal satisfaction and
development but also for social integration and employment. (Caganova
& Simurdova, 2008)
Follow on these definitions, we understand manager competency as
manager permission to perform the function as result of his position in
company organizational structure on one hand, and also we understand
manager competency as manager ability to perform expected duty and
outputs. Manager competencies include basically way of thinking,
reactions, acting and behaving in major situations. Managers are
expected to dispose with enhanced competencies compared to the basic
competencies of employees. Manager competencies have to be enhanced with
professional, individual, social, moral and ethics competencies. We
realized that managers are perceived by employees not only as an
authority, but also as a model for attitude and behavior as a result of
investigation (carried out by Jaromira Vanova, as part of PhD. thesis,
in 2007-2008, 124 respondents took part in this investigation). Partial
results from this investigation are figured in fig. 1.
Employees indicated mainly nice organizational clime and
cooperation, next to the financial assessment during investigation which
motivation factors are important to them. Organizational clime, which
had high rating compared to other motivation factors, is mostly
influenced by company management. The organizational clime was highly
appreciated by employees and managers, too. The question is, if
management is able to early identify and solve problems of
organizational clime.
Observing processes of human resource management shows, that
managers acting is not only determined by their characteristic, but also
condition factors and previous reactions of employees.
Managers with their acting, depending up actual conditions, affect
reaction of employees. These employees, afterwards, modify the
conditions for management and managers acting by their own reaction.
As a result from integration of forms of human resource management,
employees proceeding and factors affecting this forms includes, that as
is management effectiveness influenced by this factors, the management
affects these factors as well. When mutual affecting efficient
management and factors of influence is important to develop manager
skills, to realize self-examination and condition diagnostic and manage
employees on this base.
Further personable qualities, which mostly enhance manager
competencies, are featuring in this coherency:
* manager have to be knowledgeable of his own influence on
employees,
* manager have to be able to communicate with his work fellows,
* manager have to understand himself, his work fellows, their
positions, causality relation and effect of individual motivation and
performance as well as group dynamics a behaviour of the group.
The way which managers act and manage their employees has major
effect on employees performance effectiveness and so on effectiveness of
whole company.
3. COMPANY MANAGEMENT ISSUES
Statistics data shows, that 87 % of small and medium size companies
finish with business in first year of its existence. The issues, which
companies have to face, are mostly intensive international competition,
big tax burden, foreign markets entry barriers, insufficient, let us say
absent preparation for European Union integration and at last but not
least insufficient qualification of employees and managers. Management
mistakes are possible reasons for failure causes, also, mostly in small
and medium size companies. (Paulova, 2009)
When analyzing company management, focused on company management in
Slovak companies, we discovered following issues, which can eventuate to
company failure:
* company strategy management inadequacies during establishing
company own identity,
* absence of accurate formulation of human resource management
content and methods,
* there is unemployable organizational structure of human resource
management and development department,
* deficiency of professionally and personally qualified employees,
* employers participation and management activity in the area of
education which is absolutely inadequate to actual demands,
* underestimated importance of managers education as well as their
practical experiences and skills, inadequate keeping up further
education and skills development,
* preceding of others, for example political criteria, instead of
professional criteria during top managers selection,
* ineffective communication between employees and managers,
* barriers of building-up mutual reliance between employees and
managers, similarly as barriers of building-up mutual reliance between
company and its bossiness partners,
* lack of consideration is oriented on corporate social
responsibility.
Hereinbefore mentioned issues are purpose, why there is no ideal
solution, which allow relieving shortages in company human resource
management. Starting points for solving these situations can be:
* full-strength orientation on person as individuality, on his
needs, not only on his existence needs, but also on his social needs
(for example social status ambitions, self-realization related with
perspective and further education necessity on one hand,
* monitoring and in case of neediness following actual trends in
human resource management in the company.
Human resource management processes can not only be businesslike to
flexibly re-act to changing condition but also better reflect company
specifications when respecting these two aspects. (Blaskova, 2003)
Looking at human resource management in management theory
continually developed. That is reason why forms of managing people can
be regarded from different points of view:
* Theory based on managers characteristics--authors makes effort to
single out effective managers by their specific physical, psychical and
personal characteristics identification,
* Theory based on managers behaviour--these approaches endeavour to
identify, if is manager mostly oriented on tasks or people, orientation
of manager on tasks or people specifies leadership style of manager in
long term consideration,
* Situational Leadership--studies suggesting that management
success is dependent on mutual relation between leadership style and
situation,
* New Leadership--unlike classic "rational" management
theories this approach accentuate emotional and irrational site of human
resource management (transaction management and transformation
management).
4. CONCLUSION
Manager is focused on employees occupying positions in the company
when managing human resources. Leadership involves affecting follow
workers, to influence and to inspire them to achieving set goals of
organization units and whole organization.
Globalization encourages changes in managers thinking and acting.
Values, practise an expectations of managers and employees play a key
role in this process. The acting is affected and formed by culture from
this point of view. For managers, it is important to identify proceeding
of employees, to accept this proceeding and understand their background
values. then we can consider manager as leader with intercultural
competencies.
This article is a part of research Vega 1/0156/08 "Key manager
competencies in the range of specific functional management areas and
their applicable development concepts". The results from this
research will be used for a methodology design and formulation
recommendations for key management competencies identification,
measuring and development.
5. REFERENCES
Blaskova, M. (2003). Riadenie a rozvoj ludskeho potencialu.
Uplatnovanie motivacneho akcentu v procese prace s ludmi (Human
potential management and development). EDIS--ZU, ISBN 80-8070-034-6,
Zilina.
Caganova, D. & Simurdova, L. (2008). Communication in mother
tongue and foreign langue as a part of lifelong learning. In: Vedecke
prace MtF STU v Bratislave so sidlom v Trnave.--ISSN 1336-1589. ,N.
24,p. 15-22
Kubes, M.; Spillerova, R. & Kurnicky, R. (2004). Manazerske
kompetencie (Manager competencies). Grada Publishing, ISBN
80-247-0698-9, Havlickuv Brod.
Vodacek, L. & Vodackova, O. (2006). Moderni management v teorii
a praxi. Modern management in theory and practice. Management Press, p.
295, ISBN 80-7261-143-7, Praha.
Paulova, I. (2009). Vybrane metody systemoveho pristupu hodnotenia
ucinnosti a vykonnosti manazerstva kvality a komplexneho manazerstva
kvality (Selected methods of quality management and complex quality
management effectiveness and performance valuation),. AlumniPress, 97 s.
IS978-80-8096-086-5, Trnava. Available from: http://www.mtf.stuba.sk,
Accessed on: 2009-03-25
Fig. 1. Employees perception of managers
Do you regard managers in your organization not only as authority
but as model for attitude and acting, also (in %)?
Small Middle Big In
companies size companies total
Yes 12 16 20 17
Predominantly yes 57 50 45 49
Predominantly no 4 8 7 6
No 12 8 8 9
Can not qualify 15 18 20 19
Note: Table made from bar graph.