Constanta Port as a multimodal platform-plans for the future.
Popescu, Corina ; Varsami, Anastasia
1. INTRODUCTION
Constanta Port is the main Romanian port, the largest port in the
Black Sea and the fourth largest port in Europe, ranked just after
Rotterdam, Antwerp and Marseille. It offers a 3,400 km shorter transport
alternative for cargo coming from the Far East and Australia through the
Suez Canal and it has as final destination Central European countries.
By its railway network the port of Constanta, as the main Romanian
maritime gate, is the finish and start point for the Pan-European
corridor IV and it's also an important transport node of the
Tranceca corridor, providing the connection between Europe, Caucasus and
Central Asia. The Pan-European maritime corridor VII, that follows the
route of the navigable Danube and, together with the Main-Rhine Canal
and the Danube-Black Sea Canal, provides the routes between the North
Sea and the Black Sea.
From these points of view, Constanta Port can be considered as a
base plate of intermodal transport relations between Europe and Asia.
2. EVALUATION OF PORT'S INFRASTRUCTURE
2.1 Actual connections
Constanta Port offers excellent connections to all transport means:
rail, road, air, inland waterways and pipelines. These good connections
accomplished by a significant rail, road and pipelines port
infrastructure, facilitate the transport of all kind of goods in
Constanta Port. The intermodal transport plays an important role in the
massive growth of transport for the next 15 years. It also represents
one of the best solutions for the European transport improvement.
That's why the EU gives great attention to this mean of transport
and seeks the best methods in this matter. European Community admits
that over 90% of world trade is carried by sea, that shipping and
related maritime transport services represent an important contribution
to the European economy, that European Union shipping and related
services are essential for European competitiveness, that maritime
transport has a direct impact on the quality of life in Europe and that
Short Sea Shipping is an essential part of the multimodal European
transport system and door-to-door logistics (Council conclusions
regarding Maritime Transport Policy until 2018, Brussels, 30 and 31
March 2009).
Constanta Port is connected to the Pan European Corridor VII
-Danube- that links two of the main trade poles of Europe: Rotterdam and
Constanta, creating a navigable inland waterway from the North Sea to
the Black Sea. The Danube-Black Sea Canal links Constanta Port to the
Rhine-Main-Danube Corridor, offering the most efficient and ecological
transport alternative within the hinterland. According to European Union
and United Nations standards the Danube-Black Sea Canal has a class VI
rating and is an 'F' class inland canal.
The easiest access to Central Europe is provided by the good
navigable conditions of the Lower Danube and the highly limited number
of locks (4 double locks only) on the sector from Constanta to Budapest.
For an active participation within European actions and good information
about the specific problems of river transport, N.C. Maritime Ports
Administration S.A. Constanta (MPAC) is a correspondent member of Inland
Navigation Europe, a prestigious inland transport association recognized
by the European Union. MPAC's participation in this association
allows the company to actively promote Constanta Port, its connection
with the Danube inland waterway, its facilities and services.
3. SOLUTIONS FOR PORT'S DEVELOPMENT
There are several ideas that we would like to present in order to
show how Constanta Port could become 'The Eastern Gate of
Europe'. All these plans should be developed soon and they could
assure a higher maritime transport through Constanta Port.
3.1 Heavy Traffic Solution
The Anghel Saligny tunnel could be a solution for heavy traffic in
Constanta Port. The tunnel is even today a demonstration of
craftsmanship in the architectural construction of reinforced concrete and that solution does not exist in the following 100 years. The city of
Constanta has developed very much, without anyone taking into account
the pressure on the structure of the target resistance. The tunnel was
closed for rail traffic in 1992 and it was hit by a brutal wave of
floods. Since then, the tunnel was left abandoned although the water is
destroying slowly but surely, the resistance of the tunnel. The
constructions built over the tunnel exert increasing pressure unbearable
on building walls. Anyone who enters the tunnel can realize that the
authorities neglected it and there seem to be no worries regarding the
pieces that started falling from the ceiling and water coming from the
walls and unbearable smell of sewage and oil. The objective is owned by
CFR Constanta Regional Division, which in 2002 commissioned a project
that should have restored the functionality of the tunnel by a series of
rehabilitation and modernization actions. Therefore, specialists have
estimated that such a process would cost over one million euro, a sum
that far exceeds the financial possibilities of the CFR Constanta
Regional Division. Experts say that, currently, the works would cost
much more because the tunnel was severely damaged in its strength and
structure.
So, due to lack of funds, lack of interest from local authorities
and from the Ministry of Transport, an already existing way for a better
road connection for heavy traffic from Constanta Port was abandoned, and
the city has to struggle with the trucks and heavy camions coming in and
out from the port gates.
3.2 Rail and Highways Connections
Due to lack of funds and interest, Constanta will agonize for years
until passengers and cargo will be able to overtake the actual time
table of at least five hours by train between Bucharest and Constanta.
The money problem is totally solved, funds being provided, and a loan
was granted by the Japanese Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC),
another state employee from Dexia Kommunalkredit Bank and the state
budget. Only one railway Constanta--Bucharest is connecting Constanta to
the rest of the country and consequently to the rest of Europe and this
one is at the moment under capital repairs. From the total amount of 453
million Euros, 165 million is given by the Japanese and the rest is
coming from the budget and from Dexia. Deadlines for completion have
been postponed on several occasions and it seems that nobody wants to
make anymore prognostics for completion of this railway.
There is only one highway connecting Constanta to the rest of the
world: A2 highway Bucharest--Constanta, 225 km long, and this one is
also under rehabilitation, and should have been completed back in 2008.
At the moment only 70% of the highway is completed. For finalizing the
remaining part of the highway (65 km long) the Romanian government is
under negotiation with the European Union.
3.3 Tourism (Non)-Opportunities
In the last decade, Constanta Port has been trying to include
itself in the shipping lines and river cruise routes. In November 2005,
the most modern terminal for cruise vessels from the Black Sea was
inaugurated, investment that cost 2.5 million Euros.
What are the prospects for passenger traffic in the port of
Constanta, now? The cruise shipping through Constanta Port lasted almost
5 years. Now it is completely missing. One of the reasons is represented
by the loss of American tourists flow, due to world economic crisis, and
not only. Compared to the port of Odessa, passenger traffic through
Constanta is half because of lack of tourist offers. Odessa is an
interesting city with many tourist attractions, which organizes
appealing activities, folkloric programs for foreign guests. Yalta,
Soci, Nesebar and Burgas Ports are also highly sought. Because of the
competition coming from Bulgaria and Ukraine, we also lost the wine
testing tourist program. Murfatlar vineyard can't provide a hot
meal to test the wine, just a cold buffet. Conditions are the same as
for the last 30 years. Tour organizers have decided to no longer require
that bait, preferring Odessa and Burgas.
Therefore the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Tourism, the
Ministry of Culture, the Orthodox Church and Constanta County Council
and the Mayor should work together if they want foreign tourists in
Constanta Port.
3.4 LNG Terminal--only on paper
Constanta Port may become one of the destinations for the liquefied
natural gas (LNG) with the associated opportunity of becoming one major
player in the battle for resources. Gas loses only 30% of energy, an
advantage by comparison with gas transported by pipeline, which loses
more than 50% of energy through the network and stations lifting
pressure. We can take liquefied gas from Egypt, Yemen, Dubai, Qatar and
one LNG tank will provide consumption in Romania for one day during
winter. If a terminal and a warehouse are going to be built, Constanta
Port can use this modern technology.
At this moment Romania has this LNG terminal project but only on
paper. Considered by specialists to be a 'futuristic' project,
the building of this LNG terminal in Constanta remains only a project.
The extremely high cost of building suck a terminal makes it impossible
for it to be solely funded by the Government, the only chance being
European money. We can only hope that this project will rise and
Constanta Port will integrate a new LPG terminal in its multimodal
platform.
4. CONCLUSIONS
In order to conclude our research upon the Multimodal Transport in
Constanta Port we'll see which are the Strengths and Opportunities
available now.
First of all the geographic position for Romania and Constanta Port
provides a gate position for cargoes in transit from Far East to Central
and west Europe. Moreover, the Danube and other inland navigation
waterways are well connected to provide new potential for low cost bulk
freight, development of container traffic and leisure use. The waterway
network is environmentally friendly and represents an alternative to
road/rail transport meeting the new century demands regarding air
pollution and being a solution to road traffic congestion in European
cities. Finally, the new development plans of Constanta Port will allow
it to grow and to lead to greater European and international trades with
benefits not only for Constanta, but also for Romania in the role played
in relation with neighbour countries and also at the European Community
level.
For our research to be complete and accurate we'll further
analyse the Weaknesses and Threats affecting Constanta Port. Mainly, the
traffic to the terminals is concentrated by road around peak hours, and
there is no designated heavy traffic road for the trucks in / out from
the port. The port is missing a highway to connect Constanta with the
rest of the country and Europe, which leads to high traffic congestion
in Constanta city. Inland navigation is still infant in terms of transit
volumes and technologies, restrictions of depth and width on Danube and
low maintenance investments of rail infrastructure is resulting in speed
restrictions and high transit times. The insufficient response to
customer demand from government may deprive rail and waterway transport
of the opportunities to expand and develop and finally, despite
geographical position and obvious advantages, international transit
flows could choose to avoid Romania or at least to reduce the transit,
due to major lacks in infrastructure developments.
5. REFERENCES
Branch, A.E. (1998). Maritime Economics, Management and Marketing,
Stanley Thornes Publishers, ISBN 0 7487 3986 6, London
Danube Commission (2001). Kilometers indicated on Danube, Danube
Commission Budapest, ISBN 963 00 97 12 5, Bucharest
Gibson, S. (2006). Ports & Terminals Guide 2007-2008-Volume 1,
Fairplay Publications Inc, ISBN 10 1 901290 88 3, London
Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers (2006). Logistics and Multimodal
Transport, Witherbys Publishing, ISBN 1 85609 277 1, London
Iurascu G.; Huhulescu E. & Tigaret I. (2000). Danube Ports,
Cuget Liber, ISBN 973 0 02861 3, Constanta
Thoresen, C.A. (2006). Port Designer's Handbook:
Recommendations and Guidelines, MPG Books, ISBN 0 7277 3228 5, Cornwall