Cutting speed and feed based analysis of chip arrangement in the dry horizontal turning of UNS A92024 alloy.
Batista, Moises ; Sanchez-Carrilero, Manuel ; Rubio, Eva Maria 等
1. INTRODUCTION
The UNS A92024 is an Aluminium alloy commonly used in the aircraft
industry. This alloy can be processed by machining depending on its
final application. Aerospace requirements involve high quality levels
and, if possible, an online monitoring in order to preserve the
workpiece design conditions.
The machining process can be monitored by different methods. One of
the most single methods involves the analysis of the chip arrangement
(Rubio et al., 2006).
In the case of wrought aluminium alloys, standard ISO 3685 gives a
classification of aluminium chip based on its 3D external morphology
(ISO, 1993), which, in some studies, has been considered a first
approach to its machinability (Carrilero & Marcos, 1996).
However, chip arrangement studies have not considered the cross
section of the chip. Lateral compression of the chip can also be
analysed in order to improve the conclusions extracted of the single
morphology analysis.
In this paper, a first approach to the combined study of the chip
morphology, the cross section and cutting parameters has been developed.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
UNS A92024 cylindrical bars (150-200 mm long, 80-120 mm diameter)
were horizontally turned with a depth of cut of 1 mm in a CNC Lathe avoiding the use of cutting fluids in order to have a reference of the
most severe conditions.
Tests were performed by combining the cutting parameters included
in Tab. 1.
The chips obtained were collected, identified and ISO 3685
classified after being observed by Stereoscopic Optical Microscopy (SOM)
techniques.
After that, the cross section of chip was obtained using a vision
measuring system and defining a CAD model for it.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Table 2 shows images acquired by SOM after different dry turning
tests. For each image, the corresponding ISO 3685 associated form has
been included.
On the other hand, an increase of cutting does not mark a clear
tendency. In effect, a dependence of feed can be distinguished. So, when
small values of feed are applied an increase of the cutting speed
provokes an approximation of chip morphology to a chip nest form.
However, when higher feed values are used, smaller and closer to spiral
chip can be found, Tab. 3. Nevertheless, this does not suppose a better
finish quality of the workpiece as it was demonstrated in previous works
(Rubio et al., 2006; Sebastian et al., 2002).
[TABLE 2 OMITTED]
[TABLE 3 OMITTED]
Fig. 1. shows images of the chips cross section for the different
cutting speeds and feeds applied
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
The cross section images have been pre-processed by using
SOM/Video/CAD utilities. From these CAD models a first evaluation of the
cross section can be made.
As it can be appreciated in those curves, and according to images
recorded in Figure 1, the cross sections values are mainly affected by
the feed applied, not having a very soft (or even inappreciable)
variation with the cutting speed applied.
As regards as all above commented, feed provokes a cross section
increasing, as it can be expected from single models such those which
consider the initial section as the product of depth by feed.
However, cutting speed seems to have a weak influence in the cross
section values. Marginal parametric models as
S = a x [v.sup.n] (1)
were tested for analysing the cutting speed influence. In all of
cases n values were
[absolute value of n][less than or equal to] 0.05 (2)
This results confirm the small influence of cutting speeds on
section.
On the other hand, marginal parametric models as S = b x [f.sup.m]
(3)
were tested for analysing the feed influence. In all of cases m
values were
0.80 [less than or equal to] m [less than or equal to] 0.95 (4)
This result indicates that this feed dependence is close to that
marked theoretically for initial section.
Curves included in Figure 2 show cross section ([mm.sup.2]) values
as a function of cutting speed for each feed applied.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
4. CONCLUSIONS
The alloy presents a suitable adjustment with standard ISO 3685.
This suitability is translated in clear geometric tendencies. Thus the
chip appears to be more fragmented when increasing the feed. The
geometric variability is favoured with the diminution of the feed.
However, it can not be formulated a machinability criteria based on
these results because there is not a good correspondence with quality
surface (Sebastian et al., 2002; Abouelatta & Madl, 2001).
On the other hand, the analysis of the chips cross section has
reported a low cutting speed influence and a significative dependence on
the feed rate, although it could not be related to the machining process
but the initial section value.
5. REFERENCES
Abouelatta, O.B. & Madl, J. (2001). Surface roughness
prediction based on cutting parameters and tool vibrations in turning
operations. J. Mater. Proc. Tech., 118, 269-277, 0924-0136
Carrilero, M.S. & Marcos, M., On the Machinability of Aluminium
and Aluminium Alloys, J. Mech. Behav. Materials, 7(1996) 179-193
ISO 3685:1993, Tool-life testing with single-point turning tools,
1993.
Rubio, E.; Camacho, A.M.; Sanchez-Sola, J. M. & Marcos, M.
(2006). Chip arrangement in the dry cutting of aluminium alloys. J.
Achiev. Mat. Manuf. Eng., 16, 1-2, 164-170
Sebastian, M.A.; Sanchez, J.M.; Carrilero, M.S.; Gonzalez, J.M.
& Marcos, M. (2002). Parametric model for predicting surface finish
of machined AA2024 alloy bars. Int. J. Manuf. Sci. & Prod., 4,
181-188, 0793-6648
Tab. 1. Cutting parameter values
s (m/min) 43 65 85 125 170
f (mm/rev) 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.30