Dynamic simulations of a planetary chain speed increaser for R.E.S.
Saulescu, Radu ; Diaconescu, Dorin ; Jaliu, Codruta 等
1. INTRODUCTION
This paper presents the dynamic modelling of a planetary chain
speed increaser proposed by the authors, transmission which will be
manufactured in order to be included in a small hydropower plant. The
first step in the development of the dynamic model (the establishment of
the increaser structural and the theoretical kinematical features) was
presented in (Saulescu et al., 2009). This paper presents the dynamic
response of the planetary chain speed increaser by means of
Matlab-Simulink software. The dynamic model will be used in the design
of the control system for the small hydro plant. The authors will
accomplish the design, manufacturing and testing of the speed increaser
for stand-alone hydropower stations, in the frame of a research project.
2. THE DYNAMIC MODEL
In the dynamic modelling, the main objective is to determine the
angular speed transmission functions and the moments, both relative to
time (Jaliu et al., 2008; Meriam et al., 2006), considering the
planetary chain increaser from Fig. 1,a, the functions are:
[[omega].sub.13] = [[omega].sub.13] (t), [[omega].sub.H3] =
[[omega].sub.H3] (t )> [T.sub.m] = [T.sub.m] (t) [T.sub.b] =
[T.sub.b] (t) (1)
The dynamic modelling is made in the following cases:
* The motion equation is modelled by neglecting rubbing, and
* The motion equation is modelled by considering rubbing effects.
2.1 Case I (friction is neglected)
In this case the Lagrange method is used (Meriam et al., 2006):
d/dt ([partial derivative][E.sub.c]/[partial derivative][omega] -
[partial derivative][E.sub.c] [partial derivative][phi]) = Q (2)
According to Fig. 1,b the kinetic energy Ec and the generalized
force Q, have the following expressions:
[E.sub.c] = 1/2 ([J.sub.1] x [[omega].sup.2.sub.1] + [J.sub.H] x
[[omega].sup.2.sub.H]); Q = [T.sub.m] x [i.sup.3.sub.1H] + [T.sub.b] (3)
in which [J.sub.l], represents the mechanical inertia momentum of
the input element 1, respectively [J.sub.H], for the output element H:
Deriving Ec, relative to time, it is obtained:
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (4)
From relations (2) and (3), it results:
[[epsilon].sub.1][J.sub.1] + [[epsilon].sub.H][J.sub.H] = [T.sub.m]
x [i.sup.3.sub.1H] + [T.sub.b] (5)
In the premise of the neglected friction, it is finally obtained:
[[epsilon].sub.1] [J.sub.1] + [[epsilon].sub.H] [J.sub.H] =
[T.sub.m] x [i.sup.3.sub.1H] + [T.sub.b] (5)
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (6)
For the considered case, by means of numerically replacement of the
known parameters, the following motion equation is obtained:
[[epsilon].sub.H] x 0.0212 + [[omega].sub.H] x 1.0049 - 2 = 0 (7)
2.2 Case II (friction is considered
In this case, according to Fig. 1,c and d and 2, the following
system of equations can be written using the Newton-Euler method (Meriam
et al., 2006):
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (8)
In the final stage, by solving system (8) and by taking into
account friction, the equation used for modelling the dynamical system
of the machine is obtained:
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (9)
By replacing the known parameters, it results the motion equation
in the case of considering friction:
[[epsilon].sub.H] x 0.0207 + [[omega].sub.H] x 1.0031 -1.2606 = 0
(10)
In order to establish if the results obtained in the previous case
are correct, friction is neglected in relation (9) and equation (7) is
obtained.
3. NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS
Considering [[epsilon].sub.H] = 0 during the steady-state regime,
the angular speeds of the input and output shafts from the analyzed
transmission are being calculated in the two premises:
* When friction is neglected
[[omega].sub.H] = 1.9901; [[omega].sub.1] = 0.3980 [[s.sup.-1]]
* When friction is considered
[[omega].sub.H] = 1.2567; [[omega].sub.1] = 0.2513 [[s.sup.-1]]
The machine dynamic response, considering the speeds, accelerations
and moments as functions of time, in both premises are drawn in the Fig.
3:
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
4. CONCLUSIONS
1) The gearboxes for small hydropower plants increase the speed of
the turbine shaft to the generator between 3 and 5 times (Harvey, 2005).
2) The analyzed planetary chain transmission increases the input
speed 5 times and decreases the input moment 3.1516 times (see Fig. 3).
3) The dynamic modelling is made in the premise that the speed
increaser is used in a system of type: motor (turbine) + increaser +
brake (generator).
4) The system consisting of motor, speed increaser, brake starts
practically, in both cases, in about 0.16 s, after which enters in the
steady-state regime.
5) The dynamic model is useful in the design of the control system
for the wind turbines and hydro stations. The system control program can
be established by considering certain environmental conditions/seasons
and by replacing the motor and the brake from the dynamic modelling with
a turbine and a generator.
6) Based on the dynamic modelling, the authors will accomplish the
design, manufacturing and testing of a speed increaser for off-grid
hydropower stations in the framework of a research project.
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The preparation and publishing of this paper were possible with the
financial support of the research project ID_140 'Innovative
mechatronic systems for micro hydros, meant to the efficient
exploitation of hydrological potential from off-grid sites".
6. REFERENCES
Harvey, A. (2005). Micro-hydro design manual, TDG Publishing House
Jaliu, C. et al (2008). Dynamic features of speed increasers from
mechatronic wind and hydro systems, Proc. of EUCOMES 08, 2nd European
Conf. on Mechanism Science, pp. 355-373, Sept. 2008, Springer Publishing
House, Cassino, Italy
Meriam, J. L. & Kraige, L. G. (2006). Engineering mechanics:
Dynamics. 6th edition. John Wiley & Sons
Saulescu, R. et al. (2009). On the dynamic modelling of a planetary
chain speed increasers for RES, Proceedings of 20th DAAAM International
Symposium, Katalinic, B. (Ed.), pp-, ISBN 978-3-901509-70-4, Vienna,
November 2009, DAAAM International Vienna