Dynamic symulation and experiment on a sprayer boom structure.
Lupea, Iulian ; Tudose, Lucian ; Stanescu, Cristina Mihaela 等
1. INTRODUCTION
The dynamic behavior of agriculture sprayer mechanisms trailed by
tractors has been constantly observed and analyzed (Ramon & De
Baerdemaeker, 1997); (Kennes et al., 1999). The sprayer boom is a large
and relatively slender component, used to support the spray nozzles. It
is important to control and minimize the vibration of the structure on
the vertical and horizontal planes, in order to insure the uniformity of
pulverization over the field (Lupea et al., 2008). The horizontal and
vertical movements, as well as the geometrical features of the sprayer
boom, influence the pulverization quality. It has been made (Lebeau et
al., 2004) a spray controller aiming to compensate the effect of the
horizontal boom movements on the spray deposits homogeneity. In this
paper the dynamic study of a sprayer boom structure of about 12m length
on each side is presented. Initially, the real boom has been optimized
in terms of minimizing the vertical vibration, considering the dynamic
model of the whole sprayer mechanism excited from the ground when is
following a standard bumpy path. In that approach the dynamic model of
the whole sprayer mechanism and a rigid sprayer boom were considered. A
similar downscaled (1/10) boom structure has been manufactured and
tested. An important parameter of the dynamic behavior is the boom tip
vibration amplitude. This parameter is observed in the finite element
analysis of the optimized structure considered at a natural scale and in
the experimental approach of the downscaled structure, resulting a good
correlation (considering the scale factor). During the tests of the
manufactured structure, scale factors such as the time factor and the
force factor for transient dynamic load, have been considered. Other
similar parameters, such as the resonant frequencies, have been observed
in both models. This work was supported by the grant of the Romanian
Government PNII Idei id 1077 (2007).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Further research is aiming a better understanding of the
similarities of the real boom structure, the associated finite element model and the down-scaled real structure used for tests in the
laboratory.
2. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
Starting from the CAD model of the sprayer boom structure, a
standard mesh procedure as a preprocessing step of a finite element
analysis has been followed. Mainly shells, a reduced number of solid
elements, rigid connections and a few spring elements were used. Some
small components were replaced by lumped masses and finally, the same
mass in both, the model and the real structure has been reached.
The model was prepared with HyperMesh preprocessor (2007,
HyperWorks) for normal modal analysis with Optistruct solver which is
using Nastran similar cards in the deck file. The frequency band of
interest was between 0.1 and 60Hz. Some modes of vibration are
preponderant moving on the vertical plane, others are on the horizontal
plane and some are moving on both planes. The lowest mode is a lateral
bending of the structure. The most important modes of vibration are in
general the lowest ones, which generate large amplitude at the free end
of the sprayer boom. Other important modes of vibration are those which
can be excited by active loads. Hence, a typical time dependent load
coming from the ground has been used to excite the sprayer boom arm
structure. This load was derived from the dynamic simulation of the
whole agriculture sprayer machine (including the suspension) trailed by
a tractor when is following a standardized bumpy path.
In order to find out the sprayer tip (node #202497, Fig.1.)
vibration amplitude as a response to the dynamic load, a modal transient
response procedure by using finite element analysis, has been applied.
The time variable load coming from the dynamic modeling of the sprayer
mechanism excited from the ground has been applied at the level of the
symmetry line of the structure. The free end motion and the amplitude of
the boom have been registered in three perpendicular directions (Fig.
2). The vertical (Oy) response amplitude is the most important (0.068m),
followed by the lateral one (Oz) and finally the response along the
length (Ox) of the arm. The modal method, instead of the direct
integration method, has been chosen. The modal damping, experimentally
measured on a similar downscaled (1/10) real structure which was
manufactured for testing, has been plugged into the finite element
model.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
3. EXPERIMENTS
3.1 Measurement Set-up
A similar down-scaled (1/10) boom arm structure has been
manufactured in order to perform tests in the laboratory, in parallel to
the field tests.
The frequency response function--inertance of the downscaled
manufactured structure has been measured.
A measuring set-up available in the Vibration & Noise Measuring
Laboratory (www.viaclab.utcluj.ro) has been used. It is based on an
acquisition system, a shaker, a force transducer, a light accelerometer and a Labview application.
A simplified measurement set-up is shown in Fig. 3. The device
under test (DUT) is excited from the output channel 0, while the force
transducer and the mini-accelerometer are monitored by using the input
channel 0 and channel 1, respectively.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
3.2 Measurement of the FRF-Inertance
The force transducer measures the force transfered from the shaker
to the DUT. The accelerometer, glued on the structure's free end is
monitoring the vertical acceleration. From the FRF peaks (Fig.4), the
resonant frequencies of the structure in vertical plane and the modal
damping values have been derived. A mean damping ratio value of 0.02,
derived by using the bandwidth method for resonant peaks, has been
plugged into the finite element simulation. The structure has been
considered as lightly damped.
For the FRF-inertance (magnitude--phase) derivation, a Labview
application based on sine sweept procedure in the frequency band of
interest has been used (2008, Labview).
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
3.3 Down-scaled Structure Free End Response
A Labview application has been developed. The application derives
the manufactured structure compliance by double integrating the measured
FRF-inertance, finds the main harmonics of the down-scaled time varying
load acting on the similar down-scaled structure and calculates the
structure responses for each harmonic (magnitude and phase) excitation.
Finally, the application superposes the responses of the downscaled
structure to the main harmonic excitations (Lupea, 2005). The time
varying load imposed on the real structure is similar (down-scaled:
1/100) to that used for excitation on the modal transient response
finite element simulation.
After the superposition of the harmonical responses, the
structure's tip vibration is depicted in Fig. 5.
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
4. CONCLUSION
A transient response simulation of a real-sized and an experimental
approach on the down-scaled sprayer boom structure have been performed.
The free end boom structure vibration amplitude derived from FEA is in
good correlation with the one obtained from the experiment based on the
measured FRF-inertance. Resonant frequencies resulted from the
simulation of the boom structure, the measurements on the real structure
and on the down-scaled structure, correlate as well. By improving the
finite element model, better results are expected. Other standard
excitations will be imposed on the structures, observing the responses.
5. REFERENCES
Kennes, P.; Ramon, H. & De Baerdemaeker, J. (1999). Modeling
the effect of the passive suspensions on the dynamic behavior of sprayer
booms. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, Vol. 72, Issue 3,
1999, pp 217-229
Lebeau, F.; El Bahir, L.; Destain, M.; Kinnaert, M. & Hanus, R.
(2004). Improvement of spray deposit homogeneity using a PWM spray
controller to compensate horizontal boom speed variations, Computers and
Electronics in Agriculture, Vol. 43, Issue 2, 2004, pp 149-161
Lupea, I. (2005). Vibration and noise measurement by using Labview
programming, Casa Cartii de Stiinta Publisher, Cluj-Napoca, ISBN 973-686-840-0
Lupea, I.; Stanescu, C. & Drocas, I. (2008). Measurements on
the Sprayer Boom Vibration, The Fifth International Symposium about
forming and design in mechanical engineering, COD 2008 Proceedings pp.
331-334, ISBN 978-86-7892-104-9, ADEKO Association for Design, Elements
and Constructions, Belgrade, 15-16. April 2008, Novi Sad
Ramon, H. & De Baerdemaeker, J. (1997). Spray boom motions and
spray distribution - part 2: experimental validation of the mathematical
relation and simulation, Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research,
Vol. 66, Issue 1, 1997, pp 31-39
*** (2008) Labview--Sound and vibration toolset, National
Instruments, Austin, Texas
*** (2007) HyperWorks (HyperMesh and Optistruct), Altair
Engineering Inc., Troy - Michigan