Interactive adult education in engineering through EWE/EWI.
Nitulescu, Lavinia ; Visan, Alina ; Bichescu, Andrade Ionut 等
1. INTRODUCTION
The "technical" dimension of the adult education, the
continuous professional training, involves mechanisms and structures
which resort to important material resources and to human resources especially qualified for this domain, following different forms of adult
professional training (professional qualification/requalification,
professional/vocational training, reorientation, professional
reconversion, etc). The continuing education achieves the link between
the school activities of initial preparation with the activities of
professional training, the training implying the integration of actions
for initial and continuous professional preparation, through action
models specific to long life learning.
2. IIW EDUCATION, TRAINING & QUALIFICATION SYSTEM IN
ENGINEERING
The International System for Education and Qualification of Welding
Personnel is based on the harmonised European system for education and
qualification of welding personnel, existing for almost 15 years. This
International Education and Qualification System for Welding Personnel
is recognised worldwide and supported by industry and by international
training and accreditation entities, opening the road towards one Global
Education and Qualification System for Welding Personnel.
IIW--International Institute of Welding and EWF--European Welding
Federation, have decided to collaborate in combining the EWF and IIW
Systems for Education, Qualification and Authorisation into one System.
In 1997, EWF and IIW signed the first agreement of cooperation towards
the development of a single international system for education and
qualification of welding personnel, the IIW Training and Qualification
System for Welding Personnel. By use of a single Guideline for each
level of training, the same qualification may be awarded in any country.
Until the end of 2006, 36 200 IIW diplomas have been awarded worldwide.
3. EWE (EUROPEAN WELDING ENGINEER) / IWE (EUROPEAN WELDING
INSPECTOR) IN ROMANIA
The EWE/EWI system has now been adopted by 31 countries and is an
example of such widespread unification of qualification in any
profession. The following countries joined the system: Australia,
Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Croatia, Czech
Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Indonesia,
Italy, Iran, Japan, Korea, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland,
Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Singapore, United Kingdom, and United
States.
In Romania, ISIM (The National Institute of Research And
Development in Welding And Material Testing) is a training centre
approved at International/European level by ASR CertPers as a Training
/Forming Centre to carry on courses and it was also approved, at
national level, by the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection as a
professional Forming supplier. The Forming Centre has developed and
develops courses in Timisoara, Bucharest, Belgrade, Chisinau etc.
Beside other courses, the offer of the Training body consists in
International/European Welding Engineer course (addressed to the welding
coordinator personnel); International/European Welding Inspector
(addressed to the TQC personnel). The obtained
qualifications/certifications are based on the prescriptions of
guidelines issued by the International Institute of Welding (IIW), the
European Welding Federation (EWF).
The course consists of 441 hours, out of which 381 hours of
theoretical preparation and 60 hours of practical activity. The subjects
approached in the course are: Welding and Cutting Procedures and
Equipments, Materials and their Behaviour in Welding, Construction and
Design, Production and Applied Engineering.
The main objective is that the personnel qualified at a certain
level should attain the same degree of minimum knowledge regardless of
the country where he was qualified. This course has as objective the
conveyance of knowledge necessary to obtain the diploma of International
Welding Engineer, for the personnel in the factories which have
activities in the welding field, for example: the accomplishment of
metallic structures, bridges, containers under pressure, pipes and
networks of pipes, stocking containers, marine platforms, naval
constructions, hydro-electric equipment, etc.
The welding coordinator must obtain this diploma especially for the
firms which achieve or intend to achieve export activities in order to
fulfil the demand requested by the European norms. Beside the diploma
obtained by the welding coordinator, his possibility to inform on the
latest news and the directions in his domain of activity are also
considered very important.
4. INTERACTIVITY IN ADULT ENGINEERING EDUCATION
What determines the success of an activity of continuous education
in engineering is the didactic strategy and especially, the way in which
the trainer selects and adapts the strategies at the respective
educational context. In the continuing education for engineers, it is
recommended to use some interactive didactic strategies, which place the
adult trainee in the core of the activity, it favours the
inter-relational exchanges between participants, stimulating the
activism of the subject in his/her interaction with others and with the
used contents (Crasovan, 2007). But, first of all, we shall present the
characteristics of the adult learner.
4.1. Adult as a learner
According to the following parameters, Knowles stated the
characteristics of the adult learner: (Knowles et al., 2005):
* The need to know Adults need to know why they need to learn
something.
* The learner's self-concept Adults develop a deep
psychological need to be seen by others and treated others as being
capable of self--direction.
* The role of experience Adults come into an educational activity
with both a greater volume and a different quality of experience
* Readiness to learn Adults need to know how to use knowledge.
* Orientation to learning adults are life-centered in their
orientation.
* Motivation The most potent motivators are internal pressures.
4.2. Interactivity and interaction. Dimensions and types.
Interactivity and interaction are two terms that have been used
very often in the literature of science, education science, computer
science, educational technology, distance education, curriculum and
instruction, and psychology (Kahveci, 2007). Most of the times, the
terms are used in a synonymous relation. However, in the study developed
by Kahveci (on a sample of 262 didactic staff from different
universities), the result of the factor analysis on the six variables of
Functional Definitions of Interactivity showed two discrete components:
Interaction (Component 1) and Interactivity (Component 2).
To understand the multifaceted variable of interactivity, Moore
(1998) identified three types of interaction: learner-content,
learner-teacher and learner-learner. The learner-content interaction is
defined by Moore as the "interaction between the learner and the
content that is the subject of study." This is the process of the
student interacting with the content intellectually, with the outcome
being a change in the student's understanding or perspective.
Self-study materials are one example of learner-content interaction. In
the learner-teacher interaction, there is interaction between an expert
of the technical material and the student. An illustration of this
interaction is what we refer to as traditional classroom instruction. It
is noted by Moore that in this interaction the learner--educator
feedback is missing and the resulting teaching procedures are not
individualized. Therefore, motivation, successful application of content
and misconception analysis is a product of student autonomy. By using
learner-learner interaction, inter-student interaction is accomplished
through group tasks. Moore states that this interaction promotes
teamwork proficiency while developing and testing the student's
expertise.
Talking about the interactivity types, Kahveci (2005) focus on the
meaning of interactivity in the education literature as it is placed in
the context of (1) computer-based instruction (CBI), (2) cognitive
science, and (3) science education. About computer-based instruction,
Jonassen (apud Kahveci, p.17) suggests that the most fundamental level
of interactivity should provide (1) level of intelligence of design, (2)
type of interactive program, (3) level of processing, (4) task analysis,
and (5) modality of response. Generally the quality of interaction in
microcomputer courseware is a function of the learner's response
and the computer's feedback. From the point of view of the
cognitive science, Fulford's opinion is presented (Cognitive Speed
Theory), according to which the need for interaction embedded in
instruction is vital in order to maintain a high level of learning
(Kahveci, p.21 ). Last but not least, from the point of view of the
science education, interaction is defined as all manner of behavior in
which individuals and groups act upon each other. The essential
characteristic is reciprocity in actions and responses in an infinite
variety of relationships: verbal and nonverbal, conscious and
nonconscious, enduring and casual. Interaction is seen as a continually
emerging process, as communication in its most inclusive sense (Kahveci,
2005).
Kotys-Schwartz (2007) proposes to use the concept of interaction to
differentiate active learning. She considers that collaborative
learning, cooperative learning and problem-based learning each include
learner-teacher, learner-content and learner-learner interaction, then
she can characterize these methods as high-level interactivity. However,
these activities typically promote learner-teacher interaction and
learner-content interaction and should be characterized as mid-level
interactivity. Eventually, the traditional engineering lecture, where a
faculty member serves as the content expert bestowing knowledge to
students through the chalk board or PowerPoint presentations can be
characterized as low-level interactivity.
5. CONCLUSION
A higher level of interactivity promotes significant gains in the
involvement of our engineers in the continuing education's
activities. Adult learner engagement, motivation, excitement and
inspiration are improved with interactivity. Mid--and high-levels of
interactivity also encourage a higher percentage of attendance in
EWE/EWI training.
6. REFERENCES
Crasovan, M. (2007). "Designing training activities", in
Palos, R., Sava, S., Ungureanu, D. (cds.), Adult education. Theoretical
basis and practical guidelines, Polirom Publishing House, Iasi
Kahveci, M. (2007). An Instrument Development: Interactivity Survey
(IS). Journal of Educational Technology & Society
Kahveci, M. (2005). The perceptions of professors at colleges of
education about instructional interactivity, A Dissertation submitted to
the Department of Middle and Secondary Education,
www.proquest.com/cookiecutter
Knowels, M.S., Holton, E., Swanson, R. (2005). The Adult Learner.
The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource
Development, sixth edition, Butterworth Heinemann
Kotys-Schwartz, D. A. (2007). Evaluation of the impact of
interactivity on student Performance and attitudes in engineering,
ProQuest Information and Learning Company, www.proquest.com/cookiecutter
Long, H.B. (2004). Understanding Adult Learners, in Galbraith, M.W.
(ed.), Adult Learning Methods: A guide for Effective Instruction, third
edition, Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, Florida
Moore, M. (1998)."The types of interaction", American
Journal of Distance education, Vol 3 (2): 1-6
Merriam, S.B., Caffarella, R.S. (1991), Learning in adulthood. A
comprehensive guide, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco
Palos, R. (2007). Learning in adulthood, Didactic and Pedagogic Publishing House, Bucharest
Reamon, D. (1995). Educational Interactive Multimedia Software: The
Impact of Interactivity on Learning. Stanford, CA: Stanford University
***http://www.1educat.ro/mediul/dictionar.html, Accessed on:
2009-08-15
***http://www.isim.ro/doc_pdf/oferta&talon-iwe.pdf, Accessed
on: 2009-07-13
***http://www.iiw-iis.org/, Accessed on: 2009-08-15