Product life management system in digital manufacturing environement.
Mocan, Marian Liviu ; Belgiu, George ; Izvercianu, Monica 等
1. INTRODUCTION
The new generations of the Product Life Management (PLM) systems
are now solving various difficulties from the previous technology,
bordering on Web 2.0 principles for answering company needs for
manufacturing process optimization purposes.
Certainly, all existing PLM systems are resolving the storage
obstacles, working out on decisions (by means of fuzzy logic, linguistic
summaries, semantic webs, decision trees, and genetic algorithms). We
are going to realize a new PLM system (called Custom PLM). For this
system we are concerned with the PLM engine (for CAD conversion,
workflows, and data processing), decision and classification module,
search engine, interface module, and interchange module. Also, for a PLM
system important issues are: Product Structure visualization, migration
abilities, process execution and load balancing. We consider a large
company, producing electric motors for general use.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
The company has 20 years experience in CAD/CAE systems, and 15
years experience in CAM technology. An example of 3D CAD model for the
general assembly of an electric motor is presented in figure 1. The
assembly contains approximately 345 objects (parts or files). We have to
consider that the company's business is represented by the
production of special electric motors, three-phase and single-phase
motors, brake electric motors, electric motors for washing machines and
different types of special electric motors. Each of them has more than
200 parts, and in each category we have from 6 to 20 types (depending on
power, dimensions, number of rotations per minute etc.).
[N.sub.OB] = [N.sub.EM] + [N.sub.J] + [N.sub.CAM] + [N.sub.CAE] +
[N.sub.Q] + [N.sub.IA] (1)
Generally, equation (1) presents the number of parts managed by the
PLM system database ([N.sub.OB]--the number of objects), depending on
[N.sub.J]--the necessary number of mechanical jigs, fixtures, molds and
other devices, [N.sub.CAM]--the number of CAM objects, [N.sub.CAE]--the
number of CAE simulation elements, [N.sub.Q]--the number of quality
assurance files, and [N.sub.IA]--the number of additional information
assets.
In our case, [N.sub.OB] [approximately equal to] 3.500.000 objects,
and the number is growing with the rate 55.000/monthly. Most of the
objects are Pro/ENGINEER[R], SolidWorks[R], CATIA[R] Tecnomatix[R]
Delcam[R], and Microsoft Office[R] documents. The equation (1) can be
rewritten:
[N.sub.OB] = [n.sub.K1 x K2] + [K.sub.3] x f(A, B, C) (2)
where: n--the number of eclectic motors types, K1 and
K2--coefficients depending of the Product Data Management system,
[K.sub.3]--a constant depending on PLM system, A--the number of
Collaboration and Project Management objects, B the number of CAD and
Software Integration objects, C--the number of Enterprise Integration
objects.
As we mentioned before, the company has a fragmented IT
architecture (hardware and software) and, at this point, the correct
decision for selection of an appropriate PLM system is a crucial step.
2. CRITICAL OVERVIEW AND THE RESEARCH
2.1 Critical overview
Today, many PLM systems are implemented all over the world. Major
commercial players, such as Windchill[R], Teamcenter[R], Enovia[R] and
others, are very well known for the role in the process of managing the
entire lifecycle of a product from its conception, through design and
manufacture, to service and disposal, as is presented in (*** 2009 a; b;
c; and d). PLM integrates people, data, processes and business systems
and provides a product information backbone for an extended enterprise.
From copyright reasons, in our work we do not refer to a specific PLM
system. We will instead a Commercial PLM system no.1, a Commercial PLM
system no.2, and so on. Numerous authors, like (Lee, 1999) consider the
Product Lifecycle Management system is more close of managing features
of a product through its growth and life, mainly from a business and
engineering point of view; whereas product life cycle management (PLCM)
is to do with the life of a product in the market with respect to
business and commercial costs, sales and measures (Ni et al., 2008;
Batenburg et al., 2005).
Several of the PLM Commercial systems have emerged out of the CAD
and PDM market. The subject of our work was to develop an independent
PLM system, for a medium company, customized according their needs and
their market. A new PLM system must be compliant with Web 2.0, a second
generation of web development and web design. Using this new technology,
the PLM system is facilitating communication, information sharing,
interoperability, user-centered design and collaboration inside of the
enterprise based on the WWW space. The new technology has led to the
development and evolution of the traditional CAD/CAM/CAE systems,
emerging in a web-based communities, hosted services, and web
applications in the digital factory.
2.2 Research course, technical solution
Our aim was to develop a Custom PLM system (i.e. an electric motors
company), with the system software keeping track of all work and all
changes in a set of files, and allowing several engineers and
technicians (potentially widely separated in space and / or time) to
work /collaborate.
The custom PLM system we designed must fulfill a number of ordinary
functions, featured in figure number 2.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
For the operating system we adopted the Linux distribution
openSUSE, supported on an x86-64 platform. For the relational database
management system we adopted MySQL version 5.1. This cross-platform
software application runs as a server providing multi-user access to our
Custom PLM module.
3. THE NEW RESULTS
In our university laboratory we compared a Commercial PLM system
number one (PLM#1), and a Commercial PLM system number two (PLM#2),
against our Custom PLM designed for the electric motors company. The
measured parameters were:
* P1--NOB manipulated;
* P2--price of server installation and 50 clients (workstations);
* P3--PDM capabilities;
* P4--price of operation, training and maintenance capabilities;
* P5--collaboration and Project Management capabilities;
* P6--CAD and software integration capabilities;
* P7--enterprise integration capabilities;
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
The figure number 3 shows only a partial complexity of the
observable facts and could be one-sided, but was confirmed by the
experiments.
4. CONCLUSION
All PLM systems analyzed in this work do not satisfy the entire
needs for P5, P6 and P7. That is mean, if a company have a variety of
CAD/CAM/CAE software tools, heterogenic ERP and hardware, will be in a
difficult position to select the suitable PLM system. For a middle range
organizations, it will be a good alternative to develop the own (custom)
PLM system. The efforts will be compensate by the greater productivity,
high level of speed, functionality, and security.
For our custom PLM collaboration software, further research will be
oriented to optimise the web interface, in order to enables companies to
streamline product development processes, a high-performing technology
platform, regardless of source for software tools and hardware systems.
5. REFERENCES
Batenburg, R.; Helms, R. & Versendaal, J. (2005). The maturity
of Product Lifecycle Management in Dutch Organizations. A strategic
alignment perspective. Available from:
http://www.cs.uu.nl/research/techreps/repo/CS-2005/2005009.pdf.
Accessed: 2009-04-22
Lee, K. (1999). Principles of CAD/CAM/CAE Systems, Addison-Wesley,
pp. 291-319, ISBN 0-201-38036-6, Reading Massachusetts
Ni, Q.; Lu, W.F.; Fang, W.; & Yarlagadda, P., K. (2008). An
extensible product structure model for product lifecycle management in
the make-to-order environment. Concurrent Engineering: Research and
Applications (CERA), 16(4). pp. 243-251, ISSN:1531-2003,
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/ 14638, Accessed: 2009-04-16
*** (2009 a) http://www.ptc.com/products/windchill/--Reduce Risk.
Drive Value; Production-proven content and process management software,
Accesed on:2009-06-0
*** (2009 b) http://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/en_us/
products/tecnomatix--Transforming the process of innovation, Accesed
on:2009-05-2
*** (2009 c) http://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/en_us/
products/teamcenter/index.shtml--Teamcenter, Accesed on:2009-05-25
*** (2009 d) http://www.3ds.com/products/ enovia-ENOVIA
Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management, Accesed on:2009-04-20