The gripping function in mechatronics and biomechanics.
Dolga, Valer ; Dolga, Lia
1. INTRODUCTION
The grip function is of main interest both for engineering- and for
medical field, envisaging manipulation and manufacturing of various
tools, or health care, injury prevention and physical rehabilitation.
Improvement of the gripping skill, using an appropriate prosthesis recovers significantly the affected person's dexterity. As a
result, both medical field and robotics require advanced physical
gripping systems.
Mechatronics brought new openings for robotics. "New
Robotics" employs ideas and principles from biology (Pfeifer et
al., 2005). The synergy between fundamental science, engineering and
medicine is constantly evolving while providing better tools and
techniques. One can outline a parallelism biomechanics- biomechatronics-
biorobotics.
The paper highlights the role of the mechatronic philosophy during
the analysis, the design and the optimization stages of a biomedical- or
robotic gripping system. A unique algorithm for creating and analysing
gripping systems, based on the mechatronic approach, leads to a
concurrent synergistic design.
2. THE GRIPPING ORGAN--THE HUMAN HAND --WITHIN BIOMECHANICS
Within biomechanics, the human hand is both a strong organ--as it
executes the real prehension--and a delicate part because it might
perform thin micro- motions. The human hand is also an essential
sensorial organ that perceives, receives and transmits information (Fig.
1).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
The grip type varies with the shape, the size, the volume and the
weight of the grasped objects, but it is also contingent with the force
and the precision required by the motion. The relative weight
coefficient for a reliable gripping condition is:
[delta] = load force/load hand (1)
A good quality gripping operation requires four properties:
dexterity (configuration of grasping fingers), equilibrium (how hard to
squeeze with the grasping fingers), stability and dynamic behaviour
(Dario, 2000), (Barkat, 2009). The gripping force [F.sub.N] between the
finger and the grasped object produces the friction force [F.sub.f] =
[mu][F.sub.N], which acts in the same area and opposes to the motion
(Fig. 2a). The friction coefficient u. corresponds to the finger- object
contact. The dynamic behaviour of the gripped entity depends upon the
kinematic parameters of the motion (speed, acceleration), the
trajectory, and the massic parameters of the object, (Fig. 2b, c).
An optimal study of the human hand behaviour during the gripping
process requires investigating the gripping force control (Fig. 3a). The
central nervous system (CNS) receives, by the sensing organs, data about
the size, shape, and material of the targeted object and estimates a
force that might guarantee a secure gripping. The gripping force
increases linearly toward the estimated value (Fig. 3b). The
exteroceptive sensory system (the tactile sensors) detects incidental
slides of the object inside the human hand; CNS collects the information
very fast and orders the amplification of the gripping force to a new
value. If no slide of the gripped object occurred, then the gripping
force diminishes to a minimal required value. Next, the gripping force
keeps a constant value and the control process contains thin
micro-motions of the fingers over the contact area, not to break out the
tactile information. The proprioceptive sensory system detects the
internal status regarding the loading of the human hand "motor
system".
Unavailability of a normal vision in reach-to-grasp motion alters
the size of the grip aperture and the temporal features of the transport
component (Connolly, 2008), (Rand, 2007).
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
A complex configuration, with special parameters, typifies the
biomechanical "actuator" of the human hand, since the
mechanism that transmits the force encloses efficient joints, with an
uninterrupted friction, and friction forces of low value. The parts
inertia is low. Dead stroke and lost motion are absent.
The biomechanical analysis of the muscles studies the forces, the
elasticity and the hysteresis and is essential for creating artificial
systems very similar to the human hand.
In addition to the muscles, tendons, bones, joints and nerves, the
human hand includes skin, one of the man's main innate sensors.
Sensorially, the skin plays like a multiple convertor. The
mecano--electrical convertor behaviour helps the CNS to detect whether
the gripped object slides within the hand and to discover shapes and
sizes of the gripped things. The piro--electrical convertor behaviour
allows the sensing of the approximate temperature of the grasped object.
The human hand behaviour served as basis to define a mechatronic
design procedure for artificial or hybrid (artificial- biological)
systems, similar to the human hand.
3. THE MECHATRONIC DESIGN APPROACH OF A GRIPPER
Two features define the nature of the mechatronic systems:
* A functional level, broad, with 6 specific functions: the main
function (with a transformation of an input into an output), the
communication function, the protection function, the control function,
the power function, the structural function;
* An organ level, with the organs that perform the functions of the
system: sensor, computer system, actuator, power supply source,
mechanism.
The decision about the structure of a mechatronic system complies
with two principles from within the machine theory: the vertical
causality principle (principle of cause and effect) and the principle of
secondary functions (a set of secondary functions is always around the
main function).
The innovative "mechatronic design philosophy"
synergistically approaches the system design and maximizes the benefits
reachable by an a priori integration of functionality with embedded
microprocessor control (Amerongen 2007). Fig. 4 shows a fragment of how
the developing principle was applied for the prosthesis / end effector system, where the energetic flow and the information flow were
considered.
The structure of the mechatronic system (Fig. 5) aims at a superior
systemic development. A partition based on the support function of each
subsystem helps to target the aspect. Subsystems design solutions get
more flexibility by shifting the implementation of functionality from
mechanical hardware to computer software, while keeping the mechanical
end-effectors.
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
4. CONCLUSION
The paper outlines new opportunities for robotics & and
biomechanics, focused on the gripping organ. The authors propose a
structuring of the design process, starting from a parallelism
biomechanics--mechatronics applied on the human hand. The configuration
and the systemic development comply with the mechatronic design
philosophy. The system optimization is still an open question for the
authors.
Improving the mechatronic design procedure for robot- and for
prosthesis grippers, involves better models and tools that facilitate
simulation and virtual prototyping of multitechnological systems to
which mechatronic systems belong.
5. REFERENCES
Amerongen, J. (2007). Mechatronic design--a port-based approach,
Proceeding of the 4th International Symposium on Mechatronics and its
Applications (ISMA07), pp ISMA7-1-8, ISSN 20080526144835, Sharjah,
U.A.E. March 26-29, 2007
Barkat, B. et al. (2009). Optimization of grasping forces in
handling of brittle objects Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol.54,
Iss. 54, pp 460-468, ISSN 0921-8890
Connolly, J.& Goodale, M. (2008). The role of visual feedback
of hand position in the control of manual prehension. Exp Brain Res.
Revised 2008, pp 281-286, ISSN 10229019
Dario, F. (2000). Evolutionary Robotics--The Biology, Intelligence
And Technology Of Self-organizing Machines, MIT Press, ISBN: 0262140705
Pfeifer, R.; Iida, F.& Bongard, J. (2005). New robotics: design
principles for intelligent systems. Artificial life. 11(1-2): pp 99-120.
ISSN: 1064-5462
Rand, M.; Lemay, M.; Squire, L.; Shimansky, Y.& Stelmach, G.
(2007). Role of vision in aperture closure control during reach-to-grasp
movements, Exp Brain Res., 2007,181 (3), pp 447-460, ISSN 0014-4819