Achieving high temperature deformation for Al-Mg alloys processed by severe plastic deformation.
Comaneci, Radu ; Zaharia, Luchian ; Chelariu, Romeu 等
1. INTRODUCTION
There is now a great interest in developing highly formable Al-Mg
based alloys for application leading to lightweight vehicles.
Significant efforts have been made to improve the formability and
strength of Al-Mg alloys. Wrought Al-Mg alloys (5xxx series) are
non-heat-treatable. For a small amount of Mg, strength properties of
these alloys are diminishing; but they have good corrosion resistance
and weldability. Because of that, their commercial applications are
restricted to very specific area. Scandium is the only alloying
equilibrated, thermally stable, coherent L12 phase, i.e. [Al.sub.3]Sc,
in aluminum. Thus, [Al.sub.3]Sc precipitate can be used as grain
boundary resistant barrier to coarsening (Kyung-Tae et al., 2005, Musin
et al., 2004).
The principle of developing (super)plasticity through SPD relies on
the properties varying inversely with the submicronic grain size. On
review of earlier works (Noda et al., 2004, Kyung-Tae et al., 2006) it
is shown that to develop superplasticity, the material has to attain
ultrafine grain sizes and retain the ultrafine sizes at elevated testing
temperatures. If these ultrafine grains show reasonable stability at
elevated temperatures, the alloy may exhibit a capability for achieving
good ductility.
The present work thus initiated to explore the potential of
achieving high temperature deformation for Al-1.5Mg alloy without the
third alloying element, trough ECAP technique. By improvement of
mechanical properties and formability of Al-Mg alloys it is possible to
introduce these non-heat-treatable but very good corrosion resistant
alloys in near net shape forming processes.
2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
Ingots of Al-1.35Mg with dimensions of 20x24x150mm were given a
homogenization heat-treatment at 500[degrees]C for 24 hours (this
resulted in coarsening of about 100 [micro]m) and then machined at final
dimensions of 10x10x60mm.
These billets were pressed in an equal-channel angular die of 10 mm
width channel, with a [phi] = 90[degrees] channel intersection angle and
a [psi] = 28[degrees] curvature on the outer side of channel
intersection, see Figure 1. The metal was subjected to a simple share
strain in the bisect plan of the channels, under relative low pressure
compared to the traditional extrusion process. The workpieces were
pressed through the die 6 passes via route BC (rotation of sample by
90[degrees] in same direction after every pass).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
The extrusions were carried out at 293 K at a speed of 8.75 mm/s.
In order to reduce the friction, a solid lubricant was used. The total
equivalent strain accumulated for N = 6 passes was [approximately equal
to] 6 according to well-known Equation (1).
[s.sub.N] - N / [square root of 3][2 cot ([phi] / 2 + [psi] / 2) +
[psi]cso ([phi] / 2 + [psi] / 2)] (1)
where the significance of terms are revealed in Figure 1.
Samples of 24mm total length with 1.25mm gauge height, 10mm gauge
length and 2.5mm gauge width were machined parallel to the longitudinal
axis of the pressed rods by electro-discharge machine. The dimensions
were established according to the rule of proportional rectangular
tensile specimens:
[L.sub.g] = k - [square root of ([A.sub.g])]
where k = 5.65 (from ASTM Standard EN 10002-1) and [L.sub.g] and
[A.sub.g] are the gauge length and gauge area respectively. The
dimensions are imposed by the final dimensions of the work pieces after
ECAP process which step down, Figure 2.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Tensile test is performed at 463, 493 and 523K at an initial strain
rate of 1.68 x [10.sup.-3][s.sup.-1] and 8.4 x [10.sup.-5][s.sup.-1].
The samples were subjected to tensile tests through a mounting device,
Figure 3, under controlled temperature conditions using a universal
INTRON 3382 testing machine and an environmental chamber INSTRON
3119-506. The samples were held at nominal temperatures for 120min.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The Figure 4 shows the typical true stress--true strain curve for
the ECAP processed Al-Mg alloy (six passes) at an initial strain rate of
8.4 x [10.sup.-5][s.sup.-1] for 220[degrees]C.
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
The complete results of performed tensile tests for a strain rate
of 1.68 x [10.sup.-3][s.sup.-1] and 8.4 x [10.sup.-5][s.sup.-1] are
presented in Fig. 5 and 6. passes ECAP (test performed at strain rate
8.4 x [10.sub.-5][s.sup.-1])
Extensive strain hardening takes place initially. After reaching a
maximum, the flow stress continously decreases until failure. The
increase of temperature leads not to a shift of the peak stress to a
higher strain as we expect. That because the lower strain rate
sensitivity of alloy in the testing temperatures range. A steady-state
flow was not found at all examined temperatures despite the fact that
the value of elongation-to-failure is relatively high. No
superplasticity was reported.
We found maximum tensile ductility (122%) at a middle of the
testing temperatures range for the lower strain rate.
As is known from the Considere criterion (Wang & Ma, 2003)
inhomogeneous deformation (necking) sets in when:
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (3)
where a and e are true stress and true strain, respectively.
For rate-sensitive materials, the presence of the strain rate
sensitivity of the flow stress (m) helps to sustain the homogeneous
deformation. The Hart's instability criterion is (Wang & Ma,
2003):
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (4)
These equations indicate that for a high strength material (large
[sigma]), which is the case for UFG metals, sufficiently large strain
hardening and/or strain rate hardening need to be present to sustain the
uniform straining before the onset of localized deformation. A simple
derivation based on Eq. 3 shows that the strain hardening exponent (n)
corresponds to the true strain at necking under uniaxial tension. The
strain hardening and strain rate hardening properties are therefore
important for stable plastic deformation. It seems that without coherent
[Al.sub.3]Sc dispersoids which are highly effective in pinning of
boundaries no exceptional elongations takes place because of the
extensive static growth of structure takes place.
4. CONCLUSIONS
Due to ultra-fine grain structure achieved by ECAP, the Al-1.35Mg
alloy exhibit low flow stress and large degree of ductility at high
temperature and it becomes suitable for near net shape forming
processes. The high formability expands the possibility of product
design together with superior transferability of the die surface to the
metal sheet.
5. REFERENCES
Kyung-Tae, P.; Chong, S. L. and Dong, H. S. (2005). Superplastic
Behavior of as--Equal Channel Angular Pressed 5083 Al and 5083 Al--0.2
Sc Alloys, Materials Science Forum, Vols. 475-479, 2005, pp. 2937-2940.
Kyung-Tae, P.; Chong, S. L.; Yong S. K. and Dong H. S. (2006).
Superplastic Deformation of Ultrafine Grained Al Alloy Processed by ECAP
and Post-Rolling, Materials Science Forum, Vols. 503-504,2006, pp.
119-124.
Musin, F.; Kaibyshev, R.; Motohashi, Y. and Itoh, G. (2004).
Superplastic behaviour and microstructure evolution in a commercial
ultra-fine grained Al-Mg-Sc alloy, Materials Science Forum, Vols.
447-448, 2004, pp. 417-422.
Noda, M.; Funami, K.; Hirohashi, M. and Kobayashi, M. (2004) Effect
of Grain Size and Microstructure on Appearance of Low Temperature
Superplasticity in Al-Mg Alloy, Materials Science Forum, Vols. 447-448,
2004, pp. 435-440.
Wang, Y.M. and Ma. E. (2003). Strain Hardening and Strain Rate
Sensitivity of Ultrafine-Grained Metals, Journal of Metastable and
Nanocrystalline Materials, Vol. 17, 2003, pp. 55-64.
Fig. 5. Evolution of mechanical properties for Al-1.35Mg after 6
passes ECAP (test performed at strain rate 1.68 x [10.sup.-3]
[s.sup.-1])
190[degrees]C 220[degrees]C 250[degrees]C
Rm [MPa] 90.89 56.07 39.02
Rp0.2 [MPa] 73.01 41.19 32.15
A [%] 27.89 42.40 47.63
Note: Table made from bar graph.
Fig. 6. Evolution of mechanical properties for Al-1.35Mg after 6
190[degrees]C 220[degrees]C 250[degrees]C
Rm [MPa] 71.12 68.57 58.79
Rp0.2 [MPa] 38.36 34.48 31.41
A [%] 66.29 122.57 107.55
Note: Table made from bar graph.