CAM strategies and surfaces accuracy.
Peterka, Jozef ; Pokorny, Peter ; Vaclav, Stefan 等
1. INTRODUCTION
The basic sign of CAM is to minimize human intervention into the
course of the production process by the exploitation of computer data
processed in main elements of activities (Kuric et al., 2001).
The machining process is generally divided into roughing and
finishing (Morovic, 2006).
Very important for CNC program generation is the choice of
machining strategy. This strategy has influence on the final accuracy
and final quality of machined part (Lipa & Moravcikova, 2007).
Machining strategy is tool movement in machine space.
The machining strategy influences the surface accuracy and also
herewith the technological properties of construction. It is very
important for assembly (Senderska, 2006).
2. MODELLING AND PART MANUFACTURING
2.1 Part modelling
For research of influence of CAM strategies on surface accuracy was
created the part (fig.1) in PowerShape system. The model has three
identical cylindrical surfaces. Three different finishing strategies
will be applied on these surfaces.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
2.2 CNC data generation
Model was loaded to CAM system PowerMill. There were (after block,
tool and milling strategy choosing) generated CNC data for roughing,
rest machining, shape machining and finishing.
For finishing of individual cylindrical surfaces these strategies
choosen were:
* Optimized Constant Z (fig.2).
* Spiral Finishing (fig.3).
* Offset Finishing (fig.4).
Tool and cutting conditions were identical for all three choosen
strategies:
* End mill - D = 6 mm, z = 2.
* [v.sub.f] = 3000 mm. [min.sup.-1].
* n = 6000 [min.sup.-1].
* [a.sub.e] = 0,305 mm.
* [f.sub.z] = 0,25 mm.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
Machining (roughing, rest machining, shape machining, and
finishing) was realized by CNC milling centre EAGLE 1000 with control
system Haidenhein i530.
3. MEASURING OF CYLINDRICAL SURFACES
Measuring of machined cylindrical surfaces was realized by optical
3D scanner GOM ATOS I--non contact measuring method (fig.5a) and after
that the cylindrical surfaces was measured by Contura G2--contact
measuring method (fig.5b).
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
Firstly, we scanned milled model by measuring with machine GOM ATOS
I. So we got computer model of produced component. We also compared this
model with computer model which was created according to technical
documentation. This method is called CAD Comparison. (Buransky, 2008)
There is coloured map of deviations produced surfaces and computer
surfaces (fig.6).
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
By measuring with CMM machine Contura G2 were all three cylindrical
surfaces measured gradualy. Each measuring was realized three times.
After the measuring the arithmetical means of measured values were
calculated. We got the values of deviation for applied milling
strategies (fig.7).
[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]
4. CONCLUSION
The individual results of measuring are in (tab.1). Here are some
used strategies of milling operation and appropriate deviations for non
contact measuring and contact measuring.
It is liquet that for simple cylindrical surface the most suitable
is the Optimized Constant Z milling strategy. The smallest deviations
were recognized in both types of measuring.
According to the table it is possible to compare the differences
between measuring of CMM machine and non contact machine. From CMM
measuring we have expected the more correct results. And that was
approved. The precision of res ults depends on the type of measuring.
In further research, we will mill more types of surfaces and also
the free form surfaces. The various strategies of milling will be
applied on these surfaces. The influence of milling strategies on
precision of produced surfaces and the roughness of surface will be
observed.
This article was written for grantproject VEGA 1/0130/08 Research
of influence of CAM strategies on achieved dimension accuracy and
roughness of machined surface in conditions of university Hi-tech
laboratory.
5. REFERENCES
Buransky, I.; (2008) Utilizing Optical Methods of Measuring in
Machines Production Technologies, In: International doctoral
seminar:Proceedings, AlumniPress, pp. 48-53 ISBN 978-80-8096-058-2,
Smolenice
Kuric, I.; Kosturiak, J.; Janac, A.; Peterka, J. & Marcincin,
J. (2001). Computer Aided systems in the Engineering, Edis, ISBN
80-7100-984-2, Zilina
Lipa, Z.; Moravcikova, J.; (2007) The contribution of kinematic ratios in machining, In: Development of metal cutting DMC 2007, SjFTU
pp. 225-22, ISBN 978-80-8073-858-7, Kosice
Morovic, L.; (2006). Utilization of Reverse Engineering in the
Design and Manufacturing of Sport Shoes, In: International Doctoral
Seminar, STU MTF, pp. 178, ISBN 80-227-2387-8, Smolenice
Senderska, K.; (2006). Approaches and Tools to Evaluation Support
of Product Construction for Assembly, In: Inovations Transfer, SjF TU,
pp. 214-215, ISBN 80-8073-701-0, Kosice
Tab 1. Results for milling strategies
STRATEGY MEASURED VALUES [mm]
CMM GOM ATOS I
Contura G2
Optimized
Constant Z 0,0356 0,08
Spiral 0,0442 0,12
Offset 0,0491 0,09