Cultural and creative tourism as the factor of the rural community development--the case of Nakovana, Peljesac Peninsula.
Letunic, Stijepo ; Dragicevic, Marija ; Brautovic, Helena 等
1. INTRODUCTION
Attractions have been viewed by many as central to the tourism
process. They are often the reason for visiting a particular destination
(Richards, 2002). Strategies and program of tourism based on
cultural-historical heritage is relatively new throughout the World.
Cultural tourism is the fastest growing market in Europe, although
empirical arguments are rare. Culture is becoming the basis for the
"economy of experience", and cultural tourism its major part
(Richards, 2002). Every destination is unique in its own way, and this
uniqueness is what attracts tourists. Tourism based on the cultural and
historical heritage is an excellent way to put history and art in the
middle of the economic growth of a destination (Brook, 2000). Active
participation of tourists in cultural programs, i.e. a creative
component of a cultural tourist offer is an extremely interesting
segment of a tourist offer. The programs to include cultural and
historical heritage into a tourist offer should help some Croatian areas
in developing new destinations or in improving existing environmental
characteristics and cultural destinations. Unfortunately, in the
Republic of Croatia this does not still gain enough attention. The aim
of this paper is to point out to the possibilities of the development of
cultural and creative tourism on Peljesac peninsula, in the place called
Nakovana, whose extraordinary cultural potential has not yet been
evaluated from the tourism angle.
2. CULTURAL AND CREATIVE TOURISM
Cultural tourism can be defined as a type of tourists' special
interest in the search for a more extensive participation in new
cultural experiences, esthetic, intellectual, emotional and
psychological values (Xie & Wall, 2001). Today's tourists are
seeking to actively participate in cultural events. This is possible in
the area of creative tourism. In this matter, tourist buys dreams, i.e.
escape from everyday life is commercialized (Schouten, 2002). It is much
cheaper to develop creative than cultural tourism. It is based on
conveying local skills and experience to the tourists in a suitable
environment, and it does not require a developed infrastructure, which
is not the case with cultural tourism. Visitors seek for a unique
experience, funny and unusual adventures which provoke curiosity and
rouse emotional reactions (Schouten,1995).
Physical remains of the past, whether it is a landscape, site or a
building, can be presented to visitors in many ways. The real challenge
is to find a way to make remains of the past present in today's
everyday life and interesting to the tourists at the same time. Creative
tourism is becoming more and more the main factor of the development of
the outlying districts. There are very successful examples of the
cultural and creative tourism development in the world. Programs of
including cultural heritage in tourist supply should help Croatia at the
development of new destinations or improve exisiting ones. It could
attract new visitors and stimulate local economy. Creative production
processes can also attract enterprises, and individuals involved in the
cultural sector (Richards & Wilson, 2006). The main purpose of
Croatian tourism development should be creation of sustainable
development based on unique cultural heritage.
3. THE POSSIBILITIES OF CULTURAL AND
CREATIVE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN NAKOVANA
Peljesac, peninsula in the South Dalmatia is the region with many
different cultures existing throughout history (Peljesac tourist
monography, 2003). In the Western part of the peninsula there is a place
called Nakovana, consisting of two villages, Upper and Lower Nakovana.
Nakovana is situated in the ecological area and it has a rich fond of
endemic plants and rare animals. In the close vicinity to the villages
there are unique historical sites like Spila, where the 8000 year
Neolithic remains have been found, an intact Illyrian shrine from the
4th century B.C., the Illyrian hill-fort Gradina, the Illyrian
tombstones, medieval chapels, and a family house of a torpedo inventor
Ivan Lupis Vukic. Both villages are unfortunately abandoned and mostly
devastated. One can conclude that the whole place is abandoned due to
the fact that only one family lives during the entire year. The other
owners of the family houses which are in better state, visit the village
just occasionally. The climate is typical Mediterranean and convenient
for development of tourism.
3.1. Existing cultural attractions and their state
3.1.1. Spila
With its three halls, the cave was a shelter already 8000 years
ago. It represents a very rare finding and the richest finding from the
Illyrian time in the World. A great number of artifacts were found,
witnessing a life of Illyrians of that time. It is mostly about the
ceramic dishes, imported mainly from Greece and Greek colonies
(Forenbacher & Kaiser, 2003). The foundings are concentrated around
stalagmite which dominates in the cave. It has been symbol of fertility
for Ilirians in Nakovana. The collected amounts of the artifacts would
be sufficient to open a middle-size museum. Unfortunatelly, the site is
not prepared for the tourists' visits, therefore there are no
organized visits to the site and there is not any financial interest
from which the local community would make any profits. However, there
was an exhibition of some of the artifacts found in Spila in the
Rector's Palace in Dubrovnik, where many prominent researchers and
scientists from around the World as well as from Croatia participated,
and which aroused huge interest with the public. This only witnesses a
great importance of the finding.
3.1.2 Hill Grad
This place had outstanding geo-strategic position from which the
whole Adriatic see could have been controlled. The area was populated by
the Illyrians during the ancient times, and they strengthened Grad by
building terraces and walls, thus turning it into one of the most
fortified towns in the Adriatic. Illyrians used this place to start
their war and pirate crusades. Today, only the fundaments of the Grad
are visible. The Illyrian masters of this exquisite city are buried in
tumulus graves, which are in the close vicinity.
3.1.3. Illyrian tumuli
In the footage of Grad, there are about hundred Illyrian tumuli,
called "Greek tumulus", which are artificial mounds over a
grave. Some of them are of a monumental size, more than twenty meters in
diameter and about four meters of height. They had been made from stone
in the form of circle ground-plan. There are about 80 tumuli found in
the Nakovana area. Limited number of tumuli points to the conclusion
that they have not been built only for important persons. Unfortunately,
they have all been excavated and destroyed in the search of treasure.
3.1.4. Fort on Spila Gubavica
It can be said that this area is one of the most preserved Illyrian
tumuli. This pile is what has remained from an Illyrian fort which was
built to monitor the Peljesac channel. Today, it is an extraordinary
belvedere.
3.1.5. Upper and Lower Nakovana villages
Upper and Lower Nakovana villages were first mentioned in the 14th
century, although there had been some settlements even before. They can
be considered as a true jewel in the autochthones architecture. During
the Second World War the the Lower Nakovana village was burnt by the
Italian army. After Peljesac came under German occupation most
population exiled to Sahara desert, in El Shattt, Egypt. After the
Second World War most population migrated to other parts of the world,
like New Zealand and Australia. Few important persons have their origin
in village Nakovana. One of them is Ivan Lupis-Vukovic, the torpedo
inventor, and the first Croatian in New Zealand, Pavle Lupis. Although
many buildings are devastated, and are need reconstruction, some houses
have been preserved, as well as the traditional equipment that has been
used in everyday living.
3.1.6. Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary Church
This is church was mentioned in the 14th century for the first time
although it probably originates from the 12th or the 13th century, which
would mean that this is the oldest church where the mass is still
celebrated. The church is still in good condition thanks to the
inhabitants who take good care for the church. The feast of Nativity of
the Blessed Virgin Mary, the 8th September attracts many local people,
emigrants to far away countries, domestic and foreign tourists. In the
past, up to five hundred inhabitants from neighboring places used to
visit Nakovana on the 8th September. After the mass and procession, they
have continued the feast with some social activities and the traditional
dance. Since 2004 this tradition has been continued.
3.2. Development directions
The beginnings of the tourist valorization of Nakovana could be
primarily directed towards creativity in culture. The tourists would be
able to experience the past by actively participating in different kinds
of workshops and organized excursions in Nakovana area. It demands
additional education of human resource. With minor financial
investments, some of the existing buildings could be restored and used
as an adequate accommodation for a certain number of tourists. Next
phase of development should stimulate the project of the cultural and
creative tourism development. Strategic plan for the development has to
be made and some operative plans as well, in cooperation with local
inhabitants and associations. The state could be a significant factor in
stimulating investments, participating in financing and supporting the
project in any other ways. Tourist board should be involved in
stimulating and improving of original values and attractions. Local
community, i.e. local inhabitants should be actively included into the
provision of services. It is necessary to improve the existing
infrastructure and telecommunication. An urgent reconstruction of the
village into its original state is necessary too, in order to preserve
the authenticity of the place. Building apartment complex and violation
of autochthony is out of question. Building of all other side objects of
the tourist offer should be managed in accordance with the principles of
sustainable development. Beside the main road which is satisfactory,
there are many side roads in a very poor condition, and some of the
sites are impossible to reach at all. The tourist development of
Nakovana village could be aided by the fact that it is located in
vicinity of Viganj and Loviste, who have accommodation capacities and
other tourist facilities.
4. CONCLUSION
Especially attractive segment of tourist supply is tourist active
participation in cultural events. That is a creative component of
tourist supply. Development of this alternative form of tourism can
improve the attractive features of destination and bring multiplicative
financial benefits. Although these programs are rather new in the world,
there are many successful examples of the development of cultural and
creative tourism in the local communities. Unfortunately, the abundance
of the cultural resources has not yet been used to a full extent in the
Republic of Croatia. There are still many potentially interesting and
attractive tourist destinations that have not valorized their resources
yet. One of them is village Nakovana with an extreme cultural wealth
that could be categorized as very rare, but not valorized in the tourism
sense. The village is attractive because of its location, authentic
architecture, numerous historical findings and tradition. It is
necessary to induce a tourist valorization of this extremely interesting
area.
5. REFERENCES
Brook, R. (2000). Kulturno povijesna bastina hrvatskih mjesta u
funkciji turizma: izazovi, mogucnosti, potencijali, Turizam, (Cultural
and historical heritage of the Croatian places in the function of
tourism: challenges, possibilities, potentials, Tourism), Vol.48., No.,
4., 2000., pp. 407-412.
Forenbacher, S. & Kaiser, T. (2003). Spila Nakovana (The Cave
of Nakovana), V.B.Z., Zagreb
Schouten, F. (2002). Razvoj proizvoda za lokalitete naslijeda:
studija slucaja, Turizam, (Development of the product for the heritage
localities: case study, Tourism), Vol. 50., No. 3., pp. 285-293
Richards, G. (2002). Od kulturnog do kreativnog turizma: europske
perspektive, Turizam,(From cultural to creative tourism: European
perspectives, Tourism), Vol. 50., No. 3., pp. 229-236
Richards, G. & Wilson, J. (2006). Developing creativity in
tourist experiences: A solution to the serial reproduction of culture?
Tourism Management, No. 27., pp. 1209-1223
Richards, G. (2002). Tourism attraction systems exploring Cultural
Behaviour, Annals of TourismResearch, Vol. 29., No. 4., pp. 1048-1064
Schouten, F. (1995). Improving visitor care in heritage
attractions, Tourism Management, Vol. 16., No. 4., pp 259-261
Xie, P.E. & Wall, G. (2001). Iskustva kulturnog turizma na
Hainanu: prostorni prerazmjestaj etnosela, Turizam, (The experience of
the cultural tourism on Hainan: space reconfiguration of ethno-village,
Tourism), Vol. 49., No. 4., pp. 375- 382
Peljesac, tourist monography, Zagreb, 2003.