Experimental damping determination in beam bifurcation process.
Dolecek, Vlatko ; Isic, Safet ; Voloder, Avdo 等
1. INTRODUCTION
A beam is the most used element in many engineering constructions.
Because of its specific dimensions, stability loss most likely occurs
than overcome of allowable stress. So, beam bifurcation of stability is
still the problem of interests of many authors (Isic et al.,2007).
Bifurcation of beam equilibrium position is mostly analyzed by using
static approach, where postcritical equilibrium path is the subject to
be determined (Thompson & Hunt,1973; Zyczkowski, 2005). Because of
that, dynamics of bifurcation process is not widely analyzed.
Load causing bifurcation is almost assumed as the constant, while
in many practical problems load changes its magnitude according to deformation of buckled beam. Bifurcation of equilibrium of beam
straight-line position under axial load, which changes magnitude with
beam deformation, may produce moderate displacement and beam still
remains in elastic range (Isic et al.,2007). As the result of the
bifurcation, after departure from primary position, vibration around new
secondary equilibrium position appears. While stiffness and stress
stiffness change due to large displacement may be taken into account by
using higher order terms of cross-section curvature and beam shortening
(Isic et al.,2007; Thompson & Hunt,1973), damping remains unknown.
Experimental modeling may only be used to its determination (Beards,
1996; Virgin, 2000).
In this paper experimental determination of dumping in beam
vibration is presented, caused by bifurcation buckling under axial load,
which is produced by compression of elastic body with known stiffness.
The load magnitude depends on deformation of buckled beam. Equipment for
experimental measurement is also presented, which consists of supports
for beam-like specimens, mechanism for force adjustment with
strain-gauge dynamometer, piezo-accelerometer and digital amplifier. It
is assumed viscous damping scheme, and damping coefficient is determined
in function of beam length and second moment area of cross-section. For
specific specimen, viscous damping coefficient is calculated from
logarithmic decrement of amplitude and vibration frequency, which are
determined from time-domain analysis of acquiesced accelerograms of
bifurcation process. Acceleration in imposed vibrations is measured by
mounted piezo-accelerometer, connected to PC over digital amplifier,
while applied force is controlled by mechanism with dynamometer.
2. EXPERIMENT SETUP AND MEASUREMENT
On the Fig. 1 scheme of the experiment setup is presented.
Beam-like specimen 4 is connected to the testing platform 7 using two
supports 3 and 5 (pinned or clamped). Axial force is applied over
mechanism in the axially movable support 3 and measured with strain gage
dynamometer 2. The dynamometer is hollow steel tube with bonded strain
gages LY11 6/120, connected in the full bridge. The dynamometer is also
main guide bush of axially movable support. An acceleration is measured
on the middle point of the specimen by connected piezo-accelerometer
KD37V. The specimen is restrained in straight-line initial position by
auxiliary support 6, until force is regulated to the desired value,
greater than calculated critical buckling force. After that, specimen is
allowed to buckle and record of axial force and acceleration is acquired
using digital amplifier SPIDER 8 and PC with CATMAN 5.0 software.
Using presented experiment setup the acceleration for given axial
force and stiffness of dynamometer are measured. Characteristic
accelerogram is given on the Fig. 2.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Measured accelerograms show two different rates of amplitude decay.
In the beginning of the process large amplitudes appear, which are
non-symmetric around time axes, what shows presence of departure of beam
from initial straight-line position. After that process is finished in
the vibration around new buckled configuration. The accelerograms of the
process enable measurement of acceleration amplitudes, vibration period
and frequency of vibration.
3. CALCULATION OF DAMPING COEFFICIENT
In case of a single d.o.f. system, logarithmic decrement of the
amplitude may be calculated from the following expression
[LAMBDA] = C[pi]/M[omega] (1)
where C is viscous damping, M is mass of the system, [omega] is
vibration frequency and [LAMBDA] is logarithmic decrement.
Previous expression could be easily derived from corresponding
differential equation of damped vibration. It is shown in [2] that beam
deform according to buckling eigenmode. The vibration in the bifurcation
process could then be described by using single nonlinear differential
equation, which is derived by using finite elements method. Mass M and
damping C in (1) is then replaced by
M = [D.sup.T.sub.0][MD.sub.0]
C = [D.sup.T.sub.0][CD.sub.0] (2)
where M is mass matrix, C is viscous damping matrix for damping
coefficient [kappa] = 1, and [D.sub.0] is normalized buckling
eigenvector in which characteristic displacement (in
experiment--displacement of the specimen middle point) has unit value.
Using equation (2), coefficient of viscous damping [kappa], in case
of considered vibration of buckled beam, could be calculated as
[kappa] = M/C[pi] [omega][LAMBDA] (3)
Equation (3) implies that damping factor for specific case could be
calculated from measured vibration frequency and logarithmic decrement
of a acceleration amplitude.
4. MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF DAMPING
It is assumed that viscous damping coefficient k may be expressed
in shape of polynomial function of length and second moment area of the
beam-like specimen as
[kappa] = [b.sub.0] + [b.sub.1] L + [b.sub.2][I.sub.z] + [b.sub.12]
[LI.sub.z] (4)
where [b.sub.0], [b.sub.1], [b.sub.2], [b.sub.12] are constants to
be determined, L is specimen length and [I.sub.z] is second moment area.
Unknown constants in the polynomial expression (4) are determined
from [2.sup.2] factor experiment with repetition in every point of
experimental plan. Experimental measurements are done with four
specimens with two different lengths and two different second moment
areas, from which is possible to construct four points in plan of the
experiment. Obtained results in eight provided measurements are given in
the Table 1.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
The analysis of given results shows that all coefficients
[b.sub.i], i = 1,2,12 are significant if Student t-test is used with
confidence level of 95%. From presented experimental results following
mathematical model for damping coefficient could be derived
[kappa] = 159.98 - 515.70L - 17.77 x [10.sup.12][I.sub.z] + 59.08 x
[10.sup.12][LI.sub.z] (5)
which provides regression coefficient R [greater than or equal to]
0.95.
Fig. 3 shows dependency of damping coefficient on used factors of
experiment: length and second moment area.
5. CONCLUSION
Experimental damping determination of vibration induced by
bifurcation buckling under displacement dependent axial force is
presented. Damping is assumed as viscous linear damping and damping
coefficient is experimentally determined. Polynomial expression is given
for damping coefficient, where appropriate coefficients are given. It is
shown that damping could be modelled in function of beam geometry
(length and second moment area). Given mathematical model for viscous
damping calculation is chosen to give average amplitude decay in
buckling process, while experimental results show different amplitude
decay in the short beginning part than in the other part of measured
accelerograms.
6. REFERENCES
Beards, C.F. (1996). Structural Vibration--Analysis and Damping,
Arnold, ISBN 0-340-64580-6, London.
Isic S.; Dolecek, V.; Karabegovic, I. (2007). Numerical and
Experimental Analysis of Postbuckling Behaviour of Prismatic Beam Under
Displacement Dependent Loading, Proceedings of First Serbian Congress on
Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, pp. 331-338, ISBN 978-86-909973-05,
Sumarac, D., Kuzmanovic, D. (Ed.), Kopaonik, Serbia, April 2007.
Thompson, J.M.T.; Hunt, G.W. (1973). A General Theory of Elastic
Stability, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0 471 85991 5, London.
Virgin, L.N. (2000). Introduction to Experimental Nonlinear
Dynamics: A Case Study in Mechanical Vibration, Cambridge University
Press, ISBN 0-521-66286-9.
Zyczkowski, M. (2005). Post-buckling analysis of nonprismatic
columns under general behaviour of loading, International Journal of
Non-Linear Mechanics, Vol. 40, Issue 4, pp. 445-463, May 2005, ISSN 0020-7462.
Tab. 1. Results of experiment.
Value of experimental Viscous Damping Factor
factors [kappa]
Point of plan L [m] [I.sub.z] Outcome Outcome
of experiment [[m.sup.4]] [().sub.(1)] [().sub.(2)]
1 0.300 0.7840-10-11 4.911 4.875
2 0.339 0.7840-10-11 2.921 2.764
3 0.300 0.1065-10-10 4.355 5.158
4 0.339 0.1065-10-10 9.033 9.328