Experimental results concerning the geometric, structural and dimensional differences in fiber reinforced composites.
Vlase, Sorin ; Modrea, Arina ; Burca, Ioan 等
1. INTRODUCTION
This part presents experimental results concerning composite
materials reinforced with fibers. In the first part we have presented
the influence of dimensional, structural or geometric differences on the
values of the engineering constants of a composite. The theoretical
considerations (Modrea, 2001, a,b,c,d) were proved by experimental
procedures.
2. TESTA AND SPECIMENS
To verify the mentioned properties was tested specimens made
respecting the existing standards. The tests was made for traction and
bending.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
In fig.1 and 2 are presented some plastic specimens with the
industrial name of PEJS (low density poly ethylene) and PEID (high
density poly ethylene) used in the tests. These materials were made by
Intreprinderea Mecanica Targu-Mures. The specimens were organized after
the type of the test, in many groups, every group having ten specimens
and some reserved specimens. In the case when the specimens were
destroying near the ends, they were changed by a reserve specimen.
In the same time were executed specimens for the bending test,
respecting the existing standards.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
Other specimens for traction and bending tests for a composite
material reinforced with carbon fibers. These were made to S.C.COMPOSITE
srl Brasov, for traction (fig.3) and bending (fig.4) tests.
To the same enterprise was made specimens with resins matrix and
glass fibers, oriented parallel, perpendicular and to an angle of
45[degrees] (fig.5).
3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
For the traction tests was used the machine existing in the
laboratory of TRANSILVANIA University. Tests for the materials PEID and
PEJD with the series numbered T01 and T02 was made. In one series the
specimen was numbered between one and ten.
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]
For the four series of tests was obtained the following values for
the Young modulus: [E.sub.T01]=271,145MPa; [E.sub.T02]=203,951 MPa ;
[E.sub.T03] = 229,396 MPa ; [E.sub.T04] = 196,108 MPa. The specimens
made by resin reinforced with glass fibers, FSU and FSB, parallel with
the specimen, were tested to traction. The dependence
force--displacements was represented in fig.7. The series of these
specimens was numbered T05 and T06.
The specimens numbered FSMB-1 to FSMB-10 were tested to bending and
the dependence force displacement is presented in fig. 9.
[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 9 OMITTED]
4. CONCLUSIONS
The calculus made for the analyzed specimens compared with the
experimental results shown that for a number of specimens the measured
results are outside the calculated bounds of elastic moduli. This
conclusions denote that the difference between the theoretic dimension,
geometry and structure and the real composite conduce to difference,
sometimes notable, between the calculated and real values of the
mechanical properties. From these considerations results that is
necessary to study how the differences mentioned can influence the
properties of the composite material.
5. REFERENCES
Goia, I., Modrea, A., s.a. (1999). Calculus of the Mechanical
Properties for the Composite Materials. A IX-a Conferinta internafionala
CONAT, Brasov
Modrea, A., s.a. (2001, a). Evaluation of the elastic parameter for
a composite when the strain/stress field is obtain via finite element method. A III-a Conferinta de dinamica masinilor, Brasov, pp.365-370
Modrea, A., s.a. (2001, b). Evaluation of homogenized coefficients
for fiber reinforced plastic. A III-a Conferinta de dinamica masinilor,
Brasov, pp.371-374
Modrea, A., s.a. (2001, c). Mathematical Background for Evaluation
of Homogenized Coefficients for Fiber Reinforced Plastic (FRP). A III-a
Conferinta de dinamica masinilor, Brasov, pp. 375-378
Modrea, A., s.a. (2001, d). Mathematical Background for Evaluation
of Homogenized Coefficients for Fiber Reinforced Plastic (FRP). A III-a
Conferinta de dinamica masinilor, pp. 375-378, Brasov