New strategies for designing assemblies.
Marin, Gheorghe ; Petrescu, Ligia ; Dolga, Lia 等
1. INTRODUCTION
The complex transformations, which have occurred in the field of
designing and manufacturing products, consist in reducing the renewal
and supply cycle, increasing requirements on functionality and technical
and quality level, reducing dimensions of the production batches,
parallel to the increase of the production systems flexibility. These
transformations have determined factories to change their obsolete
industrial strategies, to seek for permanent innovation and
implementation as soon as possible of new technologies from the
research-development field to the production one.
In the last decade, throughout the world, the production facilities
in the goods field have been brought up-to-date beginning from the
activity of designing, production planning and processes checking to the
systems that provide measurements of the production process parameters
or measurements of the dimensional, functional and shape product
parameters.
It is well known that in the economically developed countries
(which hold "de facto" the supremacy in efficiency, quality
and performances), using computer in researchdesigning activity,
production, process checking and quality certification has no longer
been considered as a natural matter but as a necessity, a necessary
prerequisite that is not always an enough condition for market survive.
This writing intends to survey the main strategies, solutions used
at present in the field of computer-aided design, generally, and
mechanical assemblies design, particularly.
2. NEW COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGNING STRATEGIES FOR MECHANICAL
ASSEMBLIES
We can say without being wrong that a today's most widespread
and appreciated working tool of engineers from all over the world is the
computer. This extraordinary development of the information science is
due to the unique qualities of the computer in comparison with human
being (Fig. 1).
Indeed, the large successful use of the computer in almost all
activity fields including engineering has been resulted from its very
large memorizing capacity, impressive computing speed under computing
accuracy conditions many times more than sufficient, visualization
facilities as well as "patience" and "working
capacities". The computer-aided industrial processes lead not only
to an automation of same activities carried on by specialized employees
but also to the introduction of the entire available technological
knowledge for that production line in the
research-designing-planning-production-checking process. (Boothroyd, G.
2005).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Nowadays, the CAD (Computer-Aided Design) systems market is one of
the largest and most dynamic in the world and there are millions of
applications
Regardless of the application type or the platform which those
applications are created for we can notice the permanent effort of the
producing companies for developing new programs that offer the
possibility to reduce to a minimum the designing time, the production
expenses as well as the designing effort.
On that context (Rao, P. N. 2004), we can notice some important
trends for CAD systems development:
a. Applications integration: allows the model achievement,
description in detail, its analysis and finally manufacturing having one
virtual model, using the same interface; in this way the operator's
acquaintance with those applications is facilitated, being avoided the
date files translations. The unique product model includes all the
necessary information for each process and iterations take place
efficiently and quickly. In fact, in this case we are considering a CAE (Computer-Aided Engineering) application including modules for geometric
modeling, structural analysis, mechanism analysis and simulation, finite
element analysis for different requirement types, for dynamical Internet
data publishing, for documents management, etc.
b. Visualization facilities: have already reached a professional
level (Shipulsky, M. 2007), including options like radiosity, ray
tracing, photorealistic mapping, parametric animation, possibility to
manipulate cameras, etc.
c. Interconnection and team work: in today's world of
different designing systems and of necessity to convey projects, a
designing environment should be as open as possible. The operations
change is essential among systems that place at disposal and share
resources for designing process, either among teams within the same
company or among research groups from all over the world. In this way,
the designing environments have modules allowing the control on the
drawing standards; various symbols are stored in one single library for
an easy maintenance and an efficient using (Lamarche, B.; Rivest R.
2007).
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
d. Digital signature: by applying such a signature on a certain
area of the project the professional people can offer the legal access
to the create drawings. The digital signatures allow the authentication
of the stored drawings and provide information on the designer identity
and putting up-to-date made after project publication. By means of the
programs, the signature falsification or modification is not possible.
e. On-line data change and Internet connection: allow the
connection to different parts catalogues or the Internet seeking of a
certain producer whose parts match the in-process project, in this way
the designing time and efforts are shortened. When the item is found it
can be included in the model (Fig. 2), thus the data change could take
place among the designing team members, among corporations and even
among distributors (by including URL addresses in the model).
f. Hybrid modeling: represents the capacity to model 3D solids
using both wireframe entities or solids and surfaces; all these describe
the same geometric solid and have the advantage of a mixed solver
(parametric and functional); also, the hybrid modeling includes the
capacity to edit and modify the model under various techniques not
depending on the way the model was achieved but on the operator
necessity at one time.
Primitives and model features handling: graphically shows the tree
structure of model achievement history and allows modifications of
parameters and position of any element in the tree (Fig. 3). In case of
modifications causing an impossibility to achieve elements dependent on
the modified one, the system warns the operator very fast.
Using subassemblies technique (modular designing): reduces the
complexity of the designing process for it allows to focus the effort on
a single component at a moment (different assembly parts will be modeled
one by one and are to be put together in the final stage) and also for
the fact that the same part may be used several times in the same
assembly or in different assemblies. (one feature modification will
automatically appear in all positions where the feature appears). That
working way removes project date redundancy and makes fit different
parts of the assembly (*** 2008).
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
The assembly Part Manager (Fig. 3) allows parts achievement and
their modification within the assembly by using one of the techniques
"from complex to simple" (the designer makes a general
assembly plan and a hasty draft of every parts and hands them over to
other people to finish and at the end he is to put together all the
parts) or "from simple to complex" (each part is separately
designed and then it is attached to the assembly) which best suit to the
chosen purpose.
g. Relative movements can be defined for the parts of an assembly
and thus, there is the possibility to detect the eventual collisions
that may appear among moving parts (Fig. 4). Also, there is possible to
attach couplings to another subassembly so that each may have its own
coupling system (very useful thing when the movement of some subassembly
parts is desired).
3. CONCLUSION
The mechanical field designing is subject to some powerful
pressures because of the increasing competitions and market
globalization, more and more increased clients' requirements and
quickly developing technology. As a result, companies have to be more
productive, more responsible and flexible in order to survive and have
success. The CAD mechanical packages become more efficient in terms of
their cost. They are production-orientated, easy to use and allow data
management, issuing materials list, parametric surfaces and solids
modeling, various analysis and simulations, numeric control, etc.
There are also achieved interfaces according to the international
and national standards, other applications and CAD/CAM/CAE systems,
which are our next goals of research.
4. REFERENCES
Boothroyd, G. (2005). Assembly Automation And Product Design Second
Edition, CRC Press Taylor& Francis Group, ISBN I-57444-643-6, Broken
Sound Parkway, New York, USA.
Lamarche, B.; Rivest R. (2007). Dynamic Product Modelling with
Inter-Features Associations: Comparing Customization and Automation.
Computer Aided Design and Applications, Vol. 4, No. 6, (June 2007) p.
(877-880), ISSN 1686-4360
Rao, P. N. (2004). ACAD/ CAM Principles and Applications, Tata
McGraw Hill, ISBN 0070583730, Broken Sound Parkway, New York, USA
Shipulsky, M. (2007). Successful design for assembly, Available
from: http://www.assemblymag.com/CDA/ Articles/Feature_Article/
BNP_GUID_9-5-2006_A_10000000000000059386 Accessed: 2008-04-10
*** (2008). Design for assembly, Available from:
http://www.teamset.com/design-for-assembly-2.html Accessed: 2008-06-11