Quality of expertise and expertise of quality.
Petrescu, Ligia ; Marin, Gheorghe
1. INTRODUCTION
The most common interpretation of the term quality in engineering
and manufacturing is the non-inferiority, superiority or usefulness of
something. There are two common applications of the term quality as form
of activity or function within a business. One is Quality Assurance
which is the "prevention of defects", such as the deployment
of a Quality Management System and preventative activities. The other is
Quality Control which is the "detection of defects", most
commonly associated with testing which takes place within a Quality
Management System typically referred to as Verification and Validation.
Taguchi's definition of quality is based on a more comprehensive
view of the production system, and he relates Quality (or, more
precisely, the lack of it) to "The loss a product imposes on
society after it is shipped". Involving with expertise, quality can
have two meanings: the characteristics of an expertise that bear on its
ability to satisfy stated or implied needs and an expertise free of
deficiencies. In expertise report, quality control and quality
engineering are involved in developing systems to ensure expertise is
designed and produced to meet or exceed customer requirements. These
systems are often developed in conjunction with other business and
engineering disciplines using a cross-functional approach.
2. THE EXPERTISE QUALITY ASSURANCE
The expertise quality assurance covers all activities from
documentation, design, development, realization and consulting. This
introduced the rules: "fit for purpose" and "do it right
the first time".
The quality of the expertise is based on a special standard (Greavu
et al., 2005). The realization of the Professional Standard for the
activity of the extra judiciary technical experts was assumed by the
Extra Judiciary Technical Experts and Consultants' Society from
Romania. According to the protocol to establish an occupational
standard, such activity begins with an occupational analyze, what he
represents, what he must know and what he must do. He must demonstrate
fundamental, general and specific competences, which are fundamental
elements for a high quality expertise.
Critical to Quality (CTQ) is the key measurable characteristics of
a product or process whose performance standards or specification limits
must be met in order to satisfy the customer. CTQs align improvement or
design efforts with customer requirements. CTQs represent the product or
service, this time the expertise characteristics that are defined by the
customer. They may include the upper and lower specification limits or
any other factors related to the expertise. A CTQ usually must be
interpreted from a qualitative customer statement to an actionable,
quantitative business specification. To put it in layman's terms,
CTQs are what the customer expects of an expertise the spoken needs of
the customer.
If the quality of an expertise is to be evaluated, a quality model
is needed, plus a method for evaluation and a quantitative scale of
measures. A model is an abstract representation of an object: according
to this very general definition, which implies the existence of several
classes of models, it can be define a quality model as a structured set
of quality requirements. The problem of defining a quality model to be
used in the evaluation of an expertise is to obtain values that result
from weighing the quality characteristics according to their criticality
evidence, a quality profile which can be used both for evaluation and
certification.
Generally speaking about quality characteristics, there are some
external characteristics like: correctness, usability, efficiency,
reliability, integrity, adaptability, accuracy and robustness. Like
internal characteristics they can be mentioned: maintainability,
flexibility, portability, reusability, readability, testability and
understandability. It's important to work on a project what is the
priority and it's also important not to underestimate the effect of
all the unspoken tacit decisions made by developers in the course of
their work: the unspoken assumptions. Setting clear goals is a pretty
key management tenant, but one easily forgotten. Some of these
characteristics are the most important:
* Customer Facing (most of the External Characteristics)
* Maintenance and Design (most of the Internal Characteristics)
* Defects.
Each review role had a cheat sheet which consisted of the relevant
characteristics to look for, and some check lists. This helps ensure
visibility of the quality priorities into the code review, which makes
them doubly hard to ignore.
3. CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT (CRM) CONCEPT IN EXPERTISE
Customer Relationship Management is often referred to the
marketing. There is no complete agreement upon a single sense of the
term. CRM can be considered from a number of perspectives. The customer
"satisfaction" has a growing weight in the expertise success
assurance. What is to do in this direction can be expressed in two
strategies:
* Strategically vision of the organization which express
orientation to the customer and planes to create new value for both
customer and organization;
* Operational strategy which express the way to transpose in
reality the planes of the customer relationship management through the
customer needs and expectations knowledge and answering (Fig. 1).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
CRM is a combination of philosophies, policies and strategies
connecting different players within an organization so as to coordinate
their efforts in creating an overall valuable series of experiences,
products and services for the customer.
The technical expert must adapt oneself to the market demand and
supply. His service is accorded to the customer behaviors. The quality
of expertise determines and is determined by the customer satisfaction /
unsatisfaction. A dissatisfied customer imparts his unsatisfaction to
minimum ten persons, but a satisfied customer imparts his satisfaction
only to three persons. To gain a new customer is ten times expensive
then to maintain an old one. Around 80-95% of the customers are disposed
to spend more for a high quality of the needed expertise (Dragulanescu
et al., 2003).
4. EXPERTISE OF THE QUALITY
Expertise of quality is similarly with the audit of quality. The
quality's audit cans refer to an entire system of quality, to a
process, or to a product. The audit of quality aims at the
identification of the possible improvements of the system / process /
product. Expertise of quality means in plus to cooperate to solve the
problems using the knowledge, abilities and skills of an expert. The
expertise gives the solution of the problems, and the expert grants
consulting services.
The quality's management instruments (Fig. 2) are applied for
three principal goals (Dragulanescu, N. et al., 2003):
* Identification of the problems to be solved and their causes by
The Affinity Diagram (Fig. 3) and The Relations Diagram (Cause-Effect)
(Fig. 4);
* Establishment of the solutions necessarily to solve the problems
by The Matrix Diagram and The Tree Diagram (Foster, T. 2001);
* Determination of the concrete program to solve the problems by
The PERT Diagram and The Decisions Diagram (Radaceanu, E. 2001).
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
A special instrument of the quality management is
"benchmarking". It is used to evaluate the quality
performances of an organization, with the purpose to make a comparison
with an organization which is considerate a referential.
5. CONCLUSION
The expertise and the quality are the two elements on which the
accepted experts and their reports are based on a sustained effort to
improve their expertise activity.
6. REFERENCES
Dragulanescu, N. & Dragulanescu, M. (2003). Managementul
calitatii serviciilo, (Services Quality Management), AGIR Publisher,
ISBN 973-8466-33-4, Bucuresti.
Foster, T. (2001) Managing Quality--an integrative approach,
Prentice Hall Publisher, New Jersey.
Greavu, V.; Popa, D. et al (2005). Expert thnic extrajudiciar
(Extrajudicial technical expert), AGIR Publisher, ISBN 973-720-026-8,
Bucuresti.
Petrescu, L. (2004), The Engine System Study Of Reliability, 4th
International Conference "Research and Development in Mechanical
Industry" RaDMI 2004 31 August--04. September 2004, Zlatibor,
Serbia and Montenegro, ISBN 86-83803-18X pag. 412-418
Radaceanu, E.(2001). Management, BREN Publisher, ISBN
973-8143-66-7, Bucuresti.