Airbag construction. Influence of the weaving defects on proper functioning of the airbag.
Stefanuta, Ioan ; Vrinceanu, Narcisa ; Roman, Marius 等
Abstract: The present paper is focused onto influence of the
weaving defects on proper functioning of the airbag. The approaching is
oriented to basic tests for fabric characteristics, as well. Considering
the reduced quantity of operations in the production processes, high
degree of automation of the machines and efficient control systems
mounted on them, it was determined that the number and the variety of
defects that can appear on the fabric is relatively reduced compared
with production quantity.
Because the required safety standards for the functioning of the
airbag are very constricted, it is necessary an analysis of impact of
every defect on proper functioning of the products
Key words: airbag, technology, weaving, yarn, automotive, weaving
defects
1. INTRODUCTION
Identification of possible weaving defects has to be performed
according with the production process taking into consideration the
following:
--type of machinery used : degree of automation, safety and control
systems available;
--control procedures utilized in the process;
Considering the reduced quantity of operations in the production
processes, high degree of automation of the machines and efficient
control systems mounted on them, it was determined that the number and
the variety of defects that can appear on the fabric is relatively
reduced compared with production quantity.
Because the required safety standards for the functioning of the
airbag are very constricted, it is necessary an analysis of impact of
every defect on proper functioning of the products.
2. WEAVING DEFECTS. LOCALIZATION, TYPES, CAUSES AND EFFECTS
(Takata, 2007)
--Warping: fluffs, oversized knots, very high frictions on the
guiding systems, weavers knots executed incorrectly, portions with very
low resistance that can fail at weaving, supplementary forces between
yarns at weaving (Fig. 1);
--Weaving: group of broken ends in the warp, accidental contact
with a foreign object, portions with lower resistance in the fabric,
forming of zones like "efforts concentrators" where the
adherence degree between ends decreases (Fig. 2);
--Weaving: folded yarn in the fabric, failure of the edge cutting
system, modifications of the density and bigger floats in the warp (Fig.
3);
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
--Warping: loose ends, disorder of tensioning systems, very high
frictions between ends at weaving;
--Weaving: density in warp and weft incorrect on a narrow portion,
deficiency in start-up of the weaving machine at a normal working
regime, lower burst resistance of the fabric.
--Weaving: missing yarn in the weft, lower functioning pressure of
the insertion system, barriers formed by the warp ends, finishing of the
weft yarn, zones of the fabric with lower burst resistance and high
permeability;
--Weaving: tension too low of the warp ends, incorrect warping
procedure, producing of entangled yarns and obstruction of the weft
insertion, portions of fabric with missing yarns or structure
modifications;
--Weaving: conglomerations of yarns with broken filaments, intense
frictions between yarns and/or with guiding systems (Fig. 4);
--Weaving: air splice knots, incorrect functioning of the
airsplicer, incorrect knots that produce additional friction between
ends, negative modifications of the fabric structure (Fig. 5).
3. BASIC TESTS FOR FABRIC CHARACTERISTICS (ULBS, 2007)
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 9 OMITTED]
For relevance of the tests results and observation of the impact on
the functioning of the airbag was taken into consideration the most
frequent defect: conglomeration of yarns with broken filaments or bulge.
The fabric type: 70 ends /inch in the warp and weft.
Performed tests:
--tensile strength and elongation
--tear force
--high pressure air permeability
The results are listed in the graphs Fig. 6 to Fig. 9.
4. PROCEDURES, METHODS AND CONTROL POINTS
According with the operations of the production process one example
of the quality control system on the production line is:
4.1. Warping:
--visual check at every start and end of the shift of the machine
by the operator (all the devices that came in contact with the yarn are
checked).
--tensioning devices on the creel of the wrapper are fitted with
sensors that stop the machine in case of yarn brakeage.
--2 cameras count all the time the number of ends to be according
with the article type that is produced. Contrary the machine will be
stopped.
--one scanner checks all the time the diameter of the yarns in
order to detect possible broken filaments and stops the machine
automatically for each yarn that has broken filaments.
--verification of the machine at each beginning/end of the shift
with "dummy" samples for proper functioning.
--the tensions of the yarns on the creel and the unwinding from the
bobbins are permanently controlled by the machines computer according
with the settings.
--verification of the run out of the braking pads on the beamer
--reed dents are checked and also the width reed for wear off.
--the beam flanges are checked for wear off.
4.2. Weaving:
--at each beginning and end of the shift the machine status is
checked
--at each warp beam that is changed preventive maintenance is
performed for the weaving machine (washing, greasing, etc.)
--at each beginning of new fabric roll it is verified in the
laboratory the fabric density and the flammability
--on the right side of the machine there is a sensor "IR
feeler" that detects if the insertion was complete. Contrary the
machine will stop.
--with ten meters before warp is finished from the beam there is a
adhesive band that reaches a sensor who stops the machine.
--automatic system for proper length that is needed for one weft
insertion.
4.3. Coating:
--the machine is provided with control devices that measure all the
time the density of the fabric before and after coating.
--the add-on for the coating amount is measured permanently by an
NDC gauge.
5. CONCLUSIONS
--even if the automation degree of the operations is very high,
some defects may appear mostly at weaving, their number being in the
control limits;
--the most frequent defects are broken filaments and broken ends;
--the influence of this defects on the basic properties of the
fabric is controllable, the results being within the specified ranges
from the standards;
--for safety on the proper functioning of the airbag portions of
the fabric that have defects are rejected, or if the product was
produced they are scrapped at the final control check.
--the policy of the airbag production firms is "zero
defects".
6. REFERENCES
AKLV (Arbeitskreis Lieferantenvorschriften)
ASTM (American Society for Testing Methods) Documentation, 2007
FMUSS (Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard) Documentation, 2007
EASC (European Airbag Standardization Committee) Documentation,
2007
Tehnical Documentation Takata-Petri Sibiu, 2007
ULBS--Testing results from laboratory, 2007