Reliability analysis of dynamicaly loaded systems.
Karaulova, Tatyana ; Preis, Irina ; Marquis, Gary 等
Abstract: The attempt to develop the tool for dynamic system
analysis taking into account various effective factors was undertaken.
The approach evaluates reliability of a complex mechanical system by
presenting it in forms of various analytical models using loading
spectrum representation. The forestry forwarder has been selected as a
prototype of the dynamic system.
Key words: dynamic system analysis, process model, MBD, system
reliability.
1. INTRODUCTION
System reliability assessment and prediction has become an
increasingly important aspect on the different operating stages of a
process. Efficient system reliability assessment techniques need to be
developed for complicated systems with multiple components and multiple
failure mechanisms in order to ensure adequate performance under
uncertain and extreme demands (Leangsuksun et. al., 2003).
Reliability studies of complex dynamic systems require using
powerful research tools such as Multibody Dynamics (MBD), Finite Element
Analysis (FEA) and others. The forecasting of system reliability based
on the process modelling is effective and convenient. Modelling and
simulation of load processes for fatigue analysis is an important issue
in reliability and engineering design in, for example, vehicles
manufacturing.
The majority of reliability modelling approaches is based on
statistical methods such as reliability block diagrams and fault trees.
However, many intricate system dependencies cannot be adequately
represented by these methods. Instead, continuous Markov chain models
may be used to handle these kinds of system dependencies.
The present report introduces the solution logic consisting of the
following steps:
* The process model used to describe the work cycle of the system.
Results of the model simulation denote the duration of loads applied for
every item under consideration.
* The process diagram lashed with the plot of mechanical loading
spectra for considered parts or nodes of the system in time domain.
* The major external factors influencing the reliability are
studied using the process model.
2. SYSTEM DISCRIPTION
The forestry forwarder has been selected as a prototype of the
dynamic system. The external factors present an interest for the system
reliability assessment.
The system under consideration operates under complicated service
(static loading, fatigue loading, wear, impacts etc.), and environmental
(ground surface, weather, wind, illumination etc.) conditions. The human
factors (skills, health state, level of concentration etc.) also affect
the system operations. These conditions relate to so called live loads
and are to be modelled. The design and analysis of machines and
structures requires the identification of service factors, which include
loads and their quantification. The following types of load are
important (Roa, 1992):
* Dead load or gravity load, i.e. the weight of the machine or
structure with all permanent attachments. The dead load is usually
described by normal distribution with a coefficient of variation of 0,1.
* Live loads, which consist of weight of personnel, i.e. portable
load. Since these loads vary in time and space the establishing of the
random variability of these loads is a difficult task.
* Wind loads.
Since considering of all loading spectra of complex mechanism
transporting the logs is complicated, definite service loads in critical
structural cross sections (arm of the crane) were taken as modelled
loads. It should be also noticed that applied loading spectra would
change noticeably if environmental and human factors were also taken
into account.
3. ANALYSIS APPROACHES AND METHODS
Each analysis method has a definition, a discipline, and may be
used in various ways. The definition contains the concepts, motivation,
and the theory of the method.
Many system analysis and engineering methods use graphical syntax
to provide visualization of collected data as unambiguously displayed
key information. The method may be used separately or as incorporated to
a group of methods.
A model can be characterized as an idealized system of objects,
properties, and relations designed in certain relevant respects within a
particular structure to imitate the character of a given real-world
system.
The power of a model comes from its ability to simplify the
real-world system it represents, and to predict certain facts about that
system with corresponding facts within the model. Figure 1 presents
approaches for reliability analysis implementation.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
For the process modelling several standards (UML, IDEF etc.) may be
used. Here the structural analysis method has been adopted as standard
modelling language to describe system behaviour and its aspects.
The simulation model of the process is shown in Figure 2 where the
process diagram is combined with the loading spectrum in time domain.
The variable amplitude service loading is given as a real service
loading spectra. These spectra, however, could be taken from MBD
simulation as output data or even generated by Matlab or Simulink
mathematical software using Markov chains.
When considering variable amplitude loading the primary problem is
computing the expected rainflow count and the expected damage using
given random load model. In this case Markov chains have been found very
useful in describing real loads (Rychlik, 1987).
As one can see from Figure 2 the process simulator applies
statistical distribution functions of duration logic (DL) for each act
of the process (Log Normal L(a,b), where a=mean of the normal,
b=standard deviation of the normal).
Since the process has duty cycle described as the log transfer, one
deals with the service loading spectra and the reliability of the system
during this cycle. The results of preliminary process simulation (Figure
3) showed that the percentage of service loads applied to the working
arm of crane acting during complete duty cycle is 36.94%.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
5. SYSTEM RELIABILITY
It has been claimed that fatigue is responsible for at least 80% of
all mechanical failures. The system reliability, therefore, is connected
to the lifetime of the system components. The reliability is presented
in Figure 4 by damage accumulation according to the Miner's rule.
The reliability prediction connected to the system damage
accumulation is known in form of equation (1) (Carter, 1986):
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (1)
where S(s) and L(s) are strength and load distribution functions
respectively, and kt--time dependent function.
The parameter kt has to be taken as time variable according to the
simulation output data. Damage accumulation is calculated as the amount
of load cycles, i.e. their repetitions during service life.
Following the above-mentioned approach the reliability is measured
by the system's mean time to failure (MTTF). The mean time to
failure MTTF of a system is the expected time until the occurrence of
the first system failure. Given the system reliability R(t), the MTTF
can be computed with equation (2) (Leangsuksun et. al., 2003):
MTTF = [[integral].sup.x.sub,0] R(t)dt (2)
Further analysis is based on the Markov's method, which is a
powerful tool in reliability, maintainability, and safety (RMS)
engineering. Markov's chains are commonly used to study the
reliability of complex systems. Markov's analysis provides means
for analysing the RMS of systems with strong dependencies between
components. Other analysis methods, such as, for example, fault tree
analysis method, often assume independent character of components. Used
separately, these methods may lead to optimistic prediction for the
system reliability and safety parameters (Fuqua, 2003).
6. CONCLUSIONS
The present report introduces the preliminary assessment of the
reliability of dynamically loaded systems. The proposed solution brings
together benefits of different methods of reliability assessment:
starting from technologies of data acquisition, accumulation, analysis
and visualization, it ends with the complex stress and fatigue analysis.
7. REFERENCES
Leangsuksun, C., Song, H., Shen, L. (2003) Reliability Modeling
Using UML. Software Engineering Research and Practice 2003, pp. 259-262
Rao, S. S. (1992)--Reliability Based Design. ISBN 0-07-051192-6
McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York
Carter, A. D. (1986) Mechanical Reliability ISBN 0-333-40586-2,
MACMILLAN, London: pp. 49-51
Rychlik, I. (1987) A New Definition of the Rainflow Cycle Counting
Method. Int J Fatigue, 9, pp. 119-121
Fuqua, N. B. (2003) The Applicability of Markov Analysis Methods to
reliability, Maintainability, and Safety, START.