Statistical approach to intelligent managerial decision making.
Simicevic, Vanja
Abstract: This paper emphasizes the importance of statistical
approach to intelligent managerial decision-making. The research was
based on an original empirical survey, conducted on the basis of a
random sample of large Croatian firms, aimed at estimating the extent at
which Croatian managers use statistical methods. The research results
are presented in this paper, and suggestions are given for the promotion
of the statistical education in order to increase the level of
statistical thinking in Croatian firms.
Key words: statistical education, statistical thinking, intelligent
methods, managerial decision making
1. INTRODUCTION
Today's manager cannot carry out great deal of modern
management tools (Rigby, 2005) without knowledge of statistical methods
and statistical thinking. Statistical thinking and applied statistical
methods help managers to cope with modern business conditions and obtain
best results for the firm and their personal carrier (Whitaker et al.,
2001). Statistical methods can provide many possible solutions for
solving the modern age paradox of more information but less
understanding. Statistical thinking should have positive influence on
managerial efficiency, but in the business practice it is rare to find a
manager who thinks, in such a manner, which is a result of the
traditional approach to managers' education. The aim of this study
is to estimate the extent of use of statistical methods in Croatian
firms and to suggest the promotion of the statistical education in order
to increase the level of statistical thinking. To this end, an original
empirical survey was conducted on the basis of a random sample of large
Croatian firms. The results of this research, as well as suggestions how
to include statistical thinking in the statistical education, are a
scientific contribution of this paper to intelligent managerial decision
making.
2. THE METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH
Random sampling method was used to select 300 firms from the
Croatian firms database Institute for Business Intelligence. Among them,
42 firms refused to participate in the survey, mostly due to the policy
of business confidentiality. A total of 106 valid answers to the
questionnaires of the mail survey were obtained, which corresponds to
35,33%, i.e., acceptable for this type of research (Kish, 1995).
3. RESEARCH RESULTS
It was found out that typical sample firms deal with financial
transactions, industrial processing, or commercial trade, and are
registered as LLC. The sample included both genders equally, with age
range from 30 to 40 years. Majority of managers have a university
degree; while minor part holds a MBA degree, or are high school
graduates. Regarding the duration of the working experience, less then
10 years is by far the most typical. They mostly occupy the tactical
management level, which is explained by their relatively young age (most
are below 35 years). The interviewees themselves provided information on
their employment position and department, as well as their own
assessment about the defined procedures in managerial decision making,
and about dominant decision making style in their firms.
The survey results indicate that statistical methods are mostly
used in the departments that are traditionally oriented towards usage of
quantitative methods in finances, accounting, planning, trade, auditing,
production and marketing. Other departments are mentioned rarely, and
two of them are not a typical part of the firms' functional
organization. These are the insurance and public relations departments,
which are normally parts of the firms' functional organization for
finances and marketing services (Gogala & Simicevic, 2005).
The employment positions like directors of financial, marketing,
planning and production departments use statistics frequently. The
controllers, accounts manager, auditors, supply managers, actuary and
import clerks are less indicated. Clearly, all of these employment
positions correspond to the firms' area of operations. For example,
the actuaries are mostly mentioned in insurance and leasing firms, while
the auditors are most frequently mentioned in the auditing firms and
banks.
The majority of interviewees are familiar with basic statistical
notions and techniques, such as frequency distribution, mean, standard
deviation and graphs. A minority is familiar with the median and time
series indexes. Very few know about the more complex methodologies such
as linear trend, regression analysis, hypothesis testing and confidence
interval. It is worth emphasizing managers' rather high level of
awareness about the existence of statistical methods, but they were not
requested to assess the level of their own practical knowledge about
their use. Only five managers declared that they are not familiar with
any method, but they have only high school degree.
The level of use of statistical methods was analyzed, as well as
who is preparing the analyses--managers themselves, or some other
employees. Managers are mostly preparing analyses themselves by using
basic statistical methods, such as graphs and mean values. Among the
methods prepared by the other employees, priority is given to time
series indexes, regression analysis, mean, linear trend and graphs. The
least methods used are confidence interval for the mean, practiced only
by four interviewees.
Finally, interviewees were asked to assess the importance of
statistical methods in their business practice. Approximately one third
feels that statistics are useful and important for their business.
However, one quarter of interviewees are indifferent, and the same
proportion believes that statistics are not important at all. Equally
small number of interviewees (less then 10%) has both, extremely
positive and negative opinion about the importance of statistical
methods in their work.
4. STATISTICAL EDUCATION FOR MANAGERS
According to the research results, most managers are highly aware
about statistical methods, but they often use only the basic methods,
i.e., graphs, measures of central tendency, measures of dispersion and
time series indexes. On the other hand, managers consider that their own
better knowledge of statistical methods could be useful for their
business, while a minor number thinks that they are really important for
their business activities. The reasons why managers do not use
statistical methods as much as necessary mentioned in the literature
(Makrymichalos et al., 2005) are the following:
* In the past, firms were focused on research and development, as
well as production, which are not considered important nowadays (Snee,
1991). The modern firms are consumer oriented. Changes are necessary due
to highly competitive markets as the result of globalisation. Although
statistical methods are frequently used in the fields, which are
important for customer relations, such as data mining (Berry &
Linoff 2000) the operational and tactical task assignments have still
not been focused on the statistical approach.
* Statisticians are traditionally focused on technical aspects of
statistical methods. With the exception of Deming's study, a small
attention has been dedicated to improving business applications of
statistical methods for the purpose of optimising business results.
* Managers feel that statistics offer greatest benefits in
quantitative approach to business, and it has been used as alarm in case
of a deviation from the expected business results.
* At present, managers are not prepared to change their way of
thinking, which often does not include quantitative approach to the
problems.
* Traditional approach to statistical education places accent on
the mathematical details and computing procedures, and less on practical
application (Deming, 1986).
* As a result of traditional approach to statistical education,
managers are usually "scared of statistics". Statistics has
been established exclusively as a mathematical discipline, with too
little practical value and for use only by the mathematically gifted
analysers.
In order to introduce the students to the statistical thinking it
is necessary to achieve interaction between students and teachers, as
well as interaction among the students themselves. Just as in any other
discipline, the students should learn more efficiently statistics'
subject matters if they are actively involved in teaching process. It is
relatively simple to establish interaction among small number of MBA
students. Managers should be encouraged to present their firms'
experiences and discuss them together. However, even large groups of
students can benefit from interaction with teachers. In such groups, it
may be difficult to organize teamwork, but the teaching process should
not be carried out without including all students in the discussions,
though this calls for breaking down their fear of such teaching method.
An efficient way to learn is through the process of discovering.
For example, measures of central tendency are one of the most important
topics: students should be enabled to find the way of determining median
value intuitionally, as well as to estimate the reason why it is so
different from mean and mode, for example. Approach, which requires that
measures of central tendency must first be calculated, followed by the
presentation of the formula, normally does not result in students'
understanding. In the area of the regression analysis students could be
induced to draw regression line by means of scatter plot, as well as to
demonstrate why least-squares method is much more precise than the
subjective judgment.
On the basis of such an approach to statistical education for
managers, they should be enabled to take on new roles that are expected
from them in the era of statistical thinking. (Makrymichalos et al.,
2005), as follows:
* Managers should modify their attitude regarding statistical
methods. They should understand that statistics is not just a series of
statistical methods, but also the way of improving business results.
* Management decision-making should be normally based on the
carefully selected data instead of on the intuition. The data collection
should be carried out in such a way as to enable search for the causes
of variability.
* Managers should distinguish general and special causes of
variability in the business process of their firms. Such knowledge could
enable them to choose the most adequate options for the business
reengineering procedures related to general causes, or for solving the
ad hoc problems related to special causes of variability.
5. CONCLUSIONS
The nature of this study is practical: it is dedicated to
companies' top management leaderships, which deal with management
education, educators in the fields of statistics for the managers in
Croatia. It is an imperative that statistical education gains its
practical mission, by promoting statistical thinking instead of purely
mathematical aspects of computing statistics. Research in the applied
statistical methods in the Croatian economy has been rare, i.e., only
few have been published (Pejic Bach et al., 1999). In this context, this
study provides a preliminary platform for future research on statistical
education for managers in Croatia.
6. REFERENCES
Berry, M. J. A. & Linoff, G. S. (2000). Mastering Data Mining,
Wiley, ISBN: 978-0-471-33123-0, Chichester
Deming, W.E. (1986). Out of the crisis, MIT Press, ISBN:
0262541157, Cambridge
Gogala, Z. & Simicevic, V. (2005). Usage of Statistical Methods
in Croatian Firms. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Zagrebu, Vol.3,
No.1, pp. 321-339, ISSN: 1333-8900.
Kish, L. (1995). Survey Sampling, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN:
978-0-471-10949-5, New York
Makrymichalos, M.; Antony, J.; Antony, F. & Kumar, M. (2005).
Statistical thinking and its role for industrial engineers and managers
in the 21st century. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp.
354-363, ISSN: 0268-6902
Pejic Bach, M.; Dumieic, K. & Gogala, Z. (1999). Using
Forecasting Methods in Croatian Large Firms. Ekonomski pregled, Vol. 50,
No. 7-8, pp. 780-803, ISSN: 0424-7558
Rigby, D.K. (2005). Management Tools 2005: An Executive's
Guide, Available from: http://www.bain.com, Accessed: 2005-01-01
Snee, R. (1990). Statistical thinking and its contribution to total
quality. The American Statistician, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 116-121, ISSN:
00031305
Whitaker, D.; John, J. A. & Johnson, D. G. (2001). Statistical
Thinking for Managers, CRC Press, ISBN: 1584882484, Boca Raton