Study of the adhered material to the cutting tools on dry turning of aluminium alloys.
De Agustina, Beatriz ; Rubio, Eva ; Marcos, Mariano 等
Abstract: In this study the relationship between the applied
cutting parameters and the change to the tool geometry produced by
material adhesion was analysed. Namely, a series of tests of dry turning
of short duration (no longer than ten seconds) were carried out using a
workpiece of aluminium UNS A97050-T7. Different cutting conditions were
employed using uncoated based on WC-Co tools. The quantity of material
adhered to the tool were measured by macroscopic techniques. As a first
conclusion, it is possible to affirm that there is a higher material
adherence using higher feeds.
Key words: Dry machining, Short cutting tests, UNS A97050 T7, Tool
wear
1. INTRODUCTION
The aeronautical, aerospace and automotive industries use a larger
number of aluminium and titanium alloys for the production of different
elements that constitute the structural components of airships and
aerospace vehicles. This is due to their excellent weight to resistance
ratio.
However, these materials can commonly exhibit problems associated
with the heat generated during de machining process that reduces their
machinability and increases the temperature. This fact is especially
injurious for the tool because of an increase of temperature can reduce
its physical and chemical properties and, as a consequence of that, its
life decreases (Nouari et al.,2003; Rubio et al.,2005; Sebastian et
al.,2003).
Therefore, the use of lubricants and coolants during the machining
constitutes an undesirable factor owing to environmental and economical
factors. The growing social preoccupation towards environmental
conservation has made it necessary to develop cleaner production
technologies such as dry machining, in which no cutting fluids are
employed. This increases tool damage, as these contact conditions become
very severe.
Such a situation makes it necessary to look for new tool designs
or, a cheaper alternative is to look for combinations of cutting
parameters and types of tools that optimize the machining process, which
allow the possibility to obtain pieces with a good dimensional precision
and a high quality surface finish, to keep the cost as low as possible
and, of course, to ensure secure conditions for workers and equipment
(Rubio et al., 2005; Sebastian et al., 2003; Xie et al., 2003).
In this study, the investigation is focused on the different
alterations of the tool geometry, due to the material adhered to the
tool during the machining process. In this way, a series of tests of dry
machining of short duration (no longer than 10 seconds) were carried out
with a workpiece of aluminium UNS A97050-T7 under different cutting
conditions (cutting speed and feed rate), using uncoated based on WC-Co
tools. From the obtained results, a selection of tools was made to
analyse the relationship between the applied cutting parameters and the
quantity of material adhered to the tool. Furthermore, to verify if the
results vary or not when the diameter of the tested bar diminishes; the
tests were carried out twice.
2. METHODOLOGY
The present work is framed within a series of studies which
involved different materials, types of tools and cutting conditions. The
main steps of the methodology in which this work has been developed are
(Agustina et al., 2007):
* Previous activities to the machining operations. These activities
consist of the identification of the resources used and the preparation
of the protocols both to calculate cutting parameter values and to
register data and observations of the machining process.
* Turning tests. In each test a workpiece is mechanized during less
than 10 seconds (short tests) under certain conditions of feed, cutting
speed and depth of cut using both coated and uncoated cutting tools.
* Monitoring of the process. In order to have graphic documents
that can be analysed after the process, all the turning tests described
previously have been recorded by video and both the chips obtained and
the inserts used in each test have been photographed with a camera of
high resolution.
* Analysis of the tools with the reduction of the diameter. With
the aim of determining if the material exhibits different behaviour
according to the reduction of the diameter of the workpiece, the tests
were carried out twice on the same bar so that the second series of
tests began with a diameter considerably smaller than the first one.
* Analysis of tools. From the obtained results, a tool preselection
was made. Then, selected tools were analysed employing both macroscopic
and microscopic techniques. The former, using the taken macrographs and
a profile projecter that allows measuring the quantity of the adhered
material and the latter, by means of techniques of Scanning Electron
Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS) in order to
verify the alterations of the tools geometry.
3. APPLICATIONS
For this study, the workpiece used for the turning tests was a
cylindrical bar with a diameter of 70.7 mm and length of 60.5 mm of UNS
A97050-T7 aluminium alloy.
The cylindrical bar was horizontally dry turned on an EmcoTurn 120
CNC lathe equipped with an EMCO Turn 242 numerical control. The cutting
conditions are collected in Table 1.
Concretely, cutting speeds from 40 m/min (0.66m/s) up to 170 m/min
(2.83 m/s) and feeds from 0.05 mm/rev up to 0.30 mm/rev. Cutting depth
was maintained at 1 mm in all the tests.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
The cutting speed and feed rate are expressed in units that are
usually employed in manufacturing workshop. Although they are not
International Systems units (S.I.), they give a more intuitive idea of
the values used.
Uncoated WC-Co (manufacturer reference GARANT DCMT 11T304CU703326236 SS) cutting tools were employed for the tests.
To observe the machining tests carried out, photographs and videos
of the tools and the resulting chips were systematically taken during
the tests using a Sony Cybershot DSC-P100 digital camera of high
resolution.
For quantifying the adhered material on the tools a profile
projecter TOPCON VP300D (Figure 1) was used and for the SEM/EDS
analysis, a Scanning Electronic Microscope, called Quanta 200, which has
a system of Energy Dispersive Spectrometer was also used.
4. RESULTS
It can be observed that for all the values of cutting speed applied
the higher the feed was, the larger the quantity of material that was
adhered to the rake face of the tool . Figure 2 shows the tools used for
the combination of the cutting speed of v= 170 m/min for both, f=0.2 and
0.3 mm/rev tested.
In addition, at low feeds of 0.05 and 0.10 mm/rev, for cutting
speeds from 65 to 170 m/min, a reduced quantity of material is adhered
on the rake face of the tool. The inserts used at the cutting speed of
65 m/min for feed rate from 0.10 to 0.30 mm/rev, and at the feed of 0.20
mm/rev for cutting speeds from 65 to 125 m/min, were selected for
measuring the maximum thickness ([t.sub.max]) of the material adhered to
the edge tool by the profile projecter. The results are given in the
next Table 2.
It can be seen that for a cutting speed of 65m/min, [t.sub.max] is
at the maximum feed of 030 mm/rev. Meanwhile, for a feed of 0.20 mm/rev,
[t.sub.max] is at the minimum cutting speed of 65 mm/rev.
Deeper analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy
Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS) has been carried out in order to obtain
with more accuracy the quantity of the material adhered and its
compositional characteristics.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Finally it was noted, in general, that no difference was observed
in the material adhered to the tool as the centre of the bar was
approached, in spite of the existence of a microstructural differential
at the centre of the bar with respect to its periphery. In such a way,
the centre of the bar possesses a more homogeneous structure and higher
hardness, as expected given the results carried out by other researchers
(Ozcatalbas, 2003), as the centre of bar is approached, it should be
reduced the quantity of material adhered to the tool especially at high
cutting speeds.
5. CONCLUSIONS
A larger quantity of material is adhered to the tool rake face at
the higher applied feeds . In these cases the alteration of the tool
geometry can degrade the efficiency of cutting tool and surface finish
of the workpiece.
It is not possible to establish a relationship between the cutting
parameters applied and the maximum thickness of material adhered to the
edge tool. So it is proposed that the same experimental procedure is
conducted using different cutting parameters concentrating in smaller
range of values.
Finally, no difference was observed in the quantity of material
adhered to the tool on reducing the diameter of the tested bar. To
evaluate such an effect, it is recommended to carry out a series of
tests using bars of considerably different diameters maintaining the
identical test methodology.
6. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Funding for this work was provided in part by the Spanish Ministry
of Education and Science (Directorate General of Research), Project
DPI2005-09325-C02-02.
7. REFERENCES
Agustina, B.; Rubio, E.M.; Sanz, A., Domingo R. (2007) A
classification of the UNS A97050-T7 aluminium alloy chips in short
duration tests under dry cutting conditions, Proceedings of the
MESIC-CISIF'2007, SIF, In press, Madrid, July 2007. Nouari, M.;
List, G.; Girot, F.; Coupard, D. (2003). Experimental
analysis and optimisation of tool wear in dry machining of
aluminium alloys. Wear 255 (7-12) August-September 2003, 1359-1368.
Ozcatalbas,Y.; (2003). Investigation of the machinability behaviour
of Al4C3 reinforced Al-based composite produced by mechanical alloying
technique.Composites Science and Technology, 63(1) August 2003, 53-61.
Rubio, E.M; Camacho A.M.; Sanchez-Sola, J.M.; Marcos, M. (2005).
Surface roughness of AA7050 alloy turned bars. Analysis of the influence
of the length of machining. Journal of Materials Processing and
Technology, 162-163C May 2005, 682-689.
Sebastian, M.A.; Sanchez, J.M.; Rubio, E.M.; Carrilero, M.S.; Diaz,
J.E.; Marcos, M. (2003). BUE and BUL formation mechanisms in dry cutting
of AA7050 alloy, Proceedings of the 14th International DAAAM Symposium,
"Intelligent Manufacturing & Automation: Focus on
Reconstruction and Development". B. Katalinic, 125-126, Viena,
October 2003.
Xie, X.; Yan X.; Ding, F.; Zhang, S.; Chen, M.G.; Chang, Y.A.
(2003). A study of microstructure and microsegregation of aluminum 7050
alloy. Materials Science and Engineering A355, August 2003, 144-153.
Table 1. Cutting conditions.
v (m/min) 40 65 85 125 170
f (mm/rev) 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.30
p (mm) I
Table 2. Maximum thicknesses ([t.sub.max]) of the material adhered
to the edge tool at different cutting parameters.
v (m/min) 65 65 65 85 125
f (mm/rev) 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.20 0.20
[t.sub.max] (mm) 0.292 0.270 0.378 0.234 0.265