Wave size influence on the mechanical characteristics of the corrugated board.
Jurecic, Denis ; Babic, Darko ; Haric, Anita 等
Abstract: Corrugated board samples will be analysed on different
devices intended for quality testing and inspection of corrugated board.
The goal is to investigate what kind of influence has different wave
size on quality of corrugated board. Four types of examination will be
carried out:--resistance to breakthrough,--pressure on horizontal
surface,--pressure on the corrugated carton edge,--resistance to
bursting. The results will then be analyzed.
Key words: Corrugated board, Strength, Delivery side
1. INTRODUCTION
Except mechanical stability, the chemical, biological and thermal
stability are also important. If the corrugated board is well studied
and processed, it can achieve good packing with the minimal costs.
Generally, it is known which properties a particular wave kind must
have, but the investigations are always important in order to control
the product quality and to determine the possible irregularities which
appear in the production. The investigations detect bad gluing of the
paper layers in the corrugated board and bad formed or crushed waves.
Two kinds of investigations were performed in the work. Resistivity of
the corrugated board to dynamic penetration (Puncture Test) is one of
the most important tests because it shows how strong direct mechanical
blows can the corrugated board accept and not burst (Jurecic& Babic
2007). Breaking of the corrugated board under pressure (Bursting Test)
shows how high pressures can the corrugated board bear before bursting.
2. EKSPERIMENTAL
2.1 Resistance of the corrugated board to dynamic
penetration--Puncture Test
This is the test in which the corrugated board is tested to direct
mechanical blows. It determines the resistance of the corrugated board
to tearing and its toughness. The test shows how strong direct
mechanical blows can be applied on the corrugated board and that it does
not break. It is important if the products sensitive to outer blows are
packed in the packaging. The testing was performed on three different
samples of the corrugated board, 2K, 2K/3 and 2K/e. For each sample 10
measuring were done for the front side and 10 measuring for the back
side of the corrugated board. At the end, the comparison was made from
the medium measuring results to see what the quality of a particular
sample was. The testing device is called punctometer.
2.2. Breaking of corrugated board under pressure -Bursting Test
Breaking of the corrugated board under pressure is tested on Mullen
device. It is important that the corrugated board is previously
conditioned. How high pressures can the corrugated board bear before
breaking depends on its quality. The greater the bursting pressure is
the quality of the board is better.
2.3. Resistance of the horizontal layer of the corrugated board to
pressure -Flat Crash Test
In this test the grade of crushing and rigidity of the waves in the
corrugated board under pressure is determined. The test is performed to
increase the paper quality for the production of waves or for the
quality control itself. Testing is performed on the device Crush tester
which was designed for testing the deformities of the corrugated board
and its components.
2.4. Resistance of the corrugated board edges to pressure--Edge
Crush Test
In this test the resistance of the corrugated board in the
direction of its waves is determined, i.e. the edge of the corrugated
board on the wave peaks. The test is performed on the Crush Tester, the
same as the resistance test of the horizontal surface of the board;
only, the device is set at another measuring mode.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1. Puncture test
The front side of the corrugated board sample 2K, after the 10
performed measurements on the front side and after the obtained medium
value, shows somewhat lower result than the result of the testing of the
back side of the corrugated board. This shows that the back side of the
sample 2K has greater resistance to dynamic penetration than the front
side of the board. The results obtained on the sample 2K/3 show that the
back side of that board is has also greater resistance to penetration
than the front side, with somewhat greater measuring differences between
the front and the back side of the board than the difference obtained by
measuring the sample 2K. The sample 2K/2 shows the smallest difference
between the front and the back side of the board, but the back side has
greater resistance to dynamic puncture as well. It can be seen from
these measurements that the back side of the board has greater
resistance than the front side in all three samples (graph 1,2).
3.2. Bursting Test
After 10 measurements on the front side of the board and the
obtained medium value, and after 10 measurements on the back side of the
board and the obtained medium value, it can be seen on the sample 2K
that the front side of the board has greater resistance to bursting
under pressure than the back side of that board. The back side showed
somewhat lower result. On the sample 2K/3, after all the measurements
and the calculated medium value, it can be seen that the front side of
the board has better resistance to bursting than the back side. The
sample 2K/e shows the same property, which means that the front side of
the board has greater resistance to bursting under pressure. In this
case the difference among the resistance of the front side and the
resistance of the back side is very small. The investigation shows that
the front side of the board had better results in all three samples,
which means that it had greater resistance to bursting under pressure
than the back side of the board (graph 3,4). When comparing the three
medium values for the front side for all three kinds of the investigated
corrugated board it can be seen that the greatest pressure to cause
bursting was necessary for the sample with the greatest wave, the sample
2K. This was the best achieved result, which means that the sample 2K
has the greatest resistance to bursting under pressure and such
corrugated boards can be used for heavier and stronger packaging.
[GRAPHIC 1 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 2 OMITTED]
3.3. Flat Crash Test
After the performed measurements of the horizontal surface of the
corrugated board resistance to pressure, the following results were
obtained. The sample with the greatest wave 2K, after 10 measurements
and the obtained medium value for the front side of the board, shows
lower result than the back side of the board after as many measurements
and the obtained medium value. This shows that greater pressure was
necessary for the back side of the board, in order to crush the waves,
which means that the back side of the board has greater resistance. The
sample 2K/3 shows that the back side has also higher resistance under
pressure to the horizontal surface than the front side of the board
which can be seen in the obtained measuring results. The difference
between the front and the back side of the board is somewhat greater
than in the sample 2K. The board sample with the smallest 2K/e wave
shows other results. The medium value obtained after 10 measurements
shows that the front side of that board has greater resistance under
pressure to horizontal surface. The back side of the board has somewhat
minor result. From these results it can be seen that only on the sample
2K/e, the sample with the smallest wave, the front side of the board has
greater resistance under pressure to the horizontal surface. In other
two samples the back side of the board has greater resistance.
[GRAPHIC 3 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 4 OMITTED]
When comparing the medium values for the front sides of all the
three tested samples (graph 5, 6) we can see that the greatest pressure
on the horizontal surface of the corrugated board can be applied to the
sample 2K/e. This sample has the smallest waves and it needed the
greatest possible pressure to perform the crushing and the deformation of the waves. This property is essential for corrugated board packaging
during the storage.
[GRAPHIC 5 OMITTED]
[GRAPHIC 6 OMITTED]
3.4. Edge Crush Test
After the 10 performed measurements for each sample of the
corrugated board and the calculated medium values, the test results are
the following ones (graph 7); the corrugated board with the smallest
waves, 2K/e achieved the best results in this investigation. This means
that this kind of waves needed the greatest pressure to undergo to
crushing and bending. The greater pressure achieved means the better
quality of the material. The sample 2K/3 which has somewhat smaller
waves had more inferior result. Lower pressure was necessary to cause
crushing in the corrugated board. Even smaller pressure was necessary to
cause the crushing and bending in the sample 2K. This kind of the
corrugated board has the greatest waves and shows the weakest resistance
to the bending on its edge. The performed investigation on these three
samples showed that the smaller the waves are, the greater number of
them exists in one meter and the more resistance they have when the
pressure is applied on their edges on the peaks of the waves.
[GRAPHIC 7 OMITTED]
4. CONCLUSION
The investigations showed that the waves in the corrugated board
have different resistance to pressure. The greatest wave (sample 2K)
which has the smallest waves in the length of one meter shows the best
results at dynamic investigations and Mullen. This shows how the
greatest waves soften the dynamic loadings which act on the board
surface the best among all. It can be seen that the greatest wave has
the greatest strength to pressure. Because of such properties it is the
best thing to use such waves for cushioning and packing of products
which are sensitive to blows during the transport. The smallest wave
(sample 2K/e) which has the greater number of waves in the length of one
meter has opposite results from the sample with the greatest wave
(sample 2K). There where the sample 2K achieved the best results, the
sample 2K/eachieved the worst ones. So the corrugated board with the
smallest wave has the best resistance to loading the horizontal
substrate and the board edge and it is the weakest one to the direct
mechanical blows and the surface pressure. Because of such properties
this board is the most suitable for packing the heavy objects which can
make the waves even by their weight and which are not sensitive to
blows.
5. REFERENCES
Jurecic D., Babic D., Lajic B.; Ddependence of the mechanical
characteristics of the corrugated board on the wave size, Zbornik radova
Blaz Baromic, Zadar 2007.
Roth L., Wybenga G. L., The Packaging Design Book of Patterns, Vol.
No. 22-23, New York, 2002.
http://www.fefco.org/fileadmin/Fefco/ESBO_codes/english_uk2.pdf,
Accessed: 2007-05-03.
Stricevic N., Suvremena ambalaza 1(Contemporarily Package1), Vol.
No. 123-125, Skolska knjiga, Zagreb, 1981.
Stricevic N. Suvremena ambalaza 2 (Contemporarily
Package2),Vol.No.31-32, Skolska knjiga, Zagreb, 1983.
Tolliver, H., Packing trends, Am. Ink Maker, no3. 2003.
Zugaj M., Dumicic, K., Dusak, V., Temelji znanstveno istrazivackog
rada, Fakultet organizacije i informatike, Varazdin, 2001.