Russell J.A. Kilbourn and Eleanor Ty, eds. The Memory Effect: The Remediation of Memory in Literature and Film.
McGregor, Hannah
Russell J.A. Kilbourn and Eleanor Ty, eds. The Memory Effect: The
Remediation of Memory in Literature and Film. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier
up, 2013. 342 pp. $85.00.
Contemporary media is obsessed with memory. Take, for example, the
season three finale of BBC'S Sherlock, which culminates in a
revelation about villainous media mogul Charles Augustus Magnussen.
Whereas our hero has believed Magnussen to be in possession of vaults of
information, accessed remotely through a Google-Glass-like digital
interface, the show reveals that Magnussen in fact, like Sherlock
himself, accesses his blackmail material via a mind palace--an ancient
mnemonic device that organizes information by translating memory into
spatial arrangements. The digital interface is disclosed as a visual
metaphor for recollection rather than a mediation of information. This
revelation mirrors the premise of the show itself, a contemporary
adaptation that enthusiastically relocates Sherlock's deductive
skills in the world of contemporary media and technology while assuaging
anxieties about the technologization of memory by insisting that
cellphones and databases are only prosthetic enhancements of the human
mind. In so doing it gestures toward the fundamentally intertwined
concerns that shape The Memory Effect: The Remediation of Memory in
Literature and Film: the ever-increasing mediation of memory, the
parallels between remediation and adaptation, and the tensions between
technological and cultural memory. Together, these topics reinforce
editors Russell J. A. Kilbourn and Eleanor Ty's claim that
"there is nothing outside of memory" (24).
This interdisciplinary essay collection, originating from a
conference held at Wilfrid Laurier University in 2011, approaches memory
studies through the lens of media theory to ask how memory may be
constituted, or at least profoundly reshaped, by its mediations and
remediations in literature, film, and television. How does our
contemporary media ecology, in which the same narratives are recycled
endlessly between multiple media, in which technology blurs the
distinctions between reality and representation, shape what and how we
remember? Despite the presentism that Kilbourn and Ty identify, in the
introduction, as endemic to modern memory studies, the collected essays
in fact span a range of texts and historical moments, from the
propaganda posters of the First World War (Sarah Henstra) to the
Heritage Minutes' production of nationalist nostalgia in the wake
of the Quebec referendum (Erin Peters).
Kilbourn and Ty's introduction clearly states the
collection's allegiances: to poststructuralist theories of
subjectivity and representation, to cultural theory, and to
interdisciplinarity. In the process, the introduction offers a
wide-ranging survey of the field, less systematic than evocative as it
leaps from Bergson to Proust to Freud, stopping along the way at
Deleuze, Hitchcock, St Augustine, and Matt Damon. It culminates in the
claim that close engagement with specific texts and cultural objects is
key to "an ethics of memory" capable of resisting the
ideological deployment of memory as political propaganda. It is through
this engagement, they assert, that "[t]he relentless and
ineluctable technologization, exteriorization, and virtualizations of
memory is mitigated by this model of memory as intersubjective,
dialogical, social exchange" (25).
The strongest essays in the collection are testaments to the
ethical, political, and theoretical value of close engagement with
cultural objects. Tanis MacDonald's analysis of Dionne Brand's
Ossuaries reads poetry as a public archive of mourning and as a
prosthetic for the violent rupture of the body and memory. She models
how attentiveness to the fragmented and scattered dynamics of the text
enacts a refusal to indulge in a fantasy of literature as undoing the
violence of the past, concluding that "Brand's exhumation of a
non-existent ossuary is as imperative as it is impossible" (104).
In a different register, Anders Bergstrom roots his argument that
"cinema has shaped and continues to shape our conceptions of how
memory operates" (197) in nuanced comparisons of contemporary
memory films, taking into account genre conventions, techniques of
representation, and modes of production and circulation. In the process,
he convincingly demonstrates that the impact of media on conceptions of
memory does not begin and end at the level of representation but is also
entwined with the global cultural industries through which contemporary
media operates.
The range and diversity of the collection is its greatest strength.
The organizing concern--how is memory mediated, and how does mediation
reshape memory?--can only be answered in situ, and the multiplication of
concrete analyses does a better job of unpacking the book's
theoretical concerns than any top-down generalizations could. Sabine
Sielke's argument that the relation between cultural and individual
memory might be understood through the metaphor of serialization, or
repetition with difference, resonates with John McCullough's
reading of commercial television as a site of memorialization for shared
traumas that "designs intervals, creating rhythms and textured
spaces filled with data and affect, or more provocatively, history and
memory" (271). Marlene Kadar's evocation of her archival
journey toward piecing together the lost story of a female concentration
camp guard, and the ethical challenges of "learning to look
carefully at a dark side" of life-writing (139), is enhanced by
Kate Warren's analysis of the affective dimensions of re-enactment
as a means of engaging with history and mediating cultural memory.
The many threads that tie the collection together are entangled in
productive ways, but the essays also work as stand-alone arguments. The
collection thus encourages readers to dive into the readings in any
order, depending on their interests. In this way, the book could serve
equally well as a wide-ranging introduction to contemporary memory
studies or as a resource for readers interested in any of the individual
topics, from postmemory to postmodernism, and from the Holocaust to
Hollywood. Kilbourn and Ty have put together a mosaic of essays that,
read together, convincingly argue that to live in an age of media is
also to live in an age of memory.
Hannah McGregor
University of Alberta