Novel polymer aids for low-grade oil sand ore processing.
Li, Haihong ; Long, Jun ; Xu, Zhenghe 等
INTRODUCTION
Oil sand ores mined in the Athabasca area of Alberta, Canada are a
mixture of bitumen (~10 wt%), mineral solids (~85%), and water (~5%).
The mineral solids consist mainly of coarse sand grains and clay fines.
To recover bitumen from the oil sands, water-based processes derived
from the pioneering Clark Hot Water Extraction (CHWE) technology (Clark
and Pasternack, 1932) are widely used in the industry. In these
processes, hot or warm water is added to oil sands to form a slurry from
which bitumen is liberated from the sand grains and recovered as bitumen
froth by flotation (Masliyah et al., 2004). The remainder of the slurry
is discharged as tailings into thickeners or tailings ponds. The bitumen
froth is subjected to further cleaning to remove entrapped fine solids
and emulsified water before bitumen upgrading.
To improve bitumen recovery, chemical aids are often needed in
bitumen extraction (Sanford, 1983; Taylor, 1988; Hepler and Smith,
1994). Particularly, for the processing of low-grade oil sand ores with
a higher content of fines (mineral solid particles less than 44 _m),
process aids have to be used to obtain an acceptable bitumen recovery.
Although the use of conventional process aids, such as caustic, does
improve bitumen recovery and bitumen froth quality, they lead to
difficulties in tailings treatment by dispersing the fine particles in
the tailings. An attempt was made recently in our group (Li et al.,
2005) to overcome such problems. A hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) with
a high molecular weight and a medium charge density (a commercial
polymer flocculant with a trade name of Percol 727) was used to process
a low-grade ore. It was found that the addition of this polymer in the
bitumen extraction process not only improved bitumen recovery but also
enhanced tailing settling. However, it led to a deteriorated bitumen
froth quality.
From both economic and technical perspectives, it is always
desirable to achieve a holistic improvement in bitumen recovery, froth
quality, and tailings settling. With the successful use of HAPM in
improving both bitumen recovery and tailings settling, such an ambitious
goal becomes attainable as long as bitumen froth quality can be
improved. In this regard, we made a preliminary attempt in the present
study.
In order to improve bitumen froth quality, it is essential to
understand the role of HPAM in the bitumen extraction process. Long et
al. (2006) employed the technique of single molecule force spectroscopy to measure the adhesion forces of single Percol 727 molecules on the
surfaces of various oil sand components, such as bitumen, sand, and
clay, using an atomic force microscope (AFM). They found that the
polymer would preferentially adsorb onto the clay surface than onto the
bitumen surface. It is the selective adsorption of HPAM on clay that
benefited both bitumen recovery and tailings settling. When the polymer
was used as a process aid in the extraction process, it induced the
formation of large flocs of fine particles, thus reducing the number of
individual fine particles in the oil sand slurry. As a result, the
chance for slime coating, that is, the coating of bitumen surface by a
layer of fine solids, to take place was reduced. This in turn enhanced
the attachment of air bubbles to bitumen droplets and thus improved the
flotation efficiency and consequently bitumen recovery. The formation of
large floccules also increased the settling rate of the fine solids in
the tailings. Because the produced large floccules were normally loose
and irregular in shape, they could be brought up to the bitumen froth by
aerated bitumen droplets and air bubbles during the flotation process,
thereby leading to a poor froth quality. Therefore, it is desirable to
find/design polymer aids capable of enhancing flocculation of fine
particles so as to improve bitumen froth quality. The formed floccules
by these polymers must be denser than those formed by HPAM.
Among various attempts to enhance fine clay flocculation, the use
of polymer flocculants, such as HPAM, in combination with microparticles
was found to be effective. The microparticles can be either polymers or
inorganic substances. For example, Xiao et al. (1999) used cationic polymeric microparticles with an anionic polyacrylamide (PAM) flocculant
to treat clay fines and found that such a system was substantially more
efficient than either component alone. The adsorption of the cationic
polymeric microparticles on the clay surface and the complexation
between the microparticles and anionic polymers were the main driving
forces to significantly promote clay flocculation. Asselman and Garnier
(2000) found that anionic bentonite microparticles could significantly
enhance the PAM-induced hetero-flocculation between wood fibres and
fines. Ovenden and Xiao (2002) used cationic colloidal alumina
microparticles ([Al.sub.2][O.sub.3]) with various linear PAMpolymers in
clay flocculation. They found that a strong synergy between the cationic
microparticles and anionic polymers resulted in effective flocculation.
Instead of a simple combination of microparticles and polymer
flocculants, further efforts have been made to synthesize
microparticle-polymer hybrid products for more efficient flocculation.
Yang et al. (2004) synthesized a novel flocculant of hybrid
Al[(OH).sub.3]-polyacrylamide (Al-PAM) and found that an ionic bond existed between Al(OH)3 colloids and PAM chains in the Al-PAM. The
flocculation efficiency of Al-PAM in treating kaolinite suspensions was
much better than that of a commercial PAM and a PAM/Al[Cl.sup.3] blend
because the Al-PAM-induced floccules were denser and larger and of a
spherical shape.
Based on the above discussion, it appears that Al-PAM is a polymer
that can flocculate clay fines in a desirable manner as described
earlier for improving bitumen froth quality. Therefore, a hybrid Al-PAM
was synthesized in the current study and used as a process aid for
low-grade oil sand ore processing. It was found that Al-PAM was indeed
able to improve bitumen froth quality, but at the cost of bitumen
recovery. In this study, an attempt is made to use Al-PAM with HPAM for
low-grade oil sand ore processing. The goal is to achieve the
aforementioned holistic improvement in bitumen recovery, bitumen froth
quality, and tailings settling.
EXPERIMENTAL
Al-PAM Synthesis and Characterization
Hydrogen bonding is the main driving force for PAM polymers to
adsorb on clay surface (Sabah and Erkan, 2006). For HPAM, it is
therefore not sufficient to enhance their affinity on clay surface by
adjusting such molecular properties as charge density and molecular
weight (Michaels, 1954; Gu and Doner, 1993). New functional groups must
be integrated into the PAM molecular structure. These groups should
provide a stronger binding with clay surface than hydrogen bonding, thus
being able to enhance their adsorption on clay surface. Clay minerals,
in general, consist of two basic units: alumina octahedral and silica
tetrahedral. Aluminum, silicon, and oxygen are the main mineral
elements. Because there is a strong affinity between aluminum and oxygen
in the form of -O-Al-O-, integrating Al[(OH).sub.3] as a functional
group into the PAM molecular structure may help the adsorption of the
polymer on a clay surface because the resulting hybrid Al-PAM can
strongly attach to the clay surface in the form of -O-Al-O]-Al-PAM.
All chemicals used for the synthesis of Al-PAM, including
acrylamide, ammonium carbonate, aluminum chloride, ferric chloride hexahydrate, sodium bisulphite, ammonium persulphate, and acrylamide,
were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Ottawa, Canada). The synthesis
procedure has been described in detail elsewhere (Yang et al., 2004).
Briefly, it had three steps. Step one was to prepare an Al(OH)3 colloid
solution by a slow and dropwise addition of an ammonium carbonate
solution into an aluminum chloride solution at room temperature during
which the following reaction occurred,
2Al[Cl.sub.3] + 3([N[H.sub.4]).sub.2]C[O.sub.3] + 3[H.sub.2]O =
2Al[(OH).sub.3] + 6(N[H.sub.4])Cl + 3C[O.sub.2] (1)
Strong agitation was required to obtained Al[(OH).sub.3] colloidal
particles of uniform size. The second step was to synthesize the hybrid
polymer, that is, the polymerization of acrylamide monomers in an
Al(OH)3 colloidal solution with
[(N[H.sub.4]).sub.2][S.sub.2][O.sub.8]-NaHS[O.sub.3] as an initiator.
Typically, a 0.3 mL solution of 0.075 wt% NaHS[O.sub.3] and 0.15 wt%
[(N[H.sub.4]).sub.2][S.sub.2][O.sub.8] was added into a 30 mL
Al[(OH).sub.3] colloidal solution in a 2000 mL flask. Nitrogen gas was
introduced to the flask for 20 min before the addition of the initiator.
After 4.5 g of acrylamide monomers were added, the flask was sealed and
the polymerization was initiated and proceeded for 8 h at 40[degrees]C.
The final step was to extract and purify the reaction product by
dissolving the product in deionized water, precipitating impurities, and
extracting pure hybrid polymer with an acetone solution. After the
extracted material was dried at room temperature in a vacuum oven, the
final product of hybrid polymer was obtained.
Bitumen Extraction Test
The oil sand ore used for the bitumen extraction tests was a
transition ore provided by Syncrude Canada Ltd (Fort McMurray, Alberta,
Canada). The ore contained 8.8 wt% bitumen, 8.7% connate water, and
82.5% solids. In the mineral solids, 25.9% were fines (mineral particles
smaller than 44 [micro]m). Because the ore had a high fine content, it
is considered to be low grade with poor processability. The water used
in the extraction tests was a recycle process water from Aurora plant of
Syncrude Canada Ltd. Atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) analysis
showed that this process water contained 47.0 ppm calcium and 15.0 ppm
magnesium. Its pH was about 8.2.
Two polymers, including the aforementioned HPAM (Percol 727)
purchased from Ciba Specialty Chemicals (Basel, Switzerland) and the
synthesized Al-PAM, were used as process aids in the bitumen extraction.
Percol 727 is a partially HPAM with a high molecular weight of ~17.5
million Daltons and a medium charge density of ~27%. These two polymers
were used individually or together in the bitumen extraction tests.
Polymer solutions were prepared at a concentration of 0.05 wt% using
deionized water one day prior to their use in the extraction tests.
Bitumen extraction experiments were conducted in a laboratory
hydrotransport extraction system (LHES), which has been described in
detail in an earlier paper (Li et al., 2005). For each bitumen
extraction experiment, 5 L of Aurora process water preheated to
35[degrees]C were added in the LHES followed by the addition of a
polymer solution at a desired dosage. It should be noted that in the
current study, polymer dosage in ppm refers to mg of polymer per litre
of oil sand slurry. (To convert this slurry volume-based ppm to mg of
polymer per kilogram of oil sand, a multiplying factor of 3.8 should be
used. For example, 20 ppm on the basis of oil sand slurry volume, mg/L,
is equivalent to 76 ppm on the basis of oil sand mass, mg/kg.) A 1.5 kg
of the oil sand sample was then fed into the LHES system. The formed
slurry was conditioned by circulating in the LHES at a constant
temperature of 35[degrees]C for 5 min before air was introduced at a
flow rate of 200 mL/min. A timer was then started to indicate the
flotation time. Bitumen froth was collected six times in a flotation
period of 60 min at different time intervals.
The collected froth samples were assayed using the industrial
standard procedure (Dean Stark) to determine the content of bitumen,
solids, and water. The weight ratio of bitumen in the froth to that in
the feed represents the bitumen recovery. Froth quality was determined
using weight ratios of bitumen to solids (B/S) and bitumen to water
(B/W) in the froth.
After each bitumen extraction test, the tailings slurry left in
LHES was collected and used for tailings settling tests according to the
following procedure. Fifty millilitres of tailings sample directly taken
from the tailings slurry were poured into a 50 mL graduated cylinder. To
mixwell the sample, the cylinder was sealed by a glass stopper and
gently turned upside down several times. It was then placed on a bench
and the settling test was started. The descent of the solids/liquid
interface (mud line) was observed and recorded as a function of settling
time.
Colloidal Force Measurement
To understand the role of Al-PAM and the Al-PAM+HPAM dual system in
bitumen extraction, direct surface force measurements were carried out
in the current study. The interactions between a clay particle and a
bitumen surface and between two bitumen surfaces as well as between a
clay particle and a silica surface in aqueous media were measured.
A Nanoscope E AFM with a vendor-supplied fluid cell (Digital
Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA) was used for the surface force
measurements. Clay particles used as force probes were chosen under an
optical microscope from a great number of particles obtained from the
tailings slurry of the bitumen extraction experiment without chemical
addition. The chosen clay particles were attached to the apex of
gold-coated silicon nitride cantilevers (lever type 100 [micro]m wide)
with a spring constant of 0.58 N/m. Bitumen probes were prepared by
first dipping silica spheres (8 [micro]m in diameter) in a
bitumen-in-toluene solution to produce a thin layer of bitumen coating.
The bitumen-coated spheres were then attached to the cantilever (Liu et
al., 2005). The bitumen substrate surface was prepared by coating a thin
layer (~100 nm) of bitumen onto 10 x 10 [mm.sup.2] silica wafers
(NANOFAB, University of Alberta, Canada) using a spin-coater. The
characteristics of prepared bitumen surface can be found elsewhere (Liu
et al., 2003). The silica wafers had an oxidized surface layer of ~0.6
[micro]m and were also used as substrates in the force measurements to
represent sand grains. The liquid medium used in the force measurements
was the supernatant of the tailings slurries produced from the bitumen
extraction tests. The detailed procedure of AFM force measurements has
been described elsewhere (Ducker and Senden, 1992; Long et al., 2005).
Briefly, a sample surface moves towards and away from a cantilever tip
(colloid probe) by the extension and retraction of an AFM piezotube. The
force acting between the probe and surface is determined from the
deflection of the cantilever using Hooke's law. Each force plot
represents a complete extension-retraction cycle of the piezo. When a
sample surface approaches a probe, the long-range interaction force
between the two surfaces is measured while the adhesion (or pull-off)
force can be obtained during the retraction process. For quantitative
comparison, the measured long-range interaction force (F) and adhesion
force (pull-off force) were normalized by probe radius (R).
All force measurements were conducted after an incubation time of
60 min. Preliminary experiments showed that 60 min were sufficient for
the two surfaces immersed in the aqueous medium to equilibrate. For each
given condition, the force measurement was performed at different
locations of the substrate surface and several probe-substrate pairs
were used to obtain representative results. All force measurements were
conducted at room temperature of 22 [+ or -] 1[degrees]C.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Effect of Al-PAM on Bitumen Extraction
The results of bitumen recovery obtained with the addition of
hybrid Al-PAM at dosages of 0, 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 ppm in the extraction
process are given in Figure 1a. Surprisingly, the bitumen recovery was
decreased with the addition of Al-PAM from 0, 2.5 to 5 ppm. When 10 ppm
of Al-PAM was added, the recovery was still lower than that of no
polymer addition (0 ppm, ~50% recovery). At a further higher dosage of
20 ppm, the recovery is only marginally higher than 50%. Clearly, the
lower bitumen recoveries obtained with the addition of Al-PAM were not
anticipated. Such lower bitumen recoveries may be related to the
following phenomenon observed during the extraction experiments. With
the addition of Al-PAM, bitumen formed large black lumps with a size of
about 0.5-2 cm. Figure 1b shows a sample of a bitumen lump. Since Al-PAM
strongly attached to clay surface, its addition in the extraction
process resulted in the flocculation of fine clay particles. However, it
also resulted in a strong coalescence between the bitumen droplets. The
large bitumen lumps formed were too heavy to be brought up to the
bitumen froth by air bubbles with a size of about 0.1-1 mm. Thus the
bitumen recovery decreased.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Figure 2 shows the effect of Al-PAM addition on the bitumen froth
quality. As shown in Figure 2a, the B/S ratio in the froth increased
from about 1.5 to 1.7 with the addition of Al-PAM from 0 to 10 ppm.
Further increasing the dosage to 20 ppm shows little effect on the B/S
ratio. These results indicate that the amount of solids in the froth
decreased by the addition of Al-PAM and that the quality of the bitumen
froth was improved. Although both Al-PAM and HPAM can induce
flocculation of clay fines, the size, shape, and structure of the
floccules formed by these two polymers are different. Yang et al. (2004)
found that clay floccules formed by Al-PAM were larger and denser than
those formed by HPAM. These floccules also had a spherical shape
compared to an irregular shape induced by HPAM. In addition to the
common adsorption mechanism of the PAM chains on clay particles by
hydrogen binding, the cationic Al[(OH).sub.3] cores in Al-PAM also
attracted the negatively charged clay particles by electrostatic
interactions. Such a synergetic effect resulted in the formation of
dense spherical floccules. Therefore, when Al-PAM was used in the
bitumen extraction process, the formed floccules of fine solids could
not be easily brought to the bitumen froth by the air bubbles and/or
bitumen droplets, leading to an increased B/S ratio.
Figure 2b shows the effect of Al-PAM dosage on the B/W ratio. With
the addition of Al-PAM from 0 to 10 ppm, the B/W ratio significantly
increased from approximately 0.25 to 0.48.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
These numbers indicate that the amount of water in the froth was
substantially decreased through the addition of Al-PAM. This decrease
could be due to changes in the interfacial properties between water and
other components, such as bitumen and air bubbles in the presence of
Al-PAM. To show such an effect, we measured the contact angles of
produced water on a bitumen surface. The produced water was taken from
the supernatant of tailings slurry produced by the bitumen extraction
process with Al-PAM added at different dosages. Figure 3 shows the
contact angle as a function of the Al-PAM dosage used in the bitumen
extraction process. Without polymer addition, the contact angle is about
75[degrees]. However, the contact angle significantly increased to about
98[degrees] when 5 ppm or more Al-PAM was used in the extraction
process. As the contact angle increases, the amount of water brought by
bitumen droplets to the froth decreases.
Figure 4 shows the effect of Al-PAM addition on the tailings
settling. Even at the lowest Al-PAM dosage used in the extraction
process, the settling was substantially improved by the addition of
Al-PAM as compared with the case of no polymer addition. The final
sediment volumes for all the dosages used are nearly the same. As
mentioned earlier, Al-PAM can induce larger and denser spherical
floccules. Therefore, faster settling and smaller final sediment volumes
would be anticipated when Al-PAM was used.
Role of Al-PAM in Tuning Colloidal Interactions
To understand the effect of Al-PAM addition on bitumen extraction,
the long-range interaction and adhesion forces between bitumen and fine
clay particles and between bitumen and bitumen were measured by AFM.
Figure 5 shows the measured forces between bitumen and clay particles.
Because the clay particles were rough and irregular, as would be
anticipated, the force data obtained are highly scattered. As shown in
Figure 5, the long-range interactions between clay and bitumen are
repulsive albeit weak. Comparing with the force profile of no polymer
addition (circles), the addition of Al-PAM shows little effect on the
clay-bitumen interactions. However, the clay-bitumen adhesion forces as
shown in the inset of this figure were substantially decreased by the
addition of Al-PAM. In the case of no polymer addition (0 ppm), the
adhesion force is about 2.3 mN/m. Such a large adhesion force indicates
that the binding between bitumen and clay particles is strong, leading
to hetero-coagulation between bitumen and clays and thus to difficulties
in the separation of bitumen from the solids. As a result, the bitumen
recovery would be low. This anticipation is consistent with the result
of bitumen recovery obtained (50%). When Al-PAM was added at a dosage of
5 or 10 ppm, the bitumen-clay adhesion forces became small (about
0.3-0.4 mN/m). Hence, the separation of bitumen from the solids should
be easier comparing with the case of no polymer addition. An improved
bitumen recovery would be anticipated. However, the experimental results
show that the bitumen recovery was decreased by the addition of Al-PAM
(Figure 1a). This apparent discrepancy, as explained earlier, is due to
the formation of large bitumen lumps (Figure 1b), which are too heavy to
float. Analysis on samples obtained from the bitumen lumps shows that
they contain ~54 wt% bitumen, 17% solids, and 29% water. The B/S ratio
is about 3, which is higher than the B/S ratio of the bitumen froth
obtained (~1.7, Figure 2a). The higher B/S ratio in the bitumen lumps
suggests that the separation of bitumen from the solids was in fact
improved by the addition of Al-PAM. This is indeed what would be
anticipated from the measured forces.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
To understand the coalescence of bitumen droplets and thus the
formation of the large bitumen lumps, we also measured the long-range
interaction and adhesion forces between two bitumen surfaces. The
results are presented in Figure 6. In the case of no polymer addition,
the long-range interactions are purely repulsive (squares). Because
bitumen is normally negatively charged in an alkaline solution (Liu et
al., 2003), this repulsion originates from the electrostatic
interactions. When Al-PAM was added (triangles for 5 ppm and diamonds
for 10 ppm), the repulsive forces remain unchanged until a separation
distance of approximately 10 nm. Within 10 nm, attractive forces are
observed. In such a short distance, the extruded polymer chains adsorbed
on one surface could attach to the other surface by mainly electrostatic
attractions between the positively charged Al[(OH).sub.3] cores in the
Al-PAM molecules and the negatively charged sites of bitumen surface,
and/or by such interactions as hydrogen bonding and van der Waals forces
during the approach process in the force measurements. The inset of
Figure 6 shows the measured adhesion forces between two bitumen
surfaces. In the case of no polymer addition, the adhesion force is
about 6-7 mN/m. When Al-PAM was added, the adhesion forces become
extremely high, reaching about 50 mN/m. In the force measurements, we
observed that both bitumen surfaces strongly attached to each other. The
presence of an attractive long-range interaction and a strong adhesion
between bitumen surfaces facilitates coalescence of bitumen droplets,
leading to the formation of large bitumen lumps. This finding is
consistent with the experimental observation (Figure 1b).
As the addition of Al-PAM in the bitumen extraction process also
improves tailings settling (Figure 4), to understand such phenomena, the
interaction and adhesion forces between clay particles and silica wafers
(representing sand grains in oil sands) were measured and the results
are presented in Figure 7. Although the measured long-range interaction
forces are purely repulsive in all cases, the repulsions are depressed
by the increasing addition of Al-PAM. The observed attractions in a very
short separation distance of about 2 nmmay result from the electrostatic
attraction between the aluminum cores of Al-PAM and the negatively
charged sites of the silica or clay surface, or from the van der Waals
or other interactions. The inset of Figure 7 shows the adhesion forces
between clay and silica. In the case of no polymer addition, the
adhesion force is zero. The combination of a strong long-range repulsion
and a zero adhesion indicates that the solid particles in the tailings
slurry would remain in a well-dispersed state, resulting in very slow
settling. When Al-PAM was used, the adhesion force substantially
increased from 0 to about 2 mN/m. Such strong adhesion forces were
induced by the formation of polymer bridges between the solid surfaces.
Such a bridging effect leads to flocculation of fine solid particles.
Consequently, a fast settling of fine solids in the tailings slurry was
achieved (Figure 4).
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]
Effect of Al-PAM and HPAM Dual Systems on
Bitumen Recovery
From the results presented above, one can conclude that AlPAM is
able to improve the separation of bitumen from fine solids, bitumen
froth quality, and tailing settling. However, it led to deteriorated
bitumen recovery due to the formation of large bitumen lumps during the
extraction process. As shown in Figure 6, Al-PAM caused attractive
long-range interactions and very strong adhesion forces between bitumen
surfaces. As a result, coalescence between bitumen droplets occurred
readily. This finding indicates that the affinity of Al-PAM to the
bitumen surface is very high. To resolve this negative impact, a process
aid with less affinity to the bitumen should be used. In an earlier
study (Li et al., 2005), HPAM was used as a process aid to process a
similar low-grade ore. No bitumen lumps were observed in the extraction
process and the bitumen recovery was significantly improved. However,
the addition of HPAM, as mentioned earlier, resulted in poor bitumen
froth quality. Considering the different performance of Al-PAM and HPAM,
we were prompted to use both Al-PAM and HPAM together in the bitumen
extraction process. In these tests, 5 ppm of Al-PAM with 5, 15, or 20
ppm of HPAM were used in the bitumen extraction process. The results of
using such dual-polymer systems are presented in this section.
Figure 8 shows the results of bitumen recovery with the addition of
the Al-PAM and HPAM dual systems. For comparison, the results for the
case of no polymer addition and for the case with the addition of Al-PAM
or HPAM alone are also plotted in this figure. With the addition of HPAM
alone, the highest bitumen recovery, about 67%, was achieved at a HPAM
dosage of 20 ppm. With the co-addition of the two polymers at 5+5 ppm
(AlPAM+HPAM), the bitumen recovery increased to about 78%. The highest
bitumen recovery of ~86% was obtained with the co-addition of the two
polymers at 5+15 ppm. These results indicate that the use of the dual
system can substantially improve bitumen recovery as compared with the
recoveries obtained at no polymer addition (50%) and at the addition of
one polymer alone (67% for HPAM at 20 ppm and 45% for Al-PAM at 5 ppm).
Figure 9 shows the effect of the co-addition on bitumen froth
quality. As shown in Figure 9a, when the dual system was used at a
dosage of 5+5 ppm, the B/S ratio is nearly the same as that with the
addition of Al-PAM alone at 5 ppm (or 5+0 ppm). Increasing the HPAM
dosage in the dual system (e.g. at 5+15 and 5+20 ppm) decreased the B/S
ratio. Figure 9b shows the results of B/W ratio. Comparing with the B/W
ratio obtained in the case of Al-PAM addition alone at 5 ppm, the B/W
ratio was decreased by the use of the dual system. However, the B/W
ratios at 5+5, 5+15, and 5+20 ppm are still higher than that obtained
without chemical addition or that with the addition of HPAM alone.
[FIGURE 9 OMITTED]
Figure 10 shows two photographs of bitumen froths obtained without
polymer addition and with the addition of the dual-polymer system at 5+5
ppm. In the case of no polymer addition, the froth as shown by the
photograph (Figure 10a) appears greyish brown, indicating a high solid
content and a poor froth quality. In contrast, the photograph of Figure
10b shows that the froth obtained with the co-addition of the two
polymers at 5+5 ppm is shining and black, suggesting a good froth
quality.
Figure 11 shows the effect of the co-addition on tailing settling.
While compared to the case of no polymer addition (triangles), the
addition of a polymer, whether it is individual HPAM or Al-PAM, or a
dual system, can substantially improve the tailings settling. There is
no significant difference among the final sediment volumes obtained with
the addition of HPAM or Al-PAM alone, or both together.
In summary, the results presented in Figures 8 to 11 show that the
use of an Al-PAM+HPAM dual system led to a holistic improvement in
bitumen recovery, bitumen froth quality, and tailings settling.
Considering all the aspects of bitumen recovery, bitumen froth quality,
and tailings settling, the optimal dosage for the co-addition is about
5+5 ppm.
[FIGURE 10 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 11 OMITTED]
Colloidal Forces in the Presence of the Al-PAM+HPAM Dual System
To understand the effect of the Al-PAM and HPAM dual system on
bitumen recovery, the colloidal interactions between bitumen and clay
and between bitumen and bitumen were measured in the supernatant of
tailings slurry obtained with the AlPAM+HPAM dual system added in the
extraction process at 5+5 ppm. Figure 12 shows the measured long-range
interaction forces between bitumen and clay particles (open symbols).
Different symbols present different experimental runs. For comparison, a
force profile obtained in the case of no polymer addition (filled
circles) is also shown in this figure. Clearly, the long-range
interactions are all repulsive. Compared with the force profile of no
polymer addition (filled circles), some force curves (e.g. the diamonds)
show that the long-range interaction forces are affected only marginally
by the co-addition of the two polymers. Although the repulsion force
becomes slightly stronger in some cases (e.g. the triangles, inverted
triangles, and hexagons), the effect of the polymer co-addition is not
prominent. The inset shows a histogram of the corresponding adhesion
forces obtained. Although a wide range of adhesion forces from 0 to 1.5
mN/m were measured, the average adhesion force is as small as about 0.28
mN/m. For the case of no polymer addition, the adhesion force is about
2.3 mN/m (Figure 5). These results indicate that the clay-bitumen
adhesion was substantially reduced by the polymer co-addition. As a
result, the bitumen recovery should be improved by the use of the dual
polymer system. This anticipation is verified by the results of bitumen
recovery. As presented in Figure 8, the bitumen recovery increased from
~50% with no polymer addition to ~78% with the dual polymer co-addition
at 5+5 ppm.
[FIGURE 12 OMITTED]
As the use of Al-PAM alone also reduces the clay-bitumen adhesion
force (inset of Figure 5), the lower bitumen recovery (~45% at 5 ppm of
Al-PAM addition) is, as discussed earlier, mainly due to the formation
of the large bitumen lumps. When the dual polymer system was used in the
extraction process, no bitumen lumps were observed. This indicates that
the presence of HPAM in the dual system significantly altered the
interactions between bitumen and bitumen. Figure 13 shows the results of
measured long-range interaction forces between bitumen and bitumen for
the case of the co-addition of Al-PAM and HPAM at 5+5 ppm in the
extraction process. This figure shows that the long-range interaction
forces between bitumen and bitumen in the presence of the dual polymer
system are still repulsive (triangles) although the repulsion is
depressed when compared with the forces obtained with no polymer
addition (squares). In direct contrast, attractive forces were measured
between bitumen and bitumen for the case of Al-PAM alone (Figure 6). The
inset of Figure 13 shows a histogram of the adhesion forces between
bitumen and bitumen in the presence of the dual polymer system. From
this histogram, the average adhesion force obtained is about 0.36 mN/m.
As shown in the inset of Figure 6, the bitumen-bitumen adhesion forces
are about 6-7 mN/m in the case of no polymer addition and as high as 50
mN/m in the case of Al-PAM addition alone at 5 or 10 ppm. These results
indicate a significant impact of the polymer co-addition on the
interactions between bitumen droplets. Because the long-range
interaction forces are repulsive and the adhesion forces are weak, the
use of the dual system prevents the coalescence of bitumen droplets.
This resolved the major problem in the case of Al-PAM alone: the
formation of large bitumen lumps. Thus, higher bitumen recovery is
anticipated by the polymer co-addition. This agrees well with the
experimental results of bitumen recovery.
[FIGURE 13 OMITTED]
To understand the role of the dual polymer system in tailings
settling, the interaction and adhesion forces between clay particles and
silica wafers (representing sand grains in oil sands) were also measured
in the supernatant of tailings slurry obtained with the dual system
added in the extraction process at 5+5 ppm. Figure 14 shows the results.
Compared with the force profile of no polymer addition (filled circles),
the presence of the dual system significantly depresses the repulsion
between clay and silica. In some cases, it results in attractive forces
(e.g. triangles and squares). The inset of Figure 14 shows a
distribution of adhesion forces between clay and silica. A wide range of
adhesion force from about 0.5 to 4.5 mN/m were obtained. The average
adhesion force is about 2.83 mN/m. The combination of possible
attractive long-range interactions and strong adhesion forces suggests
that the solid particles in the tailings slurry would be flocculated and
that a fast tailings settling would be anticipated. This is confirmed by
the results of tailings settling shown in Figure 11.
[FIGURE 14 OMITTED]
CONCLUSIONS
To achieve a holistic improvement in bitumen recovery, froth
quality, and tailings settling in the processing of low-grade oil sand
ores, a hybrid Al-PAM was synthesized and used in combination with a
partially HPAM as process aids in bitumen extraction. An AFM was used to
directly measure the bitumen-solid, bitumen-bitumen, and solid-solid
interactions so as to understand the role of Al-PAM and the Al-PAM+HAPM
dual system in bitumen extraction and tailings settling. From the
results obtained, the following conclusions can be drawn.
Al-HPAM was capable to improve both bitumen froth quality and
tailings settling. But, it led to deterioration in bitumen recovery due
to the formation of large bitumen lumps in the extraction process. This
problem was resolved by the co-addition of HPAM. The expected holistic
improvement in bitumen recovery, tailings settling, and froth quality
was achieved by the co-addition of Al-PAM and HPAM at a low dosage.
The measured surface forces indicate that the presence of Al-PAM
induced attractive long-range interactions and strong adhesion forces
between bitumen surfaces, leading to the coalescence of bitumen droplets
and consequently to the formation of large bitumen lumps. The dual
system lowered the bitumen-clay and bitumen-bitumen adhesion forces but
increased solid-solid adhesion forces, resulting in higher bitumen
recovery and improved bitumen froth quality as well as enhanced tailings
settling.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The financial support for this work from NSERC Industrial Research
Chair Program in Oil Sands Engineering (held by JHM) is gratefully
acknowledged.
Manuscript received November 20, 2006; revised manuscript received
September 26, 2007; accepted for publication October 5, 2007
REFERENCES
Asselman, T. and G. Garnier, "The Role of Anionic
Microparticles in a Poly(acrylamide)-montmorillonite Flocculation Aid
System," Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 170, 79-90 (2000).
Clark, K. A., and D. S. Pasternack, "Hot Water Separation of
Bitumen from Alberta Bituminous Sand," Ind. Eng. Chem. 24,
1410-1416 (1932).
Ducker, W. A. and T. J. Senden, "Measurement of Forces in
Liquids Using a Force Microscope," Langmuir 8, 1831-1836 (1992).
Gu, B. and H. E. Doner, "The Interaction of Polysaccharides
with Silver Hill Illite," Clays Miner. 40, 246-250 (1993).
Hepler, L. G. and R. G. Smith, "AOSTRA Technical Publication
Series 14," Alberta Oil Sands Technology and Research Authority,
Edmonton, AB (1994).
Li, H., J. Long, Z. Xu and J. H. Masliyah, "Synergetic Role of
Polymer Flocculant in Low-Temperature Bitumen Extraction and Tailings
Treatment," Energy Fuels 19, 936-943 (2005).
Liu, J., Z. Xu and J. H. Masliyah, "Colloidal Forces between
Bitumen Surfaces in Aqueous Solutions Measured with Atomic Force
Microscope," Colloids Surf. A 260, 217-228 (2005).
Liu, J., Z. Xu and J. H. Masliyah, "Studies on Bitumen-Silica
Interaction in Aqueous Solutions by Atomic Force Microscopy,"
Langmuir 19, 3911-3920 (2003).
Long, J., H. Li, Z. Xu and J. H. Masliyah, "Role of Colloidal
Interactions in Oil Sand Tailings Treatment," AIChE J. 52, 371-383
(2006).
Long, J., Z. Xu and J. H. Masliyah, "On the Role of
Temperature in Oil Sands Processing," Energy Fuels 19, 1440-1446
(2005).
Masliyah, J., Z. Zhou, Z. Xu, J. Czarnecki and H. Hamza,
"Understanding Water-Based Bitumen Extraction from Athabasca Oil
Sands," Can. J. Chem. Eng. 82, 628-654 (2004).
Michaels, A. S., "Aggregation of Suspension by
Polyelectrolytes," Ind. Eng. Chem. 46, 1485-1490 (1954).
Ovenden, C. and H. Xiao, "Flocculation Behaviour and
Mechanisms of Cationic Inorganic Microparticle/Polymer Systems,"
Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 197, 225-234 (2002).
Sabah, E. and Z. E. Erkan, "Interaction Mechanism of
Flocculants with Coal Waste Slurry," Fuel 85, 350-359 (2006).
Sanford, E. C., "Processibility of Athabasca Oil Sand:
Interrelationship between Oil Sand Fine Solids, Process Aids, Mechanical
Energy and Oil Sand Age After Mining," Can. J. Chem. Eng. 61,
554-567 (1983).
Taylor, A. S., Eur. Pat. No. EP 261793 (1988).
Xiao, H., Z. Liu and N. Wiseman, "Synergetic Effect of
Cationic Polymer Microparticles and Anionic Polymer on Fine Clay
Flocculation," J. Colloid Interface Sci. 216, 409-417 (1999).
Yang, W. Y., J. W. Qian and Z. Q. Shen, "A Novel Flocculant of
Al(OH)3-Polyacrylamide Ionic Hybrid," J. Colloid Interface Sci.
273, 400-405 (2004).
Haihong Li, Jun Long, Zhenghe Xu and Jacob H. Masliyah *
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of
Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2G6
* Author to whom correspondence may be addressed.
E-mail address: jacob.masliyah@ualberta.Ca
DOI 10.1022/cjce.20030