The transient response study of CO, C[O.sub.2], and [O.sub.2] adsorption and CO Oxidation over [La.sub.0.4][Sr.sub.0.6][Co.sub.0.4][Mn.sub.0.6][O.sub.3].
Li, Rong ; Yu, Shui-Xian ; Wang, Fu-Shan 等
INTRODUCTION
Carbon monoxide, emitted from many industrial processes and
automobile exhausts, has been considered as a major air pollution. A
number of catalysts have been studied in the past decades (Efstathiou,
1991; Sander et al., 1991; Islam et al., 1996; Eichler and Hafner, 1999;
Bak et al., 2000; Martra, 2000). The kinetics of CO oxidation on the
perovskite-type oxides catalyst
[La.sujb.0.4][Sr.sub.0.6][Co.sub.0.4][Mn.sub.0.6][O.sub.3] has been
studied previously and the possible mechanism of CO oxidation was
proposed (Men and Xi, 1985; Ma et al., 1993). In this communication, the
transient behaviour of components in the reaction system of CO oxidation
on this catalyst was investigated by the use of transient response
method. Results showed that CO was not adsorbed on the catalyst surface
and CO oxidation was carried out between the surface oxygen species on
the catalyst and gas phase CO. Meanwhile, C[O.sub.2] can be adsorbed on
the catalyst surface but its adsorption site was different from the
forming site.
EXPERIMENT
Catalyst
A [La.sub.0.4][Sr.sub.0.6][Co.sub.0.4][Mn.sub.0.6][O.sub.3]
catalyst was prepared by the citric acid complex compound method
(Kakihana and Okubo, 1999; Julien et al., 2000). Its structure
determined by X-ray diffraction found that it was the single crystal and
its surface area was 28.4 [m.sup.2]/g with the BET method. The gases for
the reaction were commercial cylinders such as CO, C[O.sub.2],
[O.sub.2], and ultra high purity [N.sub.2].
Experimental Method and Condition
The reactor for experiments was a pylex 'u' type glass
tube (d = 5.5 mm) filled with 12.8 g of 60-80 mesh catalyst. It was put
in a thermostat in which the plant oil was used as a thermostatic
medium. All response experiments were carried out at 70[degrees]C and 1
atm.
The mixed gases for the reaction were consisted of CO, [N.sub.2],
and [O.sub.2]. The disturbance of the gas partial pressure was performed
via a four-way valve. The concentrations of two different kinds of mixed
gases were contented in all courses except the disturbance gas and
[N.sub.2]. The flowing rates of all gases were 180 mL/min during the
experiments. The mixed gases after reaction was analyzed by using
SC-6-type gas chromatograph fitted with the two columns filled with 5
[A.sup.0] molecular sieves and carbon molecular sieves, respectively. A
16-way sampling valve controlled by a TP-801 PC was used to collect
samples conveniently and determine the concentration quickly. Samples
collected were put in 16 collectors so that the volume of each one was
about 0.2 mL and then checked correspondingly. Figure 1 represented the
flow diagram for the transient response.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The case that the concentration change of the component Y in the
outlet mixed gases caused by that of X in the inlet was designated as
X-Y response. When X increased, X(i)Y; when decreased, X(d)-Y, and when
X decreased down to nil, X(d=0)-Y.
To study the CO response behaviour and make the active oxygen
species on the catalyst react completely, the catalyst was reduced with
the [N.sub.2] mixed with 6% CO. After 15 h, CO concentration in outlet
mixed gases was up to 6% with no further change. This meant that there
was not any active oxygen species on the catalyst surface. Then the
ultra high purity [N.sub.2] replacing the above gases, the CO
concentration in outlet mixed gases was examined at different time. The
CO(d=0)-CO response curve was obtained. By switching, another curve
CO(i=0)-CO was obtained. As can be seen from Figure 2, the change of CO
partial pressure from one steady-state to another was almost transient
and it exhibited that the adsorption of CO on the catalyst did not take
place.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
To collect more evidences to demonstrate the above point, the
CO-C[O.sub.2] response experiments were performed at different
conditions and the results were shown in Figure 3. During experiments,
the state A represented the mixed gases (Pco=4.65 kPa, [MATHEMATICAL
EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII], and [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT
REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] flowing in the catalyst bed. In Figure 3, two
response curves were obtained, respectively, by switching from the state
A to the mixed gases [O.sub.2] + [N.sub.2] [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT
REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII], [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN
ASCII] and to ultra high purity [N.sub.2] almost overlapped in the
experiment error. This also proved that CO cannot be adsorbed on this
catalyst and the result was similar to that of CO adsorption behaviour
on the catalyst [Pb.sub.3] [O.sub.4] (Boudart et al., 1966; Kobayashi
and Kobayashi, 1975).
C[O.sub.2] (i=0)-C[O.sub.2] and C[O.sub.2] (d=0)-C[O.sub.2]
response curves in Figure 4 were obtained by switching between two
steady states reached by two different mixed gases [MATHEMATICAL
EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] From Figure 4, it can be known
that C[O.sub.2] was adsorbed on this catalyst as it requires much time
from one state to another. The adsorption amount and the desorption amount for C[O.sub.2], obtained by integral of the above curves, were
3.3 x [10.sup.-7] mol/g and 2.6 x [10.sup.-7] mol/g, respectively. The
fact that the adsorption amount was clearly higher than the desorption
amount indicated that the adsorption of parts of CO2 on the catalyst
surface was irreversible.
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
To investigate the relationship between the adsorption of
C[O.sub.2] and C[O.sub.2] partial pressure and the gas nature,
C[O.sub.2](d=0)-C[O.sub.2] response experiments were done via switching
from one state obtained by [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN
ASCII] to another obtained by pure [O.sub.2] and pure [N.sub.2],
respectively. From the result shown in Figure 5, it can be seen that two
response curves almost overlap. This presented that the adsorption of
C[O.sub.2] in two kinds of courses were same and the desorption of
C[O.sub.2] did not depend on the gas nature in inlet mixed gases. Also,
the concentration of C[O.sub.2] in inlet mixed gases (Pco = 4.94 kPa,
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] did not apparently
influence the CO conversion rate (as can be seen in Figure 6). So it
indicated that C[O.sub.2] did not restrain the CO oxidation on the
catalyst and the adsorption site of C[O.sub.2] on the catalyst was
different from its forming site.
When switching from one state containing Pco = 5.55 kPa,
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] to another Pco =
3.29 kPa, [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII], we
obtained CO(i)-C[O.sub.2] response curve as shown in Figure 7. In outlet
gas mixture, C[O.sub.2] partial pressure was up to the maximum in 5 min
and then down quickly. This presented that the active oxygen species for
CO oxidation was not the gas phase oxygen but the surface lattice one.
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]
CONCLUSIONS
Through the experiments we reach the following conclusions:
1. The adsorption of CO on the catalyst did not take place.
2. The C[O.sub.2] adsorption amount was clearly higher than the
desorption amount indicated that the adsorption of parts of C[O.sub.2]
on the catalyst surface was irreversible.
3. The adsorption of C[O.sub.2] in two kinds of courses were same
and the desorption of C[O.sub.2] did not depend on the gas nature in
inlet mixed gases.
4. C[O.sub.2] did not restrain the CO oxidation on the catalyst and
the adsorption site of C[O.sub.2] on the catalyst was different from its
forming site.
5. The active oxygen species for CO oxidation was not the gas-phase
oxygen but the surface lattice one.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Financial support by the Jinchuan Company for the present work is
gratefully acknowledged.
Manuscript received November 19, 2006; revised manuscript received
August 24, 2007; accepted for publication September 12, 2007.
REFERENCES
Bak, T., J. Nowotny, M. Rekas, C. C. Sorrell and E. R. Vance,
"Surface Electrical Properties of (La, Sr)(Co, Fe,
Mn)O-3," Solid State Ionics 135, 563-565 (2000).
Boudart, M., A. Aldag, J. E. Benson, N. A. Dougharty and C. G.
Harkins, "On the Specific Activity of Platinum Catalysts," J.
Catal. 6, 92-99 (1966).
Efstathiou, A. M., "Temperature-Programmed Desorption (TPD),
Reaction (TPR) and Oxidation (TPO) of Surface Formed on Rh/MgO after
Interaction with H2 and CO," J. Mol. Catal. 69, 41-60 (1991).
Eichler, A. and J. Hafner, "Reaction Channels for the
Catalytic Oxidation of CO on Pt(111)," Surf. Sci. 435, 58-62
(1999).
Islam, M. S., M. Cherry and L. J. Winch, "Defect Chemistry of
LaBO3 (B=Al, Mn or Co) Perovskite-Type Oxides--Relevance to Catalytic
and Transport Behavior," J. Chem. Society-Faraday Trans. 92,
479-482 (1996).
Julien, C., C. Letranchant, S. Rangan, M. Lemal, S. Ziolkiewicz, S.
Castro-Garcia, L. El-Farh and M. Benkaddour, "Layered
LiNi0.5Co0.5O2 Cathode Materials Grown by Soft-Chemistry via Various
Solution Methods," Mat. Sci. Eng. B, 76, 145-155 (2000).
Kobayashi, M. and H. Kobayashi, "Transient Behavior of Carbon
Monoxide Oxidation on Red Lead (Pb3O4)," J. Catal. 36, 74-80
(1975).
Ma, J. T., Z. X. Xing, J. Zhao and Y. M. Men, "Kinetics of
Carbon Monoxide Oxidation on the Perovskite-Type Oxide Catalyst La
(0.4)Sr (0.6)Co (0.4)Mn (0.6)O 3," Lanzhow Daxue Xuebao (Natural
science), 29, 187-189 (1993).
Martra, G., "Lewis Acid and Base Sites at the Surface of
Microcrystalline TiO2 Anatase: Relationships between Surface Morphology
and Chemical Behaviour," Appl. Catal. A 200, 275-285 (2000).
Kakihana, M. and T. Okubo, "Low Temperature Powder Synthesis
of LaAlO3 through In Situ Polymerization Route Utilizing Citric Acid and
Ethylene Glycol," J Alloy Compd 266, 129-133 (1999).
Men, Y. M. and C. S. Xi, "An Important Information for the
Selectivity Catalytic-Oxidation Reaction of Hydrocarbons on the Basis of
Redox Mechanism," Lanzhow Daxue Xuebao (Natural Science), 21, 48-55
(1985).
Sander, M., R. Imbihl and G. Ertl, "The Mechanism of Kinetic
Oscillations in Catalytic-Oxidation of CO on Pt (210)," J. Chem.
Phys. 95, 6162-6170 (1991).
Rong Li, * Shui-Xian Yu, Fu-Shan Wang, Sheng-Lian Sun and Jian-Tai
Ma College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lanzhou University,
Lanzhou 730000, China
* Author to whom correspondence may be addressed.
E-mail address: liyirong@lzu.edu.cn
DOI 10.1022/cjce.20022