Solubility of propane in sulpholane at elevated pressures.
Schmidt, Kurt A.G. ; Jou, Fang-Yuan ; Mather, Alan E. 等
The solubility of propane in sulpholane has been determined at
temperatures in the range 298-403 K at pressures up to 17.6 MPa. The
experimental results were correlated by the Peng-Robinson equation of
state, and binary interaction parameters have been obtained for this
system. The parameters in the Krichevsky-Ilinskaya equation were
calculated from these interaction parameters.
On a determine la solubilite du propane dans le sulfolane a des
temperatures comprises entre 298 et 403 K et des pressions jusqu'a
17,6 MPa. Les resultats experimentaux ont ete correles par
l'equation d'etat de Peng-Robinson et des parametres
d'interaction binaire ont ete obtenus pour ce systeme. Les
parametres dans l'equation de Krichevsky-Ilinskaya ont ete calcules
a partir de ces parametres d'interaction.
Keywords: solubility, propane, sulpholane, equation of state, gas
treating
Sulpholane is a polar solvent, miscible with water and a good
solvent for many compounds. It is a physical solvent, in that there is
no chemical reaction when gases dissolve in it. Sulpholane is used in
the Sulfinol process, where it is mixed with water and an alkanolamine
(Dunn et al., 1964). Originally, di-isopropanolamine was used but now
N-methyldiethanolamine is more common. This solvent is used to remove
the acid gases, [H.sub.2]S and C[O.sub.2], from natural gases and
refinery gas mixtures. A question often posed is: what is the solubility
of hydrocarbons in a physical solvent, since this quantity amounts to a
loss of desirable material. An ideal solvent would remove [H.sub.2]S and
C[O.sub.2] without concomitant absorption of hydrocarbons. Rivas and
Prausnitz (1979) reported values of the Henry's constant of ethane in sulpholane at four temperatures in the range 303-373 K. Jou et al.
(1990) measured the solubility of [H.sub.2]S, C[O.sub.2], methane and
ethane in sulpholane at elevated pressures in the range of temperatures
from 298-403 K. In the present work the solubility of propane in
sulpholane is reported over the same temperature range.
EXPERIMENTAL
The apparatus and experimental technique that were used are similar
to those described by Jou et al. (1990). The equilibrium cell was
mounted in an air bath. The temperature of the contents of the cell was
measured by a calibrated iron-constantan thermocouple and the pressure
in the cell was measured by digital Heise gauges (0-10, 0-35 MPa). These
gauges had an accuracy of [+ or -]0.1% of full scale by comparison with
a dead-weight gauge. The thermocouple had an accuracy of [+ or
-]0.1[degrees]C by comparison with a platinum resistance thermometer.
The apparatus was checked by determination of the critical point and
vapour pressure of propane, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulphide.
Differences of [+ or -]0.1[degrees]C and 0.1% in vapour pressure were
found. The sulpholane (CAS No. 126-33-0) was obtained from Aldrich and
had a purity of 99%. Propane was obtained from Matheson and had a purity
of 99%.
Prior to the introduction of the fluids, the cell was evacuated.
About 100 [cm.sup.3] of liquid sulpholane was drawn into the cell. It
was heated to 110[degrees]C and a vacuum applied to remove traces of
water. The propane was added to the cell by the cylinder pressure or by
means of a spindle press. Although the melting point of sulpholane is
300.6 K, data were obtained at 298.15 K when a sufficient amount of
propane was added, causing a liquid phase to form. The circulation pump
was started and the vapour bubbled through the solvent for at least 8 h
to ensure that equilibrium was reached. A sample of the liquid phase, (2
to 20 g), depending on the solubility, was withdrawn from the cell into
a 50 [cm.sup.3] sample bomb, which had previously been evacuated and
weighed. The bomb contained a magnetic stirring bar to help in degassing the sample. The sample bomb was reweighed to determine the mass of the
sample and then attached to a vacuum rack. The rack consisted of 6.35 mm
OD stainless steel tubing connected to a calibrated Digigauge (0 to 1.0
MPa), a 50 [cm.sup.3] burette, and a 51.5 [cm.sup.3] steel reservoir.
The rack was evacuated and the gas was allowed to evolve from the sample
bomb into the reservoir, which was cooled by liquid nitrogen. The sample
bomb was heated to about 50[degrees]C to drive out the propane. The
sample bomb was then disconnected, and the apparatus allowed to warm to
room temperature. The moles collected were calculated from the P-V-T
data, assuming ideal gas behaviour. The correction for the residual
propane left in the sample at atmospheric pressure was very small. The
uncertainty in the liquid phase analyses is estimated to be [+ or -] 3%.
RESULTS
The solubility of propane in sulpholane was determined at
temperatures of 298.15 K, 313.15 K, 343.15 K, 373.15 K, and 403.15 K at
pressures up to 17.6 MPa. The experimental data are presented in Table 1
and plotted in Figure 1. At the lower temperatures, a sharp transition
occurs between (vapour + liquid) and (liquid + liquid) equilibria. At
higher pressures a liquid propane-rich phase is in equilibrium with a
liquid sulpholane-rich phase.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
DISCUSSION
The equilibrium data were correlated in the manner described by Jou
et al. (1990). The method requires that an equation of state valid for
the solvent and dilute solutions of the solute in the solvent be
available. The Peng and Robinson (1976) equation of state was used in
the calculations. The parameters a22 and b2 of propane were obtained
from the critical constants. However, sulpholane decomposes before it
reaches its critical temperature. The parameters a11 and b1 for
sulpholane were therefore obtained from the vapour pressure and liquid
density. The critical constants and acentric factor of the propane and
the equations for the vapour pressure and density of sulpholane were
taken from the compilation of Rowley et al. (2003). The resulting values
of [a.sub.11] and [b.sub.1] for sulpholane, and [a.sub.22] and [b.sub.2]
for propane are given in Table 2. The values of [a.sub.11] and [b.sub.1]
are slightly different from those presented earlier (Jou et al., 1990)
because of small differences between the data compilation used in the
earlier work and that of Rowley et al. (2003). In the two-phase regions,
the isothermal flash routine algorithm presented by Whitson and Brule
(2000) was used. The binary interaction parameter, k12, which appears in
the mixing rule of the equation of state:
[a.sub.12] = [([a.sub.11][a.sub.22]).sup.1/2] (1 - [k.sub.12]) (1)
was iteratively modified until the deviations between the
calculated liquid mole fraction and the experimental value were less
than the set tolerance.
Values of k12 were found to be dependent on the temperature and can
be fitted by a linear relationship:
[k.sub.12] = 1.87 x [10.sup.-4]T/K - 1.87 x [10.sup.-3]
The correlation reproduces the experimental data with an overall
average per cent deviation in the mole fraction of 1.6%, somewhat less
than the experimental uncertainty.
The binary interaction parameter, which was fit to the two-phase
data, and the pure component parameters were then used to predict a
three-phase bubble point pressure. The three-phase bubble point
calculations were performed with the three-phase bubble point technique
described by Nutakki et al. (1988) and Shinta and Firoozabadi (1997).
Based on this technique and the above mentioned parameters, the
calculated three-phase point pressure and compositions are given in
Table 3, together with the vapour pressure of pure propane.
The calculated mole fraction of propane in the sulpholane phase is
in good agreement with the experimental values given in Table 1. The
vapour phase is essentially pure propane and the calculated three-phase
pressure is very close to the vapour pressure of pure propane, and is
always lower than the experimental values.
Bender et al. (1984) have shown the connection between the
Peng-Robinson EOS, the binary interaction parameter and the three
parameters in the Krichevsky-Ilinskaya equation. This equation is
discussed in the book by Prausnitz et al. (1999) and is given by:
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (2)
The three parameters are the Henry's constant, [H.sub.21], the
partial molar volume at infinite dilution, and the Margules parameter,
A. Recently, Schmidt (2005) has corrected the equations which relate
these parameters to the binary interaction parameter in the
Peng-Robinson equation of state. The equations were used to obtain the
three parameters and they are given in Table 4. The Henry's
constant for propane in sulpholane is plotted in Figure 2 for comparison
with those for methane and ethane. The Henry's constant for methane
has a maximum and is the largest, indicating that it has the lowest
solubility in sulpholane of the three alkanes. Ethane is two to three
times more soluble than methane, and propane is about twice as soluble
as ethane. The value of the partial molar volume at infinite dilution is
proportional to the "size" of the solute. The value for
propane is 1.8 times that of methane and 1.3 times that of ethane.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are grateful to the Natural Sciences and Engineering
Research Council of Canada for the financial support of this research.
NOMENCLATURE
a parameter in the Peng-Robinson equation (Pa x
[m.sup.6]/[mol.sup.2])
A Margules parameter (J/mol)
b parameter in the Peng-Robinson equation ([cm.sup.3]/mol)
[[??].sub.i] fugacity of component i in a mixture (kPa)
[H.sub.21] Henry's constant of solute 2 in solvent 1 at
[P.sup.s.sub.1] (MPa)
[k.sub.ij] binary interaction parameter in the Peng-Robinson
equation
[P.sup.s.sub.i] vapour pressure of component i (MPa)
P pressure (kPa)
R gas constant (J/mol x K)
T absolute temperature (K)
[[??].sup.[infinity].sub.2] partial molar volume at infinite
dilution ([cm.sup.3]/mol)
[x.sub.i] mole fraction of component i in the liquid phase
[y.sub.i] mole fraction of component i in the vapour phase
Superscripts
[alpha] sulpholane-rich phase
[beta] propane-rich phase
REFERENCES
Bender, E., U. Klein, W. Ph. Schmitt and J. M. Prausnitz,
"Thermodynamics of Gas Solubility: Relation Between
Equation-of-State and Activity-Coefficient Models," Fluid Phase
Equil. 15, 241-255 (1984).
Dunn, C. L., E. R. Freitas, J. W. Goodenbour, H. T. Henderson and
M. N. Papadopoulis, "Sulfinol Process," Oil Gas J. 62 (11),
95-98 (1964).
Jou, F.-Y., R. D. Deshmukh, F. D. Otto and A. E. Mather,
"Solubility of [H.sub.2]S, C[O.sub.2], CH4 and C2H6 in Sulfolane at
Elevated Pressures," Fluid Phase Equil. 56, 313-324 (1990).
Nutakki, R., A. Firoozabadi, T. W. Wong and K. Aziz,
"Calculation of Multiphase Equilibrium for Water-Hydrocarbon
Systems at High Pressures," SPE 17390, SPE/ DOE Enhanced Oil
Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, OK, U.S., April 17-20 (1988).
Peng, D.-Y. and D. B. Robinson, "A New Two-Constant Equation
of State," Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 15, 59-64 (1976).
Prausnitz, J. M., R. N. Lichtenthaler and E. G. de Azevedo,
"Molecular Thermodynamics of Fluid-Phase Equilibria," 3rd ed.,
Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, U.S. (1999), p. 592.
Rivas, O. R. and J. M. Prausnitz, "Sweetening of Sour Natural
Gases by Mixed-Solvent Absorption: Solubilities of Ethane, Carbon
Dioxide, and Hydrogen Sulfide in Mixtures of Physical and Chemical
Solvents," AIChE J. 25, 975-984 (1979).
Rowley, R. L., W. V. Wilding, J. L. Oscarson, Y. Yang, N. A.
Zundel, T. E. Daubert and R. P. Danner, "DIPPR Data Compilation of
Pure Compound Properties," Design Inst. Phys. Prop., AIChE, NY,
U.S. (2003).
Schmidt, K. A. G., "Letter to the Editor," Fluid Phase
Equil. 236, 268-269 (2005).
Shinta, A. A. and A. Firoozabadi, "Predicting Phase Behavior
of Water/Reservoir-Crude Systems Using the Association Concept,"
SPE Reservoir Eng. 12 (2), 131-137 (1997).
Whitson, C. H. and M. R. Brule, "Phase Behavior," SPE
Monograph Series 20, Soc. Petroleum Eng., Richardson, TX, U.S. (2000).
Manuscript received August 27, 2005; revised manuscript received
December 27, 2005; accepted for publication January 3, 2006.
Kurt A. G. Schmidt (1), Fang-Yuan Jou (2) and Alan E. Mather (2 *)
(1.) Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen,
Allegaten 55, N-5007 Bergen, Norway
(2.) Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University
of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2G6
* Author to whom correspondence may be addressed.
E-mail address: alan.mather@ualberta.ca
Table 1. Solubility of propane (2) in sulpholane (1)
298.15 K 313.15 K
P/MPa [x.sub.2] x P/MPa [x.sub.2] x
[10.sup.3] [10.sup.3]
0.267 12.9 0.113 4.68
0.667 31.9 0.236 8.77
0.978 (a) 45.5 0.905 34.8
1.81 45.3 1.60 (a) 52.0
3.10 47.1 2.16 53.7
6.14 48.4 3.95 55.3
9.74 48.9 7.22 54.2
13.86 50.2 9.14 56.5
17.35 51.8 13.30 59.3
343.15 K 373.15 K
P/MPa [x.sub.2] x P/MPa [x.sub.2] x
[10.sup.3] [10.sup.3]
0.104 3.12 0.237 5.69
0.211 6.00 0.662 14.9
0.748 21.9 1.33 29.5
1.48 41.8 3.05 62.2
2.87 (a) 67.8 5.00 79.6
4.29 69.1 9.84 90.7
7.19 72.0 13.39 91.4
9.58 74.0 17.34 99.5
11.75 75.6
13.78 77.4
17.62 79.6
403.15 K
P/MPa [x.sub.2] x
[10.sup.3]
0.264 5.08
0.732 14.6
2.03 37.3
3.60 61.7
5.75 86.1
8.22 94.9
10.49 104
13.52 114
16.93 114
(a) Three-phase point (vapour, propane-rich liquid, sulpholane-rich
liquid)
Table 2. Equation of state parameters
T/K Sulpholane (1)
[a.sub.11]([dagger]) [b.sub.1]1([double dagger])
298.15 7.24 88.9
313.15 7.11 89.3
343.15 6.86 90.0
373.15 6.64 90.7
403.15 6.44 91.4
T/K Propane (2)
[a.sub.22]([dagger]) [b.sub.2]([double dagger]) [k.sub.12]
298.15 1.15 56.3 0.054
313.15 1.12 56.3 0.057
343.15 1.06 56.3 0.062
373.15 1.01 56.3 0.068
403.15 0.964 56.3 0.074
([dagger]) Units of a are Pa x [m.sup.6] x [mol.sup.-2]
([double dagger]) Units of b are [cm.sup.3] x [mol.sup.-1]
Table 3. Calculated three-phase pressures and compositions
T/K P/MPa [y.sub.1] x [x.sup.[alpha].sub.2] x
[10.sup.6] x [10.sup.3]
298.15 0.95 1.2 45
313.15 1.36 4.3 52
343.15 2.58 47 67
T/K P/MPa [x.sup.[beta].sub.2] x [P.sup.S.sub.2]/MPa
x [10.sup.3]
298.15 0.95 3.8 0.953
313.15 1.36 4.2 1.37
343.15 2.58 4.2 2.59
Table 4. Parameters of the Krichevsky-Ilinskaya equation
T/K [H.sub.21]/MPa [??]/[cm.sup.3] A/RT
[mol.sup.-1]
298.15 20.7 66.5 1.97
313.15 24.8 67.5 1.87
343.15 33.2 69.3 1.71
373.15 41.8 72.2 1.58
403.15 50.0 75.2 1.48