Effect of illite clay and divalent cations on bitumen recovery.
Ding, Xinlin ; Repka, Chris ; Xu, Zhenghe 等
The adverse effect of illite clay on bitumen recovery was found to
be related to its acidity. The addition of calcium or magnesium ions to
the flotation deionized water had a marginal effect on bitumen recovery
when measured using a Denver flotation cell. However, the co-addition of
illite clay and divalent cations caused a significant reduction in
bitumen recovery. The effect was found to be compounded at a lower
process temperature and low pH values. Zeta potential distributions of
illite suspensions and bitumen emulsions were measured individually and
as a mixture to investigate the effect of divalent cations on the
interaction between bitumen and illite clay. The presence of 1 mM
calcium or magnesium ions in deionized water had a significant effect on
the interactions between bitumen and illite clay. Slime coating of
illite onto bitumen was not observed in zeta potential distribution
measurements performed in alkaline tailings water.
On a trouve que l'effet adverse de l'argile d'illite
sur la recuperation de bitume etait relie a son acidite. L'ajout
d'ions de calcium ou de magnesium a l'eau deionisee de
flottation a un effet marginal sur la recuperation de bitume
lorsqu'on la mesure avec une cellule de flottation de Denver.
Toutefois, l'ajout combine d'argile d'illite et de
cations divalents entraine une reduction significative de la
recuperation de bitume. On a trouve que les effets etaient combines a
une faible temperature de procede et de faibles valeurs de pH. Les
distributions de potentiel zeta des suspensions d'illite et des
emulsions de bitume ont ete mesurees individuellement et dans le melange afin d'etudier les effets des cations divalents sur
l'interaction entre le bitume et l'argile d'illite. La
presence de 1 mM d'ions de calcium ou de magnesium dans l'eau
deionisee a un effet significatif sur les interactions entre le bitume
et l'argile d'illite. On n'a pas observe de couche de
boues d'illite sur le bitume dans les mesures de distributions de
potentiel zeta obtenues dans de l'eau de rejets alcaline.
Keywords: bitumen recovery, zeta potential distribution, divalent
cations, illite clays, pH
INTRODUCTION
At present, approximately 35% of Canada's petroleum needs can
be met from the Athabasca oil sands. As conventional sources of oil and
gas are depleted, it is inevitable that the oil sands will play a
greater role in meeting North America's petroleum needs. The main
technology used today to extract bitumen from the Athabasca oil sands is
a lower temperature version of the Clark Hot Water Process (CHWP). A
typical bitumen extraction process involves the following essential
steps: First, oil sand lumps are crushed and transported to slurry
preparation where hot water is mixed with the ore. The resulting slurry
is pumped into a hydrotransport slurry pipeline where slurry
conditioning takes place. During the slurry transport, bitumen is
liberated from the sand grains and the liberated bitumen becomes aerated
by the entrained air in the slurry. A gravity separator is then used to
recover the aerated bitumen as bitumen froth. After removing the water
and solids from the froth, the bitumen is ready for upgrading. It is
evident that the extraction process requires (Hepler and Hsi, 1989;
Hepler and Smith, 1994): liberation of bitumen from the sand grains;
attachment and/or engulfment of the liberated bitumen with air bubbles;
and flotation of bitumen-air aggregates to form a bitumen-rich froth.
Clearly, interactions between bitumen and clay minerals or air bubbles
play a key role in bitumen recovery as they affect bitumen aeration.
It is well known that extraction techniques to recover bitumen from
mined oil sand ore use large volumes of water. Currently, to produce one
barrel of bitumen, 2.5 to 4.0 barrels of imported water are required
(National Energy Board, 2004). With the increasing need to produce
bitumen and with an increasingly limited water supply, producers have to
reclaim water from mature fine tailings. To achieve this purpose, gypsum is usually added into the tailings system to accelerate the settling of
fine solids and the release of water. However, the use of gypsum is
anticipated to increase the concentration of calcium ions in the recycle
water system. Magnesium is another divalent ion that is usually present
in bitumen extraction slurries. A number of researchers (Sanford, 1983;
Takamura and Wallace, 1988; Smith and Schramm, 1992; Zhou et al., 1999;
Kasongo et al., 2000) have reported that in industrial and laboratory
tests, the levels of ions and clay minerals present in the slurry have a
significant impact on bitumen recovery. In order to elucidate the role
of ore characteristics and water chemistry on bitumen flotation, a
systematic research program was initiated in our research group. Kasongo
et al. (2000) developed a novel "doping" method that involved
the addition of a prescribed amount of calcium and/or clays into a good
processing estuarine oil sands ore during batch flotation tests
performed using deionized water. They found that the addition of calcium
ions (up to 40 ppm) or clay (kaolinite, illite or montmorillonite) at 1
wt.% of the processed oil sands had a marginal effect on bitumen
recovery. However, a sharp reduction in bitumen recovery was observed
when both calcium ions and montmorillonite clays were added together.
Further analysis revealed that the adverse impact of calcium ions and
montmorillonite clays on bitumen recovery was associated with a stronger
affinity of calcium for montmorillonite clays than for kaolinite or
illite clays. A novel technique was developed by Liu et al. (2002) to
investigate the interactions between bitumen and clays in an aqueous
solution using zeta potential distribution measurements. For a single
component suspension, a single zeta potential distribution peak was
obtained under a given solution condition. In the case of a
two-component mixture, the measured zeta potential distributions showed
either one or two distribution peaks, depending on the chemical make up
of the aqueous solution and the type/amount of clays present. Using this
method, Liu et al. (2002) found that a stronger attraction existed
between bitumen and montmorillonite clay than that between bitumen and
kaolinite clay when 40 ppm of calcium ions were present in deionized
water. This finding is in excellent agreement with the flotation results
reported by Kasongo et al. (2000). Xu et al. (2003) conducted an
electrokinetic study of clay interactions in coal flotation. Their study
further demonstrated that zeta potential distribution measurements are a
powerful tool for studying slime coating phenomena and are useful in
diagnosing flotation systems.
The primary clay minerals observed in various oil sands extraction
process streams are kaolinite and illite (Bichard, 1987; Budziak et al.,
1988; Omotoso and Mikula, 2004). To our best knowledge, only a few
studies (Kasongo, 2000; Wallace et al., 2004) were conducted to study
the effect of illite on bitumen recovery. In this study,
"doping" flotation tests using deionized water and
electrokinetic studies were carried out to further investigate the
effect of illite clays on bitumen recovery. The effect of magnesium ions
was investigated and compared with calcium ions. In addition, the
effects of temperature and tailings water chemistry are discussed.
EXPERIMENTAL
Materials
Bitumen from vacuum distillate feed and high grade north mine
estuarine oil sands ore (F11B) were provided by Syncrude Canada Ltd. and
used in zeta potential distribution measurements and flotation tests,
respectively. The oil sands ore was homogenized and stored in a
refrigerator maintained at -29[degrees]C to minimize oxidation. Samples
were allowed to thaw at room temperature prior to being used in
flotation tests. The average composition of the oil sands ore (based on
the analyses of 10 small, random sample bags) is shown in Table 1. The
analysis error was less than 0.5%.
Illite clay was purchased from the Clay Minerals Society at Purdue
University. It was ground in a porcelain ball mill for 5 h. A 44
[micro]m sieve was used to remove the coarse solids. The fine solids
were used for all the tests in this study. The average particle size was
determined to be 10.9 [micro]m. Reagent grade Ca[Cl.sub.2] x 2[H.sub.2]O
(Fisher) and Mg[Cl.sub.2] x 6[H.sub.2]O (BDH) were used as the source of
calcium and magnesium ions, respectively. Reagent grade NaOH (Fisher)
was used as a pH modifier. Deionized water with a resistivity of 18.2 MO
cm, prepared with an Elix 5 followed by a Millipore ultra water system,
was used in all the experiments, unless otherwise specified.
Procedures
Bitumen flotation tests
To simulate the commercial Clark Hot Water Extraction (CHWE)
process, Sanford and Seyer (1979) developed a Batch Extraction Unit
(BEU), which has been extensively used to conduct research on oil sands
processability. More recently, Kasongo et al. (2000) and Zhou et al.
(2004) used a modified Denver flotation cell to conduct their flotation
tests. The Denver flotation cell is more sensitive at detecting the
effects of operating parameters on bitumen recovery than BEU tests at
temperatures below 50[degrees]C. In this study, a modified Denver
flotation cell was used. In order to control the temperature, a water
jacket connected to a thermal water bath was attached to a one-litre
stainless steel flotation cell. For baseline tests, 300 g of F11B oil
sands ore and 950 ml of heated deionized water with the pH adjusted to
8.5 were placed in the cell. After the slurry was conditioned at 1500
rpm for 5 min, air was introduced at a rate of 150 mL/min. Bitumen froth
was collected as a function of time for a period of 18 min. The final pH
of the tailings slurry was recorded. All other flotation tests were
performed using a similar procedure with the exception that clay and/or
magnesium or calcium salt were added into the slurry prior to
conditioning. Unless otherwise specified, deionized water was used in
all the flotation tests.
Bitumen assays
A Dean-Stark method (Bulmer and Star, 1979) was used to obtain the
composition of oil sands ore and flotation froth (i.e., the content of
bitumen, solids, and water).
Tailings analyses
Four 50 mL centrifuge tubes were filled with the tailings slurry
that was obtained upon completion of a bitumen flotation test. The
filled tubes were centrifuged in an Allegra[TM] 64 Centrifuge at 15 000
g for 30 min. The supernatant was set aside for water analysis and zeta
potential distribution measurements. A SpetrAA (220F Varian) atomic
absorption spectrometer was used to determine the concentrations of
divalent cations in the supernatant and hence in the tailings water. The
detection limit was 0.1 ppm for divalent cations. The analysis of the
baseline tests showed that the concentrations of calcium and magnesium
ions were 0.2 and 0.4 ppm, respectively, confirming that the F11B oil
sand ore contained a negligible amount of soluble divalent cations.
Sample preparation for electrokinetic studies
For the zeta potential distribution measurements, a
bitumen-in-water emulsion was prepared by sonication of about 1 g of
bitumen in 100 ml of 1 mM KCl solution using a Model 550 Sonic
Dismembrator (Fisher) for 18 min. The clay suspension was prepared using
a similar procedure but with an ultrasonic bath (Fisher) instead of the
Sonic Dismembrator. Each sample was diluted prior to zeta potential
distribution measurements as the instrument can measure the zeta
potential of only relatively dilute suspension/emulsions. To prepare a
bitumen-clay suspension, small amounts of prepared bitumen emulsion and
clay suspension were diluted and mixed at a specified ratio and then
conditioned in an ultrasonic bath (Fisher) for 18 min before zeta
potential distribution measurements.
Zeta potential distribution measurements
Zeta potential distribution measurements were carried out with a
Zetaphoremeter IV[TM] (CAD). The instrument was equipped with an
electrophoresis chamber consisting of two electrode compartments and a
connecting rectangular cell, a laser illuminator, and a digital video
image capture and viewing system. The computerized operating system
captured the image of moving particles in a stationary plane under a
known electric field. A built-in image processing software analyzed the
captured images and then provided a histogram of the electrophoretic
mobilities. The data collected were then converted to a zeta potential
distribution as desired. All the measurements were performed with the
addition of 1 mM KCl as a background electrolyte.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Bitumen Flotation
Effect of illite clay and divalent cations
Figure 1 shows bitumen fl otation recovery as a function of
flotation time. The addition of 1 mM magnesium ions and/or illite clay
at 0.5% by weight of total oil sands ore had little effect on bitumen
flotation kinetics or bitumen recovery. Kasongo et al. (2000) reported a
similar observation. To explore whether the amount of illite clay could
be a factor affecting bitumen recovery, flotation tests were performed
with an increasing amount of clays (up to 5%). The results summarized in
Figure 2 show that at 35[degrees]C, bitumen recovery decreased slightly
with an increasing amount of illite clay addition. At 25[degrees]C, the
decrease was more pronounced. The pH of the produced flotation tailings
as a function of the amount of illite clay addition is plotted in Figure
3. The data show that the tailings water pH decreased with an increasing
amount of illite clay addition. This pH decrease is due to the acidity
of illite clay (Bichard, 1987; Du et al., 1997). As the pH of the
produced tailings water at a given level of clay addition is not
affected by temperature, one can conclude that the depression in bitumen
recovery observed at 25[degrees]C for a given clay addition is not due
to the effect of pH but rather due to the effect of processing
temperature.
[FIGURES 1-3 OMITTED]
For the flotation system containing 1 mM of magnesium ions, the
bitumen recoveries experienced a sharper reduction (when compared to the
control case) when the clay level exceeded a certain value for both
operating temperatures, as shown in Figures 4 and 5. The control tests
were conducted in the absence of divalent cations at the respective
temperature. The pH of the produced tailings water is plotted as a
function of the amount of illite clay addition (Figure 6). As was the
case where no cation addition (control case) was made, the variation of
the tailings water pH with clay content is not sensitive to temperature.
However, the pH drop observed in the presence of illite clay was larger
when divalent cations were present than when they were not present.
Here, the control curve represents the case of no divalent cation
addition for 25 and 35[degrees]C as was previously shown in Figure 3. As
mentioned earlier, at a given processing temperature and clay addition
level, the bitumen recovery is affected by the addition of divalent
cations. Since the tailings water pH at a given clay content is lower
due to the addition of the divalent cations, the depression in bitumen
recovery at a given temperature as shown in Figures 4 and 5 could be a
consequence of pH effects.
[FIGURES 4-6 OMITTED]
It is well recognized that water based bitumen extraction processes
perform better at a mildly alkaline pH (pH 8.5) (Clark and Pasternack,
1932; Sanford, 1983; Bichard, 1987; Dai and Chung, 1995; Liu et al.,
2004, 2005). At acidic pH values, bitumen liberation from the sand
grains becomes more difficult and low bitumen recovery would be
expected. It appears that the effect of illite clay addition on bitumen
recovery is also related to its acidic nature. The effect of illite clay
and magnesium ion on bitumen recovery can therefore be attributed to
incomplete bitumen liberation and slime coating of illite on the
liberated bitumen. To reconfirm whether pH is a key factor in affecting
bitumen recovery for a given processing temperature, flotation tests
were conducted at a controlled pH of 8.5. The pH was controlled by
adding NaOH solution into the flotation slurry. For the flotation slurry
containing illite and/or magnesium ions, the bitumen recovery at pH 8.5
increased greatly at both temperatures as shown in Figures 7 and 8. This
observation on the effect of NaOH addition is in agreement with previous
work (Clark, 1929; Sanford, 1983; Bichard, 1987; Dai and Chung, 1996).
To detect the change of divalent cations in the flotation system, atomic
adsorption (AA) analysis was conducted on the flotation tailings water
samples. The measured divalent cation concentrations were plotted as a
function of the amount of illite addition under the different conditions
(Figure 9). It shows that the divalent cation concentrations first
experienced a sharp decrease and then decreased slightly with an
increasing amount of illite addition for the flotation tests without pH
control. For the pH controlled flotation test, the divalent ion
concentrations were close to zero. At pH 8.5, calcium and magnesium ions
should not precipitate (Dai et al., 1992). Therefore, the decrease in
divalent cation concentration may be related to the reaction or
adsorption of the cations with surfactants or clays at pH 8.5 (Smith and
Schramm, 1992).
[FIGURE 9 OMITTED]
Zeta Potential Distribution Measurements
Effect of pH and divalent cations
As shown in Figures 3 and 6, the pH of the tailings water dropped
significantly (as low as 4.9) during the flotation tests performed with
the addition of magnesium ions and illite clay. To determine whether
slime coating occurs between bitumen and illite clays at such a low pH,
zeta potential distribution measurements were conducted at pH 4.9. The
results in Figure 10 suggest some slight interaction between bitumen and
illite for a system without the addition of magnesium ions. However, the
results shown in Figure 11 suggest a strong slime coating of illite on
bitumen occurred when magnesium ions were present. When clay coats a
bitumen surface, there is a lower likelihood of successful air-bitumen
attachment. As a result, bitumen recovery decreases. These observations
correlate well with the flotation test results, i.e. the bitumen
recovery was much lower for the flotation system with the co-addition of
illite and magnesium ions than that with the addition of illite alone.
[FIGURES 10-11 OMITTED]
During the flotation tests, when the pH of the slurry was
controlled at 8.5 by adding NaOH, depression of bitumen recovery due to
the addition of divalent cations and illite clays was not observed. To
determine whether or not slime-coating phenomena disappear at pH 8.5,
zeta potential distribution measurements were conducted at this pH. As
shown in Figure 12, the zeta potential distribution measurement results
indicate slime coating of illite on bitumen occurs. This finding
contradicts the observations from the flotation tests (where a large
recovery drop was not observed). To explain this discrepancy,
supernatant from the produced tailings water of the test with pH control
was used to conduct the zeta potential distribution measurements
(instead of deionized water). The results in Figure 13 suggest a little
slime coating of bitumen by illite clay, which correlates well with the
flotation test results. The difference in the zeta potential
distribution measurements using deionized water and the measurements
performed in the supernatant from the produced tailings water may be due
to the presence of chemical species in the tailings water generated by
the added NaOH. Zeta potential distribution measurements were repeated
using the supernatant instead of deionized water to check whether the
supernatant from the flotation tests without pH control has the same
effect on the interactions between bitumen and illite as the supernatant
from the flotation tests with pH control. The results in Figure 14 show
that the acidic supernatant did not have the same effect as the alkaline
supernatant in preventing the slime coating.
[FIGURES 12-14 OMITTED]
To summarize the effect of various additives on bitumen recovery,
Figure 15 shows a critical role of flotation slurry pH in bitumen
recovery from oil sands ore. The results here are obtained using a good
processing ores doped with calcium, magnesium and/or fine clays. It is
evident that for a given temperature, bitumen recovery correlates well
with flotation slurry pH. Flotation at pH below 8 is not recommended as
there is a sharp drop in bitumen recovery, in particular at low
operating temperatures. The general trend shown in Figure 15 is
significant as it advices us a caution in operation whenever dealing
with ores containing a significant amount of fines which are acidic. In
this case, control of flotation slurry pH by caustic addition is
advised.
[FIGURE 15 OMITTED]
Use of Plant Recycle Water
Initially, bitumen recovery tests and the subsequent zeta potential
distribution measurements were conducted using deionized water as
discussed in the previous sections. To that end, no complications were
introduced as otherwise would through the use of plant recycle water.
However, subsequent bitumen recovery tests were performed using Aurora
process water with the addition of 5 wt.% of illite clays and 1 mM
magnesium ions. Table 2 gives the divalent cation concentration and pH
of Aurora process water. The results in Table 3 show that the clay and
cation additions had no detrimental effect on bitumen recovery. As well,
zeta potential distribution measurements showed no clay slime-coating on
bitumen.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The detrimental effect of illite clay on bitumen recovery was
due to its acidity, and its negative effect could be reconciled by the
addition of NaOH.
2. The presence of 1 mM calcium or magnesium ions alone in
deionized water had little effect on bitumen recovery. But when co-added
with illite clay, both had the same adverse effect on molar equivalent
basis when tests were performed in solutions prepared using deionized
water.
3. To some extent, temperature mitigated the adverse effect on
bitumen recovery caused by the addition of illite clays and divalent
cations.
4. Slime coating of illite on bitumen was not observed in the
measurements performed using alkaline tailings water.
5. Zeta potential distribution measurements are a useful tool for
studying slime coating phenomena and diagnosing flotation systems.
6. The co-presence of illite clay and divalent cations had no
detrimental effect on bitumen recovery when tests were performed using
plant recycle water.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Financial support for this work by NSERC Industrial Research Chair
in Oil Sands Engineering is greatly appreciated.
REFERENCES
Bichard, J. A., "Oil Sands Composition and Behavior
Research," The Research Papers of John A. Bichard 1957-1965,
AOSTRA, Edmonton, AB, Canada (1987).
Budziak, C. J., E. I. Vargha-Butler, R. G. V. Hancock and A. W.
Neumann, "Study of Fines in Bitumen Extracted from Oil Sands by
Heat-Centrifugation," Fuel 67(12), 1633-1638 (1988).
Bulmer, J. T. and J. Star, "Syncrude Analytical Methods for
Oil Sand and Bitumen Processing," Alberta Oil Sands Information
Centre, Edmonton, AB, pp. 46-51 (1979).
Clark, K. A., "The Separation of the Bitumen from Alberta
Bituminous Sand," Annual Western Meeting, Edmonton, AB, Canada,
October (1929).
Clark, K. A. and D. S. Pasternack, "Hot Water Separation of
Bitumen from Alberta Bituminous Sand," Ind. Eng. Chem. 24,
1410-1416 (1932).
Dai, Q. and K. H. Chung, "Bitumen-Sand Interaction in Oil Sand
Processing," Fuel 74(12), 1858-1864 (1995).
Dai, Q., K. H. Chung and J. Czarnecki, "Formation of Calcium
Carbaonate in the Bitumen/Aqueous Solution Hydroxide System,"
AOSTRA J. Research 8, p95 (1992).
Dai, Q. and K. H. Chung, "Hot Water Extraction Process
Mechanism Using Model Oil Sand," Fuel 75(2), 220-226 (1996).
Du, Q., Z. Sun, W. Forsling and H. Tang, "Acid-Base Properties
of Aqueous Illite Surfaces," J. Colloid Interface Sci. 187(1),
221-231 (1997).
Hepler, L. G. and C. Hsi, "AOSTRA Technical Handbook on Oil
Sands, Bitumen and Heavy Oils," AOSTRA Technical Publication Series
6. Alberta Oil Sands Technology and Research Authority, Edmonton, AB,
Canada (1989).
Hepler, L. G. and R. G. Smith, "The Alberta Oil Sands:
Industrial Procedures for Extraction and Some Recent Fundamental
Research," AOSTRA Technical Publication Series 14. Alberta Oil
Sands Technology and Research Authority, Edmonton, AB, Canada (1994).
Kasongo, T., Z. Zhou, Z. Xu and J. H. Masliyah, "Effect of
Clays and Calcium Ions on Bitumen Extraction from Athabasca Oil Sands
Using Flotation," Can. J. Chem. Eng. 78(4), 674-681 (2000).
Liu, J., Z. Zhou, Z. Xu and J. H. Masliyah, "Bitumen-Clay
Interaction in Aqueous Media Studied by Zeta Potential Distribution
Measurement," J. Colloid Interface Sci. 252(2), 409 (2002).
Liu, J., Z. Xu and J. H. Masliyah, "Role of Fine Clays in
Bitumen Extraction from Oil Sands," AIChE J. 50(8), 1917 (2004).
Liu, J., Z. Xu and J. H. Masliyah, "Colloidal Forces between
Bitumen Surfaces in Aqueous Solutions Measured with Atomic Force
Microscope," Colloid Surf., A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 260,
217-228 (2005).
National Energy Board (Sept. 2004), "Canada's Oil Sands:
Opportunities and Challenges to 2015," www.neb.gc.ca. (Oct.1,
2005).
Omotoso, O. E. and R. J. Mikula, "High Surface Areas Caused by
Smectitic Interstratification of Kaolinite and Illite in Athabasca Oil
Sands," Applied Clay Sci. 25, 37-47 (2004).
Sanford, E. C. and F. A. Seyer, "Processibility of Athabasca
Tar Sand Using a Batch Extraction Unit: The Role of NaOH," CIM Bullitin 164-169 (March 1979).
Sanford, E. C., "Processibility of Athabasca Oil Sand:
Interrelationship between Oil Sand Fine Solids, Process Aids, Mechanical
Energy and Oil Sand Age after Mining," Can. J. Chem. Eng. 61(4),
554-567 (1983).
Smith, R. G. and L. L. Schramm, "The Influence of Mineral
Components on the Generation of Natural Surfactants from Athabasca Oil
Sands in the Alkaline Hot Water Process," Fuel Pro. Tech. 30(1),
1-14 (1992).
Takamura, K. and D. Wallace, "The Physical Chemistry of the
Hot Water Process," J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 27(6), 98 (1988).
Wallace, D., R. Tipman, B. Komishke, V. Wallwork and E. Perkins,
"Fines/Water Interactions and Consequences of the Presence of
Degraded Illite on Oil Sands Extractability," Can. J. Chem. Eng.
82(4), 667-677 (2004).
Xu, Z., J. Liu, J. W. Choung and Z. Zhou, "Electrokinetic
Study of Clay Interactions with Coal in Flotation," Int. J. Miner.
Process. 68(1-4), 183-196 (2003).
Zhou, Z., T. Kasongo, Z. Xu and J. H. Masliyah, "Assessment of
Bitumen Recovery from the Athabasca Oil Sands Using a Laboratory Denver
Flotation Cell," Can. J. Chem. Eng. 82(4), 696-703 (2004).
Zhou, Z. A., Z. Xu, J. H. Masliyah and J. Czarnecki,
"Coagulation of Bitumen with Fine Silica in Model Systems,"
Colloids Surf., A 148(3), 199 (1999).
Xinlin Ding (1), Chris Repka (2), Zhenghe Xu (3) and Jacob Masliyah
(3) *
* Author to whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail address:
jacob.masliyah@ualberta.ca
(1.) SNC-Lavalin Inc., Calgary, AB, Canada T2P 3H5
(2.) Baker Petrolite Corporation, Fort McMurray, AB, Canada T9K 1P1
(3.) Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University
of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2G6
Manuscript received April 15, 2006; revised manuscript received
August 10, 2006; accepted for publication August 14, 2006.
Table 1. Composition of F11B oil sand ore (mass %)
Bitumen Water Solids Fines ([dagger])
14.5 3.2 82.3 9.5
([dagger]) The fines are defined as the solids smaller than 44[micro]m
and the fines content is expressed as a percentage of solids in this
size fraction with respect to the total solids.
Table 2. Divalent cation concentration and pH
of Aurora process water
Calcium (ppm) Magnesium (ppm) pH
27.8 16.2 8.2
Table 3. Bitumen recovery test results using Aurora process water
25[degrees]C
Conditions pH Bitumen recovery
Control: no additives 8.5 88.9%
With addition of
5 wt.% illite clays and 24 ppm 8.3 88.0%
(1mM) magnesium
35[degrees]C
Conditions pH Bitumen recovery
Control: no additives 8.4 93.8%
With addition of
5 wt.% illite clays and 24 ppm 8.3 92.5%
(1mM) magnesium
Figure 7. Effect of pH on bitumen recovery using deionized
water at T = 25[degrees]C
Flotation without Flotation with
pH control pH control
without [Mg.sup.2+] 5.8 8.5
with 24ppm [Mg.sup.2+] 4.9 8.5
Figure 8. Effect of pH on bitumen recovery using deionized water
at T = 35[degrees]C
Flotation without Flotation with
pH control pH control
without [Mg.sup.2+] 5.6 8.5
with 24ppm [Mg.sup.2+] 4.9 8.5