Rosemary T. Van Arsdel, Florence Fenwick Miller: Victorian Feminist, Journalist and Educator.
Fulton, Richard D.
Rosemary T. Van Arsdel, Florence Fenwick Miller: Victorian
Feminist, Journalist and Educator (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001), xvi + 249
pp., $74.95 cloth.
Florence Fenwick Miller knew everyone who counted in the various
Victorianera women's movements. When she was 16, she enrolled at
the University of Edinburgh to study medicine with Sophia Jex-Blake and
her coterie. Her closest friend from the age of 19 on was Lucie Cobb,
second cousin of Francis Power Cobb. Other friends included Louisa
Amelia Ann Sims (Mrs. George), Charles Bradlaugh and Annie Besant, Emily
Faithfull, and Susan B. Anthony. She was acquainted with most of the
leaders of the various wings of the Suffrage movements because, from the
time she was 19, she traveled around the country as a platform speaker
for women's rights. At various times she fought with Helen
Blackburn and Lydia Becker over tactics in the movement, and was
attacked by Elizabeth Wolstenholme Elmy and Harriet M'Ilquaham in
private circles over personal issues. In addition, she was the personal
physician of the popular novelist Isabella Varley Banks. She wrote a
regular column for one of the most powerful newspapers of the late
nineteenth century, The Illustrated London News. She published articles
in Belgravia and the Modern Review, Lett's Illustrated Household
Magazine and the Lady's Pictorial, The Women's Penny Paper and
every influential daily and weekly newspaper in London and the
provinces. She wrote textbooks (mainly on health or physiology), how-to
books, short stories, an admittedly bad novel, and a biography of
Harriet Martineau. She edited a variety of periodicals, including
Outward Bound, a magazine for emigrants; she edited and published the
Woman's Signal, a woman's rights newspaper affiliated with the
Temperance Union. She made her living, and later supported her husband
and family, as a doctor, platform speaker, and writer.
Her work on behalf of woman's suffrage and woman's rights
in general spanned arguably the most critical time in the movements,
from about 1871 to her effective retirement in 1918 (her last article
appeared in the Fortnightly in November 1924). In her own career she was
something of a trail blazer: in the 1870s, only a handful of women were
doctors or platform speakers, and in 1876, only four were members of the
London School Board. Thus, Miller attracted a significant number of
influential women to her personal circle (her close friend Susan B.
Anthony appointed her to the organizing board for what became the
International Women's Suffrage Committee, and Miller later became
Treasurer of the organization). Almost everything she accomplished she
did without the support of her mother, an acerbic, strong-willed, rather
conservative woman who apparently had nothing good to say about her
daughter's scandalous behavior. It didn't help that Miller
lived with her parents during these early years as an activist. She
finally escaped to the relative safety of suburbia after marrying Fred
Ford in April of 1877. Even then her mother continued to berate her for,
among other things, her unlady-like activities that included retaining
her maiden name after her marriage (something that was literally not
done in the 1870s).
Despite her high profile during her lifetime, and despite the fact
that she regularly appeared in memoirs as a key participant in various
nineteenth-century women's organizations, little has been written
about Florence Fenwick Miller. Rosemary Van Arsdel has done a
commendable job of ransacking known (and some previously unknown)
sources to craft this biography. Except for a typescript autobiography
of Miller's first 25 years that now resides in the Wellcome
Institute for the History of Medicine, not many documents by or about
her are left. Her will tantalizingly refers to a bequest to her daughter
Irene of "all her books, papers, manuscripts, copyrights, and
'bound up volumes containing my thirty-three years' work on
the Illustrated London News' and the 'bound up volumes of the
Woman's Signal and Outward Bound' and all of her printed
articles contained in several scrapbooks" (225). This treasure
trove of materials has, alas, disappeared, forcing Professor Van Arsdel
to use newspaper articles and contemporary letters and memoirs to
reconstruct Miller's life. As a result, we get to see the public
Miller--dates and subjects of her speeches, dates of travel, campaigning
dates--and the journalistic evaluation of the effect of her speeches on
her audiences, but we don't get to see the speeches themselves. We
never really get to "hear" Miller as her audiences heard her.
Without being able to read the speeches at least, we don't know why
her audiences found her so compelling. Nor do we get to see samples of
her writing to help us to understand why her readers, especially those
who were so influential in the British and American suffrage movements,
found her so persuasive. And we don't get to see much of the
private Florence Fenwick Miller: the mother of two young women (given
her relationship with her own mother, how did she get along with her
daughters?), the happily married public figure whose husband
mysteriously disappeared sometime in the early '90s (according to
family legend, Fred ran off with a music hall actress).
What we do get, however, is the fruit of Professor Van
Arsdel's years of searching for material by, on, or about Florence
Fenwick Miller. What we do get is a sketch of one of the most
influential figures in the late Victorian suffrage movement, and a peek
inside some of the politics of the movement: the fear of some leaders
that Miller's radical beliefs would create an attractive target for
the anti-suffrage crowd; the fear of the equal-rights women that
suffragists would inject partisan politics into their meetings. And we
get both Professor Van Arsdel's delightful sense of humor and her
exacting scholarship, which packs much interesting supplementary
information into her footnotes. For example, after describing an
interview that Miller published in the Woman's Signal describing
Mrs. Frank Leslie's business acumen, Van Arsdel notes drily:
"What the interview did not say was that in October 1891, Mrs.
Leslie had made a foolish mistake in marrying Oscar Wilde's
ne'er-do-well brother, Willie, who was many years her junior. He
caused her much pain and grief during their short union through his
idleness and fondness for drink. The marriage ended early in 1892"
(212). And later, after discussing "An Address to the Queen,"
a document "signed by scores of women prominent in the women's
movement" (205), Van Arsdel footnotes: "The women who signed
this 'Address' were labeled in the press as the 'forward
women'. Thus we have the 'redundant women', the
'platform women', and the 'new women', supplying
four fresh categories in which women were seen as playing new roles in
society" (212).
Florence Fenwick Miller is a part of Ashgate Press' Series on
the Nineteenth Century, which is something of a mixed blessing. On the
one hand, it benefits from being a part of a series under the able
editorship of Vincent Newey and Joanne Shattock. On the other, it is
rather expensive, and seems to be aimed more at research libraries than
at the individual scholar. That's a pity, because it is not only a
valuable research tool, but an interesting read as well.
Richard D. Fulton
Whatcom Community College