Language evolution slays once-sacred cows in AP Stylebook.
Jarvis, John
Darrell Christian, Paula Froke, Sally Jacobse & David Minthorn,
"The Associated Press Stylebook and Briefing on Media Law:
2014." The Associated Press, New York 492 pages, $20.95
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Broadcast and print journalists who buy new Associated Press
Stylebooks every year to keep up with ever-changing grammar rules in
their chosen profession probably have grumbled at one time or another
about unlearning what once seemed carved into stone.
But for the 2014 spiral-bound edition, published in late spring,
the AP editors handed down style decisions that turned otherwise normal
grumbling into full-throated outrage.
Consider the following five new rules:
* For longtime AP Stylebook owners, a decision announced March 20
to eliminate the distinction between "over" and "more
than" in stories was not unlike waving a red flag at a charging
bull--and the news was received just about as warmly. Before that news
broke, "over" had been relegated to spatial relationships
("The plane flew over the city," for example), while
"more than" was used to denote amounts of things.
* Almost as angst-ridden was the reaction to the April 8 decision
that "underway" is now one word in all uses. Previous
stylebooks had told us that it was "two words in virtually all
uses." The 1987 version of the AP Stylebook went so far as to say
that it is "one word only when used as an adjective before a noun
in a nautical sense: an underway flotilla"
* Remember the practice of abbreviating state names in stories?
That rule has been cast aside in this year's stylebook, too. The AP
wire noted on April 23, that "effective May 1, the AP will spell
out state names in the body of stories," while "datelines will
continue to use abbreviations." The reason given was thus:
"The change is being made to be consistent in our style for
domestic and international stories. International stories have long
spelled out state names in the body of stories."
* On April 2, the Associated Press changed the "illegal
immigrant" entry. In a blog post that same day, Paul Colford, the
AP's director of media relations, detailed how the AP stylebook
"no longer sanctions the term 'illegal immigrant' or the
use of 'illegal' to describe a person. Instead, it tells users
that 'illegal' should describe only an action, such as living
in or immigrating to a country illegally." Colford's source
for his information was Kathleen Carroll, AP senior vice president and
executive editor. Carroll, he said, added that "also, we had in
other areas been ridding the stylebook of labels. The new section on
mental health issues argues for using credibly sourced diagnoses instead
of labels. Saying someone was 'diagnosed with schizophrenia'
instead of schizophrenic, for example. And that discussion about
labeling people, instead of behavior, led us back to 'illegal
immigrant' again. We concluded that, to be consistent, we needed to
change our guidance. So we have."
* On April 17, Poynter's Andrew Beaujon took note of the new
AP approach to the word "hopefully," writing this:
"Hopefully, copy editors will find another spike on which to impale
sentences. Says an update to the AP Stylebook: 'The traditional
meaning is in a hopeful manner. Also acceptable is the modern usage:
it's hoped, we hope. Correct: "You're leaving soon?"
she asked hopefully.' The old rule: 'It means in a hopeful
manner. Do not use it to mean it is hoped, let us hope or we
hope.'"
One of the co-editors of the AP Stylebook is David Minthorn, who
also serves as AP's deputy standards editor. In a 2010 interview
with the American Copy Editors Society, he had this to say about the
ever-changing nature of the reference work, which he and fellow
co-editors Darrell Christian and Sally Jacobsen update yearly:
"There has to be an evolution in the language or a clear need for
adding or amending terms."
Anyone who has owned different AP Stylebook versions over the past
decade or so has witnessed this evolution. The term "email,"
for example, originally had a hyphen after the "e" when that
term took root in the early days of the World Wide Web. (In fact, the
2000 edition was the first time the Associated Press included a
dedicated Internet style guide in its stylebook.)
But even with all those previous changes in mind, it should be
noted that over one journalist has uttered this line about the new 2014
stylebook rules: "More than my dead body!" As the transition
to all these new rules gets underway, GJR subscribers can hopefully
remember that these are not illegal changes. In fact, according to the
AP editors, these sentences are (almost) entirely correct.
At least for now.