Unraveling truth from fiction in reporting on China.
Fan, Lu
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
People rushed away on Aug. 9 in 10 seconds from a foreigner who
fainted on a Shanghai subway. The news and a surveillance video clip
about the incident caught the attention of journalists both in China and
the United States.
In the video, a Caucasian male appeared to lean unconsciously to a
woman sitting next to him. After the woman stood up quickly to get away
from him, the man fell on the ground when the train braked as it arrived
at next station. All the passengers sitting close to him quickly ran
away, except for one young man who remained nearby. Reports said someone
had shouted "Accident." The video also shows some people
running out of the train in panic after the doors opened. A subway
officer showed up to talk to the man after he awakened. Once the officer
got off the train, the Caucasian man sat down by himself in the train.
The incident was not covered by Chinese media until August 19.
Chinas official news agency, Xinhua News Agency, ran stories online from
other news outlets but did not release any news itself except a piece on
related first aid. The coverage by other Chinese mainstream media
generally fell into three categories.
The earliest stories released on the websites of mainstream media
had headlines "Foreigner Fainted in Shanghai Subway" and
"All Passengers in Three Cars Ran Away in 10 Seconds," and
similar ones indicating no one had helped. The stories included details
from the surveillance video, and a similar incident had happened on July
18 in which people had run out of another train because a woman's
mobile phone had started to smoke. The subway staff had called for
people to stay calm and to not panic.
A few hours later, some media released reports with the headlines
such as "Shanghai Subway: 'No One helped Fainted Foreigner in
Subway' Is Untrue". The reports said some kind passengers told
the subway officer about this incident and asked for help after they ran
out of the train. These stories ended with comments by subway staff that
people should not panic in such incidents.
In the following days, some media released opinion pieces on the
incident, with some outlets citing foreign media. Reference News, the
newspaper with largest circulation in China, cited the first paragraph
of a story in the Wall Street Journal that "if you're in
trouble on Chinas subways, don't expect to get help from good
Samaritans." Some pieces said there was no need to chastise the
passengers. While people might feel fearful when a foreign passenger
passes out in front of them and not make reasonable decisions when
people run away, this incident reflects the lack of knowledge and
training of handling public crisis as well as the need for better
emergency service from the subway department. An opinion piece by
People's Daily, for example, said people need to be more kind and
responsible, rather than simply protecting themselves. Some other pieces
offered more positive stories on foreigners living in China.
Chinese media covered this subway accident 10 days after it had
happened. It means they had already been delayed by the government from
covering it immediately. However, they posted the video clip online
showing people running away in panic with the headline of "No one
helped fainted foreign passenger" before they checked the fact with
the staff in Shanghai subway system. The sense of being the first to
publish news has been rooted deeper in news reporters' mind than
that of fact checking. Also there is a trend for media in China to
report on positive stories after some accidents caused negative and even
radical public opinion. However, the positive reporting can hardly save
the previous image they created.
The reason passengers ran away without helping was a hot topic on
China's Internet. Some Internet users recalled a similarly
controversial but more serious accident in 2011. A surveillance video
clip showed a two-year old girl named Wang Yue was run over three times
by two vehicles in south China. When she was lying on the floor
bleeding, 18 people walked by but no one helped. She was rescued by the
19th passer-by, a scavenger named Chen Xianmei. However, Wang Yue died
eight days later because of serious injuries. Wang's death aroused
the questions on Chinese morality, and also reminded people and the
media of the earlier "Peng Yu Case".
In 2006, Xu Shoulan, a 65-year-old female got off a bus and fell to
the ground. Peng Yu, a 26-year-old male who got off the bus after her,
helped her, accompanied her to the hospital and paid 200 RMB of her
medical bill. However, Xu sued Peng in 2007 for a compensation of
136,000 as she claimed Peng had been the one who knocked her down. Media
in China at that time spent a lot of space and time on this case and
covered many similar cases in following years. As a result, people
became cautious of offering help, which led to the so-called
indifference. Although some media in China reported on people
blackmailed after helping others, the public opinion of "think
before helping" had been formed.
Another possible reason of people running away from the fainted
passenger is the media's reporting on Ebola. Since the Ebola virus
had prevailed in West Africa, especially earlier this year, media in
China paid close attention to it. But how they covered it caused public
panic. People have only seen reports on growing numbers of patients and
death, warning from the United Nation, and how Chinese government sent
help to the affected areas. The media seldom talk about how the Ebola
virus spreads and how to prevent it scientifically. The coverage of a
suspected case in Hong Kong aggravated the panic.
Thus, media in China cannot be completely blamed for generating
such public panic and indifference in this case. However, they did not
fulfill the responsibility of an agency that the public relies on for
fair and objective information.