Towards sustainable research capacity development and research ownership for academic institutes in developing countries: the Malawian Research Support Centre model.
Gomo, Exnevia ; Kalilani, Linda ; Mwapasa, Victor 等
Introduction
Academic institutions in Africa often depend on international
collaborators for their research agenda, scientific support and funding.
For example, clinical research conducted by the College of Medicine
(CoM), University of Malawi, is recognized to be of high quality.
However, its research agenda has largely been developed, driven by and
funded through its international collaborators (Europe and the US).
Furthermore, the intellectual ownership of the research conducted in
Malawi and elsewhere in Africa has remained with the collaborating
institutes, as reflected in the main applicant on grant proposals and
key authorship positions in publications (Kerac et al, 2009; Dorsey et
al, 2007). The recent introduction of international standards such as
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) has generally improved the quality of
research. However, it has also amplified the complexity and costs of
conducting research, further increasing the dependence of
resource-limited academic institutions on their international
collaborators.
Traditional approaches to strengthening research capacity in
developing countries have focused primarily on honing individual skills
through training at the doctoral level in developed country institutions
without preparing the environment at the home institution for the return
of these skilled individuals (Sawyerr, 2004). These research
capacity-building efforts have been unable to halt the brain-drain from
African academic institutions to high-paying non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) and institutions in the North. A combination of
limited career opportunities, lack of institutionalised support for
research and remuneration are major reasons young African academics do
not return to their home countries after their training overseas
(Sawyerr, 2004; University of Malawi, 2004).
To build sustainable research capacity and local research ownership
in developing countries, a management model is needed that
comprehensively addresses the factors noted above (Figure 1). The CoM
has established a Research Support Centre (RSC), which, in its first
four years, has successfully addressed these issues. This manuscript
describes the conceptual functions and achievements of the Malawian RSC,
and proposes the RSC concept as a tool to develop sustainable research
capacity in similar, research-limited academic institutions.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Research Support Centre (RSC) Concept and Functions
There are four major elements of RSC functions that an African
university may develop.
Individual Support is focused on developing research skills by
providing both faculty and students a package of logically sequenced
courses, including research methodology and the conduct of research
(e.g., protocol writing, project management, data management, and Good
Clinical Practice [GCP]), and one-to-one consultations for statistical
and epidemiological support.
Clinical Trials Support is essential for the development of
GCP-compliant protocols and the instruments to implement them. This
includes support
with relevant research regulatory guidelines, protocol submission to
review committees, data and grants management, and trial coordination
and monitoring by locally trained study coordinators and clinical
research associates (CRAs). Training of local CRAs and study
coordinators is an essential component of the RSC concept and a
potential source of income.
Research Information Support includes the development of research
information (website and newsletter) and data management services, such
as the RSC website (www. medcol.mw/rsc/).
Grant Administration Support focuses on establishing sound pre- and
postaward administrative, financial and project management.
Critical to the success of these elements is the establishment or
strengthening of the overall research governance, including the ethical
review of research proposals.
In the initial phase of the RSC, a core staff comprised of a unit
head, statistician, epidemiologist, data manager, information technology
specialist, CRA trainees, finance officer and secretary, should be able
to establish the platform for launching the various services in a phased
approach (Table 1). Funding for the initial phase ideally should come
from the host institute, if this is not feasible, international donors
may be approached, but this has the disadvantage that support may be
tied to specific deliverables not directly related to the RSC
objectives. In the case of the Malawi RSC, core funding was provided by
the Netherlands-African Partnership for Capacity Development and
Clinical Interventions Against Poverty-Related Diseases (NACCAP). Of the
6725,000 four-year budget provided, 43% was allocated to salaries on a
sliding scale--from l00,000 [euro] in year one to 36,000 [euro] in year
four. This strategy aimed to make the RSC self sustainable within a
reasonable time frame. Therefore, from the start, income generation
(through international research grants, course fees and services for
non-university staff/projects) should be one of the key objectives of
the RSC.
The Malawian RSC Experience
The RSC was initiated at the CoM, Malawi as part of a large
research programme funded by the NACCAP that included a series of
intervention studies to prevent malaria and HIV-related morbidity and
mortality in children (NWO-NACCAP, 2010). These trials, conducted
according to GCP standards, formed an opportunity for on-the-job
training of the RSC staff.
The objective of the RSC programme was to develop a Malawian-owned
RSC that would attract high-quality Malawian researchers from abroad,
contribute to capacity building through a comprehensive course programme
and on-the-job training opportunities, introduce GCP standards, advance
Malawi's capability to develop its own research agenda, and
successfully compete for international research grants.
In the initial phase, due to unfamiliarity with the RSC concept,
recruiting of the core staff from the local academic community was
complicated. However, as soon as the RSC became well known in the local
research community, the expatriate staff initially recruited could be
replaced by scientists from the region. By year two the RSC had a well
established staff base and organisational structure. Among the 13 staff
members were a director, deputy director (an epidemiologist), three
clinical research associates (CRAs), one trial coordinator, a data
manager, a website/information coordinator, grant administrator, data
officer, and administrative assistant.
Five Malawian CoM staff were trained by South Africa-based clinical
research organisations (CROs) (Kendle and African Clinical Research
Organisation) as part of a comprehensive CRA training and mentoring
package. This included classroom and on-the-job training over a
three-year period. After completion of the training, the regional CRAs
could independently monitor trials in Malawi, generating significant
income for the RSC. By the end of the third year, the RSC was generating
11% of its total operating costs, with trial monitoring contributing
nearly 80% of this income. While this cannot replace external funding,
it indicates the potential of sustainability of the RSC, especially with
more concerted efforts to institute supportive services that both
generate income (including training courses) and prevent the loss of
indirect costs.
The course programme was developed collaboratively with the CROs
and various universities from the North, using a Train the Trainers
system. Seven local staff were trained as trainers, and over 500
individuals (students and medical and research staff) from the Southern
African region participated in the various courses.
With the RSC assuming a coordination role for research in the CoM,
the need for a governance framework for its operations became evident.
The RSC facilitated the development of a CoM Research Policy, which set
the mandate and operational scope of the RSC. The RSC also established
research grants management procedures that streamlined grant
administration into well defined pre- and post-award processes.
Four senior Malawian academics returned to assume positions either
at the RSC or in one of the RSC-linked research projects. In addition,
an improved working climate at the CoM contributed to the return of
other scientists and medical doctors. Apart from the RSC information
service (website and RSC newsletter), word-of-mouth advocacy by returned
Malawian academics seems to be a powerful tool in persuading others to
consider following suit. By year three, four other academics had
returned to the CoM through contacts with the RSC.
Over the past four years, the CoM has experienced a rapid growth in
the number of competitive international grants awarded directly to
Malawian investigators. This is attributed partly to the increased
visibility of research in the college and the support provided by the
RSC, which has motivated academics to become involved in grant writing.
The core funding for the Malawian RSC was provided by a four-year
NACCAP grant (NWO-NACCAP, 2010). However, the RSC generated significant
income (11% of its operating costs) through its various services. In
addition, the strengthening of research governance enabled the CoM,
through the RSC, to effectively recover indirect costs from research
grants. Further, the CoM managed to attract additional donor support
from international funding agencies, including the U.S. National
Institutes of Health, Wellcome Trust (United Kingdom) and the European
and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP). Clearly,
the support of the college's northern partners was critical in
setting the tone for its achievements and sustainability.
Conclusion
The Malawian RSC--A Model for Sub Saharan Africa?
The success of the Malawian RSC does not seem unique to Malawi. The
Malawian issues summarised above are comparable to those in many other
sub-Saharan African countries. An important reason for the success of
the RSC is that the Malawian academic community embraced the RSC concept
soon after its start. The comprehensive approach and local ownership of
the RSC has appealed to a new generation of African academics, who have
a growing awareness that the role of donors and guest universities from
the North may need to be revisited. In most African research
institutions, major research has traditionally been driven by expatriate
researchers who have come as part of capacity strengthening efforts.
This is evident from the few publications in which African researchers
are the lead authors. Inevitably the foreign researchers dominate the
local research agenda, have more skills and experience to attract
international funding, and, as principal investigators, exercise
intellectual ownership. An RSC-like initiative may be similarly welcomed
by other African Universities with comparable problems. Further, the
Malawian RSC core staff could play a supportive role in the initial
phase of developing similar programs in the region. This has already
been accomplished with the recent establishment of RSCs at the
University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences and the University of
Zambia School Of Medicine, based on the Malawian model and supported by
Malawian RSC staff. Other universities from Uganda, Rwanda, and
Mozambique have recently shown interest, and are considering developing
their own RSCs. It may be time to consider developing an African RSC
network in which south-south training and coaching is a critical
component. If successful, this initiative may contribute to true
sustainable research capacity building and to local research ownership.
Authors' Note
This manuscript is based on the University of Malawi College of
Medicine Research Support Centre (RSC) programme, supported by the
Netherlands-African Partnership for Capacity Development and Clinical
Interventions Against Poverty-Related Diseases (NACCAP). We thank the
Amsterdam Medical Centre and Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine,
which generously provided technical guidance and support. Additional
financial support was provided by the European and Developing Countries
Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP) and the U.S National Institutes of
Health (NIH).
References
Dorsey, G., Staedke, S., Clark, T.D., Njama-Meya, D., Nzarubarara,
B., Maiteki-Sebuguzi, C., ... Rosenthal, P.J. (2007). Combination
therapy for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Ugandan children: A
randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 297(20),
2210-2219.
Kerac, M., Bunn, J., Seal, A., Thindwa, M., Tomkins, A., Sadler K,
... Collins, S (2009). Probiotics and prebiotics for severe acute
malnutrition (PRONUT study): A double-blind efficacy randomised
controlled trial in Malawi. Lancet, 374(9684), 136-144.
NACCAP/NWO grants awarded website. Retrieved July 5, 2010, from
http://www.nwo.nl/nwohome.nsf/pages/NWOA_6LMKB5_Eng.
Research Support Centre website. Retrieved July 5, 2010, from
http://www.medcol.mw/rsc/index.htm.
Sawyerr, A. (2004). African universities and the challenge of
research capacity development. JHEA/RESA, 2(1), 213-242.
University of Malawi (2004). Partnership in capacity building for
community and public health and biomedical research in Malawi. Report of
proceedings of a meeting of 30-31 May 2003. Cameron Bowie, College of
Medicine.
Exnevia Gomo, MSc, PhD
Director of Research
University of Malawi College of Medicine
P/Bag 360, Chichiri
Blantyre 3
Malawi
Tel: +265 999 788 665
Fax: +265 1 874 700
Email: exgomo@gmail.com
Linda Kalilani
Email: lkalilani@medcol.mw
Victor Mwapasa
Email: vmwapasa@medcol.mw
Chifundo Trigu
Email: registrar@medcol.mw
Kamija Phiri
University of Malawi College of Medicine,
P/Bag 360, Chichiri
Blantyre 3
Malawi
Email: kphiri@mlw.medcol.mw
Joann Schmidt
Umoyo Health Consulting, LLC
4114 Hillside
Howell, MI, USA 48843
Email: joannjschmidt@yahoo.com
Michael Boele van Hensbroek
Global Child Health Group
Emma Children's Hospital Amsterdam Medical Centre
P.O. Box 22660,
1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
Email: mbvh04@gmail.com
Table 1: Development of Research Support Centre functions
in a phased approach
Development Phase Activities
Phase 1 (Year 1)
Infrastructure set-up Recruitment of staff
Office equipment and materials
Basic courses Research methodology
Clinical trial design
Introduction to GCP
Introduction to data management
Services One-on-one consultation
Information (email, website and newsletter)
Phase 2 (Years 2-3)
Courses Clinical trial coordination
Clinical trial monitoring (training
and monitoring)
Project management
Statistical analysis
Grant management
Services Clinical trial monitoring and coordination
Grant management
Research governance Research policy
Grants management policy and procedures
Institutionalisation of the RSC
Phase 3 (Years 3-4)
Advanced courses Advanced GCP
Advanced data management
Advanced grant management training
Evidence-based medicine
Services Data management
Statistical support
Project management/Study coordination
Trial site management
Comprehensive grant management
Research governance Research policy
Grants management policy and procedures
Ethical review and approval
Phase 4 (Year 4 onwards)
Consolidation Accreditation of courses
Accreditation of CRAB monitoring services
Quality control and assurance for
services & courses