The postmodern author on stage: Fair Use and Wallace Stegner.
Karell, Linda
Of course artists borrow--and (at times unknowingly)
collaborate--all the time, and it's important if not vital we be
allowed to do so.... So many ideas come from those who came before, and
culture will stop dead if we don't get to borrow ... and stir bits
into our own stews. But ... that is very different from taking chunks of
text written by another and folding them into one's work as if they
are one's own. I have joked that making sure I
"footnoted" everybody in Fair Use--acknowledging the source
material and quotes--added at least five minutes of text and time to the
play.
--Sands Hall (1)
I'm not trashing him. I'm just pointing out that he
"borrowed" word after word someone else wrote, typed them into
a manuscript, and called himself the "author."
--Playwright, Fair Use
On the website program for the 2002 Western Literature Association
meeting in Tucson, Arizona, conference attendees were gently admonished
to behave themselves at the Reader's Theatre, a cherished annual
event. That year's play was an abridged version of California
playwright Sands Hall's Fair Use, a complex feminist look at the
ongoing debates regarding originality and plagiarism in Wallace
Stegner's 1971 Pulitzer Prize winning novel, Angle of Repose. When
Hall, who attended the performance of her play at WLA, referred to the
organization as "a bastion of Stegner adoration," she
accurately described the esteem with which Stegner is regarded by many
of its members (Reynolds 8). The website's warning therefore
embodied a reasonable anxiety.
The specific historical and ethical disputes the play investigates
have been known to academics for three decades. Stegner's Angle of
Repose weaves together two stories. The first is the historical story of
writer and illustrator Susan Burling Ward and her engineer husband
Oliver Ward as they move throughout the West following Oliver's
dreams of invention and irrigation. The second is the contemporary story
of Lyman Ward, Susan's grandson, as he pieces together her life
from unpublished letters and other writings for a novel he is writing on
her life. In the course of sorting through her writings--primarily
letters to her dear friend back east, Augusta--Lyman comes to understand
the tragic events that led to his grandmother and grandfather's
enduring unhappiness with one another. Stegner's novel won a
Pulitzer Prize and received largely positive reviews, particularly
regarding Stegner's rendition of the historical portion of the
novel. But Stegner had "borrowed" heavily from Western writer
and artist Mary Hallock Foote's personal correspondence to her
Eastern friend, Helena Gilder, and her then-unpublished reminiscences
for the basis of his fictional Susan Ward. Many of Foote's original
letters to Gilder appear in the novel, either unchanged or slightly
edited, as letters from Susan to Augusta. In addition, the novel's
title, numerous other characters and scenes, and the major action in the
novel can be traced directly to Foote's writings.
When Stegner appropriated Foote's personal letters and other
writing into his novel, and then did not identify them or their original
context except in an oblique and deliberately vague thank-you to
Foote's descendents at the beginning of the novel, he set in motion
one of the more frustrating episodes of his career. (2) Responses to
Stegner's actions vary. While some see his decision to use
Foote's writing (and the outlines and episodes of her life) as
outright theft, the kind of bad-spirited behavior that gets writing
students expelled, others defend Stegner as a creative writer merely and
necessarily taking creative license in the production of a fictional
work.
Fair Use strides into this debate intent on provoking the audience
to ponder the issues and implications of what it means to be an Author.
Like Angle of Repose, Fair Use works structurally to intertwine stories,
but here there are three, rather than two. The first historical story is
the presumably "real" story of Mary Hallock Foote's
journey west with her husband, Arthur. The second historical story is
the fictitious Susan's journey west with her husband, Oliver. As
the play progresses, the two historical stories sometimes merge but more
often conflict or even clash as scenes unfold from Hallock's pen,
and then from Stegner's. The contemporary story that surrounds
these is also reminiscent of Angle of Repose (which is always
simultaneously recalling Foote's letters and reminiscences) in that
it features a writer doing creative work based on discovered letters--in
this case it is a female playwright who has discovered Foote's
letters and reminiscences, as well as Stegner's fictionalizing of
them--and embarks on writing a play to present a "truer version of
Mary's life" (II: 87). These layers of storytelling comprise
the playwright's imagining of Mary Hallock Foote's life based
on Foote's writings, the playwright's simultaneously imagining
of Wallace Stegner's imagining of Foote's life, and the
unfolding of the playwright's own somewhat dissembling life as she
and her young daughter attempt to live in some harmony with her father,
the historian who, like Lyman from Angle of Repose, has dedicated his
life to research and books at the cost of intimate and lasting
relationships with the women in his life.
The play is structurally complex as various story- and time-lines
emerge and intersect. It is equally provocative as it traces the
playwright's attempts to write a play about Foote that ultimately
brings her to face her own investment in "borrowing" and its
nearness to plagiarism, her vulnerability as a female writer compared
with the authoritative structures that reward masculine genius even when
it is appropriated from women, her anger at her father as an embodiment
of that authority and at her ex-husband for, ironically, rejecting that
model of authority for himself, and the dynamic, fluid nature of
authorship as a collaborative activity that makes it far more difficult
for her to condemn Stegner's actions. In other words, Fair Use
engages the literary event of Stegner's presumed plagiarizing of
Foote from a postmodern perspective: a metanarrative that constantly
performs its own embeddeness in a collaborative chain of
"authors." It refuses the desire for individual authors or
authoritative interpretations. By positioning itself as a postmodern
commentary on the impossibility of originality and the inevitability of
collaboration, Fair Use bridges the divide between Stegner camps and
exposes our unexamined assumptions regarding individual authorship and
the authority of male creativity.
At the end of Act I, Playwright quotes from a 1970 letter from
Stegner to Janet Micoleau, Foote's granddaughter and the
"J.M." of Stegner's opaque dedication, explaining his
decision to cease relying on the factual outlines of Foote's life
near the end of Angle of Repose and to depart entirely from Foote's
biography, making his character Susan a potential adulteress whose
dalliance renders her responsible for her young daughter's
drowning:
PLAYWRIGHT: He's just found out the Rems are
going to be published by the Huntington Library,
and he's a little freaked out. (Reads.) "Me, I think
it's a splendid idea. But if the reminiscences are to
be published it won't take much literary detective
work to discover what family I am basing my story
on. Must I now unravel the little threads I have so
painstakingly raveled together, the real with the fictional,
and replace all troth with fiction? Or does it
matter to you that an occasional reader or scholar
can detect the Footes behind my fictions?" (I: 55)
Stegner ends the letter by saying, dryly, "Wonderful. I feel
like a character in literary history" (I:56). The Historian
responds: "He is. And you'll see to it that she is too"
(I: 56). Through exchanges like this, Fair Use simultaneously works
forward and backward in time, while moving outward to interweave the
play's action with the legal, ethical, and theoretical issues it
raises.
One of the central discoveries postmodernism has made is to our
understanding of representation. Traditionally, representation assumes
an original; it takes as a given that what is being represented has an
original, and that recourse to that original proves both the truth of it
as original and the accuracy of its representation. Intellectual
property laws, which largely came into effect in the 18th and 19th
centuries with the printing press and the growing (international) market
for literary productions, responded to this traditional understanding of
representation. Any copies--representations--of the original must
acknowledge their creator because that original is understood as having
its genesis in the unique creativity of the author. Much of our
unexamined belief in the author as a uniquely creative, inspired
individual genius also solidified during this time. (3) Postmodern
theories of authorship challenge the belief in the inspired, individual
author. Language in particular has been a focus for this challenge.
Postmodernism deconstructs the dualism of original/copy, positing
instead a web of representations that echo and build upon prior
representations, which likewise are indebted to still prior
representations, and are prevented by their very nature as language from
ever leading back to the original. At its boldest, postmodernism argues
that there are no originals; all acts of language, and thus of
representation, carry traces of past contexts that inflect their present
meanings. The implications for authorship are dramatic.
Foucault's famous claim, that our traditional reverence for
the author is the mechanism by which we throw up the gates and bar the
door against the endlessly proliferating meanings of the text is, by
now, both old hat and blithely disregarded:
The author is not an indefinite source of significations
which fill a work; the author does not precede
the work, he is a certain functional principle by
which, in our culture; one limits, excludes, and
chooses; in short, by which one impedes the free circulation,
the free manipulation, the free composition,
decomposition, and recomposition of fiction....
The author is therefore the ideological figure by
which one marks the manner in which we fear the
proliferation of meaning. (159)
The author as we traditionally valorize him is a mechanism for
classifying and controlling knowledge. For example, our penchant for
associating various aspects of the text--word choice, mood, genre, and a
host of other stylistic markers--with a particular individual is instead
a determining factor limiting the meaning of the text, circumscribing
the range of possible meanings a text can have, and ultimately
"reduc{ing} the great peril, the great danger with which fiction
threatens our world" by granting us mastery over the text (158). We
further establish our mastery through the writer's biography,
which, if known, shapes our expectations of the text's meaning, as
can a record of the writer's explicit intentions regarding the
meaning of the text. All of these signifiers of stable identity function
to close the text off from a range of meanings.
The very nature of drama poses challenges traditional definitions
of authorship. Jeffrey A. Masten, writing about Renaissance drama prior
to the construction of authorship as an individualized demonstration of
genius, argues that "collaboration was the Renaissance English
theatre's dominant mode of textual production" (363).
Postmodernism returns us to the possibility of interpreting drama as a
fundamentally polyvocal art form that is inevitably "about"
the thing it can't fail to perform: the endless indeterminacy of
representation. In this way, drama ensures another series of
collaborations takes place: between writer and readers, writer and
performers, performers and audience. (4) Although plays have authorial
signatures and therefore claim individual authors as their originators,
the illusion of a single, overarching author that precedes the work is
visibly undone by the elaborately highlighted participation of many
contributors. Hall notes this contradiction in the development of Fair
Use:
{The director} and several actors work through various
scenes from the play; I watch and take notes.
And I find this deeply ironic: I am writing a play
about the issue of using words and ideas that belong
to someone else, and there I am, looking for a line
an actor tosses out that is more effective than one I
wrote, or even one I haven't thought of at all. I
compliment the actor, thank the director, but the
line becomes one I have "authored." ("Fair Game?"
4)
Fair Use makes much of the polyvocal mode of its production to
challenge the limiting function of traditional definitions of individual
authorship.
Within the intertwining historical stories, this intellectually
energetic play sets forth a fictional meeting between Stegner and Foote
(who never met in real life), and engages critical questions surrounding
our interpretation of Stegner's actions, including questions about
copyright, creative license, and gender. For most of Act I, WS and MHF do not see each other, although MHF can hear WS as he quotes from her
reminisces and his fictionalization of them. As the characters gradually
become aware of one another--and of their own position as characters
acting in a play within a play, they are sometimes frustrated at
competing directions from Playwright and WS, and they often have
opinions about the issues that emerge, particularly near the end of the
play when Playwright is seeking some resolution, or "repose"
for MHF and WS. All the characters except Historian are taking place in
Playwright's imagination.
Although on the whole Fair Use paints Stegner as more guilty than
innocent, even positing an apology from WS to MHF near the play's
conclusion, and tends to argue for Foote as the unacknowledged center of
the novel, the many intertwined voices, multiple character depictions,
shifting timeframes, and simultaneous presentations of the material from
various viewpoints emphasize the play's postmodernity, making the
blame game impossible to win. Fair Use is literally a palimpsest of
others' words in shifting contexts that simultaneously evoke the
parallels between the characters and between the writers of these
various interpretations of Foote. For example, Historian and Playwright
both parallel Stegner's fictional Lyman. Like Lyman, who is also a
historian, Historian has focused so self-absorbedly on his own research
and intellectual expertise that he has missed much of the richness of
his personal life; also like Lyman, his wife has left him. Playwright,
too, shares Lyman's desire to find the truth and present it; also
like Lyman, the truth she finds is already an interpretation that
requires subsequent interpretations:
PLAYWRIGHT: I want to give another, I hope truer, version of
Mary's life. And of what she meant by "angle of repose."
Stegner has Lyman Ward define it as "horizontal, permanently."
He has Susan and Oliver live in bitter silence to the ends of their
lives. What kind of "repose" is that?
WS: (in a sudden, theatrical fit of weeping) "In all the years
I lived with them I never say them kiss, I never saw them put their arms
around each other, I never saw them touch!"
PLAYWRIGHT: (crossing to him) That was your anguish, WS. You gave
that line to Lyman Ward--
WS: You gave that line to me!
PLAYWRIGHT: So.
WS: God. Let me out of this play!
PLAYWRIGHT: But it's true! You're working out your anger
and grief, figuring out some element of your life, through someone
else's story!
WS: Oh, and you're doing something so very different? (II: 87)
Like Lyman, she is struggling with a disintegrating marriage and
only will look reluctantly at her role in that. Also like Lyman, there
are some indications at the end of the play that forgiveness--or at
least a negotiated truce--may be possible.
Fair Use makes much of other possible parallels, fore-grounding
them for the audience: in Angle of Repose, Lyman gathers some news
clippings that suggest his grandmother's adulterous romance and its
tragic consequence in the death of her daughter, Agnes. These clippings
are one of the things for which no factual parallel exists in
Foote's life. As Playwright says, "A lot of people recognized
the Footes in Stegner's play, thought he'd exhumed a
well-hidden skeleton from the family closet" (II: 97). In a scene
to which I will return later, Playwright confronts WS with news
clippings describing accident he had while in a clandestine meeting with
a graduate student. The accident happened; the woman and the clippings
don't exist in fact? Identity is thus portrayed as fluid and
subject to interpretation--sometimes wild interpretations based more on
the interpreter's (un)conscious needs or desires than on any
factual basis. In a postmodern sense, identity is not a fixed, definable
essence that can be fully and accurately represented; as Fair Use shows,
identity is constantly constructed, negotiated, and struggled over. That
we rarely recognize the tenuousness of identity is due to the successful
covering over of the shifting contexts present in every utterance.
In numerous interviews, when asked about the composition process of
Angle of Repose, Stegner makes virtually identical arguments that insist
on creative license: "I used her as a model, but whenever her
papers didn't suit me, I changed them, which is why it is a novel
and not a biography. If I'd been writing her biography, I
couldn't have changed them" (Hepworth 36). Yet, Stegner's
view of history as implicitly a man's province suggests why he
chose a fictional format for his use of Foote's life. Stegner says
that, after reading Foote's letters to Helena Gilder,
I decided, quite frankly, that she wasn't worth a
biography. She wasn't an important enough literary
person, though she was pretty good. And her art
was hard to judge, because she drew so commonly,
particularly in later life, directly onto wood blocks,
so there are no originals ... So I decided against
writing a biography. (Hepworth 69)
When Rodman Paul edited and published Foote's A Victorian
Gentlewoman in the Far West: The Reminiscences of Mary Hallock Foote in
1972, only one year after Angle of Repose was published, Stegner
expressed concern Foote would be recognized in his novel. (6) In other
words, her obscurity warranted his dramatic incorporation and
assimilation of her life into his text; when she becomes somewhat more
widely known, he simultaneously opens himself to accusations of
plagiarism.
Deeply held assumptions about gender inflect Stegner's
assessment of Foote, as we can see in Fair Use's inclusion of what
Angle of Repose elides or mocks: the hidden elements of women's
history from this period, including early attempts at birth control and
the common occurrence of debilitating miscarriages. In its presentation
of history, Fair Use reveals history as a construct with ideological
functions. For example, Historian plans to speak about Stegner in a
scheduled talk on "How Artists Captured the West," and
Playwright urges him to "Talk about a woman! We've got to
change the way people perceive things! The way things are. Dad! Mary
Hallock Foote! Talk about how she captured the West! Her illustrations!
Her novels" (I: 27). Such gendered assumptions likewise shape
responses to Stegner, and readings of him as plagiarist challenge the
authorized discourses surrounding Stegner as the West's premiere
Author. The common definition of plagiarism is intentionally taking the
literary property of another without attribution and passing it off as
one's own, having failed to add value to the copied material and
having reaped from its use an unearned benefit (Stearns 7). In short, it
is a form of cheating.
All the apparent evidence, which includes letters and interviews
from Stegner regarding the production of the novel, suggests that
Stegner knowingly made use of Foote's materials in publicly
unacknowledged ways. And, as Fair Use emphasizes, Stegner's act of
plagiarism is none too subtly connected to gender as well: would Stegner
have felt as entitled to borrow the work of a male writer, albeit a then
unknown one? If so, would he have defended that sense of entitlement as
persistently, even arrogantly as he defends his use of Foote's
papers? (7) As Debora Halbert has argued, in their symbolic roles as
nurturer and even Nature, women are historically linked to writing as
the origin of ideas voiced by the male author--as the male's muse,
or as the site of inspiration. In other words, it has been acceptable to
plagiarize from women because it is impossible to do so; "male
creativity is dependent upon appropriation, and this appropriation is
not recognized as plagiarism" (114). Instead, the male writer
rescues those ideas by transforming them into writing and literature. In
fact, Stegner claimed to use Foote's writing as "raw
material" for his work and that, through the writing and
publication of his novel, he "want{ed} her to cast a bigger
shadow" through him than she could do on her own (Hepworth 69).
But, as the copyright law also argues, one test of plagiarism is
transformation. Did the author merely copy the material or did he
transform it? The issue is one of traditional conceptions of authorial
genius and creativity. Angle of Repose is a lengthy, complicated novel,
and although Stegner undoubtedly relied heavily on Foote's writing,
first for its framework, and then for much of Susan's
characterization and the content of her letters, his own contributions
are undeniable--as, in fact, we can see by the very changes he
introduced to the biographical Foote's life near the novel's
end, which he described to an interviewer in 1982:
Mary Hallock Foote didn't die until she was ninety-two.
And I wasn't going to follow her life that
long. That's one of the reasons I had to give her a
catastrophe. Her daughter didn't die in a ditch at
all at the age of five or six. She died of a ruptured
appendix at seventeen. So there was that tragedy in
her life. This was a favorite daughter and so on.
But I just moved it back and drowned the poor
child like a kitten a little younger. That's all right,
I think. I wasn't writing a biography, I was writing
a novel. (Hepworth 71)
While he certainly reaped a benefit from the publication of Angle
of Repose and the eventual Pulitzer it won, it is hard to argue that,
strictly, he "failed to add value" to the parts he
"copied," as the definition of plagiarism puts it. One of the
ironies of the situation--and of the play--is that equally disturbing is
Stegner's failure to plagiarize utterly. In the intricate slippage between fact and fiction, Foote's identity is formed for many
readers: they believe the first part of the novel, based on Foote, is
"true," so the final part of the novel, which is wholly
Stegner's creation, must be "true" as well.
Return for a moment to the term plagiarism: stealing words--the
belief that one can steal words from someone whose ownership of those
words precedes and determines the theft--is both a modern and very
Western concept. Plagiarism can only exist in a legal system that
recognizes intellectual property and offers copyright protection to
those designated as authors. But as Alfred Yen argues, the law
recognizes that a system of influence is both inevitable and desirable
in literary production: "Authorship is possible only when future
authors have the ability to borrow from those who have created before
them. If too much of each work is reserved as private property through
copyright, future would-be authors will find it impossible to create.
Society would presumably suffer from the decreased production of
creative works" (159-160). The loophole to copyright protection is
the concept of "Fair Use: the breathing space at the heart of
copyright," and it is not coincidental that Hall titles her play
Fair Use (I:15). With only small exceptions, such as the subplots about
Playwright's failed marriage to her husband Skip, due largely to
his inattentiveness to the family, and her anger at her father's
own sense of male superiority, all of the characters are from the pages
of Foote's Reminiscences and Stegner's novel. And of course,
those subplots--failed marriages and male entitlement--directly parallel
issues raised in Angle of Repose and by the current debates about
Stegner and Foore. Hall readily acknowledges that
"'In some ways I've done exactly what he did: in
addition to creating an original piece of art (in my case a play, in his
case a novel), I've copied word after word I didn't write into
a manuscript that will have my name on it.' But, she adds,
'there is one major difference: I've made it clear when I am
using someone else's words, and whose words they are. Yet even
while I've tried to clarify when the words are Foote's when
they are Stegner's, or a quote belonging to an expert on
plagiarism, water rights, or fair use, the play is considered to be
'by' me'" ("Fair Game?" 4).
The authority of authorship is endlessly dispersed throughout Fair
Use. Hall's valiant efforts to footnote and otherwise ascribe material to specific individual authors, while understandable and even
legally necessary, functions to uphold traditional ideas of originality
and creativity that are readily undone throughout her play. For example,
when the fictional Playwright of Fair Use inserts a portion of a letter
from Foote into the play, whose authorship are we reading? Foote, whose
initial penning of those words was in an entirely different context?
Stegner, who also used the words, but attributed them to his character
Susan? Or Hall, who gives us their most recent incarnation? Fair Use
resists a definitive answer to this question by having WS and MHF
frequently speak the same lines, either sequentially or simultaneously,
thereby emphasizing WS's use of words and themes that originated
with Foote but are now a part of the play being written by
Playwright--and by Hall. Another common strategy for complicating our
understanding of authorship is for WS and MHF to recite similar but not
identical lines, revealing WS's alterations and, frequently, the
gendered assumptions about women in the West those changes belie:
WS and MHF: The lonely little clusters of settlers' houses
with the great monotonous waves of land stretching miles around them
make my heart ache for the women who live there. They stand in the house
doors as the train whirls past, and I wonder if they feel (WS stresses
this): the hopelessness of their exile.
PLAYWRIGHT: It's always interesting, WS, what you choose not
to include.
MHF: Alone on the platform, I had the sunset and great prairie all
to myself--its outline against the sky was absolutely without a single
detail to break its magnificent loneliness. A wind blew across it, very
strong and yet soft--as if it came over miles and miles of sun-warmed
fields ... Every moment has been delightful--after the first night, when
I could not sleep for thinking--but in the morning I woke in a new
world, and began to look forward instead of back. (I: 31)
In this scene WS and MHF are quoting from a letter Foote wrote to
Gilder. WS's interpretation emphasizes the despair and sense of
exile with which Stegner imbued his heroine, Susan, while as the scene
continues, MHF's letter acknowledges wistfulness but stresses that
it is replaced by anticipation and pleasure. In many such examples
throughout the play, WS's interpretations of Foote's writing
emphasize her unhappiness and recreate her as an Easterner ill-suited to
the physical or intellectual rigors of the move West, while MHF protests
those interpretations with presumably more "accurate" ones
that show her keen understanding of mining and business interests and
her satisfaction with the life she created with her husband. On the one
hand, the kinds of interpretations WS makes indicate creative license:
Stegner did not merely copy Foote's writing, he altered it to
create a narrative ripe with suspense and mystery. On the other hand,
the kind of suspense and mystery he created had everything to do with
attitudes toward femininity that cast his version of Foote, his
character Susan Burling, into the role of archetypal female destroyer whose uncontrolled sexuality eventually led to her youngest
daughter's death and threaten her marriage.
Yet Fair Use does not build its case for a postmodern perspective
on gendered insights alone. As these characters talk, argue, and come to
recognize one another's viewpoints, Fair Use expands our
definitions of authorship by expanding our understanding of subjectivity
as not simply gendered--leading us down that tedious path where Stegner
was the predictable male patriarch and Foote the passive female who,
although duped posthumously, haunts his pages-, but as always already
functioning within historically changing constructions of what counts as
individual authorship. In short, the play forces us to see the many
intertwined collaborations that take place in this--in any--process of
writing. Remarking on the indeterminate layers of writing that have made
their way into the play, Hall says:
I've borrowed from all my research: biographies, histories,
novels, Internet articles, interviews, trips to
the Huntington and Stanford Libraries--there is no
way to include thanks to all of them, no way to
track or to acknowledge the ideas I've garnered from
so many sources ... ("Fair Game?" 4)
In this, Hall sounds considerably like Lyman as he sifts through
his grandmother's letters to uncover the mystery of her life. Yet,
while Fair Use in a sense "rewrites" Angle of Repose, it does
so with a difference: Hall's play is self-consciously focused on
the ironies that emerge when what is considered an individual
masterpiece is revealed to be a collaborative project that is itself
governed by expectations of individuality and originality.
Countering such assumptions of individuality and originality are
the many echoes that run through the play, including the most famous
"warp," Stegner's word for the changes he made in Mary
Hallock Foote's character and life story. He used the word
"warp" to describe those changes in a personal letter to Janet
Micoleau (I: 55) and in the printed acknowledgment to Angle of Repose.
In Act II, as Playwright describes her decision to "heighten and
complicate things"--also words Stegner, and WS within the
play--used to describe their method of creation--by introducing "a
young brunette with large tits" into the car accident Stegner did
in fact have, she notes: "Oops. Your character just warped. It
warped itself." (II: 76) WS's response echoes that of
Foote's descendants: "You're talking about my life!
People will leave your play thinking that {sic} story's true! And
it's not! That's not fair!" (II: 76). Later Playwright
returns to this event:
PLAYWRIGHT: I sent away to the Albuquerque Historical Society for
some news clippings, WS. I thought you might be interested in hear them.
(Pretends to quote.) Albuquerque, March 28, 1993: The well-known writer,
WS, was involved in a car-accident on Tuesday night, following a dinner
given by his friends. He was accompanied by Hester Prynne--a
brown-haired student at the University of New Mexico. Ms Prynne suffered
a slight concussion in the crash, which occurred when a car hit them
from behind as they were parked high on Red Mesa, otherwise known as
Lover's Lane. WS was--
WS: That never happened.
PLAYWRIGHT: But I've worked out so many details to make it
sound as if it did. "Must I now unravel the little threads I have
so painstakingly raveled together? Does it matter to you than an
occasional reader or scholar can detect--"
WS: I never cheated on my wife!
Rather than conclude the play with an apology that solidifies
Stegner's guilt and provides a reinscription of the concepts of
individual authorship and originality by having Stegner acknowledge his
failure to achieve them, is final moments resist any single
interpretation. When WS kneels before MHF saying, "I'm sorry.
I regret it," Playwright interrupts, "No no no. Maybe
not" (II: 104). Because Fair Use simultaneously critiques the vexed
origin of Angle of Repose and the process of writing a play that also
derives much of its plot, language, and detail from Foote's and
Stegner's writings, it represents writing itself as an inescapable
challenge to originality and interpretative finality, something
Historian highlights when he says to Playwright, "You've set
yourself quite a problem, haven't you?" (II: 104). The
engineering term "angle of repose" refers to that angle of
incline at which detritus stops rolling downhill; Stegner takes the term
directly from Foote's Reminiscences and uses it as his novel's
title and as a metaphor for the increasing marital strain between his
characters in the novel. Fair Use also makes use of this term at the
conclusion, when Historian, referring now to the conflict between WS and
MHF, asks his daughter, "What do you think, dear? Do they get their
repose?" Viewers and readers seeking finality in this play are
instead presented with indeterminacy: "I don't know. I'm
trying...." Playwright will remark in the final moments of the play
(II: 105). The structure of Fair Use highlights these challenges to any
desire to find a comfortable "angle of repose" from the
potentially multiplying meanings available in the multiple intersections
between reminiscences, novel, and play.
Stegner preferred what he called "traditional"
writing--which included Angle of Repose--to more experimental fiction
"which can be read backwards as well as forward, which turns
chronology on its head and has no continuity and no narrative, which, in
effect, tries to create a novel by throwing all the pieces in a bag and
shaking the bag" (Hepworth 58). Most indications suggest that
Stegner would have rejected a postmodern reading of Angle of Repose, as
well as a postmodern rewriting of it in the form of Fair Use, but
curiously, he gave his protagonist Lyman a far greater capacity to
appreciate indeterminacy. Describing the final scenes of the novel where
Lyman wonders if he might be "man enough" to be more forgiving
than his grandfather, Stegner says,
I left him there in bed sweating and listening to the
night sounds of traffic on the grade. I suppose it
sounds as if he did have an epiphany. What I meant
him to have was ... an ambiguous epiphany, a wondering
rather than a decision ... I think he might
wonder, and that's as far as I wanted to take him. If
that's an epiphany, all right, but it's got a question
mark after it. (Stegner and Etulain 95)
Stegner overtly refuses his character the kind of interpretative
certainty he claims for himself in the ongoing debates regarding Angle
of Repose--and with good reason since the novel is at some level
obsessed with the ways in which interpretative certainty is always
revealed as subjective and contextual.
Fair Use gives the last word to MHE As the lights fade on the final
scene, WS stops typing and turns away from the audience as MHF begins
writing: "There, in the whisper of the desert wind, it all comes
back ... the purple shadows darken in their canons, the color mounts to
zenith, the plains are flushed with light ..." (II: 105).
Especially given the lyricism of this ending, which foregrounds
Foote's writing, we might wonder if Playwright succeeds in writing
a "truer" version of Mary Hallock Foote's life. If the
intricacies the play presents give any answer, it is "no,"
because every version of Foote's life, including her own letters
and Reminiscences, is an interpretation that is always only a version of
the life it represents. But if we shift the question to "Did Hall
writer a truer version of Mary Hallock Foote's life?" we may
well say, "yes," because Hall's version, Fair Use, calls
attention to its own partiality, its own situatedness in various
contexts that are themselves never completely knowable. Fair Use refuses
an authoritative interpretation of Foote's life--and of
Stegner's appropriations of Foote's life--in favor of a
complex and shifting (re)presentation of the richness of authorship.
NOTES
(1.) Email to the author, 19 Nov. 2003.
(2.) Stegner's now famous epigraph reads: "My thanks to
J.M. and her sister for the loan of their ancestors. Though I have used
many details of their lives and characters, I have not hesitated to warp
both personalities and events to fictional needs. This is a novel which
utilizes selected facts from their real lives. It is in no sense a
family history" (9). One of the reasons Stegner was deliberately
vague in his acknowledgment was his agreement not to use family names, a
request Foote's granddaughter Janet Micoleau made after Stegner
decided to fictionalize Foote's life, rather than write her
biography. None of Foote's descendants read a draft of the novel
before it was published. See Stegner and Etulain 86.
(3.) See Woodmansee and Jaszi for a widely ranging discussion of
the construction of authorship as an individually inspired act of
original creativity and on the development and effects of intellectual
property laws.
(4.) A timely example of the collaborative nature of drama, even
when unwanted, occurred at the play's 2004 Boise production, where
the director and her husband (who played Historian) approached Hall with
possible changes: "They appeared to adore the play, and had a
'few changes' to suggest--and I was open, as I was using the
opportunity of this second full production to try ideas of my own that
had been steeping since the first production and the WLA reading. There
was an ironic almost fair use issue that arose: without my permission,
they deleted and changed things-actually cut WS apologizing to MHF! ...
Some of the changes I managed to salvage, but as it was two days before
the actors were to be in front of an audience, to some
degree--especially being an actor myself and sympathetic to how such
last-minute changes can throw one-my hands were tied (I chose to have
them tied)." Email to the author, 31 Mar. 2005.
(5.) Here, too, there are wonderful layers of interpretative
richness, as the fictional graduate student's name is Hester
Prynne, the adulterous woman from Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter.
Foote illustrated a gift edition of The Scarlet Letter, which Stegner
used in a scene in Angle of Repose. In an interview, he noted that,
"Hester lurks in all our souls, I think" (Hepworth 63).
(6.) After learning that Foote's Reminiscences were to be
published by the Huntington Library, Stegner wrote to Foote's
granddaughter Janet Micoleau (J.M. of the epigraph) of his concern that
Foote will now be recognizable in his novel: "Must I now unravel
all those little threads I have so painstakingly raveled together, with
the real and the fictional, and replace all truth with fiction?"
(quoted in Reynolds 5).
(7.) One of the most satisfying reparation fantasies in Fair Use
comes in Act II, when WS tells Playwright, "she just wasn't
important enough to make her more than modestly interesting. A mere
biography would have sold, at best, three thousand copies. By converting
her to fiction I at least had the chance to make her immortal" (II:
96). Playwright responds, "I see," to which WS replies,
"No, you don't. And you took that from an interview, too. It
sounds just horribly fatuous, doesn't it?" (II: 96).
WORKS CITED
Buranen, Lise, and Alice M. Roy. Perspectives on Plagiarism and
Intellectual Property in a Postmodern World. Albany: State U of New York P, 1999.
Foote, Mary Hallock. A Victorian Gentlewoman in the Far West: The
Reminiscences of Mary Hallock Foote. Ed. Rodman W. Paul. San Marino, CA:
Huntington Library, 1972.
Foucault, Michel. "What is an Author?" Textual
Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism. Ed. Josue V.
Harari. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1979. 141-160.
Graulich, Melody. "The Guides to Conduct That a Tradition
Offers: Wallace Stegner's Angle of Repose." South Dakota Review 23.4 (1985): 87-106.
Halbert, Debora. "Poaching and Plagiarizing: Property,
Plagiarism, and Feminist Futures." Perspectives on Plagiarism and
Intellectual Property in a Postmodern World. Ed. Lise Buranen and Alice
M. Roy. Albany: State U of New York P, 1999. 111-20.
Hall, Sands. Fair Use. Unpublished playscript, 2001.
--. "Fair Game?--Or Fair Use?" ArtMatters (Spring 2001):
3-4.
Hepworth, James. Stealing Glances: Three Interviews with Wallace
Stegner. Albuquerque: U of New Mexico P, 1998.
Masten, Jeffrey A. "Beaumont and/or Fletcher: Collaboration
and Interpretation of Reniassance Drama." Woodmansee and Jaszi.
361-381.
Reynolds, Susan Salter. "Tangle of Repose."
www.latimes.com/features
/printedition/magazine/la-tm-stegner12mar23001506,1,6768616.story
Stegner, Wallace. Angle of Repose. 1971. New York: Penguin, 1992.
Stegner, Wallace and Richard W., Etulain. Stegner: Conversations on
History and Literature. Rev. ed. Reno and Las Vegas: U of Nevada P,
1996.
Stearns, Laurie. "Copy Wrong: Plagiarism, Process, Property,
and the Law." Buranen and Roy. 5-17.
Woodmansee, Martha and Peter Jaszi, eds. The Construction of
Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature. Durham and
London: Duke UP, 1994.
Yen, Alfred C. "The Interdisciplinary Future of Copyright
Theory." Woodmansee and Jaszi 159-173.