Bruce Conner: Susan Inglett Gallery.
Turvey, Lisa
In early 1962, Bruce Conner decamped to Mexico, intending, he
recalled, to "live cheaply and hide in the mountains when the bomb
dropped." His survivalist outing lasted less than a year. A nuclear
attack never came, and the artist had trouble not only selling his work
but making it: The junk from which he conjured his assemblages
wasn't cast off as readily in Oaxaca it had been in San Francisco.
Conner's sense of privation comes across in DESIGN FOR A NEW ART
MUSEUM, 1962, one of eight early works that comprised a small recent
exhibition. A morass of wispy pencil lines, some of which fall just
short of describing natural forms, spill from a thinly sketched box.
Complete representational ambiguity--no anchors or space or scale--this
is a museum without a collection, one never to be built.
The significance of Conner's Mexican sabbatical has perhaps
been overstated--it was one among many abrupt changes of tack that have
marked his production (and, when asked what he did while south of the
border, the diffident reply was "a lot of drugs and
pyramids"). Here, though, the excursion functioned as the loose
hinge of an exceptionally thoughtful show that telescoped a fecund period from the mid-1950s to the mid-1960s during which Conner evolved
from Beat to psychedelic, produced (and then stopped producing) the
assemblages that brought his first critical acclaim, and made the
found-footage films (such as A MOVIE, 1958, and REPORT, 1963) that
assured him a place in the history of experimental filmmaking.
In UNTITLED, 1954-56, some sections of a small sheet of filigreed Masonite have been covered in oil paint and others gouged, scratched, or
trimmed with gold leaf. The earliest work in the exhibition, it distills
two important strands of Conner's aesthetic--a talent for infusing
even the most tatterdemalion salvage with delicacy, and an oddball feel
for structure whereby an assortment of apparently random elements
somehow appear to function as a deliberate system. THE EGG, 1959, likely
a result of scavenging San Francisco's thrift shops and crumbling
Victorian houses, piles colorful scraps of fabric, brocade, buttons,
zippers, and Conner's signature nylon mesh, along with a contorted
plastic baby doll, under the surface of a convex glass oval surrounded
by an ornate brass frame.
Perhaps the show's standout work was an assemblage made in
Mexico, GUADALUPE, 1962. A few strings of rosary beads, a shroudlike
drape of fabric, and two small religious icons make this work seem like
a shrine to the country's best-loved cultural figure, an apparition
of the Virgin Mary, but Conner injects a characteristic note of
profanity by affixing a newspaper photo of two scantily clad women,
their nether regions scraped away. Material scarcity occasioned
compositions that were sparer but no less symbolically dense; a
contemporaneous drawing is equally airy, while the clotted graphic
rhythms of a slightly later work, TEMPTATION OF ST. ANTHONY, 1963, look
ahead to a subsequent series of allover mandala drawings.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
The show's very concision was the key to its effectiveness, as
a limited number of works encouraged specific focus on their thematic
ties and formal sympathies. And Conner's medium-jumping
restlessness, to say nothing of his partiality to consumer dreck, has
its own legion of contemporary adherents. But recognizing his relevance
now was an incidental benefit. Much of this work seems resistant to
retrospect, thwarting efforts to comprehend its jumble of references and
temporalities--and for an exhibition to have succeeded at such a task in
a subtle, smart way made for art history in the best sense.