Sunny disquisition: James Quandt on Syndromes and a Century.
Quandt, James
What's given bears fruit as pleasure.
--From the Aditta Sutta
THERE IS NO MORE generous vision in contemporary cinema than that
of Apichatpong Weerasethakul. So rapturous is his desire to share
everyday delight in sun streaming through wind-whipped trees, a mass
aerobics dance in a Bangkok park, a dentist in a glittery green jacket
crooning a Thai country tune, a wild orchid riding in the backseat of a
car like a petulant child, that even the cynical critic resistant to
bliss finds himself yielding to nothing less than sheer, unaccountable
joy. The precredit sequence of Apichatpong's latest serene enigma,
Syndromes and a Century, alone offers more beauty, gentle wit, and
invention than most directors can muster in an entire film. After
suspending time with a long, locked shot of those gusted trees,
Apitchatpong tenders two abrupt close-ups introducing the major male
characters in the film. The first is Toa (Nu Nimsomboon), arrived in a
rural hospital to court a young woman physician, Dr. Toey (Nantarat
Sawaddikul). The latter remains offscreen as she interviews the second
man, Dr. Nohng (Jaruchai Iamaram), for a hospital position, discovering
that the army-trained surgeon can't stand the sight of blood and
(like Apichatpong) wants a job in which he can see "faces come and
go." When asked what DDT stands for, the prospect hesitantly offers
"Destroy Dirty Things," and then, reading Dr. Toey's
stunned disbelief at that response, "Deep Down To You." (The
joke, which gets repeated in the film's second half, derives from a
memory of Apichatpong's father, a doctor who met the
director's mother, also an MD, at just such a hospital.) Even when
the camera finally resorts to a two-shot and reveals the interviewer and
her retro office, it hangs back with a detached attention to setting and
architecture, as it will throughout Syndromes, before embarking on one
of the film's most glorious formal ploys. As Dr. Toey departs the
hospital, she exits the frame, and the camera surprises us by not
following her but instead dollying forward, in a manner that
inadvertently invokes the famous last shot of Antonioni's The
Passenger, toward lush countryside framed by a balcony, finally halting
to contemplate in long take this sun-swept vista as the credits begin to
appear. The sound track meanwhile remains with the doctor and her male
companion as they decamp, chatting about two cute construction workers,
some Star Wars glasses being given away by the hospital, a Buddhist
temple, until he suddenly complains about the thing clipped to his pants
(one assumes a mic), and she laughingly refers to playing the same scene
over ("It's only been five takes"). What would seem a
neo-Brechtian rupture in any other film here appears, given
Apichatpong's unstinting aesthetic, an accident left in merely to
mystify and amuse.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Like Apichatpong's previous film, Tropical Malady (2004),
Syndromes and a Century is bifurcated--it, too, "starts over"
halfway through, but to less baffling effect, perhaps because we are now
accustomed to the gambit. Syndromes' caesura occurs exactly midway
through the film, at the fifty-three-minute mark, a precision somewhat
surprising for an artist as intuitive as Apichatpong. As if placing a
reverse field shot almost an hour after its counterpart, the director
collapses time by introducing the film's second half with a repeat
of the opening interview, only now it is Dr. Toey's face we see and
Dr. Nohng's voice we hear offscreen as he submits to her quiz. (The
ever-ardent Toa remains in the wings, waiting to court Dr. Toey, though
this time it is Dr. Nohng's love story that will predominate.) The
interview's questions and answers differ somewhat from the
first--many of the repetitions in the film's second half are varied
or slyly transformed, as is Apichatpong's wont--and the hospital is
now urban and contemporary.
Because the symmetries of theme, setting, and character between
Syndromes' two halves are more pronounced than in the bewildering Tropical Malady, it's tempting to assign them dichotomous values--rural/urban, female/male, past/present, memory/fantasy--and to
contrast respective camera styles, more fixed and intimate in the first,
more mobile and aloof in the second. But Apichatpong's mysterious
modus seems averse to strict dualities. He loves to toy with the
diegetic or nondiegetic status of music, allowing it to slip from seen
to unsourced accompaniment and back again. He blithely conflates faith
and science, both in the love story between a monk and a dentist, and in
a series of cryptic lateral tracks that rhymes shots of a white Buddhist
statue with those of black granite monuments to important figures in the
history of Thai medicine. Certain images seem like echoes across the
divide: The black disk of an eclipse with a pink nimbus in the first
half appears to prefigure the black aperture of a pipe into which we
watch (for more than seventy seconds) mist, like memory, being
sucked--one of the stranger moments in the second half. But the story of
Noom (Sophon Pukanok), an orchid expert, is confined entirely to the
first half, interpolated Resnais-style into that of the courtship of Toa
and Dr. Toey, and has no counterpart in the second half. And, as
Apichatpong has pointed out, "the Thai title [of Syndromes] means
'Light of the Century.' The first half of the film is a kind
of portrait of the sun, or an account of the way we depend on the sun
for our survival. The second half ... is dominated by artificial light.
But the chakra healing in the second half is also all about the sun:
It's a way of channeling the sun's power into the body."
Similarly, the film's English title combines two of
Apichatpong's abiding concerns--the temporal and the somatic--but
in an allusive rather than exigent way. The director, who says that
recurrence in his work reflects his Buddhist belief in reincarnation,
seems immune to the systematic.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
In its structure and in certain details--the clinical setting and
country landscapes, a woman by the riverside spreading mud on her
injured leg, a doctor pressured to give medicine without a prescription,
a close-up of an erection, two wise old women dispensing wisdom, several
traveling shots--Syndromes recalls Apichatpong's earlier films,
like Blissfully Yours (2002) and Mysterious Object at Noon (2000). But
the film also extends his visual register, particularly in the second
half, where it descends, by way of a protracted handheld follow shot,
from the solar to the subterranean: the basement of a modern hospital.
In this strangely Kubrickian locale, with its harshly lit hallways,
pristine white walls, and surreal heaps of prosthetics (found objects
that recall the mannequins in Kubrick's Killer's Kiss),
Apichatpong's camera glides and dollies with cool precision,
accompanied by an ominous sound track of low drone, hammering, welding,
and the whine of a lathe. Again, the director reserves this baleful
space not to contrast its cold impersonality with the sunlit jungle
hospital of the first half (an arena of nostalgia because it was where
his parents met and he grew up), but instead peoples its fluorescent
underground with a host of kindly doctors, including a dipso who hides
her bottle in a prosthetic leg, and a handsome boy called Off, whose
brain has been damaged by carbon monoxide poisoning but who is
determined to get his life back on track.
Just as the concept of huzun, the Istanbul melancholy described by
novelist Orhan Pamuk, can perhaps account for the aura of inertia and
emotional gloaming in the films of Nuri Bilge Ceylan, the Buddhist idea
of dana (the treasure of generosity) might explain the euphoric sense of
Apichatpong's cinema as an act of giving. Not only do his films
bestow more than most, they also extend sympathy to every character. If
there is a more tender moment in current cinema than the one in which
Dr. Nohng examines the tattoo (PANDORA) on Off's neck and then
gently questions him about his malady, it is that between Sakda (Sakda
Kaewbuadee), monk and DJ-manque, and his would-be lover, the dentist Ple
(Arkanae Cherkam), as they discuss death and reincarnation. Throughout
the film, Apichatpong accords characters moments of repose, their faces
registering a fleeting surcease of the world. In one of those images
whose unreasonable loveliness trumps all analysis, the camera settles on
Dr. Toey's face as she gazes out a window, its double reflections
confounding our sense of space, fusing landscape and interior, inside
and out, scenery and visage. One is reminded that Apichatpong once
praised American experimental filmmaker Bruce Baillie, a formative
influence, for the way he "records pleasure, and the sun." The
modesty of that observation, its emphasis on simple happiness, slowly
effloresces into manifold mystery. Uncontrived, intuitive mystery, a
rare commodity in any art, abounds in Apichatpong's films. He
can't seem to cast his eye on any object without making it strange,
not so much defamiliarized as ineffable. One surrenders, blissfully, to
that strangeness.
Syndromes and a Century opens on April 18 in New York City.
JAMES QUANDT IS A SENIOR PROGRAMMER AT CINEMATHEQUE ONTARIO IN
TORONTO.