Tommy White: Harris Lieberman.
Hudson, Suzanne
Beginning in 1951, Robert Rauschenberg produced a number of
so-called black paintings, which, with their thick, cracked surfaces,
later prompted Helen Molesworth to suggest their resonance with
"fecal matter: the smeared quality of the paint, the varying
degrees of viscosity, and the color--shit brown and black." Her
reading takes seriously the twin poles of pleasure and disgust that
Rauschenberg so expediently summons. And yet, in his characteristic acts
of wiping, pressing, and staining, he errs on the side of
tactility--however exquisite--which is to say of desublimation.
"Rauschenberg," as Molesworth makes clear, "radically
reinserts the lower body into art."
Tommy White's work picks up where Rauschenberg's leaves
off. For his second solo show at Harris Lieberman Gallery, White offered
the optic and the haptic in equal measure. His five epic canvases--the
pictorial scope and physical dimensions of which are made even more
striking by the contrast of scale provided by little sprouts of hair
that emerge, mushroom-like, from patches of most--comprise headless
torsos and bodily fragments in various states of evacuation or
decomposition. Homesick (all works 2006), for one, evinces a perfectly
modeled, bubble-gum-pink leg emerging from an amorphous mass. Complete
with a pendant of well-formed balls, it is awkwardly bent and pressed to
the picture plane, uncanny (hence the title perhaps) in its
hyperreality.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Bloated and Pretty Please feature the torsos that are conspicuously
absent from Homesick, but there are still no faces, just shit seeping
through the open fingers of an outstretched hand or coils of
fetal-looking entrails. In the signal-orange Bad for Boy, broad planes
of color and watery runs of paint form and emanate from splayed
buttocks. In all cases, the paint handling threatens to upstage the
depicted "content," however aggressively evident it may be.
Alternately thinned to the consistency of a sugary glaze and slapped on
so lumpily and thickly as to become more obdurate in its materiality
than the skin it elsewhere depicts, paint is everywhere the point.
This oscillation between figure and ground, or pigment and what it
represents (or more often conceals), is explicit in the group of
untitled painted photographs that were hung alongside the paintings. For
these, White shot existing clay, plaster, blown-glass, and
fabric-covered sculptures he had made between 2003 and 2005, then
isolated compositional elements by applying white enamel sign paint and
hot-pink translucent ink. Glimpsed from odd vantages, the photographed
works are further decontextualized when seen only partially, as in
Untitled (2)'s imperfect cruciform. The series thus redoubles the
paintings' plays, at the same time offering a kind of companion to
them that strips them bare as process and literal subject.
While the photographs of sculptures imply, in their procedural
repetition and photomechanical processing, a more mediated engagement,
they still analogously propose a set of very human conditions that echo
those in the more expressionistic paintings, namely lust and violence.
Perhaps they even make clearer the extent to which White's project
is about estrangement. They, like the oils, are oddly raw for being so
thoroughly worked. It is this procedural investment--manifest at the
level of forms--that admits White's attempts to image the
unutterable. Whether through vulnerability or abandon, White's
interest seems to lie in getting to what bodies reveal apart from the
rationalization of language or the opprobrium of cognition: their
desultory baseness and inherent foreignness, even when--or especially
when--they are our own.