Trower jarring the ballad.
Wells, Zachariah
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Peter Trower's "Industrial Poem" is an anachronism:
a ballad, first published in 1978. Originating in medieval traditions of
oral folk song, the first printed ballads date back to the early 16th
Century and the form was often adopted by poets well into the 19th
Century. In the 20th Century, however, the ballad, rooted in
straightforward narrative, singsong rhythms and regular rimes, fell into
disrepute as a vessel for serious poetry, and was relegated to the
ghetto of popular doggerel. Not one to kowtow to authority, Trower
wields the ballad stanza like a fine old rust-flecked sword. Often used
to convey outrage against social and economic injustice, particularly
during the Industrial Revolution, the ballad is a fitting structure for
the content of this poem.
But Trower is no rustic naif, and "Industrial Poem" no
old-fashioned exercise in metrical finger-stretching or unsophisticated
protest. In some respects, this poem does adhere to the prescriptions of
balladry (it tells an action-focused story, briskly and plainly,
employing simple stanzaic and syntactic structures), but close reading
shows that Trower has also heeded Pound's edict to "make it
new." The metre Trower employs consists basically of the three and
four-beat iambic lines typical of balladry, but he diverges from it so
often and so far afield that the traditional metre and rime-scheme is
like a frame showing through free verse cladding (recalling Eliot's
admonition that "the ghost of some simple metre should lurk behind
the arras of even the 'freest' verse"). These deviations
might seem like evidence of a bad or ill-trained ear, but besides the
fact that irregularity of metre is a hallmark of Victorian balladry, I
woud argure that Trower, steeped in the more traditional ballads of
Service, Kipling and Robert Swanson, jars their rhythms strategically.
The five beats of line 8 for instance--four of them awkwardly clumped in
the spondees "life raft" and "death's
sake"--mime the injured man's deathbed struggles, like the
irregular blips of a heart monitor, as he "[clings] to his
ruin." The rhythmically and syntactically clumsy phrase in line 10,
"incapable of help," is a perfect reflection of the
workers' "shockdrunk" state, just as the six beats of
line 15, three of them in the terminal trochaic phrase "never even
flinched," limn the workers' brimming hatred for the
cold-blooded foreman, whose gallingly prosaic speech in line 13 serves
to underline his crassness.
With all of these subtle touches, Trower updates and personalises
the ballad for his purposes. The speaker's position in relation to
the subject is the other major departure of this poem from ballad
conventions. Normally, a ballad, often composed by an anonymous
author-or authors--is narrated either in the third person by a party not
directly involved in the action, or indirectly through dialogue. In this
poem, however, the speaker, as we realize in line 10, is very much
implicated in the scene he describes, and therefore incapable of
retelling it in a cool, smooth, metrical fashion.
Thus, Trower no more loosens the ballad stanza for the mere sake of
appearing modern than he chooses the structure in order to be
traditional. Rather, he crafts his lines in response to the particular
formal demands of the subject matter he has tackled. The result, all
questions of prosody aside, is a chilling indictment of industry's
capacity for dehumanization and an affirmation of art's capacity
for redress. One can readily imagine a draught of this poem penned on a
red-flecked sheet from that very mill.
This essay first appeared in the How Poems Work webzine on
arcpoetry.ca in January 2004.
COMMENTARY
Reactions to Peter Trower's 'Industrial Poem'
Disturbing, but with a strong sense of story. It made me wonder
about the time and place, and to want to know more. I was also curious
as to the conditions that could lead a man to such numbness and apparent
callousness as the foreman expressed.
--Mary Mackenzie
Having recently visited a mill, this poem transported me back to
the sounds, sights and smells of the wood in the yard and floor of the
mill. It left me with a very sensory experience of a dark and dreary
work environment. I thought of the fragility of human life and how the
work of the mill or any industrial site does go on even after what
appears to be another accident. What value does a human life have in the
industrial landscape? I particularly like, in the second last line,
"he's smelled our hate." Why did Peter Trower choose that
sense? He left me with the vision of the "hamburger for lunch, or
the red-flecked sheets" which are indeed very graphic. I could feel
the pain, see it and smell it. I live in the Ottawa Valley, which was
developed because of the lumber industry. Lumber barons like
O'Brien and Booth became wealthy because of the lumber industry.
Many people still work as "jobbers," mill workers, truck
drivers etc., and do so for a variety of reasons. For example, they may
do this work because of lack of other employment opportunities, lack of
education or because they come from a family which has always worked in
the lumber business. Every year, we have serious accidents and deaths,
just like the one described in "Industrial Poem," and I will
never hear about another incident without thinking of this poem.
--Carole Devine