Law and economics.
Jolls, Christine
The NBER's Law and Economics Program studies the effects and
causes of legal rules, with a special focus on the foundational legal
subjects--property law, criminal law, contract law, and tort law--and on
the operation of the legal process. In regard to the operation of the
legal process, the Program examines topics such as labor markets for
lawyers, litigation dynamics, judicial and agency behavior, and the
determinants of legislative action. In addition, the Program studies the
effects and causes of legal rules across a range of legal subjects
beyond property, criminal, contract, and tort law, including corporate
law, employment law, health care law, social welfare law, family law,
bankruptcy law, patent and copyright law, and antitrust law.
The Program meets twice per year, once at a mid-year program
meeting and again at the NBER'S Summer Institute. The
Program's recent special activities include a project in the area
of corporate governance, under the direction of Research Associate
Lucian Bebchuk; selected papers from that project are scheduled to
appear in a forthcoming issue of the Review of Financial Studies.
In this article, I first describe recent research in the
foundational legal subjects and then turn to work on the operation of
the legal process. I conclude with an overview of work on the effects
and causes of legal rules in corporate law, employment law, health care
law, social welfare law, family law, bankruptcy law, patent and
copyright law, and antitrust law.
Property Law, Criminal Law, Contract Law, and Tort Law
A fundamental aspect of any legal system is the structure of
property rights. Recent work by Oliver Hart (13540) is the latest in an
important line of papers by Hart, Sanford Grossman, and John Moore that
examine the effects of a particular conception of property rights
emphasizing "residual control." In this view, the owner of an
asset retains those rights to the asset that are not specifically
assigned by any existing contractual commitment. While previous papers
in the series have examined the effects of the residual control rights
conception of property rights in the face of parties'
non-contractible up-front investments, the recent paper by Hart studies
the effects of property rights of this form in a model with uncertainty
of values and costs of a good to be traded. Hart's model suggests
that ex-ante contracting over asset ownership can reduce later
incentives to engage in hold-up. A system that did not provide for
property rights in the Grossman-Hart-Moore sense (reserving residual
rights to the state rather than to the property owner) would be inferior
within this framework.
Also central to the structure of property rights is the question of
when government may obtain ownership of assets from unwilling private
parties. In a recent paper (13564), Steven Shavell models the
desirability of allowing government takings of private land by its
eminent domain power when the government's information about
owners' valuations is imperfect. Shavell shows that eminent domain
becomes appealing if the number of property owners is large, in order to
overcome a problem of "honest" holdout. This conclusion holds
regardless of whether the land that the government seeks is a parcel at
a fixed location or instead is located anywhere in a region.
A legal system determines what, if any, conduct should be subject
to criminal sanctions and establishes the shape of those sanctions. An
extensive recent law and economics literature studies the effects of
various forms of criminalization. John Donohue and Justin Wolfers
(11982) examine the potential deterrent effects of the ultimate criminal
sanction--the death penalty, which is reserved predominantly for
homicides. While there is some variation in the use of capital
punishment, both across time and across states with different legal
regimes, Donohue and Wolfers conclude that this variation is small when
compared with the large swings in the homicide rate; even when the use
of the death penalty increases, the absolute number of executions
remains quite small. Thus, existing results linking capital punishment
to reductions in the homicide rate prove to be extremely fragile, and
the data that are presently available do not allow any strong inference about even the sign of the deterrent effect of capital punishment.
Current law subjects criminal sex offenders to a variety of
registration and notification laws that, respectively, require convicted
sex offenders to provide valid contact information to law enforcement
authorities and mandate that information about sex offenders be made
public. In recent work, J.J. Prescott and Jonah E. Rockoff (13803) offer
new evidence on these laws' effects. Using fine-grained information
on state registration and notification laws, Prescott and Rockoff
present evidence that sex offenses against neighbors declined with the
adoption of registration laws and that notification laws deter potential
offenders with no prior record while increasing recidivism among those
who have previously committed sex offenses.
As the property rights work described earlier reveals, the value of
property rights is intertwined with the ability of parties to enter into
contracts governing the use of their property. Contract law determines
whether and how agreements among parties will be legally enforced. A
major part of the function of contract law is to determine whether and
how to fill gaps in parties' contracts. Are the existing
gap-filling rules of contract law efficient? Work by Surajeet
Chakravarty and Bentley MacLeod (13960) provides an affirmative answer
with respect to a range of contract law rules--including the important
rule setting "expectation damages" as the standard measure of
damages for breach of contract--in a model informed by standard industry
contracting practices.
Tort law imposes civil--as distinguished from criminal--liability
on certain forms of behavior that society wishes to deter. Civil
liability creates obligations of one private party to another rather
than liability of an individual to the state, as in criminal law. Much
recent work in tort law has been in the area of products liability--the
liability of firms to consumers for injuries sustained in using a
firm's products. Firms' liability generally will affect the
price of products, and in recent work Andrew Daughety and Jennifer
Reinganum examine consumer inferences about product quality from price
variation. (1) In Daughety and Reinganum's model, price is a signal
of product quality. Instead of signaling quality through price, though,
firms may choose to disclose quality directly. Daughety and Reinganum
show that firms may inefficiently choose signaling over disclosure of
product quality when marginal cost, including the cost of legal
liability, is increasing in product safety.
A. Mitchell Polinsky and Shavell (12776) also examine the
relationship between products liability law and firms' disclosure
behavior. In the absence of liability for product harms, there is a
tradeoff between forced sharing of information and firms'
willingness to accumulate information in the first place. When firms
face liability irrespective of their degree of fault for the harms
caused by products, by contrast, mandatory disclosure does not affect
the information that is disclosed and, thus, does not affect the
information that is accumulated.
In many circumstances, products liability law does make firms,
irrespective of their degree of fault, liable to consumers for the harms
caused by products--a regime called "strict liability." This
form of liability for product harms is ordinarily justified by reference
to informational and cognitive failures of consumers, but in recent work
Cass Sunstein and I (11738) explore the potential effects of responding
to these failures, not with strict liability, but rather with
requirements to engage in "debiasing" communications designed
to reduce consumer errors. We distinguish such debiasing communications
from conventional informational mechanisms and suggest that legal
debiasing strategies hold significant promise for understanding and
improving diverse forms of regulation of risky products.
The Operation of the Legal Process
The legal process involves many players, including lawyers,
litigants, judges, agencies that administer federal and state statutes,
and legislatures. In regard to lawyers, a number of recent papers have
analyzed labor markets for lawyers. In one paper, Jesse Rothstein and
Albert Yoon provide empirical evidence on the so-called "mismatch hypothesis"--that affirmative action in law school admissions hurts
minority students who attend more selective schools than they otherwise
would have and, as a result, experience lower graduation rates and less
success in passing the bar. (2) According to Rothstein and Yoon,
mismatch effects in fact are observed only for minority students with
the weakest entering credentials--students who, without affirmative
action, often would not have been admitted to any law school. For
minority students with moderate or strong entering credentials,
Rothstein and Yoon find no evidence of mismatch effects in either
graduation or bar passage rates.
Christopher Avery, Richard A. Posner, Alvin E. Roth, and I (13213)
examine another aspect of the labor market for lawyers--the market for
federal judicial law clerks. The hiring process for law clerks has long
been characterized by the type of unraveling of transaction times that
has also been observed in many other entry-level labor markets. Avery,
Posner, Roth, and I surveyed both federal appellate judges and clerkship
applicants and found clear evidence of substantial non-adherence to
official judicial timing guidelines intended to prevent the hiring of
clerks before a designated time. We describe, however, ways that judges
and clerks might settle at an equilibrium level of imperfect, but still
meaningful, adherence to the designated start date regime.
Lawyers, along with the clients they represent, resolve many of the
lawsuits in which they are involved without any recourse to the
courtroom. In fact, the overwhelming majority of lawsuits are settled by
the parties prior to trial. An important set of law and economics papers
has modeled the bargaining process between opposing parties over whether
to agree to a pretrial settlement. In recent work, Yasutora Watanabe
fits a dynamic model of such litigant bargaining to data on the time,
mode, cost, and terms of settlement of a large set of legal disputes.
(3) The model's fit with the data suggests that asymmetric initial
beliefs and the opportunity for learning over time are important
features of litigation-settlement bargaining.
Turning to judicial behavior, a line of recent papers by Andrei
Shleifer and coauthors has examined common law decisionmaking in a
system of judge-made law. The first paper in this series, by Shleifer
and Nicola Gennaioli, models the evolution of legal rules in common law
courts (11265); in the most recent work, Shleifer, Anthony Nisbett, and
Richard Posner turn to a specific set of decided cases to examine the
evolution of a particular legal rule in action (13856). The theoretical
model provides a foundation for the evolutionary adaptability of common
law, while in the actual set of decided cases there was no evidence of
convergence to any stable resting point.
Judges often make decisions in groups, and in recent work Edward
Glaeser and Sunstein (13687) model the evolution of group members'
views as a result of deliberations. One common effect of group
deliberation is polarization, in which individuals'
pre-deliberation views become more extreme as a result of the
deliberations. Glaeser and Sunstein show that polarization may, but need
not, follow from rational Bayesian updating by group members.
Glaeser and Sunstein's analysis has implications for
decisionmaking not only by judges but also, as they note, by members of
decisionmaking bodies within government agencies. Other recent work in
law and economics has studied a variety of effects of government agency
action. For instance, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and
Shleifer (9882) examine the relationship between government agency
enforcement activity and stock market development across nations. Using
measures of the legal powers of government agencies charged with
enforcement of securities laws, they find little relationship. Howell
Jackson and Mark Roe, by contrast, use measures of budgets and staffing
of such securities enforcement agencies in several samples of about 40
nations and find significant association between enforcement
agencies' resources and those nations' financial market
outcomes. (4)
A third type of body engaged in law making and law enforcement,
alongside courts and government agencies, is the legislature.
Legislative behavior may be influenced by, among other things, campaign
contributions and the information that legislators receive from
lobbyists and other interest-group actors. Recent work by Charles
Cameron and John de Figueiredo offers empirical evidence on the second,
information-mediated type of influence. (5) They find strong evidence
that interest-group expenditures on informational lobbying vary with
legislative budget cycles--rather than electoral cycles--as well as with
the ideological distance between the interest group and the party in
legislative power. Cameron and de Figueiredo's empirical results
are consistent with leading theoretical models on informational
lobbying.
Corporate Law, Employment Law, Health Care Law, Social Welfare Law,
Family Law, Bankruptcy Law, Patent and Copyright Law, and Antitrust Law
An extremely active area of research considers the effects and
causes of corporate law. Papers in this area have been featured both in
regular Law and Economics Program sessions and in sessions conducted by
the Corporate Governance Project.
In studying the effects of corporate law rules, much recent
attention has been paid to legal rules--many of them enacted in the wake
of the collapse of Enron--requiring increased transparency of corporate
financial information. Benjamin Hermalin and Michael Weisbach (12875)
offer a model in which such increased transparency may, contrary to its
presumed intent, reduce firm profits and increase executive
compensation. Increased transparency in Hermalin and Weisbach's
model may also increase the rate of turnover of chief executive
Officers.
Backdating of stock option grants has been a source of substantial
Securities and Exchange Commission activity, as well as private
litigation, in recent years. In a pair of studies (12771, 12811),
Bebchuk, Yaniv Grinstein, and Urs Peyer document both the frequency and
the corporate governance correlates of option grant backdating and other
forms of opportunistic option grant timing. The correlates of such
behavior include a smaller fraction of independent members of the board
of directors (for both CEO option grants and director option grants) and
longer CEO tenure (for CEO option grants).
Corporate law structures the exercise of shareholder votes, and
recent work by Yair Listokin studies the effects of the existing
structure on voting outcomes. (6) Listokin examines the results of
shareholder voting on management-sponsored resolutions in
"close" cases, in which management's share of the vote is
within 10 percentage points of the cutoff point for success (which is
typically 50 percent). He finds that management overwhelmingly wins
these close votes. His conclusion is that the existing structure of
shareholder voting is not effective in producing voting outcomes that
mirror underlying shareholder preferences.
Alongside the study of the effects of corporate law, recent
research examines the causes of corporate law. In a model of interest
group lobbying in the context of corporate lawmaking (13702), Bebchuk
and Zvika Neeman identify a range of circumstances under which such
lobbying leads to an inefficiently low level of investor protection.
Their model indicates that observed correlations between countries'
levels of investor protection and these countries' economic
performance may reflect the effects of the second factor on the first as
well as (what has been emphasized by the existing literature) the
effects of the first factor on the second.
In addition to managers and shareholders, firms are populated by
employees, whose relationship with their firm is regulated by employment
law. Many provisions of employment law mandate that particular benefits
be provided to employees. One very economically significant mandate in
the employment context is the Social Security program, which requires
payroll deductions to fund government benefits upon disability or
retirement of employees. Research by David Autor and Mark Duggan (12436)
analyzes upward trends in the level of Social Security disability
payments in recent decades. Autor and Duggan link these increases to
changes in legal qualification standards, in real benefit levels, and in
the size of the workforce.
Recent work by Louis Kaplow (12452) analyzes Social Security using
a model that incorporates myopia on the part of employees. Kaplow
studies the effect of Social Security on labor supply in the presence of
myopic employees who give excessive weight to present payroll deductions
that finance distant future benefits. Kaplow's model shows that
even with myopia, Social Security may cause labor supply either to rise
or to fall depending on the curvature of individuals' utility as a
function of consumption and on whether individuals' myopia extends
to labor supply choice as well as savings decisions.
Another important federal employment mandate involves medical leave
under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA), which I study in
a recent paper. (7) Exploiting variation across states in the presence
or absence of mandated medical leave at the state level prior to the
FMLA's enactment, I find positive employment effects of mandated
medical leave for individuals with disabilities. I suggest that this
result may reflect the absence of hiring disincentives from mandated
medical leave given the limited observability of many
leave-necessitating medical conditions at the time of hiring.
Health care law is a rapidly growing field spanning an enormous
range of research questions. One important question concerns the effects
of legal rules intended to increase the availability to patients of
health-care-related information. Recent work by M. Kate Bundorf, Natalie
Chun, Gopi Shah Goda, and Daniel P. Kessler (13888) studies the effects
of mandated health care provider "report cards" that include
detailed information on medical outcomes. Using a unique identification
strategy, the authors find that mandated birth-rate information for
infertility treatment centers increases the market share of centers with
high success rates.
Medical malpractice is another major aspect of health care law (as
well as an aspect of tort law). In a recent paper, Janet Currie and
MacLeod (12478) study the effects of medical malpractice law reform
within the field of obstetrics--a branch of medicine thought to have
been particularly hard hit by the "liability crisis" in
medical malpractice law. Thus, Currie and MacLeod examine how reform in
this area has affected the types of procedures performed in childbirth
and the ensuing health outcomes. They introduce a model of physician
behavior that allows for differential effects across patient
characteristics and that provides a new way to model alternative
liability rules. Empirically, Currie and MacLeod find that while some
medical malpractice reforms have positive effects on health outcomes,
imposing caps on non-economic damages has negative effects.
Patricia Born, W. Kip Viscusi, and Tom Baker (12086) also examine
the effects of medical malpractice law reform. While a substantial
literature examines the effects of such reform on insurers'
incurred losses, Born, Viscusi, and Baker are able to look at
longer-term effects. They find these longer-term effects to be
especially significant for non-economic damage caps.
Another important category of law is social welfare law, which
mandates benefits for children, for individuals who at the age of
majority are not able to live independently, and for adults who, though
free of any recognized disability, have not achieved financial
independence. Steven D. Levitt and Joseph J. Doyle (12519) analyze the
likely effects of an important mandate intended to protect children--the
requirement that children under specified ages (which vary across states
in the United States) ride in child safety seats. Using several datasets
containing information on auto accident injuries and types of child
restraint in use, Levitt and Doyle find that standard lap-and-shoulder
seat belts perform as well as child safety seats in preventing serious
injury for children aged 2 through 6. Child safety seats, however, are
more effective in preventing less serious injury for this age group.
Thus, Levitt and Doyle's findings suggest that existing mandates of
child safety seats have some effect in reducing injury, though perhaps
not the primary sort of effect legislators intended.
Family law is another active area of law and economics research,
and changes in divorce law in recent decades have been a particular
focus of study. Betsey Stevenson examines the effect on investment in
marriage-specific capital of the move to divorce "on demand".
(8) She finds that this change reduced the number of children produced
by the marriage, spouses' willingness to invest in their
partners' education, and spouses' likelihood of choosing to
have one partner remain out of the labor force.
The effects of bankruptcy law have been the subject of several
recent papers. Within the United States, both federal and state law are
relevant to the bankruptcy process. Recent work by Edward Morrison shows
that most distressed firms use state law to liquidate or reorganize and
that the attractiveness of state law varies in predictable ways with its
nature--and particularly with the degree of transparency of the state
insolvency process. (9) Because the choice between federal and state
regimes turns on a comparison of the two, reform of federal bankruptcy
law may have unanticipated effects if some firms switch away from the
federal regime in response to the reform.
Around the world, bankruptcy regimes exhibit a range of features,
and a recent paper by Simeon Djankov, Caralee McLiesh, and Shleifer
explores how the legal rights of creditors in bankruptcy relate to the
level of credit extended in a country. In a sample of 129 countries over
a quarter century, the authors find a positive effect of legal
protection of creditors on the level of credit extended. That effect is
observed both in the cross section and longitudinally when a given
country expands the legal protection it affords to creditors.
Patent and copyright law govern the circumstances under which
inventors and creators will be awarded special property rights. With
respect to inventions, patent law requires that an invention be
"non-obvious" in order to receive patent protection. Nisvan
Erkal and Suzanne Scotchmer suggest that models in which invention is a
product solely of investments in research and development fail to
capture the full scope of the non-obviousness requirement. (10) In their
analysis, invention is a product not only of financial investments but
also of scarce, creative ideas. When an idea comes along, a potential
innovator faces a choice of whether to invest in the idea or to take the
chance that the market niche in question may be filled by someone else
who comes along later with a substitute idea. In Erkal and
Scotchmer's model, conditioning the reward for innovation on the
level of non-obviousness is shown to be optimal.
A longstanding focus within law and economics has been antitrust
law. In recent work, Tomas Philipson and Richard Posner continue in this
line (12132). Philipson and Posner address a basic question: should
antitrust law apply in the same way to non-profit firms as to for-profit
firms? In their model, not only is there no ground for lesser antitrust
scrutiny of non-profit firms, but also in some circumstances the welfare
gains from antitrust regulation are greater than in the case of
for-profit firms.
In antitrust law as in many other areas of law, the social welfare
effects of legal regulation depend in part on the character of market
relationships in the absence of regulation. Within the antitrust domain,
a major question for researchers has been the degree to which incumbent
monopolists can succeed in excluding rivals through contracts with
downstream buyers. Complementing a line of important theoretical models
analyzing this question, Claudia Landeo and Kathryn Spier offer recent
experimental evidence on the use of exclusionary contracts. (11) They
find that such exclusionary contracts do occur both when downstream
buyers are not able to communicate with one another and when they can
engage in such communication. Their results complement theoretical
models suggesting that regulation of exclusive dealing contracts may be
welfare enhancing.
(1) A. Daughety and J. Reinganum, "Products Liability,
Signaling, and Disclosure," NBER Summer Institute Law and Economics
Workshop 2007.
(2) J. Rothstein and A. Yoon, "Mismatch in Law School,"
NBER Law and Economics Program Meeting 2007.
(3) Y. Watanabe, "Learning and Bargaining in Dispute
Resolution: Theory and Evidence from Medical Malpractice
Litigation," NBER Summer Institute Law and Economics Workshop 2006.
(4) H. Jackson and M. Roe, "Public and Private Enforcement of
Securities Laws: Resource-Based Evidence", NBER Summer Institute
Law and Economics Workshop 2008.
(5) J. de Figueiredo and C. Cameron, "Endogenous Cost
Lobbying: Theory and Evidence," NBER Law and Economics Program
Meeting 2007.
(6) Yair Listokin, "Management Always Wins the Close
Ones," NBER Summer Institute Law and Economics Workshop 2007.
(7) C. Jolls, "Mandated Medical Leave in the Workplace,"
NBER Summer Institute Law and Economics Workshop 2006.
(8) B. Stevenson, "The Impact of Divorce Laws on
Marriage-Specific Capital," NBER Summer Institute Law and Economics
Workshop 2006.
(9) E. Morrison, "Bargaining Around Bankruptcy: Small Business
Distress and State Law," NBER Law and Economics Program Meeting
2007.
(10) N. Erkal and S. Scotchmer, "Scarcity of Ideas and Options
to Invest in R&D," NBER Law and Economics Program Meeting 2008.
(11) C. Landeo and K. Spier, "Naked Exclusion: An Experimental
Study of Contracts with Externalities," NBER Summer Institute Law
and Economics Workshop 2008.
Christine Jolls *
* Jolls directs the NBER's Law and Economics Program and is a
professor at Yale Law School. In this article, the numbers in
parentheses refer to NBER Working Papers. Steven, Shavell, the previous
director of the Law and Economics Program, provided extremely helpful
feedback on this Program Report.