Rinaldo Rinaldi. "Melancholia Christiana." Studi sulle fonti di Leon Battista Alberti.
Frank, Maria Esposito
Rinaldo Rinaldi. "Melancholia Christiana." Studi sulle
fonti di Leon Battista Alberti. Firenze: Olschki, 2002.
Rinaldi's volume is, as announced in the title, a study of
Alberti's sources, which are many, and of disparate kinds. The
study takes into consideration a significant number of Alberti's
works, especially the Intercoenales, the Apologi, Momus, De iciarchia,
and various texts on love (Deifira, Ecatonfilea, Sofrona, De amore).
Digging in Alberti's mine of citations, references,
correspondences, allusions, emulations, and re-creations, Rinaldi traces
the peculiar creative process of Leon Battista, one of enigmatic
complexity. A complexity that--as Rinaldi aptly shows--has to do with
Alberti's distinctive ways of reworking ancient texts into his own,
often with pervading melancholia, and also a profound sense of religious
devotion that Rinaldi appropriately explores on the literary plane (not
the ideological one). Among Rinaldi's merits is not only the one of
adding more names and titles to the list of classical sources used by
Alberti, but especially his masterful presentation of the combinatory
quality of the work through which Alberti dismembers his sources,
accumulating fragments and quotations, both hidden and explicit, and
creates as a result a net of texts woven into a new one where the old or
pre-existing parts are no longer directly identifiable or separable, but
only audible as if through multiplying echoes. Thus we are invited to
enter the intricate semantic layers and hidden polemics produced by
Alberti's ever-proliferating variations on ancient texts.
Over and throughout that sum of "un-reassembleable"
materials (which do not simply amount to montage, puzzle, collage,
mosaic, as scholars to date have seen it) Rinaldi finds the dark shadow
of a radical skepticism, almost a Qoheletian vanitas vanitatum, about
the value of human knowledge. Indeed, Rinaldi argues, it is the very
composite character of Alberti's texts (first and foremost the
Intercoenales and Momus) that challenges any full interpretations or
deciphering, and seems instead to point to the limits of human knowledge
through a mystical-religious component (silence and faith) made of
internalization.
Rinaldi's book is well organized, with an opening chapter
where the scholar himself lays out his contentions and the issues before
tackling them more specifically in the following seven chapters, each of
which provides new insights into Alberti's various works.
Particularly interesting is chapter two, which focuses on Alberti's
writings on love (which I indicated above); here Rinaldi discusses,
among other things, previous interpretations that reduced these texts to
a kind of moralistic-didactic literature. Rinaldi shows them to be,
instead, expressions of a sort of negativity and darkness connected with
the phenomenology and pathology of love, as presented in well-known
ancient and medieval philosophical and medical traditions. Equally
noteworthy is Rinaldi's discussion of Alberti's
experimentalism with genres and his predilection for the satirical,
particularly in the Apologi, the 100 fables that, in a convincing
argument that includes fascinating references to the Hegelian
systematization, Rinaldi presents as participating in the satirical
genre. And the parodic quality/nature of the Intercoenales is also part
of this chapter that so painstakingly examines styles, genres, and the
language of these works in order to help us see, in the brachylogy of
Alberti's Apologi, an expression of saturnine brevitas and
micrology: a withdrawal of the author and of art itself, leaving
therefore an empty, silent space that presents the artistic/creative
efforts as illusory. We see other melancholy traits as
well--discontinuity, anxiety of negation, fracture and uneasiness
towards traditional morals and forms--that have no equal in the
Renaissance period and after (until our own times, in Gadda's
fables). In chapter four, the dark note pervades also the parallelisms
Rinaldi finds among the hagiographic text Vita S. Potiti, Momus, and
certain Intercoenales such as Discordia (the themes of justice being
absent from the human world, and of fortune as ruling earthly
destinies). And the main point of chapter five is the shift "dal
rifiuto melancolico al rifiuto parodico" (from Theogenius to
Momus), when the gloominess typical of Alberti's views turns
derisory, and the sublime, lofty topics are treated in a ferociously
caricaturing style and a burlesque mode. Momus is also the subject of
the sixth and seventh chapters: in the former, titled "'Momus
Christianus': altre fonti albertiane," Rinaldi discusses
Alberti's usage of biblical and Patristic materials, namely how
these sources are often superimposed over a classical, more obvious
source, thereby affecting the meaning and effect of the text (this
procedure is also to be found in the Apologi and some Intercoenales). In
the latter chapter titled "Momo come Giuda?," we read of the
images, portrayals, and allegorical depictions of Judas (as found in
Dante, Boccaccio, S. Bernardino) that are all echoed in Alberti's
Momus. But Rinaldi's investigations and observations do not merely
point at the variety of Patristic, medieval and Renaissance textual
places and ways in which the biblical Judas seems so convincingly to
re-live in Alberti's creation, Momus: his is not just a study of
sources and echoes, because these fifteenth-century pages are also seen
as proleptic to much later works, namely to nineteenth-century literary
stories--such as Anatole France's Lejardin d'Epicure and,
later yet, Borges' Three Versions of Judas. The last chapter deals
with the Dialogues that Alberti composed last (especially the De
iciarchia). The chapter is valuable not so much for its references to
Florentine politics and its reflections in Alberti's texts
(references that have been well explored before); nor for its discussion
of ante litteram Machiavellian attitudes (already observed by others),
but for its fascinating discussion of the theme of silence, as a symptom
of melancholy, and as a defense from evil. Rinaldo Rinaldi's
Melancholia Christiana sheds new light on Alberti's hypertextuality
and pluridiscoursiveness. It is a book for specialists, with frequent
and lengthy quotations in Latin. It is a rich, welcome addition to the
scholarship on Alberti and on the Renaissance in general.
MARIA ESPOSITO FRANK
University of Hartford