期刊名称：DILEMATA : Revista Internacional de Éticas Aplicadas
电子版ISSN：1989-7022
出版年度：2016
卷号：0
期号：20
页码：15-31
语种：Spanish
出版社：Unidad Asociada de Éticas Aplicadas IFS/CSIC
摘要：Casuistry has a history that must be known in order to give to the concept a precise meaning. Casuistry cannot be identified with any case analysis procedure, but only with the one that enjoyedan enormous historical fortune in Western culture. In the base of this moral method is a logical problem, which this article attempts to bring to light. Its conclusion is that casuistry has been biased by an improper logic, being that its most important difference with deliberation, a much more right procedure for making moral decisions.
