New radiocarbon dates for two stonecist graves at muuksi, Northern Estonia/Uued radiosusinikudateeringud kahest muuksi kivikirstkalmest.
Laneman, Margot ; Lang, Valter
Introduction
In this article we publish and discuss AMS dates of the human bones
from stone-cist graves 5 and 70 at Sondlamagi, Muuksi, Harjumaa.
Radiocarbon dating of these bone assemblages, unearthed years ago, was
part of the research programme briefly outlined in Laneman 2012, 92.
Here it suffices to note the background of the research: a very small
number of radiocarbon dates were available for stonecist graves which
contain human remains from different periods of time and for which other
methods of dating are limited. Out of several archaeologically excavated
graves at Muuksi (see below), graves 5 and 70 were chosen for
radiocarbon dating because they had been fully excavated with proper
documentation. Graves 32 and 33 had to be rejected despite also being
fully excavated with proper documentation because their osteological
finds were not accessible at the time of sample collection (due to the
problems in storing the bone assemblage at the Institute of History at
Tallinn University); the rest of the excavated graves had either been
excavated partially or with no documentation.
In the following we first provide an overview about the location
and research history of the graves at Muuksi in general, with a separate
section on previously offered dates for the graves. After that we will
focus on graves 5 and 70, one at a time. The readers should note that
along the way we sometimes deliberately deviate from the main course of
introducing the radiocarbon results, in order to discuss important
issues of grave construction or burial practices. Such a detailed
approach is necessary to fill some gaps in previous treatments of the
subject and, after all, a comprehensive understanding of the site is a
prerequisite for understanding the radiocarbon dates.
Context of the graves
The graves discussed in this article are located about 35 km east
of Tallinn in the surroundings of Lake Kahala, which accommodate
approximately 200 stone graves within quite a limited area between the
Loo and Pudisoo rivers (Fig. 1). The graves, most of which are probably
stone-cist graves, cluster in groups of different sizes. The
distribution density of the graves, extraordinarily high for Estonia, is
typically explained with reference to the sacral significance of the
lake which allegedly attracted the outlying population to bury their
dead on the shores of the lake (e.g. Vedru 2002, 114; 2010, 60 f.; Lang
2007, 242). Only at Muuksi and Uuri, however, have the graves been
subjected to archaeological excavation: at Muuksi around twenty
stone-cist graves have been excavated (see below) and at Uuri an Early
Pre-Roman Iron Age cairn grave (Vassar 1939) and a badly disturbed mound
consisting of one or two stone-cist graves and a 3rd-century tarand
grave (Moora 1977) have been excavated. More or less contemporary with
the stone graves in the area are a few scattered cup-marked stones, two
settlement sites and a promontory fort or hilltop settlement of
ambiguous character (Vedru 1998a; 1999b; 2010; and references therein).
Around Muuksi are two separate grave groups with a distance of
approximately one kilometre between them (Vedru 2010, 51). The smaller
one is at Kabelimagi near the village centre where six graves have been
preserved, one of which yielded four unusually arranged stone cists at
excavations in 1921 (Spreckelsen 1926; see also Friedenthal 1932). The
larger cluster, including the graves relevant to this study, are located
to the south-west at the elevation called Sondlamagi where over 80 stone
heaps, mostly 5-12 m in diameter and 0.4-1.5 m in height, have been
registered (Fig. 2). Some of them, possibly around a dozen, in the
eastern part of the group are not graves but small low clearance caims
from the end of the Iron Age or beginning of the medieval period (Vassar
1938, 305; Vedru 1996; 1998a, 31, 78 f.; 2010, 51, 56). It is also known
that many stone heaps have been destroyed over the course of time
(Vassar 1938, 305). The densest sub-group in the western part of the
grave/cairn field, i.e. graves 1-35, has locally been called
Hundikangrud [wolf cairns] (Parmas 1925, 17; Vassar 1938, 307; Lougas
& Selirand 1989, 157), although in recent archaeological literature
the name has been extended to all graves at Sondlamagi (e.g. Vedru
1998a; 1999a; 1999b; 2010; Lang 2007, 148, 224, 242). In this article,
however, we refer to the 'graves at Sondlamagi' because this
designation unquestionably includes all the graves recorded here (see
Vassar 1937, 1), distinguishes them from the Kabelimagi group, and is
not as confusing as applying local farm names which has occasionally
been used in literature to distinguish between graves. (1)
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Archaeological excavations have been performed at more than twenty
graves at Sondlamagi, although in most cases the graves were not
excavated in their entirety (Fig. 2). In 1924-26 graves 1-13, 60 and 65
were excavated under the guidance of Baltic-German amateur archaeologist
Adolf Friedenthal whose main aim was to collect better preserved bones
for an anthropological study (Friedenthal 1924; 1927; 1932; Friedenthal
& Spreckelsen 1926; see also Vassar 1938, 308). His excavations were
mostly limited to the central parts of the graves to find the cist(s).
In 1936-37 Artur Vassar performed excavations at graves 32, 33 and 70,
which were opened in their entirety to learn about the peripheral areas
of a stone-cist grave (Vassar 1938). In late 1970s and early 1980s,
under the leadership of Tanel Moora, graves 19, 35 and 71 were
reportedly excavated but, regrettably, information on these digs is no
more complete than that of the Baltic-German amateur excavations (no
documentation has been submitted; about grave 71 see Yanits 1981; about
graves 19 and 35 see Vedru 1998a, 40). Last but not least, the so-called
revision excavation of grave 5, conducted by Gurly Vedru in 1996-97 as
part of the extensive settlement archaeological research of the area,
uncovered several cists that the partial excavation in 1925 had failed
to spot (Vedru 1997; 1998a, 42 ff.; 1998b; 1998c; 1999a).
Although each grave is different in details, the excavated
stone-cist graves at Sondlamagi can be divided into two groups which
differ in terms of construction material and character of the find
assemblage, and which are also separated spatially. It should be
mentioned that graves 5 and 70, to be described in detail in the
following sections, serve as excellent representatives of these two
groups.
First, the excavated and probably also non-excavated graves under
numbers 1-35/37 seem to have been predominately built of limestone while
granite stones have been used occasionally and not in all graves. The
entirely excavated graves were edged by a circular wall constructed of
dry-laid horizontal limestone slabs. Walls of the cists, usually of
adult human length, have a similar construction, but some such cists
have large upright limestone slabs set against their inner sides, and
some graves possibly contain cists constructed entirely of upright
limestone slabs. The number of cists per grave varies between one and
four, and graves with several parallel cists may even outnumber graves
with a single cist. Artefact finds are rare in this grave group: cist of
grave 1 yielded a pointed bone object and an artefact of local flint,
supposedly an arrowhead (Friedenthal 1927, fig. 1); grave 10 yielded a
few small potsherds (Friedenthal & Spreckelsen 1926; Vedru 1998a, 33
f.) and grave 33 three pieces of quartz and a red glass bead on an iron
wire (Vassar 1938, 338).
Secondly, graves 70, 71 and perhaps also partially excavated 65 had
many more granite stones used in their construction, and graves 70 and
71 were also noticeably abundant in artefact finds, though mainly in
terms of ceramics outside of the cists. For grave 71 it must be noted
here (grave 70 will be described below) that it was in fact a triple
grave consisting of three stone-cist graves in a dense row. Each of the
three had two concentric circles of granite stones serving as foundation
for a limestone wall; centres of the graves contained a cist, which in
the southernmost grave had been built of horizontally laid limestone
slabs and in the remaining two graves of large upright slabs (see the
reconstruction of the main grave structures in Lang 2007, fig. 86).
Grave 65 had only around one-fifth of its south-eastern part excavated
and nothing is known about its possible stone surround and cist(s); only
alternating layers of limestone and granite were observed at excavation,
which also yielded abundant human bones and a single potsherd
(Friedenthal & Spreckelsen 1926, 3).
Burial practices, however, seem to have been similar in both of the
described grave categories. Most of the burials are inhumations, found
both in and outside of cists. In two graves (3 and either 4 or 13),
however, the cist contained nothing but cremated human bones, and some
graves (e.g. 5, 8, 32, 65, 70) yielded cremations also outside of cists,
although the number of such cremation deposits in a grave was rather
small. The cists, in most cases, seem to enclose the remains of a single
adult individual; less frequent are cists with two individuals and in
most such cases it is a combination of an adult and a child (e.g. in
graves 2, 5, 6, 33). Both females and males turn up in cists, although
males are more than twice as frequent as females; sub-adults (under 15
years of age) seem to be rare in cists and they have never been found
there on their own. Judging from the graves that have been excavated in
their entirety, inhumations outside of cists are common and include male
and female adults and children (in graves 5, 32, 33 and 70 the
peripheral inhumations included at least five children, four adult males
and two or three adult females). The age at death profile for the
inhumations seems to be rather diverse, particularly for men (age at
death between 20 and 80 years) while women appear to have died in
generally younger ages. (2)
On previous dating of the graves
Friedenthal proposed different dates for the graves he excavated at
Muuksi: initially around 1800 BC (Friedenthal 1924), then around 1500 BC
(Friedenthal 1927), and finally around 1200 BC (Friedenthal 1932). In
this he was undoubtedly influenced by the earlier Baltic German research
tradition which had not long ago considered stone-cist graves a Stone
Age phenomenon, although it should be pointed out that according to the
chronology used in the early 20th century, the Stone Age lasted until
the beginning of the Iron Age at the time of Christ's birth
(Hausmann 1909, 7 ff.; 1910, 10 ff.). It did not take long, however,
until the Bronze Age was firmly incorporated to the chronology, and
stone-cist graves were ascribed to this period as well as to the early
Iron Age (see below). At Muuksi, however, finds of flint and bone,
probably combined with the psychological influence of previous research,
encouraged Friedenthal to prefer a date closer to the Stone Age rather
than to the Iron Age.
Friedenthal was well aware that despite repeated shifting of the
date towards younger estimates (which can be viewed as a kind of
compromise), his opinion remained in disagreement with the views of
professional archaeologists (of native Estonian origin and with
different research tradition) who in the second half of the 1920s
arrived at the conclusion that stone-cist graves date from the end of
the Late Bronze Age and, predominately, from the Pre-Roman Iron Age--a
view that grew increasingly stronger and has largely been maintained
until today. The statement was based on the fact that stone-cists
(although merely secondary ones) at Jabara in Virumaa had yielded early
iron artefacts, which was coupled with a belief that stone-cist graves
were 'genetic' predecessors of Roman Iron Age tarand graves
and therefore cannot be much older than these (about the debate on the
date of stone-cist graves during the 1920s refer to Moora 1929, 14; see
also Friedenthal 1932, 1).
Consequently, Vassar (1938) dated graves 32 and 33 entirely to the
Pre-Roman Iron Age, and grave 70 to the period from the end of the
Pre-Roman Iron Age through the early Roman Iron Age. Such a date of
stone-cist graves became more deep-rooted in the 1970s and 80s when
Vello Lougas, the main scholar engaged with the subject, dated the
oldest stone-cist graves to period IV or V of the (Nordic) Bronze Age
(which was around the 9th century BC then) but, however, assigned the
great majority of the graves to a period of 200-250 years BC and some
graves even beyond (Lougas 1970; Jaanits et al. 1982). The graves at
Muuksi belong to the group of late stone-cist graves in Lougas's
classification because they have mostly stacked limestone cists, contain
cremations and are abundant in ceramics.
Valter Lang's studies in the 1990s, which rejected the Lougas
classification of stone-cist graves, resulted in a date that was a few
hundred years earlier for the grave type (1100/1000-200 BC), but it was
still maintained that most of the groups of stone-cist graves had been
established not long before 600 BC and the majority of the graves had
been built in the Early Pre-Roman Iron Age (Lang 1996, 292 ff., 311).
The latter view was due to an Early Pre-Roman Iron Age date assigned to
a pottery type that is present in many stone cists, and an assumption
that stone-cist graves empty of artefacts are later in date than the
rare stone-cist graves that contain well-datable bronze artefacts. The
establishment of the graves at Muuksi was also dated to 'the final
centuries of the Bronze Age or the beginning of the Pre-Roman Iron
Age', i.e. after 800 BC (op. cit., 295). There were three main
arguments for this: (1) two radiocarbon dates of human bones from one of
the cists of grave 71 yielded a calibrated date range of approximately
760-400 BC (op. cit., 284; Fig. 4); (3) (2) a pair of bronze temple
ornaments found in the same cist (Vedru 1998a, pl. XVIII: 1-2) pointed
to the earlier part of the above-mentioned date range; and (3) a bone
pin with a spade-shaped head, found during the destruction of grave 85,
suggested a date closer to the Pre-Roman Iron Age. The latter was also
favoured by the Pre-Roman period artefacts outside of cists in graves 70
and 71. The dating conventions established by Lang are also followed in
Gurly Vedru's works on the settlement history of the Kahala area
(1998a; 1999a; 1999b; 2010).
In recent years indications have appeared that the pottery in stone
cists and thus many of the bone pins dated on the basis of the pottery
may be earlier in date than previously thought (see Lang 2007, 130,
162). This means that many stone-cist graves may be older than
estimated, which on the one hand questions their temporal clustering
around the Bronze Age-Iron Age border and on the other may shift the
general date for the grave type. Evidence from the neighbouring
countries also suggests that Early Bronze Age (i.e. Period III)
stone-cist graves are anticipated to be found in Estonia (op. cit., 162
ff.).
Grave 5
Construction
Grave 5 (Fig. 3) was a predominately limestone heap with a height
of up to 60-70 cm. One 4.4 m long stone cist in its centre had been
opened by Adolf Friedenthal in 1925, while excavations by Gurly Vedru
more than 70 years later uncovered an additional three shorter cists and
a circular wall (Friedenthal 1927; Vedru 1997; 1998a-c; 1999a) (4). The
latter, approximately 9 m in diameter, was a dry wall of limestone slabs
laid one upon other, but it had survived in fragments and to a height of
only 10-20 cm. A similar low ring wall had been observed in graves 32
and 33 (Vassar 1938). The ring wall was surrounded on its outer side by
a 2.5-3 m wide zone where the stones (mainly limestone, with occasional
granites) were smaller than in the grave's interior; the stone
layer became increasingly thinner towards the edges of the excavation.
The walls of the cists inside the ring wall had been laid of
limestone slabs and preserved to a rather modest height: cist II had
five or six and cists III and IV no more than three layers of limestone
slabs left from their walls, whereas cist I with its 30 cm high walls
displayed a better state of preservation. Most of the cist ends had a
large vertical limestone slab, 20-45 cm in height and 2-4 cm in
thickness, placed against the inner side of a cist's wall. (5) The
lower ends of the slabs rested on the cists' bottoms. The upper
ends of the slabs, though in most cases apparently shattered by the time
of excavation, may have been visible from the grave surface and
functioned as grave markers, at least in the opinion of the excavator.
Cover plates of the cists had not survived, at least not in their
original position. Any floor plates that may have once been present
would have splintered and mingled with natural limestone grit.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
The number of cists in grave 5 is remarkably high. Apart from this
grave, only one grave with four cists is known in Estonia, located also
in Muuksi, though at Kabelimagi and with three of the cists built
crosswise over the fourth (Spreckelsen 1926). The excavator of grave 5
proposed that in this grave the four cists were built all at once, with
cist I originally twice as long as other cists (Vedru 1998b, 65; 1998c,
1). This interpretation is indeed suggested by the similar construction
of the cists, by the positioning of the cist bottoms at the same
vertical level and by the layout of the cists within the ring wall.
Despite this, however, it seems more likely that the grave was
originally built with a regular two metres long cist (i.e. the northern
half of cist I), because the ring wall seems to have been built with
regard to such a cist in its centre (although not as an ideal circle
around the cist). At some later point, the cist was either elongated
southwards or a separate cist was attached to its southern end. In the
latter case the partition would have been missed by the excavators of
1925 which, however, is doubtful in view of their previous
experience--if, of course, the supposed partition was a solid limestone
wall and not a simple upright slab more amenable to destruction over
time. The inference that there was a 'normal-sized' original
cist is also encouraged by the facts that the skeletons in cist I were
not lying side by side but in different halves of the cist (Friedenthal
1927, 48), and the northern part of the cist appeared to have been
bounded by an oval-shaped surround of large granite stones, while the
southern half of the cist seemed to lack such a feature. The respective
stones measured 20-30 cm and above and they were positioned at a
distance of 0.5-1 m from the cist, with bottoms situated relatively high
above the limestone bedrock and surfaces probably even with the upper
edge of the cist. Some stones, however, had been removed from their
original positions by the time of excavation and therefore the character
of the feature remains somewhat obscure; for instance its relation to
the female skeleton found not far from the northern end of cist I (see
below) is unclear. A similar feature of granite stones around the cist
was also observed in grave 12 (Friedenthal & Spreckelsen 1926, 2;
Friedenthal 1932, fig. 1).
It is not possible to firmly establish from the construction
details alone in which order the other cists were built. One may,
however, hypothesise that cist II was built when cist I was present in
its full length, as the former seems to have knowingly been fitted next
to the middle of the latter, involving perhaps an aesthetic
consideration. If this was the case, it must have been calculated from
the very beginning of its construction that no cists would be added
south of cist II. The ends of cists III and IV met but, unfortunately,
it seems that excavators did not observe in which order the cists had
been built (or whether such details were detectable at all). Based on
the example of cist I one may speculate that cist III was built before
cist IV, perhaps even before cist I was elongated. In the latter case
the grave builders might not have foreseen the need or desire to add one
more cist to the south, and when the need emerged it became evident that
there was not enough room and, as a consequence, the new cist IV was not
attached to cist III (in a fashion similar to cist I) but was instead
positioned slightly closer to the grave's centre. Of course, other
interpretations are possible. In any case, however, it is likely that
the cists were added to the grave at relatively short intervals.
Human remains
Long bones and skulls from cist I have been examined by Adolf
Friedenthal (1932), the rest of the osteological assemblage by Jonathan
Kalman (1998). According to their work, the grave contained inhumed
remains of at least 11 individuals, including three adult females, three
adult males and five children aged from 2 to 13 years. The locations of
sexed and aged individuals within the grave are shown in Figure 3.
Different sections of the grave also yielded altogether 40 grams of
slightly burnt bone fragments, ca 75 per cent of them skull fragments;
sex and age determination from the bones was, however, impossible. Apart
from a canine incisor in cist II, the grave contained nothing that could
be considered a grave good or an offering; even animal bones were almost
completely absent.
Inhumations in the cists were lying with their heads to the north.
As already indicated, in cist I the male was in the northern and the
female in the southern half of the cist and, judging from their skulls
and long bones, were probably quite well preserved (Friedenthal 1927,
48; 1932). The male skeleton in cist II was relatively complete,
according to Kalman, and, judging from the excavation records, found in
a more or less correct anatomical position. However, the skeletons in
cists III and IV showed much worse preservation: all the main parts of
the male skeleton were present but highly fragmented, while skeletons of
the female and the child were clearly incomplete, with a proportion of
bones missing. Some bones of the male in cist IV, particularly the
majority of his skull, were found in cist III, and two cranial pieces
from the left orbit of the female in cist III were north of the grave on
the exterior side of the ring wall (area 3 in Fig. 3). It is also
possible that parts of the postcranial skeleton of the latter woman were
located outside of cist in area 5. The osteologist's report,
however, suggests caution with the latter conclusion: the mentioned area
unquestionably yielded bones of an adult female, including bones that
were absent in cist III, but the bones did not allow an age-atdeath
estimation (it was only possible to definitively say that they had
belonged to a female who had given birth).
Skeletal remains outside of cists were situated between grave
stones, usually slightly above the natural ground level and with no
traces of specific burial structures--a situation commonly interpreted
as burial in the hollows recessed into the grave's stone body. The
female skeleton north of cist I was found in a rather disturbed
condition but with all of its main parts present; she had apparently
been interred with her head to the north. The bones of a 2-3-year-old
child to the east (area 1) revealed a similar alignment, while the head
of a 3-4-year-old child (area 2) apparently pointed to a more easterly
direction. The bones of the three individuals found near the corner of
cist III (area 5), however, were highly mingled and fragmented,
therefore the position and orientation of particular individuals was
impossible to ascertain.
Similarly to the cist burials, inhumations outside of cists
revealed that the bones of an individual may be found at a considerable
distance in different parts of the grave. Therefore, some cranial
fragments of the 12-13-year-old sub-adult of area 5 were found three
metres away from the otherwise rather complete skeleton (including the
skull), near the bones of the child in area 2; cranial pieces of the
female in area 4 were found behind the ring wall in area 3, where also
cranial pieces of the female from cist III had been found; and behind
the ring wall were also some bones of the young children from the
north-eastern part of the grave (cranial pieces of the 2-3-year-old in
area 1A; bones of the 3-4-yearold, particularly the upper limbs, were
slightly south of the latter (6)). The child bones near the southern end
of cist I may have belonged to either of the children in the
north-eastern part of the grave.
Kalman (1998) argues that disarticulate, mingled and incomplete
skeletons and the location of an individual's bones in different
parts of the grave are a result of secondary burial practice, i.e. clean
bones that had undergone a defleshing process elsewhere were later
placed in the grave. He suggested the place of the initial decomposition
to have been directly behind the grave's ring wall and the single
bones found there to be the leftovers from removing the skeletons for
reburial within the encircled area. This view was, without much
contemplation, accepted and repeated in literature (Vedru 1998b, 65;
1999a). An in-depth reading of Kalman's report, however, reveals
that no solid arguments are presented as why the space behind the ring
wall should be considered the initial burial ground and what excludes
the possibility that the movement of the bones (ritual-related or not)
was in the reverse order, from within the grave to the exterior area.
One might also ask how likely it is that skull pieces were overlooked
during reburial or that the skulls were already shattered by the time of
reburial. When we also consider that some inhumations in the discussed
grave almost certainly represent the primary burial practice (also in
Kalman's opinion) and that the proposed secondary burials were
found in human-sized hollows, it appears that there are no grounds
whatsoever to prefer the inference of secondary burials over that of
primary burials. Furthermore, Kalman completely overlooks natural
factors such as climate, small animals, plants (particularly junipers
which are common at the site), and possible human intrusion such as by
treasure hunters, stone robbers, etc., which would have had an effect on
the preservation and situation of the bones. For instance, in area 5 in
north-western part of the discussed grave there is a strong likelihood
that at least some of the listed factors had an important part to play,
since even the ring wall had been destroyed there.
The point here is not to prove that secondary inhumation or
re-interment of clean bones was not practised in stone-cist graves but
to draw attention to the fact that the argument is insufficient and
other possible interpretations have been overlooked. This is also
applicable to other osteologically analysed stone-cist graves.
Particular criteria are used to differentiate between secondary and
primary burials (e.g. Nilsson Stutz 2003, 208 ff.) and we encourage
bioarchaeologists and osteologists to explore and discuss these more
systematically than has previously been done, as complicated as it may
be in case of above-ground mortuary monuments with protracted use-life,
such as stone-cist graves. This highly complex subject also includes
defining the 'proper' burial (in sense of Nilsson Stutz 2003,
322; i.e. defining the norm and variations from it) and research on
rituals involving human bones--an area where so far only the surface has
been scratched.
Radiocarbon dates
Bone samples for radiocarbon dating were collected in 2012 in
cooperation with bioarchaeologist Martin Malve, who matched the bones
with skeletal characteristics provided by Friedenthal and Kalman (see
above); re-examination of the bone assemblage was not undertaken. Sample
fragments were removed sparingly so as not to inhibit metric and other
analyses potentially needed in future osteological studies. Altogether
nine samples were collected: from all of the adults present in the grave
(if female bones in cist III and area 5 belonged to the same
individual), two (out of the total of five or six) sub-adults and one
from a burnt bone. The latter was chosen rather fortuitously, since we
were unable to find the above-mentioned burnt cranial bones. Each
sampled individual is represented by only one sample. The radiocarbon
analysis was accomplished by SUERC laboratory in Glasgow, Scotland, and
the respective results along with detailed sample information (7) are
presented in Table 1 and Figures 3 and 4.
The first thing to note about the obtained radiocarbon dates is
that the grave is older than most researchers have hitherto assumed (see
the discussion on the dating of the graves above). The dates (of the
inhumations) span roughly from 1300 to 900 BC; the actual burial period
was certainly shorter but in any case it is likely that the grave was
present prior to 1100 BC and most if not all of the inhumations were
deposited before 1000 BC. Such dates for stone-cist graves in Estonia
are, however, not extraordinary, since the earliest graves at Joelahtme,
Harjumaa, which for a long time kept the title of Estonia's oldest
stone graves, were also established at some point between 1200-1000 BC,
as evidenced by both the artefactual record (Lang 1996, 295; 2007, 158
f.) and recent radiocarbon dates (with the oldest date so far in 2924 [+
or -] 32 BP, Hela-2365; authors' unpublished data). Stone-cist
grave IIA at Tougu, Virumaa was recently radiocarbon-dated to the same
period (2931 [+ or -] 29 BP, SUERC-44079; authors' unpublished
data). The dates for grave 5 may appear a bit surprising only because
the dating of those stone-cist graves without artefacts has so far been
based on a vague assumption that they are younger than the earliest
graves with well-datable bronze items and slightly older than graves
with Pre-Roman Iron Age items (Lang 1996; but see also Lang 2007, 163).
The dates from Muuksi challenge this view, which in its turn questions
the deep-rooted understanding that the majority of stone-cist graves
temporally cluster around the transition from the Bronze to the Iron
Age. One should also consider that there is no particular reason to
regard grave 5 as the oldest of the Hundikangrud group, which further
supports the thought that stonecist graves were introduced in Estonia as
early as in the Early Bronze Age (in terms of the current chronology).
It can be added that pollen data from Lake Kahala also confirm the
inference of the appearance of graves in the area in the midBronze Age
around 1300 BC at the earliest (Vedru 1999b, 412; 2002, 108 f.; and
references therein).
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
Another remarkable fact is the uniformity in the dates (of the
inhumations), which implies relatively short intervals between the
burials. This is an anticipated finding for the cist burials, since the
details of cists' construction also suggested that the cists were
not inserted all at once but still at short intervals. Radiocarbon dates
do not contribute significantly to what was said above about the order
of construction of the cists, but they seem to encourage rather than
contradict the interpretation. A more noteworthy finding is the
approximate contemporaneousness of the burials inside and outside of
cists. For instance at Kasekula, Laanemaa, the inhumations outside the
cist were considerably later insertions to the Bronze Age grave, some of
a Pre-Roman and some of a Late Iron Age date (Laneman 2012). The case at
Muuksi is obviously different, although one may want to consider the
possibility that the inhumations north of the cists were interred when
all cists were already present and 'full'. This hypothesis is,
however, challenged by the fact that the individuals outside of cists
are mostly sub-adults while in the cists there are predominately
adults--or to put it straightforwardly, it is not likely that first only
adults and then almost exclusively children died. If there still is a
slight temporal distance between the burials in and out of the cists
then the burials into the peripheral areas of grave 5 must have been
placed at the same time as burials in a new grave--which is not unlikely
either.
In any case the temporal differences between the cist burials and
exterior burials are minor, which leads to the question as to why some
individuals were accorded a burial in a cist and other were not--given
that, as it is currently believed, they were all members of the same kin
group or household. The grave under review tempts one to conclude that
first and foremost children were buried outside of cists, but evidence
from other graves in the closest vicinity disprove the inference, as it
is adults--particularly males--who are found outside of cists, whereas
children turn up rarely (though at this point one may question the
accuracy of past osteological studies). The observed discrimination in
terms of burial location was therefore not based on straightforward age
or sex characteristics. The question is further complicated by the view
that only selected members of a community were interred in a stone-cist
grave (Lang 1996, 354 f.). True, for the Kahala area or at least for
Muuksi a deviation from this pattern has been suggested, as the average
number of burials per grave (i.e. 6-7 individuals) is higher than usual
(Vedru 1998a, 68, 71, 73; cf. Vedru 2010, 57; see also Lang 2007, 153).
The radiocarbon results, a propos, indirectly support this opinion as
far as they prove that inhumations outside cists can be counted as part
of the community that built the graves. The issues of the elite
background and internal hierarchy of stone-cist grave burials are,
however, highly complex and require a more comprehensive treatment than
is possible herein. Hence the inference at this point must be confined
to the conclusion that the individuals interred inside and outside the
cists were more or less contemporaries and belonged to the same
community group--a fact that had up to now been only an assumption.
The bone fragment radiocarbon-dated to the 3rd or 4th century AD
might be part of a dispersed cremation deposit, although it is not
necessarily the case that all remains of the cremated individual were
brought to the grave or that the other burnt bones in the grave belonged
to the same individual or to the same period. In any case, however, we
are possibly observing the phenomenon of episodic re-use of old
monuments. By the time the cremated bone arrived in grave 5, the grave
group was probably well over one thousand years old and there is no
reason to think that burial had been continuous through all the time;
insertion of new graves to the group and probably also burials had ended
after about 500 years, more likely even earlier. The presence of
occasional burials or offerings of the same kind and date cannot be
ruled out in other nearby graves, although none of them have yielded
artefacts that can firmly be dated to the Roman Iron Age. How the
remains of the rest of the population of the area were treated is not
known, because Roman Iron Age sites are rare in the area. The closest
and so far the only known mortuary site, a badly disturbed tarand grave
with burnt and non-burnt bones and 3rd-century jewellery, was located at
Uuri on the eastern shore of the lake (Moora 1977). It is however
possible that tarand graves can also be found among the unexcavated
graves at Muuksi (Vedru 1999b, 409). Only one settlement site with a
probable Roman-period habitation is known, located at Kalamae on the
southern shore of the lake (Vedru 1998a, 52; 2010, 54).
Roman Iron Age burials or at least offerings or some other related
practices at stone-cist graves were not restricted to the Kahala area,
as can be seen from Roman-period artefacts from a number of farther
stone-cist graves (e.g. at Lagedi, Proosa, Vao, perhaps also Rebala).
The phenomenon has not been specifically studied, but it seems that in
comparison with the Roman-period tarand graves, stone-cist graves
contain artefacts that are rather modest in both quantitative and
qualitative terms. Human remains have so far been radiocarbon dated only
in one such grave group, at Rebala, but no Roman Iron Age dates were
obtained (unpublished data; of course, not all the burials were
subjected to individual dating).
Grave 70
Construction
Grave 70, excavated in 1937 by Artur Vassar (1937; 1938), was one
of the first stone-cist graves in Estonia excavated in its entirety
(Fig. 5). A flat cairn survived to a height of 80 cm in the middle and
slightly less at the edges; its lower part consisted predominately of
granite stones and its upper part predominately of limestone. The centre
of the grave enclosed a limestone cist built above the underlying
limestone; its walls, initially a minimum of 25 cm in height, had
collapsed by the time of excavation, and its cover plate, broken into
halves, had survived only above its southern end. The cist was
surrounded by a compact stone pile about 4 m across in which the lower
layer was predominately granite stones, the middle sections were mostly
limestone and the upper layer was granite stones mixed with limestone
shingle. The structure was defined by a limestone wall above a
foundation of granite stones. The limestone wall had been built of
remarkably thick slabs placed one upon the other with their straight
edges turned outwards; a maximum of four such layers had survived.
Unlike the limestone wall, its granite foundation was much less
pronounced, since the stones were of the same size as the rest of the
surrounding stones and not much effort had been made to form a straight
exterior side for the structure. It therefore seems that the lower part
of the circular structure had not been meant for display and only its
upper limestone part may have been exposed.
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
The space around this structure was filled with a dense packing of
granite stones which in places was three or four layers thick and which
was overlain by a relatively thick layer of smaller limestone slabs and
shingles, without any orderliness in their position. This zone was, in
its turn, edged by a lopsided roundish structure of large granite
stones, which in the opinion of the excavator may have been purposefully
formed in a hexagonal shape. The stones of this feature were much larger
than in the interior of the grave, approximately half a metre or more in
diameter, particularly in the northern and eastern parts of the grave
where the natural ground level declined towards the north-east. The
stones were situated with small spaces between and, although Vassar does
not mention it, they may have been topped with a limestone wall. The
north-western part of the circle revealed a gap, possibly a result of
destruction. (8) In the south-western part of the grave a curved row of
larger stones seemed to have connected the large stone circle with the
centre of the grave (in the vein of a spiral, as Vassar puts it). The
bottoms of the stones, however, were situated at different heights and
therefore the function and intentionality of the feature remained
undecided.
The margin of the excavated area consisted mainly of limestone
shingles, except for its south-eastern part where a 2 m wide stretch
packed with granite stones was observed against the exterior side of the
stone circle. The limestone layer was thickest by the circle stones,
over a half-metre thick, but became increasingly thinner towards the
exterior. A similar layer of limestone shingles was present all over the
grave surface, including the central cist, which led Vassar to suggest
that the limestone coating had been purposefully superimposed in the
final stages of the grave's usage to conceal the inner structures.
This interpretation is difficult to assess in hindsight; it is, however,
possible that the upper part of the grave may have been formed from
limestone from the very beginning and part of the stones may originate
from field cultivation, as old field remains lay not far from the grave
(Vassar 1937, 1; Vedru 1996). It is nevertheless likely that originally
both the inner and the outer stone circle were visible from the
grave's surface, although the former only with its topmost part;
both circles were probably built at the same time and it was the
external one that served as a real border.
In terms of construction the grave resembles the nearby triple
grave 71 where cists were surrounded by double two-layer (i.e. limestone
above granite) stone circles, although the circles of these graves were
located closer to each other than in grave 70. As to the inner limestone
wall, it resembles the granite stone structure around cist I in grave 5,
which differed from the surrounding stone material and bordered the cist
on the surface level of the grave.
Human remains
Four inhumations and two cremations were encountered in the grave.
Sex and age estimations on the inhumations were carried out by physical
anthropologist Juhan Aul (there is no detailed report but the results
are quoted in Vassar 1937 and 1938). The locations of the burials within
the grave, along with sex and ageat-death data are shown in Figure 5.
The two skeletons inside the cist, probably supine and with heads
to the north, were intermingled and damaged by the stones fallen into
the cist. The bones of the male who had died around the age of 50 had
been preserved remarkably better than the bones of the younger
individual of indeterminable sex. According to Aul, the latter had been
a young adult whose age at death was not determinable more precisely
than less than 30 years; however, according to Martin Malve's
preliminary estimation, it was a sub-adult less than 15 years of age.
Outside the cist were the remains of males who had died at a
remarkably old age (according to Aul/Vassar perhaps around 80 years of
age, though Malve's preliminary estimation was 50 and beyond).
Their bones were found above the layer of granite stones and covered in
limestone, with no recognizable traces of cist-like structures. The
western inhumation was lying at a depth of ca 30-35 cm from the
grave's surface and may have had a south-east-north-west
orientation, with head to the south-east. The southern inhumation was
lying slightly deeper and appeared to have been oriented west-east, head
to the west. The skeletons were very incomplete--both had its lower
parts (pelvic girdle and lower limbs) almost completely missing. The
western skeleton was slightly better preserved than the southern one,
except for the skull. In the archaeology of the 1930s, the possibility
of secondary burial practices was not considered, but undoubtedly the
skeletons under review may warrant this consideration today.
One of the deposits of cremated bone was found around the southern
end of the cist; it had most likely been dispersed above the cist's
cover plate. The cremation in the eastern part of the grave, however,
was a compact assemblage of bones situated at a considerable depth near
the underlying limestone bedrock, with large limestone slabs underneath
and on top of it and two larger granite stones on two sides. Next to the
southern granite stone stood an upright half-metre tall limestone slab
with a triangular upper end which may have functioned as a grave marker
(cf. cist ends in grave 5). The dimensions of the whole structure
(except for the presumed grave marker) were 60-70 x 40 x 25 cm but it
cannot be regarded as a proper cist; it was also filled with smaller
limestone and granite rocks. Both of the bone assemblages were described
as thoroughly cremated and cleaned before interment. Occasional burnt
bone fragments were also found in other parts of the grave.
Vassar argued that the first occupant of the cist was the younger
individual, because its bones were less well-preserved than the bones of
the older man. The eastern cremation and southern inhumation were
assumed to have been roughly contemporaneous with the first burial in
the cist, since they were found lying at considerable depths, while the
western inhumation with its slightly higher position was considered
somewhat later in date. The latest burial, or at least later in date
than the inhumations within the cist, was the scattered cremation in the
centre of the grave, according to Vassar. Based on artefact finds,
Vassar dated the burials to around the turn of the era.
Finds
The find assemblage of grave 70 is remarkably abundant for a
stone-cist grave, but the finds are mostly stone or bone items or
potsherds which are difficult to date. None of the finds can be firmly
associated with particular burials and many of them are located in the
margins of the excavated area which is, strictly speaking, outside the
grave (Fig. 5). The distribution and character of the finds has led
several researchers to assume that the finds originate from a nearby
settlement site, but test pitting to locate the site has yielded no
results (see Vedru 1998a, 52). Therefore Vassar may have been correct
when he suggested that the finds constituted a variety of offerings
placed during grave construction, funerary and memorial rituals and also
partly during rituals performed at the site at a considerably later time
(Vassar 1938, 333; Vedru 1998a, 52).
In this paper we review the find assemblage cursorily but,
admittedly, a more thorough investigation (of use-wear traces,
comparisons with other find contexts) might potentially yield
interesting results. This would, however, require a separate research
project, because such unspectacular stone and bone objects as those in
grave 70 have not been subjected to specific investigation and are often
neglected in publication. In regard to such finds, we have not much to
add to Vassar's 1938 treatment; as to the ceramics, however, there
has been more progress and this find type will be discussed more
thoroughly. Detailed descriptions of all non-ceramic finds together with
photographs for the majority of them can be found in Vassar 1938 (figs
21-23); in the interest of better readability we do not refer to the
latter figures in the following text, as these can easily be found in
Vassar's work.
There were two metal objects in the grave: iron awls or other
similar pointed items between the two stone circles in the northern and
eastern part of the grave (see Fig. 5). Both were lying between the
lowermost granite stones, but they had probably dropped from above, as
there was very little earth between the upper stones (Vassar 1937, 20).
The items can be dated to the Pre-Roman Iron Age, while a date in the
final Bronze Age is not entirely impossible, though rather unlikely
(Lang 1996, 47 f.; 2007, 121, 139). Iron and bronze awls have been
encountered in a number of stone-cist, cairn and tarand graves (ibid.),
which indicates that these objects were intentionally placed in graves.
Of bone objects, there were two simple pointed awl-like items, one
on the western exterior side of the outer stone circle, positioned
clearly higher above the original ground level, and the other on the
southern margin of the excavated area just above the underlying
limestone. A similar object was in the cist of grave 1 together with an
object of flint (Friedenthal 1927, fig. 1). The bone objects of grave 70
perhaps reached the site after the marginal zone of limestone shingles
had already been formed, either intentionally or as a result of natural
dispersal of grave stones over time. Besides the mentioned objects there
were a few fragments of animal bone with traces of working, for instance
a split long bone at a depth of 30 cm near the western inhumation.
The most numerous stone objects were the fragments of possible
whetstones, five in number, including three thick specimens from
sandstone and two thinner ones from metamorphic rocks. All of the finds
were made outside the encircled area at different margins of the grave,
mostly higher above the ground level between grave stones. They probably
date from the Iron Age, but a more precise estimation is not possible
(Andres Tvauri, pers. comm. 09.06.2013). Four handy cobblestones were
found at the southern margin of the excavated area, one directly against
the stone circle, others farther at the margin. At least two of them had
been used as grinding tools and one as a stone hammer. Except for the
latter which was uncovered directly beneath the turf, the stones were
lying near the original ground surface. At least one similar stone was
also found in grave 71 and, notably, two stray cobblestones with traces
of grinding or polishing have been found thereabouts not far from the
graves (Vedru 1998a, 54). Similarly to whetstones, such stone artefacts
are present in contexts of different character and date (Vassar 1943,
234 f.; see also Laneman 2012, 101 and references therein); a thorough
examination of the presence of such artefacts in graves is worth a
separate study. A date in the Late Bronze or Early Iron Age is not
unlikely for this find category. Besides the cobblestones, the grave
contained a larger flat fragment of sandstone with traces of grinding,
which was located between the stone circles in the south-eastern part of
the grave at a depth that suggested that the item must have reached the
grave at the time of its construction.
In the south-eastern margin, 1.3 m from the stone circle and
relatively high between the stones (i.e. 15 cm from the grave surface)
was a fire-striking stone, not a classic example of an oval fire-stone
but nevertheless quite similar and hence perhaps of a similar date. Oval
fire-striking stones are dated to the early Roman Iron Age through the
Pre-Viking Age and usually occur as stray finds; in stone-cist graves
they are rare but a few are known from cremation barrows and tarand
graves (Vassar 1943, 225; Tvauri 2012, 88 ff). Further, the grave
contained a small flint scraper in its western part at a depth of only
12 cm, and two quartz objects that had also been used as scrapers. One
of them is a small bipolar flake, precise location unknown, and the
other is a larger platform flake found right on the western boundary of
the excavation (the quartz and flint artefacts were classified by Aivar
Kriiska). Also, a fossil with a hole in the centre was collected from
the eastern margin of the grave.
The grave contained approximately 2000 potsherds. Based on
differences in rim, shoulder and also some bottom and side fragments, a
minimum of 22 clay vessels were distinguished, but the actual number of
vessels was undoubtedly higher (cf. Vassar 1938, 350). The full shape of
the vessel was possible to reconstruct in only a few cases (Fig. 6). The
great majority of the vessels, 13 or 14 in number, was found in the
eastern half of the grave between the stone circles, particularly near
the cremation burial where a cluster of at least ten vessels was
located. A minimum of two vessels were in the vicinity of the cist and
additional five or six were outside the encircled space (it is perhaps
relevant to note that the total number of sherds outside the circle was
relatively small, a few dozen over 300). Sherds, including the sherds
from one and the same vessel, were lying between stones at different
heights, which suggests that the vessels had once been placed or,
perhaps more likely, thrown upon the grave stones. Potsherds were also
found inside the cist, but those had most probably dropped from above
when the covering plate of the cist collapsed. The pottery assemblage
comprises several ceramics styles and chronological layers.
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
In the eastern part of the grave, on both the inner and outer side
of the stone circle, scattered sherds of an Asva-style coarse ware clay
vessel were found. It had been a relatively large undecorated pot with
roughly smoothed surfaces and a slightly incurved upper part (rim
profile in Vassar 1938, fig. 14: 5). Such pots turn up mostly in
settlement sites, including fortified settlements, while they are rare
in stone(-cist) graves; they have been dated to the Late Bronze Age,
although a slightly later date cannot be excluded (Lang 1996, 46; 2007,
127 ff.; see also Laneman 2012, 100). Not far from this vessel in the
eastern part of the grave was another similar pot (though with strong
horizontal striation on the surfaces), but it is uncertain whether it
belongs to the same style group.
At least six vessels in different parts of the grave can be
classified as Ilmandu-style ceramics. Three of them were found in the
eastern part of the grave on the inner side of the stone circle (Fig. 6:
1 and Vassar 1938, fig. 19: 1; Fig. 6: 2 and Vassar 1938, figs 16: 7,
17: 3; Fig. 6: 4 and Vassar 1938, fig. 18: 3); one was partly inside the
cist (Vassar 1938, fig. 17: 2); one in the north-eastern part of the
grave scattered between the stone circles (Fig. 6: 3; Vassar 1938, figs
16: 5, 18: 1); and one scattered over the north-western periphery of the
site. The exteriors of the vessels had been either striated or smoothed
and decoration was observed in three vessels: the north-easternmost
vessel had a row of stick impressions on its shoulder (Fig. 6: 3); the
vessel in the vicinity of the cist had deep oblique cuts on top of its
rim and imprints of a thin object reminiscent of the end of a wooden
chip on its shoulder; and the shoulder area of one of the eastern
vessels displayed impressions made by a 20-25 mm long stick that had a
cord twisted around it (Fig. 6: 4). The latter vessel has similar
counterparts in the stone-cist grave at Loona, Saaremaa (AI 4210:
44/53), the tarand grave at Liiva-Putla, Saaremaa (AI 4339: 80), tarand
grave I at Poanse, Laanemaa (Mandel 1978, pl. VIII: 3), the cist of
stone-cist grave II at Lagedi, Harjumaa (Spreckelsen 1927, pl. III: 81)
and the settlement site at Rannamoisa, Harjumaa (Lang 1996, fig. 13: 1).
Ilmandustyle pottery is also present in other settlement sites
(including fortified and hilltop settlements) and tarand and cairn
graves, while it is uncommon in stonecist graves. Recent (and so far
unpublished) AMS dates from tarand grave III at Ilmandu, Harjumaa, which
apply to inhumations that had been accompanied by Ilmandu-style pots as
grave goods, fell within the 5th century BC, (9) but this pottery type
was probably used even later in the Pre-Roman Iron Age and it may have
appeared as early as at the end of the Bronze Age (Lang 2007, 130 ff).
Scattered sherds of a vessel that had two parallel horizontal rows
of cord impressions on its shoulder were found on the western exterior
side of the outer stone circle (Vassar 1938, fig. 18: 2). Another vessel
with a presumably similar decoration was in the vicinity of the northern
end of the cist and partly within the cist (Fig. 6: 5; Vassar 1938, fig.
17: 4-5), although in this case there is a slight possibility that the
impressions originate from a cord twisted around a stick or from other
similar stamp (cf. Vassar 1938, 353). The top of the rim of this vessel
bears notches or shallow indentations. A vessel with similar two cord
impressions on the shoulder is also known from a grave at Uuri in the
Kahala area, as well as from graves in the areas surrounding Tallinn
such as Lehmja-Loo II, Kurna IIB, Lagedi I and Rannamoisa II (AI 4887:
54; 4444: 249; AM A30: 35; 13: 4; 264: 265). The majority of the rest of
the Cord-Impressed Pottery, distributed mainly in the western mainland
Estonia and the islands, displays more elaborate decoration, e.g. zigzag
and wavy impressions. Cord-Impressed Pottery dates predominately from
the second half of the Pre-Roman period (Lang 2007, 132 f.).
Five sherds from a carinated vessel with a pinched decoration
(Vassar 1938, fig. 20: 6) were scattered both within and outside the
stone circle in the south western periphery of the grave, with distances
of several metres between the sherds. Pottery with a pinched decoration,
as a southern Baltic influence, is mainly distributed in southern
Estonian Middle Iron Age sites (Tvauri 2012, 80 f.). However, the sherds
in grave 70 may be earlier in date, since they resemble for instance
pinched carinate vessels from fortified settlements in Lithuania, which
are locally classified among the striated ceramics (e.g. Danilaite 1968,
fig. 3; Grigalaviciene 1995, fig. 129: 1-3). Carinated vessels appeared
in the fortified settlements of Lithuania in the Late Pre-Roman Iron Age
(Grigalaviciene 1986, fig. 38) and the vessel from Muuksi cannot
therefore be of a much earlier date. Dating it to the later Pre-Roman
period would correspond to the date of the CordImpressed Pottery (cf.
Vassar 1938, 358), although a date in the later periods of the Iron Age
cannot be ruled out (since the grave also contained other later finds).
The vessel was probably an imported item.
Three bottom pieces found in the eastern pottery-rich part of the
grave bear textile impressions (Vassar 1938, fig. 20: 7-8) which,
according to Silvia Laul (1966), originate from a plant fibre fabric
woven using the rep technique. She claims that vessels with analogous
textile impressions can be found in the Bronze Age fortified settlement
at Asva and Roman Iron Age tarand graves in southeastern Estonia.
The eastern part of the grave, both within and outside the
encircled area, also yielded a number of highly dispersed wall fragments
from one or perhaps even more vessels that had sand in the modelling
paste and carefully smoothed surfaces. The sherds are clearly different
from the rest of the grave's pottery and date from later periods,
the Middle or Late Iron Age. The remaining nine vessels that were
distinguishable (one in the northernmost periphery, one in the closest
vicinity of the southern inhumation, and the rest in the eastern part of
the grave) had deteriorated to the extent that neither type nor date
could be determined. It is nevertheless likely that the vessels pre-date
the end of the Roman Iron Age, whereas the most likely date is in the
Pre-Roman Iron Age.
Animal bones were scattered all over the grave, most abundantly in
the peripheral areas and rather the upper than lower layers of the
grave; they were particularly numerous at the north-western margin
together with potsherds (Vassar 1938, 332). Sheep or goat, cattle and
horse were present in all quarters of the grave; the south-eastern
quarter also contained pig bones, the north-western quarter seal bones,
and bones of a wolf-sized dog were uncovered at the northern (NNW)
border of the excavation. Other species present (various wild birds,
hare, toad, marten) need not have been associated with human activities.
Summing up the review of the finds, the first thing to note is that
according to the artefacts the most clearly and firmly represented
period in grave 70 is the Pre-Roman Iron Age--the great majority of the
ceramics and the iron objects most probably come from this period.
Ilmandu-style pottery and Cord-Impressed Pottery are usually dated,
respectively, to the first and second halves of the Pre-Roman Iron Age,
but chronological overlapping around the middle of the period is
entirely possible. There are also other sites that comprise both of the
mentioned ceramics styles (tarand graves at Poanse and Liiva-Putla, the
settlement site at Rannamoisa). Further, a later part (or parts) of the
Iron Age is (are) represented--by a few potsherds and probably also a
fire-striking stone. One or two Asva-style coarse ware vessels may
indicate an earlier, i.e. Bronze Age temporal layer at the site, but on
the other hand the contemporaneity of these pots with the
Pre-Romanperiod pottery cannot be ruled out. Stone and bone objects
cannot be dated but it seems that at least most of them could also be
dated to the Iron Age rather than the Bronze Age.
It may also be worthwhile to have a quick look at the artefact
finds of the neighbouring triple grave 71, although the absence of
excavation records does not allow a detailed account thereof. The cist
of the middle grave contained a pair of bronze temple ornaments (Vedru
1998a, pl. XVIII: 1-2) which unquestionably date from the Bronze Age. At
the well-datable stone-cist grave field at Joelahtme such spiral temple
ornaments date from Period IV or, at the latest and less likely, the
beginning of Period V of the (Nordic) Bronze Age (see Lang 1996, 283 f.;
this date is confirmed by AMS dates of the skeletal remains, hitherto
unpublished). A tiny tube of sheet bronze, ca 22 mm in length and 3 mm
in diameter, which was found outside the cist of the middle grave (AI
4980: 900), is probably of the same date, since an analogous find was
made in the cist of grave 3 at Joelahtme. The find assemblage apparently
also includes a small amount of Asva-style fine ware pottery (AI 4980:
699) and Luganuse-style pottery (AI 4980: 58, 667, 847/849), which may
also date from the Bronze Age (Lang 2007, 128 ff.). The majority of the
grave's approximately thousand potsherds, however, come from
Ilmandustyle and Cord-Impressed potteries and date from the Pre-Roman
Iron Age. The amount of Ilmandu-style ceramics is, however, smaller than
in grave 70. A date in the Pre-Roman period has also been attributed to
the spindle whorl of sandstone (Lang 2007, 138). A scythe, a polychromic
glass bead, a horse hoof ice spike and perhaps also some pottery
originate from the later periods of the Iron Age (Vedru 1998a, pl.
XVIII: 9, 15). These finds have counterparts for instance in the stone
grave-field at Proosa and the hill fort at Iru not far from Tallinn, and
they might therefore date from the late Viking Age or the early Final
Iron Age (e.g. Lang 1996, 99, 101, 199, 202; Vedru 1998a, 41 f.).
Besides the mentioned items, the find assemblage also includes a
cobblestone, a lump of quartz, bone fragments with cut-marks and an
abundance of slags.
Radiocarbon dates
Samples for radiocarbon dating were collected in 2010, in the same
way as described above with grave 5, and were processed in the dating
laboratory of the Finnish Museum of Natural History (Table 2; Figs 4 and
5). All four inhumations were sampled. The cremations could not be
dated, because at excavation 'cremated bone crumbs were not quite
collected' (Vassar 1937, 22). The existing bone assemblage was in a
quite unfortunate condition and seemed to have been repeatedly
re-arranged. Therefore, the bones recorded under numbers 19 and 20,
which represent the male inhumations outside the cist, had been mixed
and can no longer be distinguished, given that the bones belonged to
individuals of the same sex and age at death. This unfortunately means
that we do not know which of the radiocarbon results Hela-2409 and -2410
belongs to which of the two inhumations outside the cist. However, it is
important to emphasise that these two dates definitely apply to these
peripheral inhumations.
The results suggest that the grave was built between 900-800 BC,
more likely perhaps towards the end of the period--which is nevertheless
slightly earlier than previously thought (see the discussion on previous
dating above). There is a possibility that, a little unexpectedly, the
oldest burial of the grave is one outside the cist (due to the problems
indicated above it cannot be ascertained which of the two inhumations;
based on Vassar's suggestion, though not particularly
well-grounded, the southern one is more likely). If this was the case,
it probably implies that the grave (or graves in general) had not been
erected after a particular death case (cf. Vassar 1938, 334) and there
were quite strict rules to decide who is to be interred inside and who
outside the cist (which by the way applies even if the eastern cremation
was the oldest burial). It is also possible (though cannot apparently be
verified) that the inhumation under review was a secondary burial thrown
out of the cist or brought to the grave from elsewhere. By all this
guesswork, however, one should not forget that the inhumation under
review may also be slightly later in date than the man of about 50 in
the cist. As for the latter, it should be remarked that, contrary to
what Vassar proposed, this individual is more likely than the younger
individual to be the earlier occupant of the cist; Vassar was however
right when he argued that at least one burial inside and one outside the
cist were more or less contemporary.
Two skeletons, one inside and other outside of cist, were
radiocarbon-dated to quite a long stretch of time between 800 and 500
BC, and it is advisable to attempt to estimate whether they originate
from either the earlier or later part of the period. A date at the
beginning of the period is suggested by the fact that the other two
skeletons date from around 800 BC; also, evidence from the nearby grave
5 suggests that a grave was probably used for burial for a relatively
short time, as opposed to a period of several centuries. On the other
hand, the date of the abundant Ilmandu-style pottery around 500 BC is
not entirely impossible and thus the later part of the discussed period
should be considered. It was, however, shown above that the association
between the pottery and the burials was obscure; also, the Ilmandu
pottery accompanied by the Cord-Impressed Pottery dates from rather the
Pre-Roman Iron Age than the Bronze Age, and is thus indicative of an
activity that is chronologically later than the inhumations. All things
considered, it seems more likely that all the inhumations of grave 70
originate from a relatively short period of time and inhumations outside
and inside the cist are roughly contemporaneous. In any case all the
inhumations are of a Bronze Age date.
The date of the cremations is difficult to estimate without
radiocarbon dating because, similarly to peripheral inhumations in
stone-cist graves, peripheral cremations may be roughly contemporaneous
with or much later than cist burials. Vassar may well have been right
when he proposed that the eastern cremation burial is among the earliest
in the grave. That cremation was practised in the Bronze Age is
evidenced for instance by cremated human bones in two cists hereabout at
Sondlamagi, Muuksi. The eastern cremation in grave 70, however, was not
situated in a proper cist, but it nevertheless resembles cremations in
Bronze Age ship graves which were placed in small box-like stone
structures (Jaanits et al. 1982, 150 f.; Lang 2007, 164 ff.). Grave 18
at Iru, Harjumaa has even provided evidence that a cremation with no
cist whatsoever in the periphery of a stone-cist grave may be of a
Bronze Age date (unpublished data of authors). Despite all this, an Iron
Age date for the discussed burial in grave 70 cannot be ruled out. The
only relevant conclusion that can be drawn from the artefactual record
is that the discussed cremation is more or less contemporary with or
earlier than the Pre-Roman Iron Age pottery above it; a later date is
nevertheless unlikely.
The cremation in the centre of the grave must be later than the
inhumations within the cist, but a more precise estimation is hardly
possible. Similar cremations in upper layers outside of cists were
encountered in graves 8 and 32, but no artefacts to enable dating were
present. As seen above, the nearby grave 5 contained burnt bones of a
Roman Iron Age date. It is possible that the cremation under review is
somehow associated with the ceramic finds and dates from the Pre-Roman
period the surroundings of the cist indeed yielded at least one
Ilmandu-style vessel and one presumably of Cord-Impressed style. On the
other hand, however, similar vessels were found in other parts of the
grave with no cremated bones nearby. At Rebala, Harjumaa, for instance,
such cremations from the grave's upper layers were recently
radiocarbon-dated to most likely the Early Pre-Roman Iron Age, although
a Bronze Age date is also possible (unpublished data of authors).
As for the abundant artefact finds, only one or two Asva-style clay
vessels may possibly fit the obtained radiocarbon dates, while the other
ceramics are probably from the Pre-Roman Iron Age and are perhaps, but
not necessarily, associated with the cremation burial(s). The
association of finds and human bones in any case provides no grounds for
re-dating the ceramics to an earlier period or doubting the credibility
of the absolute dates. Hence, the most likely interpretation currently
appears to be that the pottery originates from an activity performed at
the grave a number of centuries after its construction and the interment
of inhumations; this activity may, though not necessarily, have involved
placing cremation burials. The vessels overwhelmingly outnumber the
cremation deposits (even if there were actually more cremations than the
excavator succeeded to trace), which suggests that burial, if it had
been practised, was not the most important element in the Pre-Roman Iron
Age use of the grave, and the majority, if not all of the clay vessels
had not been involved in funerals but rather in offering-like practices,
memorial meals, or the like. Here a reference can be made to Vassar
(1938, 358), who suggested from the thick layer of a charred porous
substance that was observed on the interiors of a few vessels that the
latter were used to bring embers (the grave itself embraced no traces of
fire), or birch tar used as medicine, to the grave. There also seems to
be a clear association between ceramics and faunal remains, since the
latter were also distributed predominately in the upper strata of the
grave, and the nearby graves that lacked artefacts also lacked animal
bones. The Pre-Roman-period practices, the precise content of which
remains unknown, may also have involved other artefacts that were
present in the grave but are not firmly datable to confirm the
hypothesis.
It is notable that similar activities probably occurred 30 m away
at grave 71, where the Pre-Roman Iron Age ceramics was complemented by a
radiocarbon date calibrated between 400-200 BC (2240 [+ or -] 40 BP,
Tln-513; Lang 1996, 289); the date was obtained from charcoal collected
from beneath the peripheral stones outside the ring walls. Perhaps it is
possible that in the Pre-Roman Iron Age, graves 70 and 71 formed a kind
of joint ritual locale, which might also account for the dense
clustering of the ceramics in the eastern part of grave 70.
Unfortunately, information on the location of the human remains and
artefact finds in grave 71 is insufficient.
A few artefacts in the grave represent an even later temporal layer
(or layers) which, as was perhaps the case during the Pre-Roman Iron Age
usage, most probably did not involve burials. These later components are
more evident in grave 71 where they can be dated to the late Viking or
beginning of the Final Iron Age, but in this case the finds of the two
graves may not have any association whatsoever. It may be that the
latest finds are in some way or another associated with the nearby field
remains from the end of the Iron Age. Current knowledge is however
insufficient to tell what these finds mean and what was the meaning of
the graves at the time of their arrival at the site.
Conclusions
Radiocarbon dates revealed that grave 5 at Sondlamagi, Muuksi had
been established prior to 1100 BC and grave 70 prior to 800 BC.
Inhumations inside and outside of the stone cists do not show
considerable differences in date. Although the discussed graves may
leave one with an impression that in stone-cist graves mainly children
and elderly people were interred outside of cists, evidence from other
graves at Muuksi and elsewhere do not confirm the inference. Burials
(cremations rather than inhumations) and/or other ritual practices at
the graves were carried out also in the Iron Age.
When viewing the obtained radiocarbon dates in the local context of
Sondlamagi, it seems that the inventory-less limestone graves clustered
in the western part of the grave field are older than the find-richer
graves with more granite stones east and perhaps also west of them.
True, the temple ornaments of grave 71 would allow dating the grave to
approximately the same time as the inhumations of grave 5, but on the
other hand it is entirely possible that such ornaments were also worn
around the 8th century BC, which is also suggested by the radiocarbon
dates from the same grave. In other words, the differences in the grave
groups that we described in the beginning sections of the article were
due to variations in the date of the graves and not, as suggested by
previous studies (Vedru 1998a, 65 f.; 2002, 110 f.; 2010, 51), a result
of contemporary graves being constructed by grave builders of different
social backgrounds. Moreover, the 'rich' artefact assemblage
of grave 70, or at least part of it, turned out to be considerably later
in date than the burials. The observed development in the peculiarities
in the graves' construction over time is, however, a local trend
and is not valid in general.
In a broader perspective, the current study provides strong support
to the thought that stone(-cist) graves were introduced to what now is
Estonia at a slightly earlier date than previously held, i.e. in terms
of the current chronology in the Early Bronze Age (note that Herr
Friedenthal was right, after all). Of significance is also the
conclusion that peripheral burials outside of cists not always are
'late' in date but may be contemporaneous to the cist burials,
even when the artefact finds suggest inversely. Since in stone-cist
graves either case can be encountered, it is evident that scientific
dating of the osteological material is highly advisable. Information
that was obtained on the post-Bronze Age use of the graves, however,
cannot currently be used for drawing far-reaching generalisations, but
if we aim at a better understanding of what the role of the Bronze Age
monuments was in the landscapes and mindscapes of the following
generations, then any bit of applicable information is important.
Acknowledgements
Our particular thanks are due to Martin Malve for his help with
collecting the bone samples, and to Gurly Vedru for a detailed
discussion of grave 5 and the Kahala area. Figures were prepared by
Kristel Kulljastinen and the English was adjusted by Mara Woods. Thanks
are also extended to Aivar Kriiska and Andres Tvauri for useful comments
on some artefacts, and Ulle Tamla and Kristi Tasuja for their help with
the find assemblages. The study was financed by the European Union
through the European Regional Development Fund (Centre of Excellence in
Cultural Theory).
References
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon
dates.--Radiocarbon, 51: 1, 337-360.
Danilaite, E. 1968. Lietuvos bruksniuotosios keramikos
ornamentas.--Lietuvos TSR Mokslu Akademijos Darbai, A serija, 1: 26,
41-57.
Friedenthal, A. 1924. Hochgeehrter Herr Professor! (Letter to Prof.
B. Nerman in AI.)
Friedenthal, A. 1927. Ein Graberfeld der Bronzezeit in
Estland.--Beitrage zur Kunde Estlands, XIII: 1-2, 47-52.
Friedenthal, A. 1932. Ein Beitrag zur vorgeschichtlichen
Anthropologie Estlands.--Zeitschrift fur Ethnologie, 63, 1-42.
Friedenthal, A. & Spreckelsen, A. 1926. Bericht uber die
Ausgrabungen im Kirchspiel Kusal im Juli 1926. Manuscript in AI.
Grigalaviciene, E. 1986. Sokiskiu piliakalnis.--Ankstyvieji Siaures
Rytu Lietuvos piliakalniai. (Lietuvos Archeologija, 5.) Mokslas,
Vilnius, 89-138.
Grigalaviciene, E. 1995. Zalvario ir ankstyvasis gelezies amzius
Lietuvoje. Mokslo ir Enciklopediju Leidykla, Vilnius.
Hausmann, R. 1909. Ubersicht uber die archaologische Forschung in
den Ostseeprovinzen im letzten Jahrzehnt: Vortrag gehalten auf dem
Historikertag in Riga 1908. Hacker, Riga.
Hausmann, R. 1910. Prahistorische Archaologie von Estland, Livland,
Kurland. Mattiesen, Dorpat. Jaanits, L., Laul, S., Lougas, V. &
Tonisson, E. 1982. Eesti esiajalugu. ENSV Teaduste Akadeemia Ajaloo
Instituut, Eesti Raamat, Tallinn.
Kalman, J. 1998. Skeletal report.--Vedru, G. 1998c. Aruanne
kivikirstkalmete kaevamistest Muuksi Hundikangrutes 1996-1997.
Manuscript in AI.
Laneman, M 2012. Stone-cist grave at Kasekula, western Estonia, in
the light of AMS dates of the human bones.--EJA, 16: 2, 91-117.
Lang, V. 1996. Muistne Ravala: muistised, kronoloogia ja
maaviljelusliku asustuse kujunemine Loode-Eestis, eriti Pirita joe
alamjooksu piirkonnas, I-II. (MT, 4. Toid arheoloogia alalt, 4.) Eesti
Teaduste Akadeemia Ajaloo Instituut, Tallinn.
Lang, V. 2007. The Bronze and Early Iron Ages in Estonia. (Estonian
Archaeology, 3.) Tartu University Press.
Laul, S. 1966. Tekstiilijalgedest keraamikaleidudel
Eestis.--Pronksiajast varase feodalismini: uurimusi Baltimaade ja
naaberalade arheoloogiast. Eds H. Moora & J. Selirand. Eesti NSV
Teaduste Akadeemia Ajaloo Instituut, Eesti Raamat, Tallinn, 96-101.
Lougas, V. 1970. Eesti varane metalliaeg (II a.-tuh. keskpaigast
e.m.a.--1. sajandini m.a.j.): dissertatsioon ajalooteaduste kandidaadi
kraadi taotlemiseks. Eesti NSV TA Ajaloo Instituut, Tallinn. Manuscript
in AI.
Lougas, V. & Selirand, J. 1989. Arheoloogiga Eestimaa teedel.
Teine, parandatud ja taiendatud trukk. Valgus, Tallinn.
Mandel, M 1978. Uber die Ausgrabungen der Tarandgraber von
Poanse.--TATU, 27: 1, 78-81. Moora, H. 1929. Die Eisenzeit in Lettland
bis etwa 500 n. Chr. I. Teil: die Funde. (Opetatud Eesti Seltsi
toimetused, XXV.) Tartu.
Moora, T. 1977. = Moopa T. [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]. TATU,
26: 1, 52-55.
Nilsson Stutz, L. 2003. Embodied Rituals and Ritualized Bodies:
Tracing Ritual Practices in Late Mesolithic Burials. (Acta Archaeologica
Lundensia. Series In 18[degrees], No. 46.) Lund.
Parmas, O. 1925. Kuusalu kihelkond. Manuscript in AI.
Reimer, P. J., Baillie, M. G. L., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J.
W., Blackwell, P. G., Bronk Ramsey, C., Buck, C. E., Burr, G. S.,
Edwards, R. L., Friedrich, M., Grootes, P. M., Guilderson, T. P.,
Hajdas, L, Heaton, T. J., Hogg, A. G., Hughen, K A., Kaiser, K F.,
Kromer, B., McCormac, F. G., Manning, S. W., Reimer, R. W., Richards, D.
A., Southon, J. R., Talamo, S., Turney, C. S. M, van der Plicht, J.
& Weyhenmeyer, C. E. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age
calibration curves, 0-50,000 years Cal BP.--Radiocarbon, 51: 4,
1111-1150.
Spreckelsen, A. 1926. Ausgrabungen in Neuenhof, Kirchsp. Kusal,
Dorf Muuksi, Lookese-Gesinde. Beitrage zur Kunde Estlands, XI, 38-42.
Spreckelsen, A. 1927. Das Graberfeld Laakt (Lagedi), Kirchspiel St.
Jurgens, Harrien, Estland. (Opetatud Eesti Seltsi toimetused, XXIV.)
Dorpat.
Tvauri, A. 2012. The Migration Period, Pre-Viking Age, and Viking
Age in Estonia. (Estonian Archaeology, 4.) Tartu University Press.
Varul, L. 2012. Kivikirstkalmete uurimine osteoloogiliste meetodite
abil Joelahtme kalmete nr 6, 7, 15, 16 ja 19 naitel. Bakalaureusetoo.
Tartu Ulikool. Manuscript in the Institute of History and Archaeology at
the University of Tartu.
Vassar, A. 1937. Kaevamisaruanne Kuusalu khk. Kolga vl. Muuksi kl.
Sepa tl. kivikangrul 24.-30. juuli ja 1.-8. august 1937. a. Manuscript
in AI.
Vassar, A. 1938. Drei Steinkistengraber aus Nordestland.--Opetatud
Eesti Seltsi Aastaraamat, 1937, 1, 304-364.
Vassar, A. 1939. Kaevamisaruanne Kuusalu khk. Kolga vl. Uuri kl.
Klaukse tl. kivikangrul 22. aug. 13. sept. 1939. a. Manuscript in AI.
Vassar, A. 1943. Nurmsi kivikalme Eestis ja tarandkalmete areng.
Doktoritoo. Tartu Ulikool, Tartu. Manuscript in the University of Tartu
Library.
Vedru, G. 1996. Inventories in the surroundings of Lake Kahala and
archaeological excavations on the fossil field remains at Soorinna and
Muuksi.--TATU, 45: 4, 434-437.
Vedru, G. 1997. New settlement sites in the surroundings of Lake
Kahala and revision excavations of stone-cist grave.--AVE, 1996 (Stilus,
7), 62-67.
Vedru, G. 1998a. Kahala jarve umbruse asustuspiirkond muinasajal.
Magistritoo arheoloogia erialal. Tartu Ulikool, Tartu. Manuscript in the
University of Tartu Library.
Vedru, G. 1998b. New archaeological data of the prehistory of Lake
Kahala area.--AVE, 1997, 62-66.
Vedru, G. 1998c. Aruanne kivikirstkalmete kaevamistest Muuksi
Hundikangrutes 1996-1997. Manuscript in AI.
Vedru, G. 1999a. Esiisade nekropol--Hundikangrud.--Horisont, 1,
32-34.
Vedru, G. 1999b. Archaeological evidence for settlement in the
surroundings of Lake Kahala. Environmental and Cultural History of the
Eastern Baltic Region. Eds U. Miller, T. Hackens, V. Lang, A. Raukas
& S. Hicks. (PACT, 57.) Rixensart, 405-414.
Vedru, G. 2002. Maastik, aeg ja
inimesed.--Keskus--tagamaa--aareala: uurimusi asustushierarhia ja
voimukeskuste kujunemistest Eestis. Ed. V. Lang. (MT, 11.) Tallinn,
Tartu, 101-122.
Vedru, G. 2010. Kahala jarve umbruse muinasaegne asustus ja
maastikukasutus.--Uurimusi Lahemaa ajaloolistest maastikest:
teadusartiklid kultuuriparandist. Comp. A. Paulus. Keskkonnaamet, Huma,
47-62.
Yanits, K. 1981. = [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] 1980, 384-385.
(1) The majority of the graves at Sondlamagi, including grave 5,
are located on the land of former Toomani farm while a few graves,
including grave 70, are located on the land of Sepa farm; graves at
Kabelimagi are also known as graves of Lookese farm (see Vassar 1938,
305; Spreckelsen 1926).
(2) One must consider that age-at-death and sex data for the
inhumations have been provided by different researchers of different
schools: bones excavated in the 1920s were studied by Adolf Friedenthal,
a medical doctor by profession (Friedenthal 1932); bones from the 1930s
by Juhan Aul, a physical anthropologist (Vassar 1938); and bones from
the 1990s by Jonathan Kalman, a forensic expert at the time (Kalman
1998). There is no reason to question the results of their work here,
although it is likely that a re-examination of the bone assemblages
would result in considerably different estimations, first and foremost
perhaps in regard of the minimum number of buried individuals,
particularly children (see e.g. Varul 2012). On these grounds detailed
statistics and far-reaching conclusions should be avoided, the more so
because osteological assemblages of graves 19, 35 and 71 have not been
studied.
(3) It is relevant to note that the dates (2430 [+ or -] 50 and
2330 [+ or -] 55 BP; Tln-529 and -536), originating from the 1980s, were
among the earliest radiocarbon dates ordered for prehistoric human bones
in Estonia. Unfortunately, they were never published by the researchers
who ordered the analysis (the data comes directly from a lab report
archived in the Institute of History at Tallinn University) and it is
not known whether they represent one individual or two different
individuals. It is also uncertain whether the radiocarbon-dated bones
belonged to the individual who wore the temple ornaments and was found
in the same cist.
(4) Besides the listed sources, part of the following information
on the construction of the grave originates from personal communication
with Gurly Vedru, because some relevant details have not been included
in the records.
(5) Note that Figure 3 may leave one with a wrong impression as if
the cist ends had been formed barely of upright slabs. Behind each
vertical slab there was in fact a wall similar to that on the
longitudinal sides of the cists.
(6) This fact is presented only in Kalman's unpublished report
while it has, for an unknown reason, been neglected in other relevant
accounts and figures by Vedru. Therefore, the burial area could not have
been located in Figure 3 either. It is perhaps relevant to note that
there are some other minor discrepancies between Kalman's report
and the quotations of his results in the works of Vedru. The current
article, however, follows the original report.
(7) Note that bones collected in the 1920s (i.e. long bones and
skulls) belong to the Estonian History Museum (AM) but are currently
kept at the Institute of History at Tallinn University (AI), with no
respective registry number whatsoever. The Estonian History Museum has
been unaware of the fate of the bones since at least the 1950s and has
written the bones out of their collections (Krista Sarv, pers. comm.
05.02.2013). The bones are, however, marked and contextually
identifiable with the aid of Friedenthal's 1932 article.
(8) In the original plan of the grave (in this paper adapted as
Figure 5) the gap shows, for an unexplained reason, a fill of smaller
stones, although the texts by Vassar clearly state that the circle
stones were absent at this spot.
(9) 2361 [+ or -] 29; 2354 [+ or -] 29; 2413 [+ or -] 29 BP
(SUERC-44060 ... 44062).
Margot Laneman, Institute of History and Archaeology at the
University of Tartu, 18 Ulikooli St., 50090 Tartu, Estonia;
margot.laneman@ut.ee
Valter Lang, Institute of History and Archaeology at the University
of Tartu, 18 Ulikooli St., 50090 Tartu, Estonia; valter.lang@ut.ee
Table 1. Radiocarbon dates and stable isotope measurements
of the human bones of grave 5 at Sondlamagi, Muuksi.
Calibration after OxCal v4.1.7 (Bronk Ramsey 2009; Reimer et al. 2009)
Context Sex/ Bone / Lab. No.
Age Register No.
Cist I Male Left radius SUERC-
50-60 AM 365: T4 44064
Female Left humerus SUERC-
20-25 AM 365: T5 44065
Cist II Male Right tibia SUERC-
20-25 AI 6320: 135 44069
Cist IV Male Frontal bone SUERC-
25-35 AI 6320: 176 44070
Area 5 Female Left humerus SUERC-
outside of cists ? AI 6320: 171 44071
Area 4 Female Left tibia SUERC-
outside of cists 20-24 AI 6320: 146 44072
Area 5 ? Cranium SUERC-
outside of cists 12-13 AI 6320: 192 44073
Area 2 ? Cranium SUERC-
outside of cists 3-4 AI 6320: 79 44074
Area 3 ? A long bone SUERC-
(cremation) (adult) AI 6320: 151 44075
Context Date Date cal
BP (95.4%)
Cist I 2966 [+ or -] 29 1300-1060 BC
2943 [+ or -] 29 1260-1050 BC
Cist II 2908 [+ or -] 26 1210-1010 BC
Cist IV 2906 [+ or -] 25 1210-1010 BC
Area 5 2876 [+ or -] 25 1130-940 BC
outside of cists
Area 4 2856 [+ or -] 29 1120-930 BC
outside of cists
Area 5 2909 [+ or -] 26 1210-1010 BC
outside of cists
Area 2 2879 [+ or -] 25 1190-940 BC
outside of cists
Area 3 1728 [+ or -] 28 AD 240-390
(cremation)
Context [delta][sup.13]C [delta][sup.15]N
([per thousand]) ([per thousand])
Cist I -21.2 10.3
-21.1 10.2
Cist II -21.1 9.7
Cist IV -21.3 10.4
Area 5 -21.4 9.7
outside of cists
Area 4 -21.2 9.6
outside of cists
Area 5 -21.2 10.0
outside of cists
Area 2 -21.1 11.2
outside of cists
Area 3 -13.2 --
(cremation)
Table 2. Radiocarbon dates and stable isotope measurements
(by IRMS method) of the human bones of grave 70 at Muuksi.
Calibration after OxCal v4.1.7 (Bronk Ramsey 2009;
Reimer et al. 2009). The uncertainty in the stable isotope
measurements is [+ or -] 0.1 [per thousand]
Context Sex/ Bone / Lab. No.
Age Register No.
Outside of cist Male Occipital bone Hela-2409
~80? AI 3583: 19-20
Outside of cist Male Occipital bone Hela-2410
~80? AI 3583: 19-20
Cist Male Left femur Hela-2411
~50 AI 3585: 21a
Cist ? Right femur Hela-2412
>30 AI 3585: 21a
Context Date Date cal [delta][sup.13]C
BP (95.4%) ([per thousand])
Outside of cist 2531 [+ or -] 30 800-540 BC -20.2
Outside of cist 2702 [+ or -] 30 910-810 BC -20.7
Cist 2620 [+ or -] 30 830-770 BC -20.7
Cist 2539 [+ or -] 30 800-545 BC -20.6
Context [delta][sup.15]N
([per thousand])
Outside of cist 10.5
Outside of cist N/A
Cist 10.1
Cist 10.2