Frontiers and opportunities in productivity research.
Fraumeni, Barbara M.
FRONTIERS IN PRODUCTIVITY RESEARCH include, but are not limited, to
research on intangibles, management practices and human capital. The
pioneering work of Corrado, Hulten, and Sichel (2009) kicked off
investigation into the role of intangibles in economic growth and
productivity. How and why do some firms' management practices lead
to higher productivity and what can be done to disseminate such
practices across countries and borders? Nick Bloom and others (Bloom et
al., 2012) are important contributors to this line of research. An early
contributor to the notion that not only physical capital matters for
productivity was Eric Brynjolfsson (Brynjolfsson and Hitt, 2000).
What are the implications for future economic growth and
productivity of younger workers being much more highly educated than
older workers in many countries (although not in the united states)?
Detailed human capital estimates for a growing number of countries,
including china and india, are facilitating investigation of such
questions (Gundimeda et al., 2006; Li et al., 2013; and Liu, 2011).
Expectations are that the specific role of human capital in current and
future productivity will more often enter into academic discussions in
the near future.
It is important to develop productivity estimates for all
countries, but particularly for emerging and developing countries. Most
understand the importance of China, whose GDP has apparently recently
surpassed that of the united states. Data issues make measurement of
productivity in China particularly challenging. in my opinion, analysis
of economic growth and productivity in Latin America will become an
increasingly fertile area for research. I have noted that there is a
growing presence of Latin American economists, as well as national
statistical office staff, at international meetings i have attended.
Challenges facing such research may still be very significant, but i
expect they will lessen.
As this conference illustrates, our understanding of the forces
that shape productivity has been enhanced by interactions, and even
collaborations, between national statistical agency staff and academic
researchers. Events organized by the International Association for
Research in Income and Wealth (IARIW), EU KLEMS and World KLEMS, the
US-based NBER Conference on Research in Income and Wealth (CRIW) and the
new Society for Economic Measurement are all important vehicles for
dissemination and presentation of such research. Hopefully these
linkages will continue and even strengthen despite statistical agency
budget stresses.
The good news is that there are more than enough opportunities to
keep anyone interested in the productivity field busy. I hope that as we
move forward younger researchers will continue to be become engaged in
this line of research as the grey beards such as those on this panel
become less active.
References
Bloom, Nicholas, Christos Genakos, Raffaella Sadun, and John Van
Reenen (2012) "Management Practices Across Firms and
Countries," NBER Working Paper No. 17850, February.
Brynjolfsson, Erik and Lorin Hitt (2000) "Beyond Computation:
Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business
Performance," Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp.
23-48.
Corrado, Carol, Charles Hulten, and Daniel Sichel (2009)
"Intangible Capital and U.S. Economic Growth," Review of
Income and Wealth, Vol. 55, No. 3, September, pp. 661-685.
Gundimeda, Haripraya, Sanjeev Sanyal, Rajiv Sinha, and Pavan
Sukhdev (2006) "Estimating the Value of Educational Capital
Formation in India," Monograph 5, GAISP (Green Accounting for
Indian States Project) (New Delhi, India: TERI Press).
Li, Haizheng, Yunling Liang, Barbara Fraumeni, Zhiqiang Liu, and
Xiaojun Wang (2013) "Human Capital in China, 1985-2008,"
Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 59, No., June, pp. 212-234.
Liu, Gang (2011) "Measuring the Stock of Human Capital for
Comparative Analysis: An Application of the Lifetime Income Approach to
Selected Countries," OECD Statistics Directorate, Working Paper No.
41, October.
Barbara M. Fraumeni
Central University for Finance and Economics (1)
(1) The author is Special-term Professor at the Central University
for Finance and Economics in Beijing, China. This article is based on a
presentation to the closing panel on priorities and directions for
future productivity research at the conference "Productivity:
Measurement, Drivers, and Trends" organized by the International
Association for Research in Income and Wealth and the University of New
South Wales held in Sydney, Australia November 26-27, 2013. Email:
bfraumeni@usm.maine.edu.