Active Canada 20/20: a physical activity plan for Canada.
Spence, John C. ; Faulkner, Guy ; Bradstreet, Christa Costas 等
Population levels of physical activity (PA) have decreased, and
sedentary behaviours have increased in most developed countries over the
past 50 to 70 years. (1-3) Physical inactivity is now identified by the
World Health Organization as the fourth leading risk factor for global
mortality, (4) and the vast majority of Canadian adults (5) and children
(6,7) do not meet minimum guidelines for PA. The solution to such
widespread unhealthy lifestyle behaviours does not rest solely on
individual-level interventions or programs promoting leisure-time PA;
(8) policy and environmental approaches are also essential. (9-11) For
instance, the Toronto Charter for Physical Activity (12) calls for the
implementation of robust national policies and action plans that support
PA.
Such national policies, plans or strategies can provide direction,
support and coordination of the many sectors and stakeholders involved
through the establishment of common objectives and strategies, and the
negotiation of roles and responsibilities (i.e., an action plan). These
describe the procedures of institutions in the government,
non-government and private sectors to promote PA in the population. (13)
The development of a policy should also allow greater allocation of
resources and greater accountability, and it would be a significant
indicator of political commitment. To be effective, such policies and
plans should recommend a combination of strategies to affect multiple
levels of influence (e.g., individual, organizational), incorporate
evidence-based guidelines on PA and health, provide an implementation
plan and obtain support from a broad range of relevant stakeholders.
(12) National policies, plans or strategies have been developed and
implemented in countries across the world (e.g., Australia, the US).
(14,15) Though Canada has a long history of policy initiatives
addressing physical fitness, active living and sport, (16) a recent
assessment of the current policy context determined these were
"inadequate to increase population PA". (17) In spite of
efforts such as the Integrated Pan-Canadian Healthy Living Strategy,
(18) which was driven by concerns about rising obesity rates in the
mid-1990s, Canada's approach to increasing PA has been
under-resourced (17) and has lacked the coordination and strategic
approach required for population-wide interventions that link evidence
to action. (19-21) For instance, the most recent version of Canadian
physical guidelines was funded and produced with minimal support,
involvement or leadership from the federal government. (22)
A call to action and plan for Canada: Active Canada 20/20
In the absence of demonstrable leadership, the PA sector responded
with a collective call to action and identified the need for a
coordinated approach to address physical inactivity and sedentary
behaviour in Canada. The result of their efforts was a document entitled
Active Canada 20/20, A Physical Activity Strategy and Change Agenda for
Canada. (23) As its development has not been led by or endorsed by
government at the federal level to date, Active Canada 20/20 (AC 20/20)
is not a formal or national policy but, rather, an action plan or
strategy. It is designed to engage decision-makers and rally the
collaborative, coordinated and consistent efforts of all stakeholders at
every level to reverse the decline in population PA levels and the rise
in sedentary behaviours that have taken place over recent generations,
and to create a "culture of an active nation". It provides a
vision for an active Canada, focuses on high-priority actions and needed
investments, builds on current strengths, identifies strategies to
address gaps, and provides focus and opportunity for coordinated action.
AC 20/20 is intended to support and guide the work of stakeholders at
the local, regional, provincial/territorial and federal levels.
Provinces and territories may also choose to use AC 20/20 as a basis for
developing their own plan appropriate to their own context and
priorities.
Development of Active Canada 20/20
Grounded in the 2010 Toronto Charter for Physical Activity, (12)
the Pan-Canadian Physical Activity Strategy (24) developed by the
Coalition for Active Living in 2003 and a number of Canadian and
international evidence-based PA strategies, an AC 20/20 consultation
document was prepared in 2011 that incorporated recommendations for
bridging the research, policy and practice components to collectively
achieve the vision of an active Canada (see Table 1 for a timeline of
the development of AC 20/20). This process was initiated by the advisory
groups of ParticipACTION (www.participaction.com), which serve as a
voice of PA and sport participation in Canada. (25) The plan was
developed around a framework consisting of four Areas of Focus (Policy
Development, Change and Implementation; Targeted Information and Public
Education; High Quality, Accessible Programs and Services; Community
Design); three Foundations for Change (Evidence and Knowledge Exchange;
Strategic Investments; Mobilization); and a series of strategic and
priority actions that are mutually reinforcing and work together to
achieve the AC 20/20 objectives (see Figure 1). The Foundations provide
essential support to the Areas of Focus, which in turn provide the major
thrusts of a change agenda to make Canada a more physically active
country. No one Area of Focus can be addressed in isolation, and each is
essential to building an active Canada.
The consultation document was used to support a national
consultation through an online survey and a series of in-person
consultations held from September 2011 to January 2012. Over 850
respondents completed the online survey along with another 450
respondents specifically from the Aboriginal community. Participants
originated from every province and territory in Canada and represented
multiple sectors (e.g., recreation, sport, government, health care
professionals). In total, approximately 1,700 stakeholders provided
input and feedback that informed the final version of AC 20/20. (23) The
resulting document was supported by members of the Interprovincial Sport
and Recreation Council and was presented to federal/provincial/
territorial (F/P/T) ministers responsible for sport, physical activity
and recreation in Inuvik, Northwest Territories, in June 2012. Ministers
accepted the document and encouraged the sector to continue its efforts
to fine-tune AC 20/20 in relation to initiatives in the sport and
recreation sectors. At their most recent meeting in Prince George,
British Columbia (BC), in February 2015 the ministers called for a
review of AC 20/20 "with a view to developing a pan-Canadian
framework to be brought to Ministers for endorsement at a future
meeting". (26)
Implementing Active Canada 20/20
The first step toward implementing the plan was to convene a
two-day National Gathering in Fredericton, New Brunswick, in May 2013
with 100 delegates from across Canada in attendance. The invited
delegates comprised representatives from every province and territory
and from a variety of sectors (e.g., PA, sport, recreation, public
health, government), as well as 20 national non-government organizations
(NGOs). The primary objectives of the Gathering were to create momentum
in the country for the aligned and collaborative implementation of AC
20/20 by key stakeholders and to identify national priorities for
collective action. Provincial and territorial delegations agreed to
develop and/ or align their PA strategies with AC 20/20. Further, they
identified national priorities for collective action, which resulted in
the development of four actions groups to address active play, active
transportation, school PA, and accessibility and diversity. The AC 20/20
Steering Committee identified an additional priority: to advocate for a
national PA policy.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
As a result of, or in alignment with, the outcomes of the National
Gathering, several provinces are developing plans consistent with AC
20/20 (e.g., BC, Saskatchewan) or re-examining existing ones (e.g.,
Alberta). Further, the Steering Committee is working towards the
development of a "business case" in partnership with the
Conference Board of Canada, (27,28) an implementation plan that includes
a communications strategy, and an advocacy plan for the creation of a
national PA policy. A synthesis that aligns AC 20/20 with the national
recreation framework (29) and the Canadian Sport Policy 201230 was
conducted in January 2015 in preparation for the meeting later that
month of F/P/T ministers responsible for sport, physical activity and
recreation in Prince George. Finally, an evaluation framework to
establish the baseline criteria for evaluating the impact of Active
Canada 20/20 has been developed through funding from the Canadian
Institutes of Health Research.
SUMMARY
Canada's approach to increasing PA has been fragmented and has
lacked coordination, funding and a strategic approach. AC 20/20 provides
both a national plan and a commitment to action from NGO and public
sectors with a view to engaging corporate Canada and the general public.
It outlines a road map for implementing proactive initiatives to address
this prominent health risk factor in the Canadian population. The
identified actions are based on the best available evidence and have
been endorsed by the majority of representatives in the relevant
sectors. The next crucial steps are to engage all those involved in
public health promotion, service provision and advocacy at the
municipal, provincial and national levels to incorporate AC 20/20
principles into practice and planning, and thus increase the PA level of
every person in Canada. Further, governments, as well as the private,
not-for-profit and philanthropic sectors, should demonstrate leadership
and continue their efforts toward providing the substantial and
sustained resources needed to recalibrate Canadians' habitual PA
patterns; this will ultimately improve the overall health of our
citizens. In the absence of a coordinated effort and plan, it will be
difficult for a haphazard assortment of programs and initiatives to have
any meaningful impact on the national secular trend in physical
inactivity.
REFERENCES
(1.) Brownson RC, Boehmer TK, Luke DA. Declining rates of physical
activity in the United States: What are the contributors? Annu Rev
Public Health 2005;26:421-43. doi:
10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144437.
(2.) Buliung RN, Mitra R, Faulkner G. Active school transportation
in the Greater Toronto area, Canada: An exploration of trends in space
and time (1986-2006). Prev Med 2009;48:507-12. doi:
10.1016/j.ypmed2009.03.001.
(3.) Ng SW, Popkin BM. Time use and physical activity: A shift away
from movement across the globe. Obes Rev 2021;13:659-80. doi:
10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00982.x.
(4.) World Health Organization. Global Health Risks: Mortality and
Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risks. Geneva,
Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2009. Available at:
http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/en/ (Accessed August
10, 2014).
(5.) Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J,
Tremblay MS. Physical activity of Canadian adults: Accelerometer results
from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep
2011;22(1):7-14.
(6.) Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J,
Tremblay MS. Physical activity of Canadian children and youth:
Accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures
Survey. Health Rep 2011;22(1):15-23.
(7.) Gray CE, Barnes JD, Cowie Bonne J, Cameron C, Chaput JP,
Faulkner G, et al. Results from Canada's 2014 Report Card on
Physical Activity for Children and Youth. J Phys Act Health
2014;11(Suppl 1):S26-32. doi: 10.1123/jpah. 2014-0178.
(8.) Heath GW, Parra DC, Samiento OL, Andersen LB, Owen N, Goenka
S, et al. Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: Lessons from
around the world. Lancet 2012;380:272-81.
(9.) Pratt M, Perez LG, Goenka S, Brownson RC, Bauman A, Sarmiento
OL, et al. Can population levels of physical activity be increased?
Global evidence and experience. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2015;57(4):356-67.
doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.09.002.
(10.) Bull FCL, Gauvin L, Bauman A, Shilton T, Kohl HW III, Salmon
A. The Toronto Charter for Physical Activity: A global call for action.
J Phys Act Health 2010;7(4):421-22.
(11.) Raine KD, Muhajarine N, Spence JC, Neary N, Nykiforuk CIJ.
Coming to consensus on policy to create supportive built environment and
community design. Can J Public Health 2012;103(Suppl 3):S5-8.
(12.) Global Alliance for Physical Activity/International Society
for Physical Activity and Health. The Toronto Charter for Physical
Activity. A Call to Action. Available at: http://www.globalpa.org.uk
(Accessed August 18, 2014).
(13.) Bellew B, Schoeppe S, Bull FC, Bauman A. The rise and fall of
Australian physical activity policy 1996-2006: A national review framed
in an international context. Aust New Zealand Health Policy 2008;5:18.
doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-5-18.
(14.) Bornstein D, Pate RR, Pratt M. A review of the national
physical activity plans of six countries. J Phys Act Health 2009;6(Suppl
2):245-64.
(15.) Pate RR. A national physical activity plan for the United
States. J Phys Act Health 2009;6(Suppl 2):S157-58.
(16.) Bercovitz KL. Canada's Active Living policy: A critical
analysis. Health Promot Int 1998;13(4):319-28. doi:
10.1093/heapro/13.4.319.
(17.) Craig CL. Evolution and devolution of national physical
activity policy in Canada. J Phys Act Health 2011;8(8):1044-56.
(18.) Secretariat for the Intersectoral Healthy Living Network.
F/P/T Advisory Committee on Population Health and Health Security. The
Integrated Pan-Canadian Health Living Strategy. Ottawa, ON: Minister of
Health, 2005. (Cat No H P10-1/2005. ISSN 0-662-69384-1).
(19.) Active Healthy Kids Canada. Is Active Play Extinct? 2012
Active Healthy Kids Canada Report Card on Physical Activity for Children
and Youth. Toronto, ON: Active Healthy Kids Canada, 2012.
(20.) Spence JC, Dinh T. Moving Ahead: Taking Steps to Reduce
Physical Inactivity and Sedentary Behaviour. Ottawa: The Conference
Board of Canada, 2015.
(21.) Spence JC, Holt NL, Sprysak CJ, Spencer-Cavaliere N,
Caulfield T. Non-refundable tax credits are an inequitable policy
instrument for promoting physical activity among Canadian children. Can
J Public Health 2012;103(3):175-77.
(22.) Tremblay MS, Warburton DE, Janssen I, Paterson DH, Latimer
AE, Rhodes RE, et al. New Canadian physical activity guidelines. Appl
Physiol Nutr Metabol 2011;36(1):36-46; 47-58. doi: 10.1139/H11-009.
(23.) ParticipACTION Advisory Groups. Active Canada 20/20: A
Physical Activity Strategy and Change Agenda for Canada - Creating a
Culture of an Active Nation, May 2012 version. Available at:
http://www.activecanada2020.ca/ (Accessed September 11, 2015).
(24.) Coalition for Active Living. The Pan-Canadian Physical
Activity Strategy 2003. Available at:
http://www.activeliving.ca/english/index.cfm?fa=WhatWeDo.main (Accessed
September 11, 2015).
(25.) Latimer-Cheung AE, Murumets K, Faulkner G. ParticipACTION:
The national voice of physical activity and sport participation in
Canada. In: Pate R, Buchner D (Eds.), Implementing Physical Activity
Strategies. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2014; pp. 61-70.
(26.) Canadian Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat. Press
release Ministers take action to promote sport, physical activity and
recreation in year of sport, February 13, 2015. Available at:
http://www.scics.gc.ca/english/Conferences.asp?a=viewdocument&
id=2258 (Accessed February 27, 2015).
(27.) Bounajm F, Dinh T, Theriault T. Moving Ahead: The Economic
Impact of Reducing Physical Inactivity and Sedentary Behaviour. Ottawa:
The Conference Board of Canada, 2014.
(28.) Dinh T. Moving Ahead: Making the Case for Healthy Active
Living in Canada. Ottawa: The Conference Board of Canada, 2014.
(29.) A joint initiative of the Interprovincial Sport and
Recreation Council and the Canadian Parks and Recreation Association.
Pathways to Wellbeing. A Framework for Recreation in Canada - 2015.
September, 2014. Available at:
http://www.cpra.ca/main.php?action=cms.framework (Accessed February 9,
2015).
(30.) Ministere du patrimoine canadien | Department of Canadian
Heritage. Canadian Heritage--The Canadian Sport Policy. N.p., June 27,
2012. Available at: http://sirc.ca/sites/default/files/content/docs/pdf/csp2012_en.pdf (Accessed February 9, 2015).
Received: March 5, 2015
Accepted: September 20, 2015
John C. Spence, PhD, [1] Guy Faulkner, PhD, [2] Christa Costas
Bradstreet, MA, [3] Mary Duggan, CAE, [4] Mark S. Tremblay, PhD [5]
[1.] Sedentary Living Lab, Faculty of Physical Education &
Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
[2.] School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, BC
[3.] ParticipACTION, Toronto, ON
[4.] Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology, Ottawa, ON
[5.] Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research
Institute, Ottawa, ON
Correspondence: John C. Spence, PhD, Sedentary Living Lab, Faculty
of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, 3-113 Van
Vliet Complex, AB T6G 2H9, Tel: 780-492-1379, E-mail:
jc.spence@ualberta.ca
Acknowledgements: G. Faulkner holds a CIHR-PHAC Chair in Applied
Public Health. Stephen Grundy of LifeUnplugged, Inc. was a project
consultant on the development of Active Canada 20/20. Also,
ParticipACTION is recognized for important leadership throughout the
process, and the members of the ParticipACTION advisory groups are
acknowledged for significant input into the Plan. Finally, the insight
shared by those many Canadians who participated in consultations on the
Plan is much appreciated.
Conflict of Interest: None to declare.
Table 1. Active Canada 20/20 timeline
2010, February ParticipACTION's Policy and Capacity
Building Advisory Group identifies gaps
and decides to develop a sector-wide
national physical activity
framework/strategy.
2011, February Active Canada 20/20 Steering Committee
established.
2011, June Draft Active Canada 20/20 Strategy
presented to members of ParticipACTION's
advisory groups.
2011 Steering Committee fine-tunes Active
Canada 20/20 Strategy and develops
Consultation Strategy.
2011, July Domain name purchased and website
developed.
2011, July Stakeholders engaged in national online
survey (683 responses).
2011-2012 Stakeholders engaged in face-to-face
consultation sessions in 12 out of 13
provinces and territories (Sept
2011-Jan 2012).
2011, October National online survey: Aboriginal
stakeholders (approx. 450 responses).
2012, January Finalized Active Canada 20/20 Strategy
document.
2012, February Presented to
federal/provincial/territorial (F/P/T)
deputy ministers responsible for sport,
physical activity and recreation.
2012, January & February Presented Active Canada 20/20 Strategy
and consultation results: Canadian Sport
for Life (CS4L) Summit; 4th Chronic
Disease Prevention Alliance of Canada
(CDPAC) Conference.
2012, June Presented Active Canada 20/20 Strategy
document to F/P/T ministers responsible
for sport, physical activity and
recreation, Inuvik, Northwest
Territories.
2013, February Development of an evaluation framework
through the leadership of the
ParticipACTION Research Advisory
Committee.
2013, May A two-day National Gathering was held in
Fredericton, New Brunswick, to create
momentum in the country for
collaborative implementation of Active
Canada 20/20.
2013, May; ongoing Action groups established to coordinate
efforts in four priority areas
identified at the National Gathering:
Active Transportation; Inclusion/
Accessibility; Schools; Active Play.
2013, August F/P/T ministers responsible for sport,
physical activity and recreation called
for collaboration and alignment between
the Canadian Sport Policy, Active Canada
20/20 and the National Recreation
Agenda, Sherbrooke, Quebec.
2014, November Pathways to Wellbeing. Framework for
Recreation in Canada; National Summit.
2015, February F/P/T ministers responsible for sport,
physical activity and recreation called
for review of Active Canada 20/20 with a
"view to developing a pan-Canadian
framework to be brought to Ministers for
endorsement at a future meeting," (27)
Prince George, British Columbia.