Chronic perinatal pain as a risk factor for postpartum depression symptoms in Canadian women.
Gaudet, Caroline ; Wen, Shi Wu ; Walker, Mark C. 等
Postpartum depression (PPD) is a mood disorder that can occur after
childbirth. Using the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders, PPD is classified as a major depressive
disorder with a "peripartum" onset specifier if symptoms occur
during pregnancy or within 4 weeks postpartum. (1) However, research
demonstrates that PPD onset can be anywhere from pregnancy to late
postpartum. (2,3) PPD can be a challenge to detect as its symptoms are
similar to normal consequences of childbirth. (4) It is therefore
unfortunately often missed by clinicians, and many women may remain
undiagnosed. (5) Mothers who are diagnosed with PPD may not be treated
as adequately as others receiving treatment for depression. (5) Left
untreated, PPD can result in important and pervasive consequences.
Depressed mothers are less likely to return to their pre-pregnancy
levels of function, partners of depressed mothers may have difficulties
adjusting, and their children may have poorer health outcomes. (6-8)
There is a wide range of estimates of PPD due to the varying
methodologies and PPD definitions used in research. (2) The most widely
reported prevalence of PPD is 13%.9 However, a recent systematic review
reveals that the prevalence of depression (minor and major) at three
months after childbirth could be as high as 19.2%. (10) Data from the
Maternity Experience Survey reveal that the national prevalence of PPD
symptomatology (undiagnosed PPD) in Canada is approximately 8.7%, and
varies from province to province ranging from 5% in New Brunswick to
15.9% in the territories. (11)
The aetiology of PPD is complex. Many psychological, psychosocial,
socio-economic and obstetric risk factors have been reported to be
associated with this disorder. Meta-analyses revealed that the
psychological and psychosocial risk factors such as prenatal depression,
stress, anxiety, and low social support are among the strongest risk
factors for PPD. (9,12,13) It is surprising that these reviews do not
identify pain as a risk factor for PPD as the association between pain
and depression is well known and consistently observed across a variety
of diagnostics. (14) Evidence suggests that the association between pain
and depression could be of a causal nature. (14)
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
There are three main causal hypotheses to describe the nature of
the pain-depression association. In the "antecedent"
hypothesis, depression precedes and causes pain whereas in the
"consequence" hypothesis, pain precedes and causes depression.
(14) The third hypothesis is the "scar" hypothesis according
to which "episodes of depression occurring before the onset of pain
predispose to a depressive episode after pain onset". (14) Of all
three hypotheses, the "consequence" and "scar"
hypotheses are the most supported by evidence while the antecedent
hypothesis is mainly refuted. (14,15)
The association between chronic pain and depression is thought to
be universal. (14) However, it remains unknown whether chronic pain
caused by pregnancy and childbirth is associated with PPD symptoms. The
objective of this study was to examine whether pain caused by pregnancy
and childbirth is an independent risk factor for PPD symptoms in a
nationally representative sample of Canadian women.
METHODS
We received ethics approval from the Ottawa Hospital Research
Ethics Board to perform secondary data analyses of the Canadian
Maternity Experiences Survey (MES), a cross-sectional study conducted by
Statistics Canada on behalf of the Public Health Agency of Canada in
2006.16 The MES population included 6,421 respondents who represented a
total of 76,508 puerperal Canadian women. (16) Respondents were
"birth mothers 15 years and older who had a singleton live birth in
Canada, between February 15, 2006 and May 15, 2006 in the provinces or
between November 1, 2005 and February 1, 2006 in the territories and who
lived with their infants at the time of data collection". (16) The
survey was conducted at an average of 7.3 months postpartum (range: 5 to
14 months postpartum).17 Data were collected through computer-assisted
telephone interview (CATI) in the provinces and territories, and through
in-person interviews in the territories when it was not possible to do
the survey by phone. (16)
The outcome of interest was a positive screen for PPD symptoms,
defined as a score of 13 or higher on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression
Scale (EPDS).18 A score of 13 or higher on the EPDS is the recommended
cut-off to use for identifying probable major depression postnatally.
(18,19) The EPDS is a 10-item scale that has been validated for research
and for use in the community to screen for PPD.18 It has a sensitivity
of 86%, a specificity of 78%, and its positive predictive value is 73%.
(18)
There were three exposures of interest pertaining to problematic
perinatal pain: 1) the presence of problematic perinatal pain in the
first three months postpartum, 2) the duration of problematic perinatal
pain, and 3) the number of types of perinatal pain at the time of
interview.
Presence of problematic perinatal pain in the first three months
postpartum
The first exposure of interest was the presence of problematic
perinatal pain in the first three months postpartum. It was a binary
variable and was created with the respondent's answers to the MES
questions about the experience of five types of problematic pain within
the first three months postpartum (vagina, caesarean incision site,
breasts, back, and severe headaches). For each of these types of pain,
the respondents were asked: "during the first three months after
the birth of your baby, how much of a problem was pain (in this body
area)?" The choices of response were: 1) not a problem, 2) somewhat
of a problem, and 3) a great deal of a problem. Answering "somewhat
of a problem" or "a great deal of a problem" to any of
the pain-related questions would classify a respondent as being exposed.
(20)
Duration of problematic perinatal pain
The second exposure of interest was the duration of problematic
perinatal pain. It was a three-level exposure variable: no pain, acute
pain only, and chronic pain. Respondents who reported problematic
perinatal pain in the first three months postpartum but no problematic
perinatal pain at the time of interview were considered to have had
acute pain only. Respondents who still reported problematic pain at the
time of interview (range: 5-14 months postpartum) were classified as
having chronic perinatal pain.
Number of types of perinatal pain at the time of interview
The third exposure of interest was the number of types of perinatal
pain reported by the participants at the time of interview. The range
was from 0 to 5. However, to comply with Statistics Canada disclosure
control policy, categories with too few respondents were collapsed. This
variable has four categories: 1) none, 2) one, 3) two, and 4) three or
more.
Covariates
The covariates included in this study were selected from studies on
the risk factors of PPD and pain. In order to ensure meaningful
interpretation of the results, the variables were grouped according to
three main categories: 1) socio-demographics, 2) obstetric and health,
and 3) psychosocial and psychological factors. Please refer to Appendix
A for more information on the covariates.
We assessed each risk factor for confounding. First, we compared
prevalences of perinatal pain and PPD symptoms for respondents with the
risk factor and for those without the risk factor. We then obtained and
analyzed the crude odds ratio for the association between the risk
factor and perinatal pain, and the risk factor and PPD symptoms.
Confounding was suspected if the prevalence of pain and PPD symptoms
were higher when the risk factor was present, and if the crude odds
ratios were statistically significant for each association. Results from
the confounding analyses are available in Appendix B.
A few selected variables were suspected effect modifiers and were
analyzed for effect modification. These variables were: maternal
nativity status, birthing method, sex of the baby, use of non-medical
pain relief methods, use of medical pain relief, maternal body mass
index, maternal smoking, and social support. The authors can be
contacted for further information on the selection of these potential
effect modifiers.
Figure 1 presents the study analytical plan. Analyses included full
multivariate logistic regression models as well as six submodels that
were fitted for each of the three main pain exposures of interest. The
six submodels contained different combinations of the three groups of
covariates (socio-demographic, obstetric/ health, and
psychological/psychosocial) in order to assess the different impact of
these three groups of variables on the association between perinatal
pain and PPD symptoms. Unbiased weighted analyses were obtained using
Statistics Canada's BOOTVAR program (version 3.1) and the bootstrap
weights. (21) Multiple imputations by means of regression analysis were
done using the IVEware Imputation and Variance Estimation software
available online. (22) All logistic regression analyses were performed
on SAS 9.2. (23)
A complete subject approach to the analyses was implemented. Due to
incomplete information, 12.6% of the respondents were eliminated,
resulting in a final sample size of 5,614. To address potential bias,
sensitivity analyses were performed on a full multiply imputed dataset
as well as in a subsample of respondents who were never previously
depressed.
RESULTS
Descriptive statistics
Among the respondents included in the final analysis, 449/5614 (7%)
screened positive for PPD symptoms. The characteristics of the MES
respondents are described in Table 1.
Problematic perinatal pain in the first three months postpartum
Most of the respondents (4553/5614, 81.7%) reported problematic
perinatal pain within the first three months postpartum. Among women who
underwent caesarean section, incisional pain was the most common
(927/1480, 62.6%). Among women who had a vaginal delivery, perineal pain
was most commonly reported (2144/4134, 51.9%). Other common types of
pain in the study population included breast pain (2819/5614, 50.5%),
back pain (1915/5614, 35.5%), and severe headaches (556/5614, 10.4%).
Problematic perinatal pain at the time of interview
Twenty-seven percent (1468/5614) of the respondents reported
problematic perinatal pain at the time of interview. Once again,
caesarean incision pain was the most often reported problematic
perinatal pain for women who had had a caesarean section (298/1480,
20.1%). The second most common, back pain, was reported by 16.1%
(853/5614) of all respondents. Perineal pain was still present in 7.1%
(294/4134) of women who had had a vaginal delivery. Severe headaches
(174/5614, 3.3%) and breast pain (161/5614, 2.8%) were the least common
types of pain at the time of interview.
Multivariate logistic regressions
Table 2 presents the results from the multivariate logistic
regressions, as well as the sensitivity analyses.
Presence of problematic perinatal pain in the first three months
postpartum
When all study variables were held constant, odds of screening
positive for PPD symptoms for respondents who reported any problematic
perinatal pain in the first three months postpartum were 1.7 (95% CI
1.2-2.5) compared to respondents who did not report problematic
perinatal pain.
Duration of problematic perinatal pain
Compared to their counterparts who did not report any problematic
perinatal pain, odds of screening positive for PPD symptoms for women
who reported problematic perinatal pain in the first three months
postpartum were 1.3 (95% CI 0.9-1.9) while the odds for those who
reported problematic perinatal pain at the time of delivery were 2.4
(95% CI 1.6-3.6).
Number of types of perinatal pain at the time of interview
A dose-response association was observed between the number of
types of perinatal pain at the time of interview and PPD symptoms, with
increasing odds of screening positive for PPD symptoms with more types
of perinatal pain. Odds of screening positive for PPD symptoms in
respondents reporting one type of perinatal pain were 1.7 (95% CI
1.3-2.2) while the odds were 3.2 (95% CI 2.1-4.9) for respondents with
two types of perinatal pain and 4.2 (95% CI 0.7-0.25) for respondents
with three or more types of perinatal pain.
Only a few study variables remained independent predictors of PPD
symptoms when all variables were included in the regression models.
Along with the pain variables, the covariates that consistently remained
independent predictors of PPD symptoms were: 1) maternal nativity
status, 2) perceived stress, 3) number of past stressful life events, 4)
lack of social support, 5) a history of depression, and 6) a history of
abuse.
The results from the investigations into effect modifications are
presented in Table 3. No statistically significant effect modification
or biological interaction was found, although trends were observed. The
association between problematic perinatal pain and PPD symptoms was
stronger for respondents who were foreign-born, had had a caesarean
delivery, were obese, reported having adequate social support, were
non-smokers, and did not use any pain relief method.
The sensitivity analyses revealed that the final model estimates
were robust. The estimates from the multiply imputed dataset were
slightly higher than the estimates from the complete subject sample,
suggesting that our final estimates are conservative.
DISCUSSION
In our study, problematic perinatal pain was strongly associated
with PPD symptoms in a large representative sample of Canadian women.
These findings are consistent with other studies that examined the
association between various types of perinatal pain and PPD.
In a large study on 1,288 women who had vaginal and caesarean
deliveries, acute pain at 36 hours postpartum was associated with both
persistent pain and PPD at eight weeks after giving birth. (24)
Lumbopelvic pain at three months postpartum was associated with PPD
symptoms in a small cohort study, (25) and back pain at six months
postpartum was associated with PPD symptoms (OR 2.2) in n Australian
population-based study. (26) Finally, in a study on early breastfeeding
experiences, women who experienced severe breastfeeding pain at one day,
one week, and two weeks postpartum were more likely to be depressed at
two months postpartum. (27)
One study reports findings suggesting that pain is a confounding
factor in PPD screening. (28) PPD status at 8 weeks postpartum was not
associated with postpartum pain measured between the 3rd and 5th day
postpartum. (28) It is possible that pain measurements in the study were
taken too early to capture the suffering associated with pain that
becomes chronic, and this may explain why they did not find an
association between postpartum pain and PPD. As Gatchel (15) explains,
"one of the consequences of dealing with chronic pain is the
development of emotional reactions such as anxiety and dysphoria
produced by the long term "wearing down" effects and drain of
psychological resources".
The design of this study does not allow for any conclusion
regarding causality. However, this study does give important clues that
merit further examination. The fact that the association between pain
and PPD symptoms in the subsample of respondents who were never
previously depressed was stronger than in the full sample is one clue
that deserves further attention. According to the antecedent hypothesis,
excluding study subjects who were previously depressed should weaken the
pain-PPD symptoms association, not strengthen it. In reality, all three
causal hypotheses probably describe the association between pain and PPD
in a Canadian puerperal population to some degree. Fishbain et al. (14)
believe that "the scar hypothesis may apply more to patient with
major depression, and the consequence hypothesis to pain of the
neuropathic type (ex: caesarean section or operative vaginal
deliveries)". (14) Further prospective studies are needed to
confirm whether or not pain can be placed on a direct pathway to
postpartum depression and be considered as one of the causes of PPD.
There were no significant effect modifications or biological
interactions found in this study, possibly due to the lack of power
required to detect an effect modification or interaction. However,
interesting trends were observed. For example, the association between
perinatal pain and PPD symptoms appears to be stronger for women who
report adequate social support. The protective effect of social support
on PPD symptoms is well established. However, evidence suggests that
social support may not have the same protective effect on pain, as it
could act as a positive re-enforcer of pain behaviours. (29)
To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale study to directly
examine the association of perinatal pain with PPD symptoms in Canadian
women. The MES was conducted in a nationally representative sample of
Canadian women. The results can therefore be generalized to the
puerperal population in Canada. Rich social-demographic, clinical, and
psychological information collected by the MES allowed a thorough
adjustment of potential confounding factors. We have also been able to
perform sensitivity analyses. Results from the main analyses, stratified
analyses, and sensitivity analyses were consistent and suggest that our
study findings are robust.
Our study was probably somewhat affected by misclassification bias.
Both perinatal pain and PPD symptoms were subjective measures, and the
tool used to classify respondents according to PPD symptom severity, the
EPDS, is a screening tool, not a diagnostic tool. Also, it was not
possible to find out for each respondent when exactly pain subsided.
However, the misclassifications were likely non-differential. This would
have biased the results towards the null.
There is also a non-negligible risk that recall bias was introduced
in the study as some respondents might have been depressed at the time
of interview and their memory and assessment of pain and other symptoms
from the previous months might have been distorted. It is highly likely
that their recall of pain and other symptoms could differ significantly
from the recall of healthy respondents. Differential recall of pain and
other symptoms in the postpartum period in turn could have led to
reverse causality bias and could offer an alternative interpretation of
the association between pain and PPD symptoms in this study. As a
result, caution should be applied in the interpretation of these study
findings.
Appendix A. Variable Definition
Category Variable Name Definition Type
SES and Maternal Age of Categorical
demographic age mother
at time of
interview
Maternal Mother's Categorical
education educational
level
Maternal Mothers Categorical
marital marital
status status
Household Household Categorical
annual income for the
income past 12 months
Maternal Region of Categorical
region of residence of
residence respondents at
time of 2006
census
Dwelling Size of area Categorical
area of residence
from the
2006 census
Maternal Whether mother Binary
nativity is
status foreign-born
or not
Maternal First Nations, Binary
Aboriginal Metis or Inuit
status
Type of The final Binary
birth method of
Operative Use of forceps Binary
delivery--forceps to aid in
Obstetric delivery
and health
Operative Use of vacuum Binary
delivery--vacuum to aid in
delivery
Operative A cut to Binary
delivery--episiotomy enlarge vagina
for delivery
Maternal stitches Stitches to Binary
repair a tear
or a cut
Maternal parity Number of live Binary
births
Postpartum contact Whether Categorical
by public respondents
health nurse were contacted
or not by a
public health
nurse
Sex of baby Sex of baby Binary
Maternal prenatal Attended Binary
education prenatal
education
Non-medical pain Use of Binary
relief non-medical
pain relief
such as
birthing ball
massage,
positioning,
etc.
Medical pain relief Use of medical Binary
pain relief
such as
epidural,
Demerol, or
nitrous oxide
Postpartum period of Age of baby at Binary
interview time of
interview
Infant Neonatal Admission of Categorical
Intensive Care the baby to
Unit (NICU) NICU
admission
Maternal previous Previous Binary
no-live births pregnancies
not ending in
live births
Maternal smoking Maternal Binary
smoking
Previous Health Binary
pre-pregnancy health problems
problem before
pregnancy
Maternal new health New health Binary
problem problem in
pregnancy
Maternal body mass Pre-pregnancy
index body mass
index
Reaction to First reaction Categorical
pregnancy to becoming
pregnant
Perceived stress Self-perceived Binary
Psychosocial and stress during
psychological pregnancy
Stressful events Number of Binary
stressful
events in the
12 months
before birth
of baby
Social support Perceived Categorical
social support
History of Previous Binary
depression diagnosis of
depression or
having
been
prescribed
antidepressants
Alcohol use Use of alcohol Binary
during
pregnancy
Drug use Use of street Binary
drugs in
pregnancy
History of abuse Experience of Binary
any type of
violent abuse
in the past 2
years
Appendix B. Tables 1-3
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics and Results From the Confounding
Analyses for the SES and Demographic Variables
Outcome: Presence of Problematic Pain
SES and Total Pain Pain 95% CI PPD
Demographics
Variables Sample Prevalence Crude Prevalence
Size ([dagger]) OR
Maternal age
(years)
15-19 * 155 87.4% 1.6 1.0-2.7 14.5%
20-24 680 85.7% 1.4 1.1-1.8 8.4%
25-29 (ref) 1693 80.9% 6.0%
30-34 1962 81.4% 1.0 0.9-1.2 6.4%
35-39 921 81.5% 1.0 0.8-1.3 7.9%
>40 * 203 76.7% 0.8 0.6-1.1 8.7%
Maternal
education
No high school 452 81.9% 1.0 0.8-1.3 13.0%
High school 786 81.5% 1.0 0.8-1.2 8.9%
graduation
Post-secondary 2423 81.6% 1.0 0.8-1.2 6.6%
Bachelors (ref) 1953 81.8% 5.6%
Maternal marital
status
Married/common 5085 81.5% 6.5%
law (ref)
Divorced/ 102 77.9% 0.8 0.5-1.3 16.3%
widowed *
Single 427 85.5% 1.3 1.0-1.8 11.1%
Household annual
income
< $20,000 503 82.2% 1.0 0.8-1.4 14.1%
$20,000-$39,999 998 83.1% 1.1 0.9-1.4 9.7%
$40,000-$59,999 1088 82.1% 1.0 0.8-1.3 6.3%
$60,000-$79,999 1016 81.7% 1.0 0.8-1.3 5.4%
$80,000- 716 79.2% 0.8 0.7-1.1 5.0%
$99,999 *
> $100,000 (ref) 1034 81.8% 4.7%
Unknown * 259 80.1% 0.9 0.6-1.3 9.7%
Maternal region
of residence
Atlantic 1016 80.3% 0.8 0.7-1.0 6.0%
Quebec 1035 82.8% 1.0 0.8-1.2 7.5%
Ontario (ref) 1667 82.9% 7.5%
Prairies 1175 79.7% 0.8 0.7-1.0 6.1%
British Columbia 552 79.3% 0.8 0.6-1.0 6.2%
Territories 169 77.4% 0.7 0.5-0.9 9.9%
Rural dwelling 1255 80.0% 0.9 0.7-1.0 5.8%
Urban dwelling 4359 82.0% 7.2%
(ref)
Maternal
nativity status
Yes 975 84.2% 1.3 1.0-1.5 11.2%
No (ref) 4639 81.0% 5.8%
Maternal
Aboriginal
status
Yes * 329 80.0% 0.9 0.7-1.2 10.5%
No (ref) 5285 81.7% 6.8%
Appendix B.
Table 2. Descriptive Statistics and Results From the Confounding
Analyses for the Obstetric and Health Variables
Outcome: Presence of Problematic Pain
Obstetric and Health Total Pain Pain 95% PPD
Variables Sample Prevalence Crude CI Prevalence
Size ([dagger]) OR
Type of birth
Vaginal birth (ref) 4134 81.2% 7.2%
Caesarean birth 1480 83.0% 1.1 1.0- 6.3%
1.3
Operative
delivery--Forceps
Yes 291 87.0% 1.5 1.1- 8.4%
2.2
No (ref) 5323 81.4% 6.9%
Operative
delivery--Vacuum
Yes 490 87.5% 1.6 1.2- 5.4%
2.2
No (ref) 5124 81.1% 7.1%
Operative
delivery--Episiotomy
Yes 900 87.2% 1.6 1.3- 8.3%
2.0
No (ref) 4714 80.5% 6.7%
Maternal stitches
Yes 2973 84.4% 1.5 1.3- 7.1%
1.7
No (ref) 2641 78.5% 6.9%
Maternal parity
One (ref) 2550 86.2% 6.0%
Two 2067 79.5% 0.6 0.5- 6.9%
0.7
Three 693 76.8% 0.5 0.4- 9.2%
0.7
Four + 304 70.0% 0.4 0.3- 10.7%
0.5
Postpartum contact
by public health
nurse
Yes (ref) 5247 81.7% 6.7%
No 367 81.0% 1.0 0.7- 10.2%
1.3
Sex of baby
Male (ref) 2885 81.6% 7.0%
Female 2729 81.7% 1.0 0.9- 7.0%
1.2
Maternal prenatal
education
Yes (ref) 1903 85.5% 5.6%
No 3711 79.8% 0.7 0.6- 7.7%
0.8
Maternal use of
non-medical pain
relief
Yes (ref) 4324 81.4% 6.7%
No 1290 82.7% 1.1 0.9- 7.8%
1.3
Maternal use of
medical pain relief
Yes (ref) 4531 83.5% 7.2%
No 1083 74.4% 0.6 0.5- 6.3%
0.7
Postpartum period of
survey
Early postpartum 1592 81.1% 0.9 0.7- 6.3%
1.1
Mid postpartum 2750 81.7% 1.0 0.8- 7.2%
1.2
Late postpartum (ref) 1272 82.4% 7.5%
Infant neonatal
intensive care unit
admission
Yes 720 82.3% 1.1 0.8- 8.2%
1.3
No (ref) 4894 81.6% 46.5%
Maternal previous
no-live birth
Yes 1785 80.8% 0.9 0.8- 8.3%
1.1
No (ref) 3829 82.1% 6.4%
Maternal smoking
Yes 1032 82.1% 1.0 0.8- 9.9%
1.3
No (ref) 4582 81.6% 6.4%
Maternal
pre-pregnancy health
problems
Yes 893 81.7% 1.0 0.8- 10.2%
1.2
No (ref) 4721 81.7% 6.4%
Outcome: Presence of Problematic Pain
Obstetric and Health Total Pain Pain 95% PPD
Variables Sample Prevalence! Crude CI Prevalence
Size OR
Maternal new health
problems
Yes 1389 84.4% 1.3 1.1- 9.3%
1.5
No (ref) 4225 80.8% 6.3%
Maternal body mass
index
Underweight 274 82.1% 1.0 0.7- 7.5%
1.3
Normal (ref) 3205 82.4% 6.6%
Overweight 1287 80.0% 0.9 0.7- 6.8%
1.0
Obese 848 81.0% 0.9 0.7- 8.6%
1.1
Outcome: Postpartum Depression
Obstetric and Health PPD 95% Adjusted 95% Adjusted
Variables Crude CI OR: CI OR:
OR Model 1. Model 2
([double ([section])
dagger])
Type of birth
Vaginal birth (ref)
Caesarean birth 0.9 0.7- 0.8 0.5- 0.8
1.1 1.3
Operative
delivery--Forceps
Yes 1.2 0.8- 1.1 0.6- 1.1
2.0 2.0
No (ref)
Operative
delivery--Vacuum
Yes 0.7 0.5- 0.7 0.4- 0.7
1.2 1.1
No (ref)
Operative
delivery--Episiotomy
Yes 1.3 0.9- 1.1 0.8- 1.2
1.7 1.7
No (ref)
Maternal stitches
Yes 1.0 0.8- 1.1 0.8- 1.1
1.3 1.6
No (ref)
Maternal parity
One (ref)
Two 1.2 0.9- 1.2 0.8- 1.2
1.5 1.7
Three 1.6 1.2- 1.3 0.8- 1.3
2.2 2.1
Four + 1.9 1.2- 1.2 0.7- 1.2
2.9 2.3
Postpartum contact
by public health
nurse
Yes (ref)
No 1.6 1.1- 1.5 1.0- 1.5
2.3 2.3
Sex of baby
Male (ref)
Female 1.0 0.8- 1.0 0.8, 1.0
1.2 1.3
Maternal prenatal
education
Yes (ref)
No 1.4 1.1- 1.1 0.8- 1.1
1.7 1.5
Maternal use of
non-medical pain
relief
Yes (ref)
No 1.2 0.9- 1.2 0.9- 1.2
1.5 1.8
Maternal use of
medical pain relief
Yes (ref)
No 0.9 0.7- 0.8 0.6- 0.8
1.2 1.1
Postpartum period of
survey
Early postpartum 0.8 0.7- 0.9 0.6- 0.9
1.1 1.2
Mid postpartum 1.1 0.9- 1.0 0.7- 1.0
1.3 1.4
Late postpartum (ref)
Infant neonatal
intensive care unit
admission
Yes 1.2 0.9- 1.1 0.7- 1.0
1.7 1.5
No (ref)
Maternal previous
no-live birth
Yes 1.3 1.1- 1.0 0.8- 1.0
1.6 1.3
No (ref)
Maternal smoking
Yes 1.6 1.2- 1.0 0.7- 1.0
2.1 1.5
No (ref)
Maternal
pre-pregnancy health
problems
Yes 1.7 1.3- 1.4 1.0- 1.3
2.1 1.9
No (ref)
Outcome: Postpartum Depression
Obstetric and Health PPD 95% CI Adjusted 95% Adjusted
Variables Crude OR: CI OR:
OR Model 1 Model 2
([double ([section])
dagger])
Maternal new health
problems
Yes 1.5 1.2- 1.3 1.0- 1.3
1.9 1.7
No (ref)
Maternal body mass
index
Underweight 1.1 0.7- 0.8 0.5- 0.8
1.9 1.4
Normal (ref)
Overweight 1.0 0.8- 1.0 0.7- 1.0
1.3 1.3
Obese 1.3 1.0- 1.0 0.7- 1.0
1.8 1.4
Obstetric and Health 95% Adjusted 95%
Variables CI OR: CI
Model 3
([parallel])
Type of birth
Vaginal birth (ref)
Caesarean birth 0.5- 0.8 0.5-
1.3 1.2
Operative
delivery--Forceps
Yes 0.6- 1.1 0.6-
1.9 1.9
No (ref)
Operative
delivery--Vacuum
Yes 0.4- 0.6 0.4-
1.1 1.1
No (ref)
Operative
delivery--Episiotomy
Yes 0.8- 1.1 0.8-
1.7 1.6
No (ref)
Maternal stitches
Yes 0.8- 1.2 0.8-
1.6 1.6
No (ref)
Maternal parity
One (ref)
Two 0.8- 1.1 0.8-
1.7 1.6
Three 0.8- 1.3 0.8-
2.1 2.0
Four + 0.7- 1.2 0.7-
2.3 2.3
Postpartum contact
by public health
nurse
Yes (ref)
No 0.9- 1.4 0.9-
2.3 2.3
Sex of baby
Male (ref)
Female 0.8- 1.0 0.8-
1.3 1.3
Maternal prenatal
education
Yes (ref)
No 0.8- 1.1 0.8-
1.5 1.6
Maternal use of
non-medical pain
relief
Yes (ref)
No 0.9- 1.2 0.9-
1.8 1.8
Maternal use of
medical pain relief
Yes (ref)
No 0.6- 0.8 0.6-
1.2 1.2
Postpartum period of
survey
Early postpartum 0.6- 0.9 0.6-
1.2 1.2
Mid postpartum 0.8- 1.0 0.8-
1.4 1.4
Late postpartum (ref)
Infant neonatal
intensive care unit
admission
Yes 0.7- 1.0 0.7-
1.5 1.5
No (ref)
Maternal previous
no-live birth
Yes 0.8- 1.1 0.8-
1.4 1.4
No (ref)
Maternal smoking
Yes 0.7- 1.0 0.7-
1.5 1.5
No (ref)
Maternal
pre-pregnancy health
problems
Yes 1.0- 1.3 1.0-
1.8 1.8
No (ref)
Obstetric and Health 95% Adjusted 95%
Variables CI OR: CI
Model 3
([parallel])
Maternal new health
problems
Yes 1.0- 1.3 1.0-
1.7 1.7
No (ref)
Maternal body mass
index
Underweight 0.5- 0.8 0.5-
1.4 1.4
Normal (ref)
Overweight 0.7- 1.0 0.7-
1.3 1.3
Obese 0.7- 1.0 0.7-
1.4 1.4
* Interpret with caution, 16.6 < CV [less than or equal to] 33.3:
high sampling variability.
([dagger]) All prevalences and odds ratios as well as 95% CI
were obtained using bootstrap weights.
([double dagger]) Model 1: Multivariate logistic regression predicting
PPD with presence of postpartum pain as main exposure.
([section]) Model 2: Multivariate logistic regression predicting PPD
with the duration of pain as main exposure.
([parallel]) Model 3: Multivariate logistic regression predicting PPD
with the number of chronic pains as main exposure.
Appendix B.
Table 3. Descriptive Statistics and Results From the Confounding
Analyses for the Psychosocial and Psychological Variables
Outcome: Presence of Problematic Pain
Psychosocial and Total Pain Pain 95% PPD
Psychological Sample Prevalence Crude CI Prevalence
Variables Size ([dagger]) OR
Reaction to
pregnancy
Negative 408 82.1% 1.03 0.8- 13.7%
1.4
Positive (ref) 5206 81.6% 6.5%
Perceived stress
High 3203 84.9% 1.6 1.4- 10.0%
1.9
Low (ref) 2411 77.4% 3.1%
Stressful events
None (ref) 2170 79.9% 3.3%
One event 1546 82.3% 1.2 1.0- 6.3%
1.4
Two events 912 80.7% 1.1 0.9- 7.9%
1.3
Three events 497 84.6% 1.4 1.1- 13.8%
1.8
Four events or more 489 87.1% 1.7 1.2- 19.0%
2.3
Social support
Adequate (ref) 4990 81.5% 5.8%
Inadequate 624 83.1% 1.1 0.9- 16.1%
1.4
History of
depression
Yes 895 84.3% 1.3 1.0- 13.4%
1.5
No (ref) 4719 81.2% 5.8%
Alcohol use
(pregnancy)
Yes 534 83.9% 1.2 0.9- 8.0%
1.5
No (ref) 5080 81.4% 6.9%
Drug use (pregnancy)
*
Yes 51 93.8% 3.4 1.0- 25.0%
11.6
No (ref) 5563 81.6% 6.8%
History of abuse
Yes 674 87.2% 1.6 1.2- 15.3%
2.0
No (ref) 4940 81.0% 6.0%
Outcome: Postpartum Depression
Psychosocial and PPD 95% Adjusted 95% Adjusted
Psychological Crude CI OR: CI OR:
Variables OR Model 1 Model 2
([double ([section])
dagger])
Reaction to
pregnancy
Negative 2.3 1.7- 1.3 0.9- 1.2
3.1 1.9
Positive (ref)
Perceived stress
High 3.5 2.6- 2.5 1.8- 2.5
4.6 3.4
Low (ref)
Stressful events
None (ref)
One event 2.0 1.4- 1.5 1.1- 1.5
2.8 2.2
Two events 2.5 1.7- 1.9 1.3- 1.8
3.7 2.8
Three events 4.7 3.2- 2.7 1.8- 2.7
7.0 4.3
Four events or more 6.9 4.8- 3.3 2.1- 3.1
9.8 5.2
Social support
Adequate (ref)
Inadequate 3.1 2.4- 1.9 1.4- 1.8
4.0 2.5
History of
depression
Yes 2.5 1.9- 2.0 1.5- 2.0
3.2 2.7
No (ref)
Alcohol use
(pregnancy)
Yes 1.2 0.8- 1.2 0.8- 1.2
1.7 1.8
No (ref)
Drug use (pregnancy)
*
Yes 4.5 2.1- 2.1 0.8- 2.1
9.7 5.5
No (ref)
History of abuse
Yes 2.8 2.2- 1.6 1.2- 1.6
3.6 2.3
No (ref)
Psychosocial and 95% Adjusted 95%
Psychological CI OR: CI
Variables Model 3
([parallel])
Reaction to
pregnancy
Negative 0.8- 1.2 0.8-
1.8 1.9
Positive (ref)
Perceived stress
High 1.8- 2.4 1.8-
3.4 3.3
Low (ref)
Stressful events
None (ref)
One event 1.0- 1.5 1.0-
2.1 2.1
Two events 1.2- 1.9 1.2-
2.7 2.8
Three events 1.7- 2.7 1.7-
4.1 4.2
Four events or more 1.4- 3.1 2.0-
4.9 5.0
Social support
Adequate (ref)
Inadequate 1.3- 1.7 1.2-
2.4 2.3
History of
depression
Yes 1.5- 1.9 1.5-
2.6 2.6
No (ref)
Alcohol use
(pregnancy)
Yes 0.8- 1.2 0.8-
1.8 1.8
No (ref)
Drug use (pregnancy)
*
Yes 0.8- 2.2 0.8-
5.4 5.6
No (ref)
History of abuse
Yes 1.1- 1.6 1.1-
2.2 2.2
No (ref)
* Interpret with caution, 16.6 < CV [less than or equal to]
33.3: high sampling variability.
([dagger]) All prevalences and odds ratios as well as 95% CI
were obtained using bootstrap weights.
([double dagger]) Model 1: Multivariate logistic regression
predicting PPD with presence of postpartum pain as main exposure.
([section]) Model 2: Multivariate logistic regression predicting PPD
with the duration of pain as main exposure.
([parallel]) Model 3: Multivariate logistic regression predicting
PPD with the number of chronic pains as main exposure.
CONCLUSION
In summary, our analysis based on a large national representative
sample of postpartum women revealed that problematic perinatal pain was
a major risk factor for PPD symptoms. Although postpartum experience of
pain is very common, excessive pain should not be dismissed as a normal
consequence of childbirth. Women who report considerable amounts of pain
postpartum should be systematically screened for PPD symptoms and should
be offered the opportunity of pain control measures such as counselling
and pain-relieving therapies.
Correspondence: Caroline Gaudet, Centre local de services
communautaires Metro (CLSC Metro), 1801 boul. de Maisonneuve Ouest,
Montreal, QC H3H 1J9, Tel: 514934-0354, ext. 7256, E-mail:
caroline.gaudet1@gmail.com or caroline.gaudet@mcgill.ca
Acknowledgements: At the time of the study, Caroline Gaudet was an
MSc (Epidemiology) candidate and a recipient of a Frederick Banting and
Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarships--Master's Award from the
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). The authors thank the
staff at the Carleton, Ottawa, Outaouais Local Research Data Centre
(COOL-RDC) for their help in accessing the survey data.
Disclaimers: The present research and analyses are based on data
from Statistics Canada and the opinions expressed do not represent the
views of Statistics Canada.
Conflict of Interest: None to declare.
REFERENCES
(1.) American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth ed. Arlington, VA: American
Psychiatric Publishing, 2013.
(2.) O'Hara MW, McCabe JE. Postpartum depression: Current
status and future directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2013;9:379-407.
(3.) Stowe ZN, Hostetter AL, Newport DJ. The onset of postpartum
depression: Implications for clinical screening in obstetrical and
primary care. AJOG 2005;192(2):522-26.
(4.) Epperson NC. Postpartum major depression: Detection and
treatment. Am Fam Physician 1999;59(8):2247-54,2259-60.
(5.) Nonacs R, Cohen LS. Postpartum mood disorders: Diagnosis and
treatment guidelines. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59(Suppl 2):34-43.
(6.) Posmontier B. Functional status outcomes in mothers with and
without postpartum depression. J Midwifery Womens Health
2008;53(4):310-18.
(7.) Larsen KE, O'Hara MW. The Effects of Postpartum
Depression on Close Relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, 2002.
(8.) Grace SL, Evindar A, Stewart DE. The effects of postpartum
depression on child cognitive development and behavior: A review and
critical analysis of the literature. Arch Womens MentHealth
2003;6(4):263-74.
(9.) O'Hara MW, Swain AM. Rates and risk of postpartum
depression-A meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatr 1996;8:37-54.
(10.) Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, Meltzer-Brody S, Gartlehner G,
Swinson T. Perinatal depression: A systematic review of prevalence and
incidence. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106(5 Pt 1):1071-83.
(11.) Lanes A, Kuk JL, Tamim H. Prevalence and characteristics of
postpartum depression symptomatology among Canadian women: A
cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2011;11:302.
(12.) Beck CT. Predictors of postpartum depression: An update. Nurs
Res 2001;50(5):275-85.
(13.) Robertson E, Grace S, Wallington T, Stewart DE. Antenatal
risk factors for postpartum depression: A synthesis of recent
literature. Gen Hosp Psychiat 2004;26(4):289-95.
(14.) Fishbain DA, Cutler R, Rosomoff HL, Rosomoff RL. Chronic
pain-associated depression: Antecedent or consequence of chronic pain? A
review. Clin J Pain 1997;13(2):113-37.
(15.) Gatchel RG, Dersh J. Psychological approaches and chronic
pain: Are there cause-and-effect relationships? In: Turk DC, Gatchel RJ
(Eds.), Psychological Approaches to Pain Management: A
Practitioner's Handbook, 2nd Edition. New York, NY: Guilford Press,
2002.
(16.) Public Health Agency of Canada. What Mothers Say: The
Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. Ottawa, ON: PHAC, 2009.
(17.) Chalmers B, Dzakpasu S, Heaman M, Kaczorowski J. The Canadian
maternity experiences survey: An overview of findings. J Obstet Gynaecol
Can 2008;30(3):217-28.
(18.) Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal
depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression
Scale. Br J Psychiatry 1987;150:782-86.
(19.) Matthey S, Henshaw C, Elliott S, Barnett B. Variability in
use of cut-off scores and formats on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression
Scale--Implications for clinical and research practice. Arch Womens Ment
Health 2006;9:309-15.
(20.) Public Health Agency of Canada. Maternity Experiences
Survey--Code book. Ottawa: PHAC, 2009.
(21.) Statistics Canada. Bootvar: User guide. (Bootvar 3.1--SAS
version) Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 2005.
(22.) Raghunathan TE, Solenberger PW, Van Hoewyk J. IVEware:
Imputation and variance estimation software: User guide. March 2002.
Available at: ftp://ftp.isr.umich.edu/pub/src/smp/ive/ive_user.pdf
(Accessed September 24, 2009).
(23.) SAS Institute Inc. SAS[R] 9.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.,
2009.
(24.) Eisenach JC, Pan PH, Smiley R, Lavand'homme P, Landau R,
Houle TT. Severity of acute pain after childbirth, but not type of
delivery, predicts persistent pain and postpartum depression. Pain
2008;140(1):87-94.
(25.) Gutke A, Josefsson A, Oberg B. Pelvic girdle pain and lumbar
pain in relation to postpartum depressive symptoms. Spine
2007;32(13):1430-36.
(26.) Brown S, Lumley J. Physical health problems after childbirth
and maternal depression at six to seven months postpartum. BJOG
2000;107(10):1194-201.
(27.) Watkins S, Meltzer-Brody S, Zolnoun D, Stuebe A. Early
breastfeeding experiences and postpartum depression. Obstet Gynecol
2011;118(2 Pt 1):214-21.
(28.) Jardri R, Maron M, Delion P, Thomas P. Pain as a confounding
factor in postnatal depression screening. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol
2010;31(4):252-55.
(29.) Gil KM, Keefe FJ, Crisson JE, Van Dalfsen PJ. Social support
and pain behavior. Pain 1987;29(2):209-17.
Received: April 29, 2013
Accepted: September 17, 2013
Caroline Gaudet, MSc, OT, [1,2] Shi Wu Wen, MB, PhD, [3,5] Mark C.
Walker, MSc, MD, FRCSC [3-5]
Author Affiliations
[1.] School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill
University, Montreal, QC
[2.] Centre de sante et de services sociaux de la Montagne,
Montreal, QC
[3.] OMNI research group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute,
Ottawa, ON
[4.] Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Faculty of
Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
[5.] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine,
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
Table 1. Maternity Experiences Survey Respondent Characteristics
(n = 5,614)
Main Exposure n % Obstetric and Health
Variables Variables
1) Presence of Caesarean birth
problematic
perinatal pain in 4553 81.7% Operative
the first three delivery--Forceps
months postpartum
Operative
delivery--Vacuum
2) Duration of Operative
problematic delivery--Vacuum
perinatal pain
None * 1061 18.3% Operative
(reference) delivery--Episiotomy
Acute pain only 3085 54.6% Maternal stithces
Chronic pain 1468 27.1% Maternal parity
3) Number of types One (reference)
of perinatal pains
at the time of Two
interview
None (reference) 4146 72.9% Three
One 1193 21.8% Four +
Two 241 4.6% No postpartum contact
by public health
nurse
Three or more 34 0.6%* Female baby
Socio-demographic n % No maternal prenatal
variables education
Maternal age No maternal use of
(years) non-medical pain
relief
15-19 * 155 1.8% No maternal use of
medical pain relief
20-24 680 11.2% Postpartum period of
interview
25-29 (reference) 1693 31.0% Early postpartum
30-34 1962 35.3% Mid postpartum
35-39 921 16.8% Late postpartum
(reference)
> 40 * 203 3.8% Infant neonatal
intensive care unit
admission
Maternal education Maternal previous
no-live birth
No high school 452 7.2% Maternal smoking
High school 786 13.3% Maternal pre-pregnancy
graduation health problems
Post-secondary 2423 43.4% Maternal new health
problems
Bachelors 1953 36.2% Maternal body mass
(reference) index
Maternal marital Underweight
status
Married/common law 5085 92.2% Normal (reference)
(reference)
Divorced/widowed * 102 1.8% Overweight
Single 427 6.0% Obese
Household annual
income
< $20,000 503 8.0% Psychosocial and
Psychological
Variables
$20,000-$39,999 998 16.6% Negative reaction to
pregnancy
$40,000-$59,999 1088 19.2% High perceived stress
$60,000-$79,999 1016 18.4% Stressful events
$80,000-$99,999 * 716 13.4% None (reference)
> $100,000 1034 19.8% One event
(reference)
Unknown * 259 4.7% Two events
Maternal region of Three events
residence
Atlantic 1016 6.2% Four events or more
Quebec 1035 22.6% Inadequate social
support
Ontario (reference) 1667 40.0% History of depression
Prairies 1175 19.1% Alcohol use
(pregnancy)
British Columbia 552 11.7% Drug use (pregnancy) *
Territories 169 0.4% History of abuse
Rural dwelling 1255 18.2%
Maternal nativity 975 22.2%
status
(foreign-born)
Maternal Aboriginal 329 4.1%
status
Main Exposure Total Proportion
Variables Sample
Size
1) Presence of 1480 26.4%
problematic
perinatal pain in 291 5.3%
the first three
months postpartum
2) Duration of 490 9.0%
problematic
perinatal pain
None * 900 17.0%
(reference)
Acute pain only 2973 53.6%
Chronic pain
3) Number of types 2550 45.3%
of perinatal pains
at the time of 2067 37.1%
interview
None (reference) 693 12.3%
One 304 5.2%
Two 367 6.9%
Three or more 2729 48.7%
Socio-demographic 3711 67.3%
variables
Maternal age 1290 23.3%
(years)
15-19 * 1083 19.9%
20-24
25-29 (reference) 1592 28.9%
30-34 2750 50.5%
35-39 1272 20.7%
> 40 * 720 12.8%
Maternal education 1785 32.3%
No high school 1032 16.1%
High school 893 15.2%
graduation
Post-secondary 1389 24.4%
Bachelors
(reference)
Maternal marital 274 5.3%
status
Married/common law 3205 58.9%
(reference)
Divorced/widowed * 1287 21.9%
Single 848 13.9%
Household annual
income
< $20,000 n %
$20,000-$39,999 408 6.6%
$40,000-$59,999 3203 56.9%
$60,000-$79,999
$80,000-$99,999 * 2170 39.6%
> $100,000 1546 28.4%
(reference)
Unknown * 912 15.7%
Maternal region of 497 8.6%
residence
Atlantic 489 7.7%
Quebec 624 12.0%
Ontario (reference) 895 15.4%
Prairies 534 10.7%
British Columbia 51 0.9%
Territories 674 10.8%
Rural dwelling
Maternal nativity
status
(foreign-born)
Maternal Aboriginal
status
* Interpret with caution, 16.6 < CV < 33.3: high sampling variability.
Table 2. Descriptive Statistics As Well As Crude and Adjusted Odds
Ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals for the Associations Between
the Main Pain Exposures of Interest and Postpartum Depression Symptoms
in Canadian Women (n = 5,614)
Exposure n PPD Crude Adjusted Adjusted
Symptoms OR OR: OR:
Prevalence SES Obstetric
([dagger]) /demographic /health
Presence
of
problematic
perinatal
pain
No (ref) 1061 3.7%
Yes 4553 7.7% 2.2 2.1 2.2
(1.5- (1.5-3.1) (1.6-3.2)
3.1)
Duration of
problematic
perinatal
pain
None (ref) * 1061 3.7%
Acute only 3085 5.3% 1.5 1.7 1.5
(1.0-2.2) (1.0-2.2)
Chronic 1468 12.7% 3.8 3.4 3.8
(2.6- (2.3-5.1) (2.6-5.7)
5.6)
Number of
types of
perinatal
pains at the
time of
interview
None 4146 4.9%
One 1193 10.0% 2.2 1.55-2.58 2.1
(1.7- (1.6-2.7)
2.8)
Two 241 22.6% 5.7 4.7 5.7
(4.0- (3.3-6.8) (3.9-8.2)
8.1)
Three + 34 33.5% 9.8 7.1 8.7
(4.6- (3.1-16.0) (3.6-
21.1) 21.0)
Exposure n Adjusted Adjusted Adjusted
OR: OR: OR:
Psychological SES/dem., SES/dem.,
/psychosocial obstetric psychological
/health /psychosocial
Presence
of
problematic
perinatal
pain
No (ref) 1061
Yes 4553 1.8 (1.3-2.7) 2.1 1.7 (1.2-2.5)
(1.4-
3.1)
Duration of
problematic
perinatal
pain
None (ref) * 1061
Acute only 3085 1.3 (0.9-1.9) 1.5 1.3 (0.9-1.9)
(1.0-
2.2)
Chronic 1468 2.5 (1.6-3.7) 2.4 2.5 (1.6-3.7)
(2.3-
5.0)
Number of
types of
perinatal
pains at the
time of
interview
None 4146
One 1193 1.7 (1.3-2.3) 1.9 1.7 (1.3-2.2)
(1.5-
2.5)
Two 241 3.7 (2.5-5.5) 4.7 3.1 (2.1-4.7)
(3.2-
6.9)
Three + 34 5.9 (1.9-17.9) 6.5 4.4
(2.5- (0.9-21.0)
16.7)
Exposure n Adjusted Final Model: Final Model:
OR: OR Adjusted Multiply
Obst./health, for All Imputed
psychological Variables Dataset
/psychosocial
Presence
of
problematic
perinatal
pain
No (ref) 1061
Yes 4553 1.8 (1.3-2.6) 1.7 1.8
(1.2-2.5) (1.4-2.1)
Duration of
problematic
perinatal
pain
None (ref) * 1061
Acute only 3085 1.3 (0.9-2.0) 1.3 1.4
(0.9-1.9) (0.6-2.2)
Chronic 1468 2.7 (1.8-4.0) 2.4 2.4
(1.6-3.6) (1.6-3.2)
Number of
types of
perinatal
pains at the
time of
interview
None 4146
One 1193 1.7 (1.3-2.3) 1.7 1.6
(1.3-2.2) (1.4-1.9)
Two 241 3.8 (2.6-5.7) 3.2 2.6
(2.1-4.9) (2.2- 3.0)
Three + 34 5.5 4.2 4.1
(1.4-22.7) (0.7-25.0) (3.0-5.1)
Exposure n Final Model:
Never
Previously
Depressed
Subsample
Presence
of
problematic
perinatal
pain
No (ref) 1061
Yes 4553 2
(1.2-3.2)
Duration of
problematic
perinatal
pain
None (ref) * 1061
Acute only 3085 1.5
(0.9-2.5)
Chronic 1468 2.8
(1.7-4.7)
Number of
types of
perinatal
pains at the
time of
interview
None 4146
One 1193 1.7
(1.2-2.3)
Two 241 3.4
(2.1-5.7)
Three + 34 5.1
(0.0-8.5)
* Interpret with caution, 16.6 < CV [less than or equal to]
33.3: high sampling variability.
([dagger]) All prevalences and odds ratios as well as 95% CI
were obtained using bootstrap weights.
Table 3. Investigation of the Modification Effect of Selected Variables
on the Associations Between the Main Exposures and Postpartum
Depression Symptoms (n = 5,614)
Variables n Presence of Problematic
Perinatal Pain in the
First Three Variables
Months Postpartum
Acute Pain Only
Crude OR Adjusted OR Crude OR
Maternal
nativity status
Foreign-born 975 4.0 3.8 2.6
(1.3-12.2) (1.0-13.8) (0.8-8.1)
Canadian-born 4639 1.72 1.3 1.2
(1.2-2.6) (0.8-1.9) (0.8-1.8)
Type of birth
Caesarean 1480 2.9 2.4 1.8
delivery (1.0-7.8) (0.7-7.4) (0.6-5.1)
Vaginal 4134 2.1 1.6 1.4
delivery (1.4-3.1) (1.0-2.4) (0.9-2.1)
Sex of baby
Female 2729 2.9 2.4 1.9
(1.6-5.4) (1.3-4.7) (1.0-3.5)
Male 2885 1.7 1.3 1.2
(1.1-2.8) (0.8-2.3) (0.7-2.0)
Non-medical
pain relief
Use 4324 1.9 1.5 1.4
(1.3-2.9) (1.0-2.3) (0.9-2.1)
No use 1290 3.4 2.9 1.9
(1.1-10.7) (0.7-10.9) (0.6-6.3)
Medical pain
relief
Use 4531 1.9 1.6 1.3
(1.3-2.8) (1.0-2.4) (0.9-2.0)
No use 1083 3.7 2.3 2.0
(1.4-10.1) (0.6-9.3) (0.7-5.7)
Maternal
smoking
Smoker 1032 1.1 0.7 0.7
(0.6-2.0) 0.3-1.7) (0.3-1.3)
Non-smoker 4582 3.0 2.3 2.0
(1.9-4.6) (1.4-3.8) (1.2-3.2)
Maternal body
mass index
Underweight to 3479 1.7 1.2 1.1
normal (1.1-2.6) (0.8-2.0) (0.7-1.7)
Obese to 2135 3.8 3.2 2.6
overweight (1.9-7.6) (1.5-6.7) (1.3-5.3)
Social support
Adequate 4990 2.4 1.8 1.7
(1.5-3.7) (1.1-2.9) (1.1-2.7)
Inadequate 624 1.7 1.5 1.0
(0.9-3.4) (0.6-3.9) (0.5-2.2)
Variables n Duration of Problematic
Perinatal Pain
Chronic Pain
Adjusted OR Crude OR Adjusted OR
Maternal
nativity status
Foreign-born 975 2.6 6.3 5.5
(0.7-9.6) (2.0-19.5) (1.4-21.0)
Canadian-born 4639 1.0 3.0 1.8
(0.6-1.6) (2.0-4.5) (1.1-2.7)
Type of birth
Caesarean 1480 1.7 4.5 3.2
delivery (0.5-5.6) (1.6-12.9) (1.0-10.1)
Vaginal 4134 1.2 3.7 2.3
delivery (0.8-1.9) (2.4-5.7) (1.5-3.7))
Sex of baby
Female 2729 1.8 5.4 3.6
(0.9-3.5) (2.9-10.0) (1.8-7.2)
Male 2885 1.0 2.9 1.8
(0.6-1.8) (1.7-4.7) (1.0-3.2)
Non-medical
pain relief
Use 4324 1.2 3.3 2.1
(0.8-1.9) (2.1-5.0) (1.3-3.3)
No use 1290 1.8 6.1 4.6
(0.4-7.1) (1.9-19.5) (1.2-18.1)
Medical pain
relief
Use 4531 1.3 3.0 2.1
(0.8-2.0) (2.0-4.6) (1.3-3.3)
No use 1083 1.6 9.0 4.8
(0.4-6.8) (3.2-25.2) (1.0-22.6)
Maternal
smoking
Smoker 1032 0.5 1.8 1.1
(0.2-1.3) (0.9-3.6) (0.4-2.8)
Non-smoker 4582 1.8 5.1 3.3
(1.1-2.9) (3.2-8.2) (2.0-5.6)
Maternal body
mass index
Underweight to 3479 0.9 2.9 1.8
normal (0.6-1.5) (1.8-4.7) (1.1-3.1)
Obese to 2135 2.5 6.4 4.5
overweight (1.1-5.3) (3.1-12.9) (2.1-9.8)
Social support
Adequate 4990 1.4 3.9 2.5
(0.9-2.3) (2.5-6.3) (1.6-4.2)
Inadequate 624 0.9 2.7 2.2
(0.3-2.7) (1.3-5.5) (0.8-6.3)
Variables n Number of Sites of Problematic Perinatal
Pain at the Time of Interview
One Site of Pain Two + Sites of
Pain
Crude OR Adjusted OR Crude OR
Maternal
nativity status
Foreign-born 975 2.3 2.22 4.6
(1.5-3.7) (1.2-4.0) (2.7-8.1)
Canadian-born 4639 2.0 1.4 6.3
(1.5-2.7) (1.0-1.9) (4.3-9.2)
Type of birth
Caesarean 1480 1.7 1.5 7.0
delivery (1.0-2.3) (0.8-2.8) (3.9-12.7)
Vaginal 4134 2.4 1.8 6.0
delivery (1.8-3.1) (1.3-2.4) (4.0-8.9)
Sex of baby
Female 2729 2.6 1.9 6.5
(1.8-3.6) (1.3-2.9) (4.1-10.3)
Male 2885 1.8 1.4 5.8
(1.3-2.6) (0.9-2.1) (3.7-9.0)
Non-medical
pain relief
Use 4324 2.1 1.6 5.4
(1.5-2.7) (1.1-2.2) (3.6-7.9)
No use 1290 2.5 2.1 8.1
(1.5-4.2) (1.1-4.1) (4.4-14.7)
Medical pain
relief
Use 4531 1.8 1.4 5.6
(1.3-2.4) (1.0-1.9) (4.0-7.9)
No use 1083 4.8 3.1 9.1
(2.7-8.5) (1.1-8.4) (3.5-24.1)
Maternal
smoking
Smoker 1032 1.6 1.2 7.1
(0.9-2.8) (0.5-2.6) (3.7-13.7)
Non-smoker 4582 2.3 1.8 5.9
(1.8-3.1) (1.3-2.5) (4.0-8.9)
Maternal body
mass index
Underweight to 3479 2.1 1.7 5.8
normal (1.5-2.9) (1.1-2.4) (3.8-8.7)
Obese to 2135 2.2 1.7 6.8
overweight (1.5-3.3) (1.1-2.8) (4.0-11.5)
Social support
Adequate 4990 2.0 1.5 6.3
(1.4-2.6) (1.1-2.0) (4.4-9.2)
Inadequate 624 2.3 2.3 3.4
(1.4-3.8) (1.1-4.9) (1.8-6.3)
Variables n
Adjusted OR
Maternal
nativity status
Foreign-born 975 3.5
(1.5-8.1)
Canadian-born 4639 3.8
(2.3-6.1)
Type of birth
Caesarean 1480 4.3
delivery (1.8-10.4)
Vaginal 4134 3.2
delivery (1.9-5.3)
Sex of baby
Female 2729 3.8
(2.1-6.8)
Male 2885 3.4
(1.9-6.2)
Non-medical
pain relief
Use 4324 3.0
(1.8-4.8)
No use 1290 7.3
(2.6-20.2)
Medical pain
relief
Use 4531 3.2
(2.1-4.9)
No use 1083 4.5
(0.8-26.7)
Maternal
smoking
Smoker 1032 5.6
(1.8-17.6)
Non-smoker 4582 3.3
(2.0-5.3)
Maternal body
mass index
Underweight to 3479 3.3
normal (1.9-5.6)
Obese to 2135 4.7
overweight (2.3-9.5)
Social support
Adequate 4990 4.2
(2.7-6.6)
Inadequate 624 2.3
(0.7-7.1)