Investments in patient-oriented research and population health research are complementary: response to editorial by Gilles Paradis.
Edwards, Nancy ; Rouleau, Jean ; Tamblyn, Robyn 等
Dear Editor:
Dr. Paradis' editorial in the July/August issue of the CJPH
(1) is timely because the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
strategic plan for patient-oriented research was recently released. (2)
A key point made by Dr. Paradis is the need for greater population
health research infrastructure. He asserts that "CIHR should
support a massive investment in a multi-decade population health
research initiative", arguing that this would be a better option
than proposed investments in patient-oriented research.
It is our view that investments in patient-oriented research and
population health research are complementary and not mutually exclusive.
We need investments in both areas for a stronger health care system and
for improvements in the health of Canadians.
Finding the points of intersection between these two arenas of
research is essential. Within CIHR, we are doing this in a number of
ways. For instance, some of our new Signature Roadmap Initiatives, such
as the Community-Based Primary Health Care Initiative, are providing
fertile ground for integrating these two perspectives within planned
research funding launches. These joint perspectives are also reflected
in the request for applications on implementation research to control
and prevent hypertension that was announced earlier this year in
collaboration with the Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases. (3)
With respect to Dr. Paradis' call for investments in
population health infrastructure, substantial progress has been made by
CIHR and its partners. Research capacity has been built through
initiatives such as Applied Public Health Chairs, Strategic Training
Initiatives and Centres for Research Development. (4) Secondary data
analysis is being supported through Regional Data Centres. The field of
population health intervention research is advancing through the
Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada,
international symposia and strategic funding competitions, but ongoing
effort is needed to strengthen the theoretical and methodological
underpinnings of this field. (4) A major deliverable of the Strategy for
Patient-Oriented Research is further improvement in the population
health sphere of research and infrastructure. Finally, cohort studies
are being funded through the open operating grants program and strategic
initiatives. With respect to the latter, the Canadian Longitudinal Study
on Aging, one of CIHR's largest investments in population health
infrastructure, will offer a unique platform to allow advances in our
understanding of the factors that maintain health and contribute to
disability and disease as we age. (5)
Nevertheless, we agree that additional long-term investments in
population health research infrastructure, including intervention
research, are essential. A recent document on Big Science in Population
Health, scheduled for release later this fall and commissioned by
CIHR's Institute of Population and Public Health, outlines some
important considerations in doing so. But if Canada is to achieve the
ambitious agenda laid out by Dr. Paradis, the investments required
cannot be met by CIHR alone. As is the case for patient-oriented
research, a wide range of funders and new models for building and
sustaining that infrastructure are needed. With sufficient long-term
investments, we can ensure that Canada is a recognized leader in these
two critical areas of research and that the benefits of these
investments are realized by all Canadians.
REFERENCES
(1.) Paradis G. Patient- or population-oriented research?
[Editor's Page] Can J Public Health 2011;102(4):243.
(2.) Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Strategy for
Patient-Oriented Research. Available at: http://www.cihr.ca/e/41204.html
(Accessed September 12, 2011).
(3.) CIHR. Team Grant: Implementation Research on Hypertension in
Low and Middle Income Countries. Available at:
http://www.researchnetrecherchenet.ca/rnr16/
viewOpportunityDetails.do?prog=1304&language=E&fodAgency=CIHR& view=browseArchive&browseArc=true (Accessed September 12, 2011).
(4.) CIHR. International Assessment for 2011. International
Review-CIHR Institute of Population and Public Health. Available at:
http://www.cihr.ca/e/43679.html#c3 (Accessed September 12, 2011).
(5.) Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Available at:
http://www.clsa-elcv.ca/ (Accessed September 13, 2011).
Nancy Edwards, [1] Jean Rouleau, [2] Robyn Tamblyn, [3] Yves
Joanette [4]
[1.] Scientific Director, Canadian Institutes of Health
Research-Institute of Population and Public Health (CIHR-IPPH), Ottawa,
ON
[2.] Scientific Director, CIHR-Institute of Circulatory and
Respiratory Health, Montreal, QC
[3.] Scientific Director, CIHR-Institute of Health Services and
Policy Research, Montreal, QC
[4.] Scientific Director, CIHR-Institute of Aging, Montreal, QC