Poverty reduction in an elite-driven democracy: the case of India.
Hassan, Khalid Wasim
V. M. Rao
Institute for Human Development and Daanish Books, New Delhi, 2005,
Pages-xxiii +328; Price Rs. 275
V.M.Rao, a retired professor of economics has written extensively
on issues relating to poverty, agriculture and rural development. This
book under review focuses on the failure of the anti-poverty policies in
India that result from the elite driven feature of its democracy. The
author describes the Indian democracy as elite-driven, as it primarily
serves the consumerist and parasitic priorities of the elites and middle
classes. There is a wide gap in this respect between what an elite
driven democracy does-giving doles and what it promises to the poor in
its plan. In this book a three-phase conceptual framework to argue that
India is still lagging behind in alleviating hardcore poverty.
Part I of the book--Beyond Relief Measures discusses the low Human
Development and the lack of empowerment of the poor. The author
emphasizes that the process of poverty reduction focused on improving
conditions of the poor in their local contexts without taking note of
global linkages that generate poverty. On the other hand, the
institutional reforms fall far short of the reforms needed for the
empowerment of the poor in the sense of eliminating relative poverty.
There is a possibility that if legitimate path for the poor to move
towards empowerment remain closed, they would propel towards less
legitimate paths. The author also gives us the Human Development status
of various states, some of which are at the rock bottom of the ranking.
Taking the example from Karanataka, the author makes a point that the
policies to raise the Human Development levels should take into
consideration the historical, social and economic factors influencing
the human development. Sometimes it is very difficult to select
beneficiaries for the programs for the poor. The author stresses on the
need to choose indicators which are more effective in monitoring the
process of poverty reduction than the poverty line. According to the
author the selection procedure can be simplified by enabling the PRIs to
take this task. It is hoped that decentralized planner would be able to
make better use of large funds because he belongs to rural environment
and has close links with the rural poor.
The second part discusses the poverty generating processes with
special focus on marginalization process in the agriculture and the
policy weaknesses in creating livelihood for poor. There has been a
secular growth in the number of small and marginal farmers and in their
proportion to the total number of farmers which has serious implications
on poverty reduction. The livelihood perspective of poverty was brought
in by reflecting on the poor districts of Maharastra. The issue of
farmer's distress is also taken up in this part. The non-caring
regime and drought prone environment are made responsible for the spate
of suicides among the farmers in recent years. It is argued strongly
that the farmer's suicide cannot be considered as a tragedy
confined to individuals and household affected by them but are symptoms
of deeper disease. Analysis of faulty irrigation policies and neglect of
watershed and land development throws light on the farmers' plight.
The various indicators reflecting the agriculture backwardness of five
states--Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Madras, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan
are also discussed. The rural-urban divide, a contemporary issue, was
highlighted taking Bangalore--Indian version of Silicon Valley and the
rural version poor in its vicinity. The rural people do not get any
benefit in terms of earning their livelihoods in the growing
metropolitan centre located in their door step. The last section of the
part II provides a picture as why the benefits of policies are not
trickling down to the poorest of the poor. The better-off sections are
only able to take the benefits due to biases and distortions by policy
makers. The less visible and less vocal sections among the poor are left
out in the anti poverty policies.
Part III seeks to bring out the role of systemic view and
international community for poverty reduction in developed countries
rather than the statistical perspective which guided relief measures.
The strategy of microfinance with the help of self help groups (SHGs)
and the participation of poor to counter grip of elite helps in
constructing systematic view. The author also brings the role those
external change agents like NGO's, civil society groups, activists
and community based organizations can play a vital role for the
improvement of the poor. The studies made in Bihar and West Bengal on
micro finance and political mobilization provide valuable insights for
the policy makers the effectiveness of anti- poverty strategies depends
on the three distinctive roles which international community (UN and
World Bank) has to play for poverty reduction. The three roles are
helping the formation of alliance of developing and developed countries
against poverty facilitating role to form strategies and an
interventionist role by implementing anti-poverty programmes at ground
level. The author comments that international donors may get impatient
with India's inability to show achievement in poverty reduction and
human development. In that context, the author concludes and pleads
strongly saying that statistical perspective is not enough and there is
a need for systematic view for going beyond relief measures.
This book becomes important in the present era when on the one hand
India is competing with the other developed countries in the world and
on the other hand the hardcore poverty still exists in many regions.
While much of the literature these days concentrate on the themes like
globalization and the market economy and the study of the poverty is
left out and it is heartening that this book has taken up. The
indicators to measure the various forms of poverty in this book are
helpful for the researchers who want to take up the issues like poverty
reduction, Human Development, etc. The criticism of non caring policy
regimes by the author need to be taken seriously at the policy level in
order to come up with the policies which will be more effective and go
beyond relief measures.
However, all is not well with the book as it fails to discuss
external factors like the globalization and influence of market in a
comprehensive manner. The study only looks at government policies as the
main reason for existing poverty, while there are many other factors
that equally contribute to poverty. The study also grossly ignores the
implementation of poverty policies and measures. The study of only four
south Indian states does not give the clear picture of the whole India
and it lacks the comparative study of the south Indian states especially
with the BIMARU states where large section of the population is poor.
The farmers' distress and suicides which is very relevant in the
present context has not been discussed deeply and the causes given by
the author like non-caring regimes and drought prone areas are only one
side of the problem. The discussion on rural-urban divide by taking
example of Bangalore has failed to mention the role of market in
developing the rich core and the poor periphery. But the author has been
successful in bringing out the Poverty of 'Poverty Reduction
Policies' of the government.
Doctoral Fellow, Institute for Social and Economic Change,
Bangalore (Karnataka). e-mail: khalidwaseemster@gmail.com