首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月27日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Role of education in social development: an empirical analysis.
  • 作者:Venkatraja, B. ; Indira, M.
  • 期刊名称:Madhya Pradesh Journal of Social Sciences
  • 印刷版ISSN:0973-855X
  • 出版年度:2011
  • 期号:June
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Madhya Pradesh Institute of Social Science Research
  • 关键词:Education;Human development;Human growth;Social planning

Role of education in social development: an empirical analysis.


Venkatraja, B. ; Indira, M.


Education plays an important role in human development. Human development encompasses development in several dimensions of human well being. Social development is one of the important dimensions. The main objective of the paper is to analyze the contribution of education to social dimension of human development. The present exploratory study is based on the micro level household survey conducted in ten villages of Dakshina Kannada (D.K) district of Karnataka state. The frame work developed by Oxford Poverty Human Development Initiative (OPHI) was used for the identification of the indicators for the Social dimension of human development. Accordingly the five indicators are health, empowerment, safety and security, ability to go about without shame, and meaning and value in one's own life. UNDP methodology with appropriate modifications is adapted to quantify development at individual level as well as aggregate social development. Results show that there exists high correlation between attainment of education and social dimension of development at individual level. This reflects on the importance of education in influencing the social well-being of individuals.

Introduction

Education is one of the most important means to improve personal endowments, build capabilities, overcome constraints and in the process, enlarge available set of opportunities and choices for a sustained improvement in well-being. The process of education and attainments thereof has an impact on all aspects of life. It is a critical invasive instrument for bringing about social, economic and political inclusion of people (NHDR, 2001). In this context, the present paper makes an attempt to assess the contribution of education to one of such several dimensions of life of individuals, i.e. social development.

Social development first attracted widespread attention through the principles set out in the millennium development goals of the United Nations in 1995 (the Copenhagen Declaration- "World Summit for Social Development"). Midgley (1995) conceives social development as a "process of planned social change designed to promote the well-being of the population as a whole in conjunction with a dynamic process of economic development". The goal of social development in the context of modern welfare is to produce a social well-being that makes people capable of acting and making their own decisions in the broadest sense. In this context, Oxford Poverty Human Development Initiative (OPHI) has proposed a methodology to evaluate development including social sphere of well-being of individuals. According to OPHI health, empowerment, meaning and value in life, external humiliation and safety and security are some of the major indicators of social development.

Gould (1993) opines that the rapid expansion of education over the last three decades is one of the most outstanding achievements of the developing world. This book examines the origin of this expansion and its impact on the improvements of social and economic development at local, national and global levels. Through discussions of the historical, economic and political contexts of the demand for education, a review of the issues in educational planning in the developing world and the governmental and community response at all levels is provided. His survey reveals that expansion of education has greatly contributed to the quality of life, economic and social development. The text concludes with an overview of the social effects of education and also specifies its failure to meet the aspirations of all individuals and communities.

"Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century" authored by Nutbeam (2000) explains the role of health education in addressing the social determinants of health. In this analysis, improving health literacy means more than transmitting information, and developing skills to be able to read pamphlets and successfully make appointments. Instead, by improving people's access to health information and their capacity to use it effectively, it is argued that improved health literacy is critical to empowerment.

Similarly, Albert and Davia's (2010) have explained that there is a link between education and health in developed countries. The analysis is based on 11 European Union countries. They estimate country-specific health functions, where the dependent variable is self-reported health status and the education attainment is one of the main inputs. Results confirm the positive impact of secondary education on health in most cases and tertiary education in all cases, even after taking unobserved heterogeneity into account. Secondary education has an impact on health in all countries in the sample except for The Netherlands and UK. The effect does not differ between secondary and tertiary education in France, Ireland and Greece. From their results, the correlation between education and health is interpreted in different but complementary ways.

Child labour is a pervasive problem throughout the world, especially in developing countries. Africa and Asia together account for over 90 per cent of total child employment. Siddiqi and Patrinos (1995) in their working paper on "Child Labour: Issues, Causes and Interventions" firmly believe that these working children are the objects of extreme exploitation in terms of toiling for long hours for minimal pay. Their work conditions are especially severe, often not providing the stimulation for proper physical and mental development. Many of these children endure lives of pure deprivation. According to them any plan of abolishing child labour depends on schooling. The state could help by making it worthwhile for a child to attend school, whether it be by providing students with nutritional supplements or increasing the quality and usefulness of obtaining an education. This emphasises the role of education in bringing about a transformation in the social lives of the children.

According to Karnataka State Human Development Report (2006), development is predicated upon universal access to education, with its implications for equity and social justice. Education empowers people to make informed choices about their lives and about their rights as citizens in a democracy. It further states that when women have access to education, which increases their sense of autonomy and self worth. Therefore, gender justice is closely and positively linked to educational attainment. People's health status also improves as their education levels rise. Above all, education is valued, quite simply, for itself and the avenues of knowledge and awareness that it opens for us.

These literary works of different writers though vary in their approach and methodology, share a similar opinion that education is instrumental in achieving the well-being in all dimensions of social life. It may be health, nutrition, empowerment, gender justice, child labour or other social issues duly depend on education attainment to progress.

Filed Work: Methodology and Context

The main objective of the paper is to analyse the contribution of education to social development of the people in selected villages located in Dakshina Kannada district, Karnataka based on micro level data. The specific objectives are: to develop a broad based methodology to measure social dimension of human development, and to analyse the impact of education on social dimension in study area.

The present exploratory study is based on the micro level household survey conducted in 10 villages of Dakshina Kannada (D.K) district of Karnataka state in India. A sample of 250 households from 10 villages located in five taluks of the district was selected randomly. From each taluk, two villages were selected purposively. Data was collected through a pre-tested questionnaire. The reference unit was the individual. Due to the nature of the indicators selected, which mainly pertain to the personal situation.

On the basis of education attainment, the individual respondents are classified into five groups such as: (i) Illiterates, (ii) Primary education (class one to seven), (iii) Secondary education (class eight to ten), (iv) PUC (Plus Two and Graduation), and (v) Post Graduation.

Dimensions of Social Development

Social development, in the present study, has been evaluated on the basis of a list of dimensions proposed in Oxford Poverty Human Development Initiative (OPHI) survey. It is confined to a set of five dimensions-health, empowerment, safety and security, ability to go about without shame, and meaning and value in one's own life. Appropriate indicators were developed to represent each of the five dimensions. The dimensions selected and their indicators are the following: (i) Health: It is measured by variables related to health care services, food, sanitation and water. It is denoted by Health Index (HI). (ii) Empowerment: It is measured by several variables that express subjective perception of one's own ability to make decisions and their effectiveness, and the extent of free choice in life. These variables are measured on rank order scales. The composite index of these variables is called Empowerment Index (HI). (iii) Safety and Security: This dimension is measured by the presence/absence of violence in the neighboring area. To measure this, Safety and Security Index (SSI) is developed using a list of five variables with different degree of seriousness. (iv) Ability to Go About Without Shame: It is referring to external humiliation. External Humiliation Index (EHI) measures this dimension of social development. (v) Meaning and Value: This is the last dimension of social development. This dimension measures individual perceptions about one's own life and is measured by four variables. It is denoted by Meaning and Value Index (MVI).

Measurement

In order to measure these five dimensions of social development, each variable was assigned rank order score ranging from one to five; one signifying the least achievement of the variable, whereas five the most. Based on the scores, the individual index for each of the five dimensions is computed. UNDP methodology was adopted for the computation of the individual index for each of the dimensions (2). Through this operation, five indices are obtained. Finally, an overall index i.e., Social Development Index (SDI), has been computed by taking the simple average of the five resultant indices, giving equal weightage to each (2).

Each of the five dimensions and the resultant composite index, i.e. SDI, have been rated on the scale of zero to one, where zero shows the absolutely no social development and one represents the highest social development.

Correlation Coefficient

Association between education and indicators of social development was estimated with correlation coefficient.

Status of Education in Dakshina Kannada District

Dakshina Kannada (D.K.) is one of the districts which rank high in educational attainment. According to population census (2001) of Government of India, the literacy rate of D.K. district was 83.4%. While male literacy was estimated to be 89.7% and female literacy was 77.2%. However, there exists a wide gap between urban and rural literacy rates. When the urban literacy rate is as high as 89.1%, it is only 79.7% in rural areas. High literacy rate in the district is because of the availability of good educational infrastructure. For instance, the district is comprised of 1374 primary schools, 415 high schools and 150 PU Colleges. Apart from this, the district also has 150 general colleges and 30 professional colleges (Dakshina Kannada District At A Glance, 2008-09). The literacy rate of the district is found at 95.9% in the age group of 6-40 years. The district has therefore been declared as totally literate.

Influence of Education on Social Development

In order to understand the influence of education on all five dimensions of social development, the indices are presented based on educational level of respondents. A comparison of achievement of these social dimensions by people with different levels of education explains the differences in social development among people with different educational attainment.

Health Dimension

Health is the first dimension of social development. A Health Index (HI) is constructed to measure the status of health in the study area. HI is measured by taking into account four variables pertaining to health viz. health care services, food, sanitation and source of drinking water. Health Index of illiterates is 0.699. It is estimated to be 0.745 for people with primary education. Respondents with secondary education appear to have better HI, i.e. 0.78. Influence of education on health and hygiene is, further, clear from the fact that individuals with PUC and degree education have still more achieved HI (0.832) and it is highest among post graduates (0.849). From this it is understood that respondents with higher levels of education attainment have better health conditions. The results presented in Table I show that in the case of health dimension of social development, the illiterate people appear to have attained a lower level. There is not much difference among those who are educated; whether they are educated up to only primary or secondary. But, those who have higher attainment in education level also attained greater levels in health dimensions of social development.

Empowerment Dimension

Empowerment is the next indicator of social development. An Empowerment Index [Emil is constructed for all individuals. It shows to what extent an individual is free to make decisions affecting his/her own life. There is a wide gap in the achievement of empowerment between people with different levels of education. While the EmI of illiterates is only 0.473 and EmI of people with primary education is 0.568. Respondents with secondary education have achieved EmI of 0.634. Therefore, individuals with higher grades of education have attained more empowerment. This is, once again, proved from the fact that EmI is the highest among post graduates (0.703). Thus, greater achievement of EmI among better qualified respondents vividly explains that they are more empowered and have free choices and more control on their life. Whereas, low EmI of the illiterates and low qualified people is the reflection of deprivation of empowerment, constrained choices and lack of control on their life.

Safety and Security Dimension

This dimension indicates whether there is security to life and property of the respondents and whether the surrounding areas are free from violence and whether they are able to resist any violence. It is measured in terms of Safety and Security Index (SSI). The results of the present study, as reported in Table 1, reveals that in the case of SSI, only marginal differences are observed among the people with different education levels, which means that educational attainment does not influence the perceptions of people about safety and security of their lives. It is only the society which they live play an important role. However, it appears that more people among post graduates have reported higher levels of safety and security compared to people with other levels of education. This is reflected by higher SSI of post graduates (0.797) than illiterates (0.727).

External Humiliation Dimension

This social dimension analyses the extent of respect and fair treatment received by the respondent in the society. In other words, it shows how far the respondent is free from external humiliation. Data reveals that there are differences in External Humiliation Index (EHI) of illiterates and literates. Illiterates have lower Index (0.529) indicating that less percentage of sample respondents from this group have reported that they are free from external humiliation and they are able to live without shame. But in the case of educated, higher EHI (0.644) shows that more percentage of people are feeling that they are able to live without any external humiliation and live without shame. It can be observed that EHI among graduates and post graduates is much better than illiterates. This is the manifestation of greater ability of the highly qualified people to go about without shame. They are highly respected, treated very fairly by the community and are able to live a life without shame.

Meaning and Value Dimension

This is the fifth and the last dimension of social development. Meaning and Value Index [MVI] is developed out of the individual perception of one's own life. In other words, it measures how much an individual feels that there is a value and meaning for life. Table I shows that people with higher levels of education find more meaning and greater value in their life compared to the respondents with no education or low education. This is substantiated by the fact that MVI is only 0.505 among illiterates. But it is 0.612 among primary educated, indicating higher meaning and value in their life than illiterates. Even people with secondary level education (0.697) and plus two and graduation (0.763) have much better MVI. In case of post graduates, MVI is marginally less (0.719) compared to graduates.

Composite Social Development Index

An aggregated index i.e. Social Development Index (SDI) is calculated based on the five indices of social development. Since all the dimensions are equally important, equal weightage has been given in the calculation of SDI. The SDI indicates the social well-being attained by the people. A comparison of SDI achieved by people with different levels of education attainment shows the influence of education on the social well-being of the respondents.

As represented in Table 1, illiterates have high deprivation of social well-being. This is indicated by their very low SDI (0.587). Whereas, people with primary education have achieved more SDI (0.644) and it is still higher among secondary level educated (0.744). The respondents who have plus two and graduation have attained high social welfare. This is indicated by their greater achievement of SDI (0.726). The post graduates have the highest SDI, i.e. 0.73, marking greater realisation of social development.

Correlation between Education and Social Development

The above analysis clearly explains that people with higher levels of education have achieved greater levels in different levels of social development. A positive correlation between these two variables is expected. In order to understand the degree of association between education and social development, correlation coefficient between the two variables has been calculated. The results show that correlation coefficient (r) is 0.731 and [r.sup.2] is 0.534. This shows that there exists a strong and positive correlation between educational attainment and social development of the people. Higher [r.sup.2] (0.534) shows that 53.4% of change in social development of individuals is influenced by the education attainment. And the remaining 36.6% of variation in social development may be due to some factors other than education. But education attained by individuals appears to be a very important factor in determining the changes in social well-being.

Summary and Conclusion

The present paper makes an attempt to understand the social development by developing an aggregate index of social development at a micro level. The variables of social development are derived based on the methodology proposed by OPHI and measuring social development is based on the methodology adopted by the UNDP to calculate HDI. Five dimensions of social development were identified to measure the social well-being and different indices were calculated for each dimension. An aggregate measure of social development was developed based on the individual indices. In order to understand the relation between education and social development, correlation coefficient was calculated. The results show that: All dimensions of social development are positively influenced by education attainment. People with higher attainment of education are able to achieve greater levels in different dimensions of social development. Aggregate index of social development has high correlation with educational attainment, indicating the importance of education in influencing social development of people.

From the results, it is clear that education empowers men and women to make informed choices about their lives and about their rights. Education influences people's confidence in their ability to go about without shame and resist humility. It also increases their chances of high respect and fair treatment in the society. Educated people have a clear sense of purpose and meaning in their life. Social development is predicated upon universal access to education, with its implications for social justice. Above all, education is valued, for awareness that it opens for us and removes inherited social evils, which are stumbling blocks in the path of development. The policy for universalisation of elementary education has to focus on universal access and enrollment; and universal retention of children up to fourteen years of age. The governments need to evolve policy frameworks for bringing about substantial improvement in the quality of education at all levels. The focus of such educational strategies should be towards improvements in educational infrastructure, standardisation and regular review of curricula, improvement in teaching aids. This should enable children to achieve essential levels of learning, which in turn contribute to the development process.

References

Albert, Cecilia; Davia Maria A. (2010) Education is a key determinant of health in Europe: a comparative analysis of 11 countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gould, W. T. S. (1993) People and education in the Third World, UK: Longman Group Limited, Longman Scientific & Technical.

Government of Karnataka (2006) Karnataka State Human Development Report 2005, Government of Karnataka.

Government of Karnataka (2009) Dakshina Kannada District At A Glance 2008-09, District Statistical Officer, Mangalore.

Midgley, J (1995) Social development: The developmental perspective in social welfare, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp 25.

Nutbeam, Don (2000) Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) (2008) Department of International Development, University of Oxford.

Planning Commission of India (2002) National Human Development Report 2001, Government of India.

Siddiqi, Faraaz; Patrinos Harry Anthony (1995) Child Labour: Issues, Causes and Interventions, working paper submitted to the human Capital development and Operations Policy.

UNDP (1990-1999) Human Development Report, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Notes:

(1.) Individual Indicator's Index = Actual Value - Minimum Value/Maximum Value - Minimum Value

(2.) Social Development Index = HI + EmI + SSI + EHI + MVI/5

Venkatraja. B. * and M. Indira **

* Research Scholar, Department of Economics and Co-operation, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore. e-mail: bakilapadavu@gmail.com.

** Professor, Department of Economics and Co-operation, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore. e-mail: mahindira@yahoo.com.
Table 1
Achievement of social development at different levels of education.

Levels No. of Index Value of Social Indicators
of Individuals
Education Interviewed HI EmI SSI EHI MVI SDI

Illiteracy 49 0.699 0.473 0.727 0.529 0.505 0.587
Primary 119 0.745 0.568 0.721 0.575 0.612 0.644
Secondary 48 0.78 0.634 0.763 0.644 0.697 0.704
PUC & Degree 30 0.832 0.69 0.715 0.631 0.763 0.726
PG 4 0.849 0.703 0.797 0.583 0.719 0.73
District 250 0.755 0.579 0.731 0.586 0.627 0.655

Source: Sample Survey.
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有