摘要：This article seeks to examine, in the light of the foundation of human dignity and the fundamental rights and guarantees enshrined in the Constitution of 1988, the constitutionality of Precedent 385, edited from the Superior Court of Justice (STJ). This statement prohibits the consumer that has at least one legitimate record in a credit protection agency of judicially demanding compensation for moral damage in the face of subsequent annotation, although the latter is irregular. The method of approach used in this study was deductive, scientific procedure, with the use of techniques of bibliographic research and case.
关键词：Previous judicial;precedent persuasive;precedent from the Supreme Court 385;constitutionality.;Direito do Consumidor
