Source material: toward the study of the first lady: the state of scholarship. (Features).
Watson, Robert P.
I hope that someday someone will take the time to evaluate the true
role of the wife of a president, and to assess the many burdens she has
to bear and the contributions she makes.
--Harry S. Truman
Getting right to the point, first ladies have done it all.
Presidential spouses dating to Martha Washington have functioned as
their husband's trusted confidante, key supporter, and counselor in
times of crisis. First ladies presided over state dinners and a variety
of social affairs held at the executive mansion and also deserve credit
for renovating and preserving the White House. So too have these wives
edited presidential speeches, hit the campaign trail, testified before
Congress, lobbied on behalf of legislation, chaired task forces,
traveled internationally as unofficial presidential envoys, and
championed important social causes. Indeed, the accomplishments and
political activities of first ladies--at least those serving from
Eleanor Roosevelt to the present time--have been fairly well documented
in recent years.
Quite early on, the first lady emerged as a key player in what
would become known as the White House. The first ladyship is an
institution in that the far majority of presidents have served with
their wife beside them, presidential spouses are well-known public
figures, and the first ladyship has become an office-albeit one of
extraconstitutional design--complete with office space, staff, and
budget. Nevertheless, scholarship on the first ladies is a quite recent
phenomenon and, as a subfield, it is still maturing.
Growing Interest in First Ladies
Possibly due to the controversial and highly public first ladyship
of Hillary Clinton, coming on the heels of the controversial but
powerful first ladyship of Nancy Reagan and the popular first ladyship
of Barbara Bush, the office has generated much interest by the public,
press, and scholars alike. However, as will be noted, scholars came
quite late to the game.
With the exception of the significant media coverage of and public
attention paid to Eleanor Roosevelt, popular interest in modern first
ladies grew considerably in the 1980s. In April 1984, a conference
titled "Modern First Ladies: Private Lives and Public Duties"
was held at the Gerald R. Ford Library in Michigan. A year later, NBC aired a one-hour, primetime special on First Lady Nancy Reagan. During
the 1988 presidential campaign, the press and pundits pondered a first
lady forum for the candidates' wives. Analysts noted that the
candidates--George Bush and Michael Dukakis--were nowhere near as
interesting as their wives, Barbara and Kitty (Watson 2000b). In
addition to Mrs. Bush and Mrs. Dukakis--who had lectured at Harvard-the
other presidential hopefuls in 1988 boasted capable spouses. The group
included three lawyers--Hattie Babbitt, wife of Arizona governor Bruce
Babbitt; Jeanne Simon, wife of Illinois senator Paul Simon; and Elise du
Pont, wife of former Delaware governor Pierre "Pete" du Pont.
Tipper Gore, wife of then-Tennessee senator Al Gore, was an author and
activist with a graduate education; and Jill Jacobs, wife of Senator
Joseph Biden of Delaware, was, at the time, pursuing her second
master's degree.
In 1992, the candidates' wives again proved to be newsworthy.
Hillary Rodham Clinton would become the first first lady with a graduate
education, completing her law degree at Yale. During Mrs. Clinton's
first term as first lady, a $1,000-a-plate event was held at the U.S.
National Botanical Garden to raise awareness, support, and funding for
the new National Garden in Washington, a monument dedicated to the first
ladies. First ladies Lady Bird Johnson, Betty Ford, Rosalynn Carter,
Nancy Reagan, and Barbara Bush joined Mrs. Clinton in honoring the
service of all first ladies. In 1996, both presidential candidates'
spouses--Hillary Clinton, with degrees from Wellesley and Yale; and
Elizabeth Dole, with degrees from Harvard and Duke--possessed ivy league diplomas, law degrees, and impressive political resumes. Mrs. Dole was a
former secretary of labor and secretary of transportation, and Mrs.
Clinton had been rated by the American Bar Association as one of the one
hundred most influential attorneys in the United States.
The spouses from the 1996 race would eventually go on to prove that
the first ladyship was not the conclusion of their political service but
rather a launching pad for senatorial careers. The 2000 race proved to
be a continuation of this trend, as both Laura Bush and Tipper Gore held
master's degrees, as did the spouses of their husbands'
leading opponents--John McCain and Bill Bradley, whose wife happened to
also hold a Ph.D.
The American Studies Summer Institute at Louisiana State University
in Shreveport devoted the focus of its triennial program in 1997 to the
topic of "First Couples in the White House: Presidents and
Spouses," while in June 1998, the National First Ladies'
Library opened at the historic Saxton-McKinley House in Canton, Ohio.
(1) Prominent television programs such as A & E and Biography have
produced video documentaries on the lives of several first ladies, and
the first ladies exhibit at the Smithsonian's Museum of American
History remains a popular attraction. Reflecting the growing interest in
first ladies and expanding political influence and activism, the exhibit
has since been enlarged and renamed "First Ladies: Political Role,
Public Image," and provides a serious and educational examination
of the "office." (2)
Coinciding with the growing interest in first ladies, it is now
conventional wisdom that the president's spouse wields influence at
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and has emerged as a political force with which
to be reckoned. Recent scholarship on the first ladies is making it
equally clear that this influence and activism is less the exception
than it is the rule, that Hillary Rodham Clinton was less the
"trailblazing" activist she was made out to be by the press
than she was simply the latest in a long line of active, capable, and
political wives to live in the White House (Caroli 1987; Watson 2000b).
There has been a proliferation of books on the first ladies in
recent years, some academic and some not so academic. The publications
include a bewildering array of children's books, coloring books,
paper doll cut-out books, books on White House china collections and
inaugural balls, the first ladies' favorite recipes, collections of
photographs, accounts of the dresses and fashion of first ladies, first
family ancestries, the usual assortment of gossip and scandal, and even
novels. Add to this books such as First Ladies Quotations Book (Foss
1999), Exclusively First Ladies Trivia (Pitch 1993), and the enduring
guidebook The First Ladies, first published by the White House
Historical Association and National Geographic Society in 1975 and still
sold to tourists visiting the capitol city (Klapthor 1975). Hit
television shows have taken viewers into the West Wing, the White House,
and the security detachment assigned to the first lady, and an
assortment of plays about first ladies have hit the stage. (3)
The Literature
Edith Roosevelt once quipped, "A lady's name should
appear in print only three times, at her birth, marriage, and
death." Sadly, it appears that historians took Mrs.
Roosevelt's advice to heart. Indeed, the first ladies, as a group,
have generally been ignored by scholars. Historically, few books
examined more than the cursory facets of first ladies' lives, and
even though they are somewhat helpful to scholars today, these books are
largely social accounts and stories of first ladies. The literature base
on first ladies receives a mixed grade, containing several excellent
biographies, collections of letters and papers for a few first ladies,
and a growing list of scholarly texts. At the same time, the author
estimates that roughly one-half of the books in print on the first
ladies are neither reliable nor useful to scholars. (4) Table 1 lists
the books focusing on individual first ladies. It does not include books
on the first ladies collectively, nor does it include children's
coloring books or paper doll collections and the like.
The lion's share of serious biographies and scholarly
collections of papers for the first ladies are devoted to only a handful
of first ladies: Abigail Adams, Dolley Madison, Mary Todd Lincoln,
Eleanor Roosevelt, and Jacqueline Kennedy. Very little of substance
exists for other first ladies, and most of the first ladies have yet to
be the focus of a serious, reputable biography. Moreover, as is evident
in Table 1, several first ladies have yet to be treated in print.
Margaret Taylor, Abigail Fillmore, Jane Pierce, Harriet Lane (James
Buchanan's niece and hostess), Eliza Johnson, Ellen Arthur,
Caroline Harrison, and Ida McKinley have yet to be examined in print.
Martha Jefferson, Elizabeth Monroe, Hannah Van Buren, Letitia Tyler, and
Julia Tyler have each been the focus of one book. However, these, along
with much of the literature on first ladies, are either scant leaflets,
fiction, or something that would not qualify as serious scholarship.
As will be discussed, most books written on the first ladies prior
to the late 1980s were little more than social accounts of the weddings,
children, and dresses of first ladies, and frequently these works were
romanticized to the point of fiction. Some of the better, more ambitious
early works are listed in Table 2.
The first book ever written by a first lady was penned by Louisa
Catherine Adams, who wrote her memoirs but did not intend them to be
published. This work is available today as part of the Adams Papers
Microfilms at the Massachusetts Historical Society. The first book ever
published on a first lady was done so in 1848, when Charles Francis
Adams published his grandmother's letters in the volume Letters of
Mrs. Adams, the Wife of John Adams. Perhaps the first biography of a
first lady to be published was a campaign bio titled Sketch of the Life
of Mrs. William McKinley, released by one of William McKinley's
backers in 1896 as a romanticized and not completely accurate account of
the candidate's wife. The first memoir of a first lady intended for
publication was written by Julia Dent Grant, which was eventually
organized and published posthumously by noted Ulysses Grant scholar John
Y. Simon in 1975. Arguably the first comprehensive, systematic study of
the first ladies was The First Ladies, written by Betty Boyd Caroli and
published in 1987. The first multivolume study of the first ladies was
penned by Carl Sferrazza Anthony. His two-volume First Ladies: The Saga
of the Presidents' Wives and Their Power was released in 1990 and
1991. Myra G. Gutin's The President, Partner: The First Lady in the
Twentieth Century, published in 1989, marked the first time a systematic
study was completed on a facet of the first ladyship that could be
forwarded as a model for studying first ladies. Gutin studied
communication strategies and activities of first ladies in the twentieth
century. The first scholarly compilation of biographies of all first
ladies was edited in 1996 by Lewis Gould under the title American First
Ladies. The first textbook on the subject, which was also the first book
offering an assessment of the state of scholarship, was Robert P.
Watson's The Presidents' Wives: Reassessing the Office of
First Lady, published in 2000.
Prior to the late 1980s, few reliable books had been written on the
topic, and there was a general dearth of resources, scholarship, and
attention devoted to first ladies. Even today, the availability of
sources and the literature base on the subject remain a mixed record. It
was only in the late 1980s and early 1990s when systematic studies of
the first ladies began to appear, albeit few and far between (see Table
3).
A rich source of information on first ladies exists in the papers
and letters of first ladies. The papers of a few first ladies have been
collected and edited. Relatedly, the words of first ladies can also be
found in their autobiographies. Those first ladies who wrote
autobiographies include Louisa Catherine Adams, Helen Taft, Edith
Wilson, Eleanor Roosevelt, Lady Bird Johnson, Betty Ford, Rosalynn
Carter, Nancy Reagan, and Barbara Bush. Hillary Rodham Clinton's is
forthcoming. Of course, a few of these books feature second authors who
completed varying amounts of the writing and, like Nancy, are overly
sterile and kind. However, others are candid and useful recollections of
public lives. The collections of first lady papers and letters are
listed in Table 4, and first lady autobiographies are listed in Table 5.
Another helpful source on the first ladies, which also receives a
mixed grade, are the biographies about first ladies. There are a few
reliable texts that feature short biographies on every first lady (Gould
1996; Watson 2002, 2001b), but there is an absence of books solely
devoted to individual first ladies. Some are quite balanced, well
written, and penned by scholars, while others are clearly written for
the purpose of creating a scandal or attacking a first lady. This latter
type of "biography" is especially prevalent with Hillary
Clinton, who attracted a number of obviously biased and negative
accounts of her life, such as Barbara Olsen's Hell to Pay. The most
useful and thorough biographies of first ladies are listed in Table 6.
Last, there are a few systematic studies of first ladies and first
families that have collected what is known about all or some of the
first ladies and provide descriptions and assessments of the
institution. These are listed in Table 7 and Table 8.
As is evident, there is a long way to go in the development of a
complete literature base for the first ladies, and serious, inherent
challenges remain. For instance, scholars are only now beginning to set
forth essential questions about the subject and spell out the challenges
facing and direction for the field of study. Scholars have, however,
noted the lack of serious attention devoted to the first ladies, while
calling for further study (Gould 1996; Mayo 1993; Troy, 1997; Watson
2000b; 1999). Presidential scholars Lewis Gould and Gordon Hoxie both
suggested in 1990 that their colleagues could learn much about the
president by the way he managed the first lady's public image in an
effort to reap benefits for his own popularity.
Challenges to the Study of First Ladies
The study of the first lady has faced and continues to face some of
the same inherent difficulties troubling presidential scholars. For
instance, the subject has a small number of cases, with much variation
among them. The subject thus lends itself poorly to quantitative
assessments and methodologies. So too must the researcher contend with
the possibility that many of the sources on presidents and first
ladies--memoirs, accounts written by former aides, press releases by the
White House--are politicized. Presidential scholars recognize and take
into account the fact that nearly everything coming out of the White
House is subjected to a positive "spin." The machinery of the
White House functions to make the president look good, and any
accomplishment is rightfully or wrongly attributed to the president.
When it comes to the first lady, there is an added dimension. In
addition to accounting for the credit claiming and positive spin, it is
possible that even when the first lady was involved in a political
action, decision, or accomplishment, her role in the matter will be
minimized or omitted from public mention in an effort to both direct all
accolades to the president and avoid criticism about the first lady
functioning in an "inappropriate" manner.
Perhaps the most obvious challenge to studying the first ladies has
been the lack of resources, letters, and materials on the first ladies.
The amount of information available on first ladies is a teaspoon compared to that which exists for the presidents. Volumes of documents,
papers, and other items on the presidents have been preserved, edited,
published, and made available to scholars. The presidential
libraries--established for every president serving after Calvin
Coolidge--house a treasure trove of materials on presidents and dedicate themselves to the study of the presidents. Their work is complimented by
centers such as the Center for the Study of the Presidency in
Washington, DC, and the Center for Presidential Studies at Texas A&M
University, which promote the study of the presidents through an array
of scholarly, research, and educational services. (5) The American
Political Science Association supports a section--the Presidency
Research Group--devoted to presidential studies. (6) So too do a number
of organizations exist that are dedicated to a specific president such
as the Hayes Presidential Center, Theodore Roosevelt Association, the
Lincoln Forum, the International Lincoln Association at Louisiana State
University in Shreveport, and the Calvin Coolidge Memorial Foundation.
(7) And countless foundations, state parks, memorials, monuments, and
other historic sites and associations preserve and promote the memory of
presidents, and most presidential birthplaces and homes are preserved.
(8) Compare this to that which is in place to promote the study of first
ladies, and the first ladies come up quite short.
Another concern is who should be included in the study of first
ladies. While it might appear to be a simple matter, some spouses of
presidents died prior to their husband's presidential years (Martha
Jefferson, Rachel Jackson, Hannah Van Buren, Ellen Arthur, Alice
Roosevelt), while Benjamin Harrison married again after his presidency.
While they never served as first lady, these women were married to one
who served as a president. James Buchanan was a lifelong bachelor, and
there remains the question as to whether his niece and White House
social hostess, Harriet Lane, should be studied with the first ladies.
Just as it is difficult for presidential scholars to assess William
Henry Harrison and James Garfield because they died shortly into their
presidencies, first ladies Letitia Tyler, Caroline Harrison, and Ellen
Wilson died prior to the completion of their first ladyships, with
Harrison the only one of the three to serve the majority of her term
(sometimes not included in rankings).
There is also the related matter of the surrogate or proxy
(Schermer 2002; Watson 2000b) first ladies. At times, the presidential
spouse has either been deceased or in poor health and thus unable to
function as first lady. For instance, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson,
Martin Van Buren, and Chester A. Arthur all lost their wives prior to
their elections to the presidency. These presidents and presidents such
as James Monroe, Zachary Taylor, and Millard Fillmore, whose spouses
were in poor health, relied on a young female relative to fulfill the
social hosting duties required of the first lady. A variety of nieces
(Emily Donelson), daughters (Martha and Mary Jefferson, Betty Taylor
Bliss, Mary Abigail Fillmore), and daughters-in-law (Angelica Singleton
Van Buren, Priscilla Cooper Tyler) assisted the president as "proxy
hostesses." President James Buchanan, who entered the White House
as a bachelor, turned to his niece, Harriet Lane, to assist him in
matters of social hosting. Another bachelor, Grover Cleveland, relied on
his sister, Rose, until he married Frances Folsom during his first term
in office. There remains a question of who exactly can be called a first
lady and whether the spouses not serving as first lady and the proxy
hostesses should be studied as such. For example, Caroli (Caroli 1987)
and Watson (2001a, 2001b, 2002) devote a separate chapter or coverage in
the appendix to these hostesses. Anthony (1990) offers an occasional
reference to them in the body of his book, and Gould (1996) chose not to
discuss these hostess but did list their names in the appendix. Most
other books fail to even mention them.
Approaches to Studying the First Ladies
Once one determines who should be included in the study of the
first ladies, the challenge of how to approach the study of the first
ladies arises. The first ladyship as an office is an extraconstitutional
development. The president's spouse is not mentioned in the
Constitution and the position is neither elected nor appointed; as such,
it is technically not even an office. However, the first ladies of the
modern era have enjoyed office space, a budget, and staff of
considerable size, larger than those of most presidential aides and
advisers. It is therefore an office but one without portfolio, statutory
legitimacy, electoral mandate, or clearly defined roles and
responsibilities, making it difficult to study.
It is possible to assess presidents according to basic roles of the
office. Even though Article II of the Constitution is vague, it at least
provides the parameters of the office, and there are public approval
ratings, margin of electoral victory, treaties, confirmations, vetoes,
and a number of other items suitable for evaluating presidents. With
first ladies, questions remain unanswered as to whether they should be
politically active, whether this activism enhances their first ladyship,
and so on. In some ways, the first ladies have been "damned if they
do, and damned if they don't," as, absent definable parameters
for the job, first ladies have been criticized for being too outspoken
and active and criticized for failing to speak out or act (Watson
2000b). Perhaps the only agreed-upon roles for a first lady are
presidential supporter and White House hostess. Even though the role of
hostess remains undefined, it nevertheless evolved, given sex-role
norms, within the purview of the first lady. But is this duty something
by which we can evaluate first ladies? Eleanor Roosevelt does not appear
to have been the hostess that Julia Tyler was, but should that detract
from Mrs. Roosevelt's other notable accomplishments? On the other
hand, Barbara Bush was not overtly active in politics, but she was
popular with the public, something that undoubtedly benefited the Bush
presidency. Bess Truman distinguished herself as neither a hostess nor a
political player, but she appears to have been a trusted confidante to
her husband. So the issue of how to assess these first ladies remains.
There are no clearly defined roles or responsibilities, and the
first lady serves at the discretion of the president, with consideration
to her personal inclinations and abilities, the state of the
presidential marriage, events of the day, and the ever-present force of
public opinion. This is all likely to change when madam president is
elected and, if she is married, a man serves as presidential spouse,
making the study of the presidential spouse even more difficult. Whether
he will be expected to preside over White House teas and socials is
doubtful, suggesting that the office and role as we know it will change
dramatically (Watson and Gordon 2002). The prospects for madam president
present further challenges to studying presidential spouses.
That presidential scholars continue to debate the methodological
and theoretical directions of the field and general health of the state
of scholarship reflects the challenges inherent in studying the
presidency. Arguably, it is even more difficult to study the first
ladies. Without agreed-upon parameters for the office, no statutory
authority, and few discernable roles, it should not surprise readers to
learn that most studies of first ladies historically lacked anything
approaching systematic inquiry, a conceptual framework, the development
of theory, or the development of models by which to test theories. In
fact, although several well-researched and useful accounts of the first
ladies have appeared in the past fifteen years, the development of
theories and approaches to the study of presidential spouses is a very
recent phenomenon and is still evolving. Even in contemporary times,
much of the writing on first ladies remains anecdotal.
Scholars are now beginning to call for scholarship on the first
ladies. A dialog on the problems with previous studies, challenges to
studying the subject, the state of scholarship, and directions for the
developing field of study to take is barely under way. Even many of the
leading textbooks on the presidency and American government--which
otherwise treat a wide array of topics with impressive attention--failed
to expose undergraduates to the real roles, challenges, and
contributions associated with presidential spouses (Eksterowicz and
Watson 2000). For the study of first ladies to advance, several
components are necessary, factors that have only recently emerged or are
still emerging. For instance, too few scholars were seriously pursuing
the topic for a viable literature base to be developed. Relatedly, even
Ph.D. students studying such fields as the presidency and women's
studies were not exposed to the possibility of studying first ladies.
This is not surprising, as the subject was not seen as worthy of serious
scholarship. For instance, it was quite difficult for doctoral students
to find faculty members willing and able to serve on dissertation committees on the topic; journals were not interested in publishing
studies of first ladies; and academic presses, journal reviewers, hiring
committees, and promotion/tenure boards most likely did not afford the
topic much weight.
The State of Scholarship
All this is changing and a literature base on the first ladies is
developing, although any "field of study" is still in its
infancy. It is clear that there is a long way to go in terms of having
Ph.D. training and coursework in the area, adequate theories and models
to guide research, and support for the subject. Regarding the latter
point, there appears to be a shift in mindsets toward the subject under
way. Journals are publishing scholarship on the topic, papers are being
presented at professional academic meetings, and a number of books have
been released since the late 1990s.
Indeed, a compelling case can be made that the systematic study of
the first ladies is under way and has gained acceptance among
presidential scholars and historians. For the purpose of evaluating the
state of scholarship, it can be said that all disciplines and fields of
study must exhibit some fundamental elements to gain legitimacy and be
considered healthy. These include but are not limited to (1) a body of
scholarly literature; (2) developed, tested, and (somewhat) agreed-upon
models, theories, and approaches; (3) scholarly outlets (journals) for
publishing research on the subject; (4) scholarly gatherings
(conferences) for exchanging knowledge and ideas; (5) a critical mass of
scholars working in the area; (6) acceptance by scholars working in
related, accepted fields; (7) mentoring of junior scholars and graduate
students by senior scholars; (8) reference works and resources on the
subject available to scholars and the general public; and (9) formal
education and training at the undergraduate, graduate, and postgraduate
levels in the discipline. In an effort to assess the state of
scholarship on the first ladies, each of these nine elements is briefly
considered below.
1. Scholarly Literature
As is evident in Tables 1 through 8, the literature base on the
first lady is developing but is far from being complete. A number of
fine autobiographies, collections of letters, and other primary source
materials are available, but, as is the case for biographies on the
first ladies, they tend to cover only a few first ladies such as Abigail
Adams, Dolley Madison, Mary Todd Lincoln, Eleanor Roosevelt, and
Jacqueline Kennedy. Beginning in the late 1980s and growing in recent
years, there are now a few well-received scholarly books on the first
ladies as a group.
2. Theory and Methodology
One of the most serious shortcomings of studies of first ladies is
the lack of theories and models to guide research. There are no widely
accepted approaches to studying the first ladies and, as was discussed
earlier in this article, a number of inherent challenges present
themselves when trying to formulate systematic approaches to studying
the subject. Perhaps the first study that developed theory and offered a
model for further study was Gutin's (1989) study of communication
activities of first ladies in the twentieth century. In this study,
Gutin chronicled the total number of communication activities of first
ladies and offered three different classifications of first ladies based
on their communication style--housekeepers, social hostesses, and
ceremonial presences; emerging spokeswomen; and political surrogates and
independent advocates. Since Gutin's work, a handful of studies
have assessed the communication and rhetoric of first ladies, most
notably Kelly's (2001) study of Mrs. Clinton's rhetoric.
A related subject--and one of the few other facets of the first
ladyship to attract scholarship--is public opinion and public image.
Public opinion polls have been taken on first ladies since Gallup polled
the public about Eleanor Roosevelt in 1939. This poll and others focused
on approval ratings. Unfortunately, very few polls appeared after 1939.
In 1969, Gallup again polled the public about its approval of Pat Nixon,
and subsequent polls have been conducted of all first ladies with
increasing regularity. Today, these polls are taken regularly and
provide useful data for studying first ladies. A few studies have been
done on public opinion and the first ladies, most notably Burrell's
(1997) study of Hillary Rodham Clinton's approval ratings (see also
Muir and Benitez 1996).
One of the most important areas of study has been on the roles of
first ladies, given the vagueness surrounding their duties, controversy
stirred by "inappropriate" activities, and great diversity in
how first ladies have decided to approach their office. A few studies
have considered the legal and political parameters of the roles pursued
by first ladies (Burrell 1999; Watson 2000b). Relatedly, Watson (1997)
traced the historical development of the office in terms of its
influence and political activism, while Eksterowicz and Paynter (2000)
and Watson (2000b) examined the growth of the first lady's office
as a key instrument in assisting her to wield influence. Studies by
Watson (2000b) and Wekkin (2000) have sought to systematically identify
specific roles and activities, evaluate each of them, and place them
into categories. These two studies offer models for assessing the roles
and activities of first ladies. Relatedly, Watson (2000b) forwards two
typologies, one based on types of influence wielded by first ladies and
the other based on the status of the presidential marriage as a
partnership. Rifkind (2000) offered a comparative study of Hillary
Rodham Clinton and Sara Netanyahu, one of the few comparative
assessments, while O'Connor, Nye, and van Assendelft (1996)
attempted to document the total number of political activities of first
ladies.
The by-product of the scholarship on first ladies has certainly
been that the first lady has come to be seen as a "partner" to
the president or an "associate" president. A few studies have
documented examples to argue that first ladies have functioned in this
capacity to varying degrees (Gutin 1989; Troy 1997; Watson 2001c;
2000b). Other efforts to develop theory to guide the study of first
ladies has included research on first lady personality types and first
lady character (Watson 2001a; 2000b). Using presidential studies as a
model, perhaps it was inevitable that efforts would be made to rate or
rank first ladies. This includes three polls of historians and
presidential scholars that ranked first ladies (Siena Research Institute
1993, 1982; Watson 1999).
3. Scholarly Journals
It is encouraging to note that scholarly journals are beginning
with increased frequency to publish research on the first ladies. The
first special issue of a journal focusing on first ladies appeared in
1990 when Presidential Studies Quarterly--the leading journal in the
field--devoted half an issue to the topic. Edited by Lewis Gould, the
issue included essays on specific first ladies: Lou Hoover, Eleanor
Roosevelt, Lady Bird Johnson, Betty Ford, Rosalynn Carter, and Nancy
Reagan (Gould 1990). The first full issue of a journal dedicated to the
first ladies was a special issue of The Social Science Journal published
in 2000 and edited by Robert Watson (Watson 2000a). Not long thereafter,
the Organization of American Historians' Magazine of History
featured an issue on the first ladies in 2001, coedited by Allida Black
and Edith Mayo (Mayo and Black 2001). Presidential Studies Quarterly and
White House Studies regularly feature scholarship on the first ladies,
and articles on first ladies have appeared in journals such as Talking
Politics, Women & Politics, Political Communication, Media Studies
Journal, Politics & Policy, PS: Political Science & Politics,
Sex Roles, Women's Studies in Communication, and others. While
there is not a single journal on first ladies, the wide array of
journals, frequency of articles now appearing, and variety of
disciplines publishing studies of first ladies is both encouraging and
signals the acceptance of the subject as a legitimate scholarly
endeavor.
4. Conferences
Another encouraging development is the growing frequency of not
just papers but panels as well devoted to first ladies at professional
meetings. Conferences such as those of the American Political Science
Association, Midwest Political Science Association, Western Social
Science Association, and others now routinely accept papers on first
ladies. This is a necessary ingredient for a field or subfield of study
to emerge, as the work of scholars on the topic must be encouraged and
opportunities for sharing ideas and research on the first ladies must be
offered.
5. Scholars Researching First Ladies
A growing number of scholars--mostly junior scholars--are now
engaged in the study of first ladies. Moreover, this includes scholars
in such fields as presidential studies, women and politics, media
studies and journalism, communication, history, and other fields. The
author edits a journal and has within his files of qualified manuscript
reviewers roughly two dozen individuals who list the first ladies as an
area of expertise. Gould (1996) and Watson (2002) edited a reference
book and encyclopedia, respectively, on the first ladies. One byproduct of these publishing endeavors was that the books featured essays by
numerous scholars, which both contributes to and reflects the number of
scholars working on the topic. The Gould volume contained essays by
thirty-two different individuals, and the Watson volume contained
forty-two different contributors.
6. Acceptance of the Topic
While some scholars, promotion/tenure committees, dissertation
advisers, and publishers most assuredly frown on the study of first
ladies as a serious topic of inquiry, the growing number of books--and
therefore presses--journals, and conferences featuring research on the
subject paints a positive view of the state of scholarship. These
outlets for research include some of the leading journals, academic
associations/conferences, and university presses. It is uncertain,
however, how many academic departments and manuscript reviewers share
such a view. It is clear that the degree of acceptance is on the rise.
Because studies on presidential spouses promise to inform our
understanding of the presidency, women's history, and an array of
other important subjects and issues, the acceptance of the legitimacy
and viability of first lady studies must be across disciplines. And this
must continue when we eventually encounter a male presidential spouse.
7. Mentoring
It will be necessary for senior, respected scholars to encourage
and support their colleagues to conduct research on the first ladies.
Until dissertation committees, promotion/ tenure committees, editorial
boards of journals, and presses treat the subject as one worthy of
serious study, the state of scholarship cannot advance. As was mentioned
in the previous category, scholars will not risk their careers or
reputation if the subject is not widely accepted in the academy.
8. Reference and Resources
Many of the presidential libraries have in recent years made
available the papers of first ladies. In 1998, the National First
Ladies' Library opened in Canton, Ohio, dedicated to promoting the
legacy and collecting the history of first ladies. The library is also
building a research and education center. These developments mark a key
ingredient for the growth and health of first lady studies: available
resources. So too have reference books (Gould 1996; Watson 2001b) and
encyclopedias (Watson 2002) been published on the topic. Helpful
resources are also appearing on specific first ladies. For instance, an
encyclopedia on Eleanor Roosevelt has been published (Beasley, Shulman,
and Beasley 2001), and various presidential centers, presidential
journals, libraries, and foundations are promoting the study of first
ladies.
There remains a serious gap in our understanding of many individual
first ladies, as noted in Table 1. However, two collections of
biographies on first ladies are in production that should help address
the lack of scholarship on many first ladies. Under the direction of
Lewis Gould, the "Modern First Ladies Series" has, at the time
of this writing, one book out in print, with plans to publish a few
additional titles; while the "Presidential Wives Series,"
edited by Robert Watson, has published eight titles to date, with
another twenty-three volumes under contract. (9)
9. Education and Training
The author recently examined the course catalogs of twenty-five
universities in the United States and found that not one offered a
course on first ladies. (10) At some schools, however, it is being
taught as a special topics course, and it is frequently cross-listed in
two or more disciplines/majors. For instance, James Madison University,
Georgia State University, Rider University, and a few other institutions
offer courses on first ladies. It appears that these schools do so
largely because first lady scholars serve on the schools' faculty.
(11) There is the need to improve graduate training on the subject, to
expose Ph.D. candidates in presidential studies to the first ladies, and
enhance library holdings on the subject.
Conclusion
The study of the first lady has advanced considerably since the
first serious studies on the topic appeared in the late 1980s. A growing
and vibrant area of study is emerging, and one not restricted to a
single discipline. Indeed, a strength of the existing research on the
first ladies is that it crosses traditional disciplinary boundaries. Any
future studies should continue in this manner, as the subject lends
itself well to being and is inherently interdisciplinary.
On balance, there are strengths and weaknesses in the literature on
first ladies, as has been presented in this article. Scholars studying
the first ladies must enter into a dialog on the direction of the field
and must take advantage of collaborative projects and professional
meetings to spell out the needs and shortcomings in the field as well as
to mentor graduate students and junior scholars. There is a need to
develop further theories and models and test the existing ones. Further
comparative studies are needed, as are studies of the spouses of
governors and mayors, for which little scholarship exists (Gould 1968;
Stambough and O'Regan 2002). Of course, scholars will also have to
confront the challenge not only with respect to history, but in job
title, when the first man becomes a presidential spouse.
TABLE 1
Biographies and Biographical Works on First Ladies
First Lady Number of Books
Martha Washington 5
Abigail Adams 13
Martha Jefferson 1
Dolley Madison 16
Elizabeth Monroe 1
Louisa Catherine Adams 4
Rachel Jackson 2
Hannah Van Buren 0
Anna Harrison 0
Letitia Tyler 1
Julia Tyler 1
Sarah Polk 2
Margaret Taylor 1
Abigail Fillmore 0
Jane Pierce 1
Harriet Lane (a) 1
Mary Todd Lincoln 19
Eliza Johnson 0
Julia Dent Grant 2
Lucy Hayes 2
Lucretia Garfield 3
Ellen Arthur 0
Frances Cleveland 1
Caroline Harrison 1
Ida McKinley 2
Alice Roosevelt 1
Edith Roosevelt 3
Helen Taft 1
Ellen Wilson 3
Edith Wilson 7
Florence Harding 1
Grace Coolidge 3
Lou Hoover 3
Eleanor Roosevelt 35
Bess Truman 4
Mamie Eisenhower 5
Jacqueline Kennedy 37
Lady Bird Johnson 9
Pat Nixon 3
Betty Ford 4
Rosalynn Carter 5
Nancy Reagan 8
Barbara Bush 4
Hillary Rodham Clinton 27
Laura Bush 3
Note: The list includes autobiographies, biographies, collections of
letters, novels, books of photographs, and so on; but it does not
include books of jokes, children's books, children's coloring books,
or children's paper doll books.
(a.) Harriet Lane was the niece of bachelor James Buchanan.
TABLE 2
Early Studies of First Ladies
Laura Holloway, Ladies of the White House;
or, in the Home of the President
Marianne Means, Woman in the White House: The Lives,
Times and Influence of Twelve Notable First Ladies
Mary Ormsbee Whitton, First First Ladies, 1789-1865:
A Study of the Wives of the Early Presidents
TABLE 3
Books on the First Ladies in the Late 1980s/Early 1990s
Betty Boyd Caroli, The First Ladies (1987)
James S. Rosebush, First Lady, Public Wife: A Behind-the-Scenes
History of the Evolving Role of First Ladies in American Political
Life (1987)
Paul F. Boller Jr., Presidential Wives: An Anecdotal History (1988)
Peter Hay, All the President's Ladies: Anecdotes of the Women behind
the Men (1988)
Donna Dixon Healy, America's First Ladies: Private Lives of the
Presidential Wives (1988)
Myra G. Gutin, The President's Partner: The First Lady in the
Twentieth Century (1989)
Carl Sferrazza Anthony, First Ladies: The Saga of the Presidents'
Wives and Their Power (1990-91)
TABLE 4
Collections of First Lady Papers
Joseph E. Fields, ed., "Worthy Partner," The Papers of Martha
Washington
Stewart Mitchell, ed., New Letters of Abigail Adams
--, Book of Abigail and John: Selected Letters of the Adams
Family, 1762-1784
--, Letters of Mrs. Adams, the Wife of John Adams
--, Familiar Letters of John Adams and His Wife Abigail Adams, during
the Revolution
--, Adams Family Correspondence
Allen C. Clark, ed., The Life and Letters of Dolley Madison
Lucia Beverly Cutts, ed., Memoirs and Letters of Dolley Madison, Wife
of James Madison, President of the United States
Justin G. Turner and Linda Levitt Turner, eds., Mary Todd Lincoln: Her
Life and Letters
John Y. Simon, ed., The Personal Memoirs of Julia Dent Grant
John Shaw, ed., Crete and James: Personal Letters of Lucretia and
James Garfield
Arthur S. Link, ed., The Papers of Woodrow Wilson
Eleanor Randolph McAdoo, ed., The Priceless Gift: The Love Letters of
Woodrow Wilson and Ellen Axson Wilson
--, President in Love: The Courtship Letters of Woodrow Wilson and
Edith Bolling Galt
Lawrence Wikander and Robert H. Ferrell, eds., Grace Coolidge: An
Autobiography
Allida M. Black, ed., What I Hope to Leave Behind: The Essential
Essays of Eleanor Roosevelt
Joseph P. Lash, ed., Eleanor Roosevelt's My Day
--, Mother and Daughter: The Letters of Eleanor and Anna Roosevelt
--, It Seems to Me: Selected Letters of Eleanor Roosevelt
--, Empty without You: The Intimate Letters of Eleanor Roosevelt and
Lorena Hickok
Robert H. Ferrell, ed., Dear Bess: The Letters from Harry to Bess
Truman, 1910-1959
Margaret Truman, ed., Letters from Father: The Truman Family's
Personal Correspondence
I Love You, Ronnie: The Letters of Ronald Reagan to Nancy Reagan
TABLE 5
Books/Writings by the First Ladies
Louisa Catherine Adams, Narrative of a Journey from St. Petersburg to
Paris in February 1815
--, Diary
--, Records of a Life: My Story
--, Adventures of a Nobody
Edith Roosevelt, Cleared for Strange Ports
Helen Herron Taft, Recollections of Full Years
Edith Bolling Wilson, My Memoir
Eleanor Roosevelt, The Autobiography of Eleanor Roosevelt
--, On My Own
--, This I Remember
--, This Is My Story
--, Eleanor Roosevelt's Christmas Book
--, Tomorrow Is Now
--, You Learn by Living
--, Eleanor Roosevelt's Book of Common Sense
--, The Wisdom of Eleanor Roosevelt
--, Growing toward Peace
--, Ladies of Courage
--, UN: Today and Tomorrow
--, India and the Awakening East
--, If You Ask Me
--, It's Up to the Woman
Lady Bird Johnson, A White House Diary
--, Wildflowers across America
--, Texas: A Roadside View
Betty Ford, The Times of My Life
--, Betty: A Glad Awakening
Rosalynn Carter, First Lady from Plains
--, Helping Yourself Help Others: A Book for Caregivers
--, Helping Someone with Mental Illness: A Compassionate Guide for
Family, Friends, and Caregivers
Jimmy Carter and Rosalynn Carter, Everything to Gain: Making the
Most of the Rest of Your Life
Nancy Reagan, My Turn: The Memoirs of Nancy Reagan
--, Nancy
--, Love a Child
Barbara Bush, Barbara Bush: A Memoir
--, Millie's Book
--, C. Fred's Story
Hillary Rodham Clinton, It Takes a Village: And Other Lessons Children
Teach Us
--, Children's Rights: A Legal Perspective
--, An Invitation to the White House
TABLE 6
Biographies on First Ladies
Phyllis Lee Levin, Abigail Adams
Lynne Withey, Dearest Friend (Abigail Adams)
Dorothy Clarke Wilson, Queen Dolley: The Life and Times of Dolley
Madison
Virginia Moore, The Madisons: A Biography
Ethel Stephens Arnett, Mrs. James Madison: The Incomparable Dolley
Paul M. Zall, Dolley Madison
Barbara Bennett Peterson, Sarah Childress Polk, First Lady of
Tennessee and Washington
Jean Baker, Mary Todd Lincoln
Ruth Painter Randall, Mary Lincoln: Biography of a Marriage
Carl Sandburg and Paul M. Angle, Mary Lincoln: Wife and Widow
Ishbel Ross, The President's Wife: Mary Todd Lincoln, A Biography
--, The General's Wife (Julia Grant)
Emily Apt Greer, First Lady: The Life of Lucy Webb Hayes
John Shaw, Lucretia (Lucretia Garfield)
Stephen F. Robar, Frances Clara Folsom Cleveland
Sylvia Jukes Morris, Edith Kermit Roosevelt: Portrait of a First Lady
Tom Lansford, A "Bully" First Lady: Edith Kermit Roosevelt
Ishbel Ross, Power with Grace: The Life Story of Mrs. Woodrow Wilson
Alden Hatch, Edith Bolling Wilson: First Lady Extraordinary
Carl Sferrazza Anthony, Florence Harding: The First Lady, the Jazz
Age, and the Death of America's Most Scandalous President
Ishbel Ross, Grace Coolidge and Her Era
Helen Pryor, Lou Henry Hoover: Gallant First Lady
Allida M. Black, Casting Her Own Shadow: Eleanor Roosevelt and the
Shaping of Postwar Liberalism
Blanche Wiesen Cooke, Eleanor Roosevelt, 1884-1933 (2 vols.)
Tamara K. Haraven, Eleanor Roosevelt: An American Conscience
Lorena A. Hickok, Reluctant First Lady
Joseph P. Lash, Eleanor and Franklin: The Evolution of a Reformer
--, Eleanor and Franklin: The Story of their Relationship
--, Eleanor Roosevelt: A Friend's Memoir
--, Eleanor: The Years Alone
Archibald MacLeish, The Eleanor Roosevelt Story
Elliott Roosevelt, Mother R: Eleanor Roosevelt's Untold Story
Margaret Truman, Bess Truman
Jhan Robbins, Bess and Harry: An American Love Story
Susan Eisenhower, Mrs. Ike: Memories and Reflections on the Life of
Mamie Eisenhower
Lester David and Irene David, Ike and Mamie: The Story of the General
and His Lady
Dorothy Brandon, Mamie Doud Eisenhower: Portrait of a First Lady
Carl Sferrazza Anthony, As We Remember Her: Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis
in the Words of Friends and Family
Stephen Birmingham, Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy Onassis
Lester David, Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis: A Portrait of Her Private
Years
John H. Davis, Jacqueline Bouvier: A Personal Memoir
Mary Barelli Gallagher, My Life with Jacqueline Kennedy
Edward Klein, All Too Human: The Love Story of Jack and Jackie Kennedy
Mary Van Rensselaer Thayer, Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy
--, Jacqueline Kennedy: The White House Years
Richard Taylor and Sam Rubin, Jackie: A Lasting Impression
Lewis L. Gould, Lady Bird Johnson and the Environment
Ruth Montgomery, Mrs. LBJ
Marie Smith, The President's Lady: An Intimate Biography of Mrs.
Lyndon B. Johnson
Julie Nixon Eisenhower, Pat Nixon: The Untold Story
Lester David, The Lonely Lady of San Clemente: The Story of Pat Nixon
Chris Wallace, First Lady: A Portrait of Nancy Reagan
Frances Spatz Leighton, The Search for the Real Nancy Reagan
Pamela Kilian, Barbara Bush: A Biography
Donnie Radcliffe, Simply Barbara Bush: A Portrait of America's Candid
First Lady
David Brock, The Seduction of Hillary Rodham
Joyce Milton, The First Partner: Hillary Rodham Clinton, A Biography
Gail Sheehy, Hillary's Choice
TABLE 7
Studies of First Families
Carl Sferrazza Anthony, America's First Families: An Inside View of
200 Years of Private Life in the White House
Harry Benson, First Families: An Intimate Portrait from the Kennedys
to the Clintons
Hugh Brogan, American Presidential Families
Robert P. Watson, ed., Life in the White House: A Social History of
the First Family and President's House
John Whitcomb and Claire Whitcomb, Real Life at the White House: 200
Years of Daily Life at America's Most Famous Residence
TABLE 8
Studies of the First Ladies
Alice E. Anderson, Behind Every Successful President: The Hidden Power
and Influence of America's First Ladies
Carl Sferrazza Anthony, First Ladies: The Saga of the Presidents'
Wives and Their Power (2 vols.)
Paul F. Boller Jr., Presidential Wives: An Anecdotal History
Betty Boyd Caroli, First Ladies
Lillie D. Chaffin, America's First Lady (2 vols.)
Lewis L. Gould, ed., American First Ladies: Their Lives and Legacy
Myra Gutin, The President's Partner: The First Lady in the Twentieth
Century
Peter Hay, All the Presidents' Ladies: Anecdotes of the Women behind
the Men in the White House
Donna Dixon Healy, America's First Ladies: Private Lives of the
Presidential Wives
Edith P. Mayo, First Ladies: Political Role and Public Image
Edith P. May, The Smithsonian Book of the First Ladies
James S. Rosebush, First Lady, Public Wife: A Behind-the-Scenes
History of the Evolving Role of First Ladies in American Political
Life
Elizabeth Simpson Smith, Five First Ladies: A Look into the Lives of
Nancy Reagan, Rosalynn Carter, Betty Ford, Pat
Nixon, and Lady Bird Johnson
Gil Troy, Affairs of State: The Rise and Rejection of the Presidential
Couple since World War II (reprint, Mr. and Mrs. President: From the
Trumans to the Clintons)
Margaret Truman, First Ladies: An Intimate Group Portrait of the White
House Wives
Robert P. Watson, The Presidents' Wives: Reassessing the Office of
First Lady
Robert P. Watson, First Ladies of the United States: A Biographical
Dictionary
Robert P. Watson, ed., American First Ladies (encyclopedia)
Robert P. Watson and Anthony J. Eksterowicz, eds., The Presidential
Companion: Readings on the First Ladies
(1.) The National First Ladies' Library is at
http://www.firstladies.org; the International Lincoln Center of American
Studies at Louisiana State University at Shreveport is at
http://www.lsus.edu/la/histss/lincoln/ index.html.
(2.) The first ladies exhibit is at the Smithsonian's National
Museum of American History, http:// americanhistory.si.edu.
(3.) There are a number of docents and actresses performing as
first ladies, including Mary Margaret Buss and Pamela K. Thorson in
Florida. Ms. Thorson has also produced a series of fictitious dialogs
among first ladies, written as "round robin" letters and
published under the title The Camp David Diaries by Sterling-Miller
Books.
(4.) The author is familiar with many of these titles through his
research on the subject conducted since 1995. Based on a random review
of twenty of the titles, the author found only half of them to be
reliable and based on documentation. Searches were conducted through
Books in Print, Amazon.com, the Library of Congress, and the National
First Ladies' Library.
(5.) The Center for the Study of the Presidency is at
http://www.cspresidency.org; the Center for Presidential Studies is
located at Texas A&M University and is at http://bush.tamu.edu/home.
(6.) The Presidency Research Group of the American Political
Science Association is at http://
www.apsanet.org/about/sections/section9.cfm or at
http://sunsite.unc.edu/lia/prgnet.
(7.) The Theodore Roosevelt Association is at
http://www.theodoreroosevelt.org; the Calvin Coolidge Memorial
Foundation is at http://calvin-coolidge.org; the Hayes Presidential
Center is at http://www.rbhayes.org; the Lincoln Forum is at
http://www.thelincolnforum.org.
(8.) For a listing of these sites, see Clotworthy (1998).
(9.) The "Modern First Ladies Series" edited by Lewis L.
Gould is being published by the University Press of Kansas. The title
out in print is Lady Bird Johnson: Our Environmental First Lady. The
"Presidential Wives Series" edited by Robert P. Watson is
being published by Nova History Books/Nova Science Publishers, and the
biographies out in print include books on Dolley Madison, Sarah Polk,
Lucretia Garfield, Frances Cleveland, Edith Roosevelt, and Betty Ford.
Several additional titles are forthcoming in 2003.
(10.) For an argument for including the topic in the classroom, see
Watson (1999). Very few universities offer courses on the first ladies
at either the undergraduate or graduate levels.
(11.) Prof. Anthony Eksterowicz teaches at James Madison, Prof.
Lawrence Rifkind teaches at Georgia State, and Prof. Myra Gutin teaches
at Rider.
References
Anthony, Carl Sferrazza. 1990-91. First ladies: The saga of the
presidents' wives and their power, 1789-1961. 2 vols. New York:
Quill.
Beasley, Maurine H., Holly C. Shulman, and Henry R. Beasley, eds.
2001. The Eleanor Roosevelt encyclopedia. Westport, CT: Garland.
Boiler, Paul F., Jr. 1988. Presidential wives: An anecdotal
history. New York: Oxford University Press.
Burrell, Barbara. 1997. Public opinion, the first ladyship, and
Hillary Rodham Clinton. New York: Garland.
--. 1999. The governmental status of the first lady in law and in
public perceptions. In Women in politics: Outsiders or insiders? 3d ed.,
edited by Lois Duke Whitaker, 233-47. New York: Prentice Hall.
--. 2000. Hillary Clinton as first lady: The people's
perspective. Social Science Journal 37 (4): 529-46.
Caroli, Betty Boyd. 1987. The first ladies. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Clotworthy, William G. 1998. Presidential sites: A directory of
places associated with presidents oft he United States. Blacksburg, VA:
McDonald & Woodward.
Eksterowicz, Anthony J., and Kristin Paynter. 2000. The evolution
of the role and office of the first lady: The movement toward
integration with the White House Office. Social Science Journal 37 (4):
547-62.
Eksterowicz, Anthony J., and Robert P. Watson. 2000. Treatment of
the first ladies in American government and presidency textbooks:
Overlooked yet influential voices. PS: Political Science & Politics
33 (3): 589-96.
Foss, William O. 1999. First ladies quotations book. New York:
Barricade Books.
Gould, Lewis L. 1968. Governors' wives: Women of influence.
Madison, WI: LaFollette Institute of Public Affairs.
--. 1990. Modern first ladies. Presidential Studies Quarterly 20
(4): 677-83.
--. 1996. American first ladies: Their lives and their legacy. New
York: Garland.
Gutin, Myra G. 1989. The president's partner: The first lady
in the twentieth century. New York: Greenwood.
Hoxie, R. Gordon. 1990. About this issue. Presidential Studies
Quarterly 20:672-75.
Kelly, Colleen Elizabeth. 2001. The rhetoric of First Lady Hillary
Rodham Clinton: Crisis management discourse. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Klapthor, Margaret Brown. 1975. The first ladies. Washington, DC:
White House Historical Association and National Geographic Society.
Mayo, Edith P. 1993. The influence and power of first ladies.
Chronicle of Higher Education 39 (September 15): A52.
Mayo, Edith P., and Allida M. Black, eds. 2001. First ladies
(Special issue). Magazine of History 15 (3).
Muir, Janet Kenner, and Lisa Benitez. 1996. Redefining the role of
the first lady: Rhetorical styles of Hillary Rodham Clinton. In The
Clinton presidency: Images, issues, and communication strategies, edited
by Robert Denton and Rachel Holloway. Westport, CT: Praeger.
O'Connor, Karen, Bernadette Nye, and Laura van Assendelft.
1996. Wives in the White House: The political influence of first ladies.
Presidential Studies Quarterly 26:835-53.
Pitch, Anthony S. 1993. Exclusively first ladies trivia. Potomac,
MD: Mino.
Rifkind, Lawrence. 2000. Breaking out of the circle: An analysis of
the gendered communication behaviors of Hillary Clinton and Sarah
Netanyahu. Social Science Journal 37 (4): 611-18.
Schermer, Craig. 2002. Other White House hostesses. In American
first ladies, edited by Robert P. Watson. Pasadena, CA: Salem Press.
Siena Research Institute. 1982. SRI Poll. Siena, NY: Siena Research
Institute, Siena College.
--. 1993. SRI Poll. Siena, NY: Siena Research Institute, Siena
College.
Stambough, Stephen J., and Valerie O'Regan. 2002. Female
candidates for executive office: The road to the governor's
mansion. White House Studies 2:299-314.
Troy, Gil. 1997. Affairs of state: The rise and rejection of the
presidential couple since World War II. New York: Free Press.
Watson, Robert P. 1997. The first lady reconsidered: Presidential
partner and political institution. Presidential Studies Quarterly
27:805-18.
--. 1999. Incorporating the first ladies into the classroom. Social
Studies 89 (4): 165-71.
--, ed. 2000a. Focus on the first ladies (Special issue). Social
Science Journal 37 (4).
--. 2000b. The presidents' wives: Reassessing the office of
first lady. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
--. 2001a. The first ladies' character: Applying Barber's
character study to the presidential spouses. White House Studies 1 (1):
51-64.
--. 2001b. First ladies of the United States: A biographical
dictionary. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
--. 2001c. First lady studies: Challenges, accomplishments, and the
state of scholarship; some preliminary notes. Paper presented at the
Western Social Science Association Conference, April 18-21, In Reno, NV.
--, ed. 2002. American first ladies. Pasadena, CA: Salem Press.
Watson, Robert P., and Ann Gordon. 2002. Anticipating madam
president. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Wekkin, Gary. 2000. Role constraints and first ladies. Social
Science Journal 37 (4): 601-10.
Robert P. Watson is an associate professor of political science at
Florida Atlantic University, where his research interests are in the
presidency, first ladies, bureaucracy, and women in politics. He has
written or edited fifteen books, and his recent books include
Anticipating Madam President (Lynne Rienner, 2002) and The Presidential
Companion: Readings on the First Ladies (University of South Carolina,
2002).